Three Key Steps to Apply IPT on New Lines of Business

Christophe Bourdaire
September 18, 2019

In the increasingly complex world of IPT, understanding, assessing and applying the right taxes to new insurance products can be a challenge for insurers when complying with fragmented regulations.

As new risks continue to emerge, so do new insurance products. But how can insurers ensure insurance premium tax (IPT) is correctly applied? The three questions below provide some guidance and highlight the key points to be considered to ensure IPT compliance.

Step 1: What do local IPT legislations say?

IPT is an old tax in some territories. As such, the relevant legislations have often been drafted a long time ago (sometimes before World War II) and don’t always reflect the current insurance landscape. Classic insurance products including fire, liability or health insurance, will often be covered by the relevant legislation but emerging risks such as cyber insurance will not be specifically addressed. To apply IPT correctly, insurance companies are therefore left to classify their new product based on the existing local classification of risks.  This may involve a premium allocation exercise to ensure that if several risks are to be covered, IPT is correctly applied to each of them.

Some territories provide administrative guidance which can help the insurance company understand how the IPT legislation should be applied.  All too often however it’s driven by local insurance products that are usually specific to the domestic market and as a result global risks are not always addressed.

Step 2: Is it actually insurance?

A new type of cover provided by an insurance company doesn’t automatically mean that the product sold is insurance. As innovation drives the insurance world, it can easily cross its borders. Some new products recently introduced, such as parametrics insurance or surety products, are seen as enhancements of classic insurance covers. In order to assess whether they really are insurance products, the first step should be to check that they comply with the definition of insurance provided by local authorities. This is not always a straightforward exercise and is why some local administrations, such as HMRC in the UK, provide guidance and list the minimum criteria that should be met for the new cover written to qualify as an insurance product. This is an important point as once it is not classified as insurance, then IPT is no longer applicable, but clearly other indirect taxes may apply and need to be considered.

Step 3: How is the policy worded?

Lastly, it all comes down to the policy itself. The way it’s actually worded and how the risks are defined will be the legal basis for applying IPT and/or any other indirect taxes. Using cyber insurance as an example, if the risks listed in the contract are mainly defined as liability insurance, it’s likely that the premium will be fully taxed as a classic liability insurance policy. Should other risks also be covered, the premium might have to be split to apply other IPT rates and parafiscal charges or IPT exemptions on the relevant portion of the premium.

It’s not uncommon for the wording of a new type of cover to be challenged by tax authorities. This can lead to legal action that overturns how the tax was initially applied by the insurance company. A few years ago, the European Court of Justice did just this by reclassifying a mechanical breakdown cover, initially taxed under the VAT regime, as insurance, which was subject to IPT.

Assessing the correct tax application of new insurance products can be challenging, but some tools exist to help insurance companies be as compliant as possible.

 

Take Action

To read more about the insurance landscape and tax compliance, download Trends: Insurance Premium Tax and follow us on LinkedIn and Twitter 

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Christophe Bourdaire

Senior Regulatory Specialist, Regulatory Analysis. Christophe joined Sovos FiscalReps in 2011 and has been managing the IPT compliance process for a portfolio of captives and French speaking clients. Based in France, he focuses on the development of the global IPT content and technology offering. Christophe completed a degree (certificate) in Journalism at Ecole Nouvelles in Nice, France. He is a native French speaker, and also speaks fluent Spanish.
Share This Post
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email

North America ShipCompliant
October 15, 2021
The Latest on Retailer Direct-to-Consumer (DtC) Shipping

Retailer direct-to-consumer (DtC) shipping still has a way to go in terms of being as widely accepted as DtC wine shipping. However, there has been continued interest in making that a reality.  Sovos ShipCompliant keeps a close watch on the latest updates in the beverage alcohol industry, and we’ve gathered a few of the top […]

E-Invoicing Compliance EMEA
October 15, 2021
Greece’s myDATA Mandate Live From 1 October With a Revised Timeline

The myDATA mandate finally went live on 1 October 2021 for most taxpayers after several postponements (and lobbying for a further postponement). The Greek authorities have stated that no penalties will be imposed for 2021 until relevant legislation is published. The primary goal of the authorities is to ensure all taxpayers are in a position […]

EMEA IPT
October 14, 2021
How Historic Legislation can Make IPT Compliance Complicated

Legislation is always evolving, and legislation covering Insurance Premium Tax (IPT) and the relevant parafiscal taxes is no different. As IPT is so niche, references to other legislation are often made – this can be to a finance act, VAT, or another piece of tax related legislation. And on top of this, there are the […]

North America ShipCompliant
October 12, 2021
The Data: Wine DtC Shipments and Off-Premise Retail (August 2021 Special Report)

Fall is here and the wine direct-to-consumer (DtC) shipments landscape has adapted to the “new normal” of the pandemic. Staying mindful of marketplace data will ensure the industry can properly adjust to any ebbs and flows, helping wine producers, retailers and consumers alike.  Nielsen is collaborating with Wines Vines Analytics and Sovos ShipCompliant to provide […]

IPT North America Tax Information Reporting
October 12, 2021
Sovos Unveils Browser-Based Interface for Statutory Reporting Solution

At our Insurance Regulatory Summit, we announced the launch of the Web App, a new browser-based interface for the Sovos Statutory Reporting solution. The Web App is an addition that can further help users  comply with statutory reporting and state filing requirements.  The Web App was created for and by Sovos users to deliver a […]