GoKeyless: We Thought We Were Ready For Wayfair, We Were Wrong 

Tim Roden
April 8, 2020

GoKeyless Journey

3-part Q&A blog series

This three-part blog series will cover the journey of GoKeyless as they struggle to deal with the initial impact of the South Dakota vs. Wayfair ruling. Told from the vantage point of Skip Graham, network administrator at GoKeyless, this series is an inside look at how manual compliance processes were no match for the onslaught of changing tax regulations, and what ultimately led them to pursue outside options. This series covers the criteria, consideration and implementation phases of the technology that enabled GoKeyless to solve their Wayfair problems for good.

 

Q: Tell us about the situation at GoKeyless and what the impact of the Wayfair decision has been.

A: As an eCommerce company, GoKeyless is selling to a large number of states and even outside the US.  It’s fair to say that we’ve had growth across every department and channel in the past couple of years.

The impact of the Wayfair decision has been substantial. At first, we thought we could manage the changes ourselves through a series of manual procedures and protocols. We implemented several different procedures that quickly proved insufficient for the task at hand.

We got to the point where we were trying things just for goodwill, to show the states that we were trying to do something in order to comply. However, the deeper we got into the process, the more we realized exactly what we were getting ourselves into.

We came to the conclusion that we were becoming completely overwhelmed, and that Wayfair was a much larger problem than we had anticipated.

Q: Where did you feel the greatest stress in trying to remain compliant?

A: The endless list of tax obligations was becoming all-consuming. Post-Wayfair, we aren’t just dealing with states anymore. It was now a matter of dealing with hundreds, if not thousands of individual counties and cities, all with their own rules and rates.

Trying to put in place manual systems to keep track of what rate is charged on what products and in what state, county or city was a nightmare. We literally hired a person here at GoKeyless solely for the purpose of trying to keep track of these taxes. It’s been insane. There really isn’t another word for it. 

Q: How successful were you in properly charging taxes and what was the impact on customers?

A: We experienced varying degrees of success based largely on the complexity of the jurisdiction in which we were operating. I’d estimate in the year that we were tracking taxes manually that we only got it 100% right about 5 – 10% of the time. 

We pride ourselves on being completely transparent with our customers. When they are doing business with us, we want them to know that we are a company of the highest ethical standards. It’s been an adjustment for both us and the customers as we work to ensure the regular and accurate tracking of taxes. 

In the end, we came to the obvious conclusion that we couldn’t do this alone and needed help.

Take Action

Continue reading about the GoKeyless journey in

Part II: In search of the right sales tax partner

Part III: Life with sales tax automation

 

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Tim Roden

Tim Roden is Sales Engineer, SME (Subject Matter Expert) for Indirect Tax. He and his group specialize in solving complex business and systems challenges around Indirect Tax for Global and Enterprise businesses. Tim has been providing expertise in these areas for Sovos since 2014. Prior to his time at Sovos, Tim worked as a Senior Solutions Engineer for ACI Worldwide, supporting SaaS-based electronic payment solutions for Global and Regional Financial Institutions. Tim has a B.A. in History from Wake Forest University.
Share this post

North America
June 6, 2024
Observations and Predictions: The Future of Tax and Compliance

When I became the CEO of Sovos one year ago, I knew that I was stepping into an innovative company in an industry primed for a seismic transformation. However, even with this knowledge in place, I must admit that the speed and scope of change over the past year has been extraordinary to witness. Here […]

EMEA IPT
July 8, 2024
Hungary Insurance Premium Tax (IPT): An Overview

Regarding calculating Insurance Premium Tax (IPT), Hungary is the only country in the EU where the regime uses the so-called sliding scale rate model.

North America ShipCompliant
July 3, 2024
The Prospects and Perils of AI in Beverage Alcohol

I recently had the privilege of speaking on a panel at the National Conference of State Liquor Administrators (NCSLA) Annual Conference, a regular meeting of regulators, attorneys and other members of the beverage alcohol industry to discuss important issues affecting our trade. Alongside Claire Mitchell, of Stoel Rives, and Erlinda Doherty, of Vinicola Consulting, and […]

North America ShipCompliant
June 27, 2024
Shifting Focus: How to Make Wine Country Interesting to Millennials

Guest blog written by Susan DeMatei, President, WineGlass Marketing WineGlass Marketing recently conducted a study to explore how Millennials and Gen X feel about wine, wine culture and wine country. The goal was to gain insight into how we can make wine, wine club and wine country appealing to these new audiences. We’ll showcase in-depth […]

North America Sales & Use Tax
June 24, 2024
Illinois to Adjust Sales Tax Nexus Rules in Light of PetMeds Threat

Illinois is poised to change their sourcing rules again, trying to find their way in a world where states apply their sales tax compliance requirements equally to both in-state and remote sellers. With this tweak, they will effectively equalize the responsibilities of remote sellers with no in-state presence, to those that have an Illinois location. […]

EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
June 21, 2024
ViDA Rejected Again – Europe Misses Another Chance to Harmonize e-Invoicing

During the latest ECOFIN meeting on 21 June, Member States met to discuss if they could come to an agreement to implement the VAT in the Digital Age (ViDA) proposals. At the ECOFIN meeting in May, Estonia objected to the platform rules being proposed, instead requesting to make the new deemed supplier rules optional (an […]