Luxembourg is one of many European countries to implement SAF-T and e-invoicing to provide greater visibility into a wide range of business, accounting and tax data.
Luxembourg introduced SAF-T requirements in 2011. In 2019 the country introduced an e-invoicing legislation.
Luxembourg is part of the EU single market economy and falls under the EU VAT regime. The EU issues VAT Directives laying out the principles of how the VAT regime should be adopted by Member States. These Directives take precedent over any local legislation.
VAT law within the country is administered by the Administration de l’Enregistrement et des Domaines and is contained within the General Tax Code.
Get the information you need
Quick facts
Just like in any other EU Member State, e-invoicing is permitted in Luxembourg, subject to the buyer accepting the exchange of electronic invoices.
Businesses must ensure integrity of invoice content and authenticity of origin for their invoices. Integrity and authenticity can be proved using Advanced Electronic Signatures, ‘proper EDI’ with an interchange agreement based on the EC 1994 recommendation, and Business Controls-based Audit Trail.
In May 2019, Luxembourg adopted legislation about e-invoicing in public procurement following the EU Directive 2014/55/EU. The Directive states that e-invoices will continue to be exchanged voluntarily by suppliers to the government and the centralised PEPPOL access point will continue to be used.
Prior authorisation is required before outsourcing to a service provider – written authorisation is recommended.
Invoices stored in electronic form must have evidence of their integrity and authenticity stored electronically as well.
E-invoices may only be stored in EU Member States (or other countries) of which Luxembourg has signed a mutual tax assistance treaty – prior to notification and access.
VAT returns may be filed monthly, quarterly or annually electronically through Luxembourg’s online platform (eCDF) via PDF or XML format. Alternatively, annual filings can be made either in electronic format through the portal or via sending a paper copy of the VAT return to the requisite tax office.
To submit tax returns electronically, taxpayers must ensure the service provider they use is certified within eCDF.
SAF-T reforms
Officially implemented in 2011, Luxembourg’s Standard Audit File for Tax (SAF-T) is locally known as Fichier Audit Informatisé AED (FAIA).
Businesses must, if requested, submit their financial data electronically in a format that is compliant with AED electronic audit file specifications (i.e., in the specified FAIA format). Only resident businesses subject to the Luxembourg Standard Chart of Accounts must file the FAIA.
Mandate rollout dates
2011 – Introduction of SAF-T, known as Fichier Audit Informatisé AED (FAIA)
2019 – Adoption of e-invoicing legislation in public procurement with 2014/55/EU Directive
How Sovos can help
Need help to ensure your business stays compliant with evolving e-invoicing, reporting and SAF-T obligations in Luxembourg?
Keeping up with VAT compliance obligations has become more difficult as Luxembourg continues to take steps to reduce its VAT gap and modernise the system.
Our experts continually monitor, interpret and codify changes into our software, reducing the compliance burden on your tax and IT teams.
Learn how Sovos’ solutions for changing SAF-T and VAT obligations can help companies stay compliant.
Transition from voluntary to mandatory e-invoicing expected from 1 April 2023
From 1 January 2022, taxpayers have been able to issue structured invoices (e-invoices) using Poland’s National e-Invoicing System (KSeF) on a voluntary basis, meaning electronic and paper forms are still acceptable in parallel. Introduction of the KSeF system is part of the digital transformation happening in Poland following the establishment of continuous transaction control (CTC) mandates all around Europe, supporting faster and more effective identification of tax fraud.
The KSeF system enables taxpayers to issue and receive invoices electronically. It is one of the most technologically advanced tools in Europe for exchanging information on economic events. Structured invoices issued via the system are prepared in accordance with the invoice template developed by the Ministry of Finance. After issuance, the invoices are sent from the financial and accounting system via an interface (API) to the central database (KSeF). Afterwards they are available in the system and can be downloaded by the recipient.
On 5 August 2021, the Republic of Poland requested authorisation to derogate from Articles 218, 226 and 232 of the VAT Directive to be able to implement an obligation to issue electronic invoices, processed through the National e-Invoicing System (KSeF), for all transactions that require the issuance of an invoice according to Polish VAT legislation.
Subsequently, on 9 February 2022, Poland modified its request, asking for the authorisation to derogate only from Articles 218 and 232 of the VAT Directive and specified that mandatory electronic invoicing would only apply to taxable persons established in the territory of Poland.
Poland considers the introduction of a generalised obligation to issue electronic invoices would bring significant benefits in terms of combating VAT fraud and evasion while simplifying tax collection. Moreover, the implementation of the measure will accelerate the digitalization of the public sector.
The European Commission derogatory decision
As derived from Article 218 of the VAT Directive, Member States are obliged to accept all documents or messages in paper or electronic form as invoices. Poland strived to obtain a derogation from the above-mentioned Article of the VAT Directive so that only documents in electronic form could be considered as invoices by the Polish tax administration.
Additionally, based on Article 232 of the VAT Directive the use of an electronic invoice is subject to acceptance by the recipient. Therefore, the introduction of an electronic invoicing obligation in Poland requires a derogation from this Article, so that the issuer no longer has to obtain the consent of the recipient to send an invoice in a paperless format. Currently, under Article 106n of the Polish VAT law, the use of electronic invoices requires the approval of the invoice recipient, which hinders the possibility to impose mandatory electronic invoicing.
As announced by the European Commission on 30 March 2022, Poland has been granted the derogatory decision both from the Article 218 and Article 232 of Directive 2006/112/EC. The decision will apply from 1 April 2023 until 31 March 2026, after receiving the last approval from the EU Council. The mandatory phase of the mandate is expected to begin on 1 April 2023.
The KSeF taxpayer application – on the horizon
To allow taxpayers to issue and make electronic invoices available using KSeF, the Polish Ministry of Finance will offer several tools free of charge:
e-Mikrofirma, an online app accessible via smartphone and a web form to any taxpayer logged on to e-Urząd (e-Office).
e-Urząd, will provide taxpayers with online tools that will make it easier to meet tax obligations, including paying taxes, through an online electronic payment service.
On 31 March 2022 the Ministry of Finance announced that the test version of the KSeF Taxpayer application will be made available on 7 April 2022. It will enable management of authorisations, issuing and receiving invoices from the KSeF.
Next steps
With the published decision of the European Commission Poland has entered into the next implementing stage of mandatory e-invoicing. The next steps will follow after receiving the approval from the EU Council (which is now a formality and should take place within a few weeks). Subsequently, the Ministry of Finance will implement universal electronic invoicing in Poland giving adequate time for the businesses to adapt to new solutions.
Need help with Poland’s evolving CTC requirements?
Development of Sovos’ CTC solution for Poland is already well-advanced and will shortly be ready for implementation. To get ahead of the inevitable rush to comply with Poland’s CTC mandate, contact us today.
Update: 12 September 2023 by Robson Satiro de Almeida
Tax Reform in Brazil: Simplification Statute Published
Recent developments in Brazil indicate changes on the horizon, as the country continues to move towards a tax reform for simplification of e-invoicing obligations.
A significant reform of ancillary tax obligations is underway aiming to create a unified system for issuing tax documents. The government has long anticipated and discussed this project, but it now shows promise of becoming a reality.
The Brazilian government published Complementary Law no. 199 (Lei Complementar no. 199) in August 2023, establishing the National Statute for the Simplification of Additional Tax Obligations (the Statute). The Statute derives from Draft Law Proposal no. 178/2021 and seeks to streamline ancillary tax obligations, including filing tax returns, keeping accounting records and issuing electronic invoices.
What will change in e-invoicing?
The Statute’s primary change provides the unification of rules for issuing electronic invoices and fulfilling other ancillary obligations. There are currently more than a thousand different electronic invoice formats throughout the country, driving up business maintenance costs and resulting in adversities in company budgets.
Specifically, the Statute establishes integrated action at the Federal, State and Municipal levels to reach the following:
Unified issuance of electronic tax documents
Use of e-invoicing data to calculate taxes and provide pre-filled tax returns
Simplification of tax and contribution payments by consolidating collection documents
Centralisation of tax records and their sharing in accordance with legal mandates
How will changes occur?
To achieve unified e-invoice issuance and integration of other ancillary obligations, the government will assess existing systems, legislation, special regimes, exemptions and electronic tax platforms. The next step is to standardise legislation and the respective systems used to fulfil such obligations.
As per the Statute, this integration effort aims to provide benefits such as:
Cost savings for taxpayers
Encouraging taxpayer adherence at all federative levels
Modernising systems and digitalising operations
The Statute also creates the National Committee for the Simplification of Ancillary Tax Obligations (CNSOA) to establish and improve the processes for simplifying tax obligations in line with a definition of a national standard process. However, the Union, States, Federal District and Municipalities may establish additional tax responsibilities related to their respective taxes, if they are aligned with the CNSOA provisions.
What’s next?
After formal composition of the National Committee, the Federal Executive Branch must adopt the necessary measures to allow it to carry out its activities as defined in the Statute. This is essential to start the official move towards national unification of e-invoicing processes and other ancillary obligations.
Additionally, the National Congress will still analyse and vote on certain points of the Statute that the President vetoed, which could result in further alignment or changes within the National Statute for the Simplification of Additional Tax Obligations.
Starting to prepare for eventual changes with e-invoicing in Brazil? Sovos can help.
Update: 21 March 2022 by Kelly Muniz
Brazil is, without doubt, one of the most challenging jurisdictions in the world when it comes to tax legislation. The intricate fiscal system that encompasses rules fromhttps://sovos.com/vat/tax-rules/brazil-e-invoicing/ 27 states and over 5000 municipalities has created a burden on companies, especially for cross-state and cross-municipality transactions.
Furthermore, taxpayers must carefully examine the numerous e-invoicing formats and requirements (and, sometimes, the lack of such). Therefore, hopes for tax reform in Brazil have existed for quite some time.
Simplifying e-invoicing compliance
In recent years, several legislative initiatives towards integrating indirect taxation mandates across the country have not met successful outcomes. Meanwhile, a feasible step into bringing forth such changes may be through the unification of rules on digital compliance with tax obligations, such as VAT e-invoicing and e-reporting.
In late 2021 a draft law proposal (Projeto de Lei Complementar n. 178/2021) was initiated by the private sector. Named the National Statute for the Simplification of Ancillary Fiscal Obligations, it has been welcomed this year by the House of Representatives. Its primary purpose is to introduce a significant reform within digital tax reporting obligations by creating a unified e-invoicing system.
By establishing national fiscal cooperation, the proposal intends to reduce costs with compliance, allow information sharing among tax authorities, and create an incentive for taxpayers’ conformity across all federal, state and municipal levels.
The principal agenda of the draft law proposal is to introduce:
A unified national standard for e-invoicing
A unified e-bookkeeping format, the Digital Fiscal Declaration (DFD)
A pre-filled tax return using e-invoice data
A unified fiscal registry file and information sharing system (RCU)
What this means for businesses
The most significant change is the introduction of the NFB-e (Nota Fiscal Brasil Eletronica), a national standard for e-invoicing. It entails the unification of the NF-e (Nota Fiscal Eletronica), NFS-e (Nota Fiscal de Servicos Eletronica) and NF-C (Nota Fiscal do Consumidor Eletronica) in one single document. This will cover Brazil’s VAT-like taxes, in this case, ICMS (VAT on products and certain services) and ISS (services VAT).
In practice, this means that instead of complying with numerous e-invoicing formats and mandates, according to the state and municipality of the transaction, one national digital standard will provide uniform country-wide compliance for e-invoicing. The NFB-e will cover invoicing of goods and services on state and municipal levels for B2G, B2B and B2C transactions.
The reform will drastically reduce the burden on taxpayers and expand the scope of e-invoicing to municipalities where such a mandate hasn’t been adopted yet.
It’s essential to add clearance requirements for e-invoicing in Brazil will be maintained, meaning that businesses will still need to comply with rules for real-time clearance of invoices with the tax authority.
What’s next?
The draft law proposal is still in early discussions and will follow to the Justice and Citizenship Constitutional Commission (CCJC) for approval and possible amendments before voting by Congress. Until then, compliance with e-invoicing rules across Brazil remains at its current challenging status.
Take Action
Need to ensure compliance with the latest Brazilian e-invoicing requirements? Speak to our team or download Trends Edition 13 to keep up to date with the latest regulatory news and updates.
The modernization of tax and tax controls remains a high priority for Slovakia’s tax authority. The Slovakian Ministry of Finance plans to introduce a continuous transaction control (CTC) scheme, with the aim to lower Slovakia’s VAT gap to the EU average and obtain real-time information about underlying business transactions.
The Slovakian tax authorities have begun to introduce mandatory business to government (B2G) and government to government (G2G) e-invoicing via the IS EFA platform. Regarding business to business (B2B) and business to consumer (B2C) e-invoicing, there is currently no indication when the mandate will be rolled out, yet the IS EFA platform is planned to also be used for B2B e-invoicing.
Have questions? Get in touch with a Sovos Slovakia CTC expert.
Quick facts on Slovakia e-invoicing and VAT reporting
e-Invoicing
Just like in any other EU Member State, e-invoicing is permitted in Slovakia, subject to the buyer accepting the exchange of electronic invoices.
While Slovakia today is considered a post audit jurisdiction, a CTC reform is currently underway.
The implementation of the mandatory B2G and G2G schedule for the involvement of government and public administration institutions as well as for their suppliers, is expected to happen progressively throughout 2023 and 2024.
E-invoices can be stored in another Member State without notification, provided they are made available in Slovakia should they be requested by the tax authority.
VAT Reporting
Filed either monthly or quarterly and must be submitted through a downloadable form issued by the Slovakian tax authority.
Additionally, Slovakia requires the submission of the Slovak Control Statement.
Data submitted to the tax authority must be in XML format.
Infographic
Slovakia CTC Requirements
Understand more about Slovakia’s CTC requirements including when businesses need to comply and how Sovos can help.
The Slovakian tax authorities have begun to slowly introduce mandatory B2G and G2G e-invoicing via the IS EFA platform, but there is currently no indication if/when a business to business (B2B) and business to consumer (B2C) mandatory e-invoicing mandate will be rolled out. The previous government decided to freeze the B2B and B2C element of the CTC mandate, with no clear date when it will be implemented, or if the information outlined in the original draft legislation will be maintained in the future.
According to the unpublished CTC draft law, which has been put on hold by the current government, suppliers would have to report invoice data to the tax authority’s e-invoicing platform, IS EFA, before issuing them to their customer. Similarly, buyers would have to report data from the received invoice.
Mandated e-invoicing rollout dates
B2G and G2G throughout 2023 and 2024
B2B and B2C TBD
How can Sovos help with VAT compliance?
Sovos software already addresses the periodic reporting requirements facing companies with VAT compliance obligations domestically in Slovakia, as well as those with obligations due to trade with counterparties in other EU Member States and third countries.
Building on our existing commitment to Slovakia and pending the release of official information and detailed specifications, we’re planning further development to our core CTC platform to ensure our customers remain continually compliant with Slovakian CTC regulations, in line with the emerging digitization of tax controls in Slovakia.
Learn how Sovos’ solution for VAT compliance changes can help companies stay compliant.
Meet the Expert is our series of blogs where we share more about the team behind our innovative software and managed services.
As a global organisation with indirect tax experts across all regions, our dedicated team are often the first to know about new regulatory changes and the latest developments on tax regimes across the world, to support you in your tax compliance.
We spoke to Russell Brown, senior IPT consulting manager, about Sovos’ IPT consultancy, supporting tax teams and his thoughts about the future of IPT.
Can you tell me about your role and what it involves?
I head up the Insurance Premium Tax (IPT) consultancy practice within Sovos. We’re responsible for providing advice, mostly to compliance clients on tax issues of different types of insurance that they write in EU and non-EU countries. We provide clarity on applicable tax rates and their compliance requirements in various countries, as well as location of risk queries.
One of my main responsibilities is to review and approve the reports written by consultants in the team. I also assist our sales team with clients interested in registering for IPT in different countries. This involves discussing the insurance the client provides and the countries involved and helping to onboard new customers. I also participate in writing regular IPT blogs and articles on a variety of subjects, and in webinars and other client events where we discuss a wide range of IPT issues around the world.
We also assist the compliance managed services team with any questions from their clients that they need help with. This can include legislative references or just confirmation of tax rates.
Can you tell us about Sovos’ IPT consultancy and typical projects you help with?
The short answer is we help insurers with their IPT compliance queries but that can vary from project to project.
A typical project for the consultancy team would be for a client to approach us and say, “We’re thinking of writing this type of insurance policy in 10 countries. Could you please tell us all the taxes and tax rates that apply, who bears the cost of those taxes and how they’re calculated. Could you also provide us with guidance on the compliance requirements in each country?”. This could be for EU and non-EU countries.
Another common project is to look at insurance policies and confirm the type of insurance to ensure its taxed correctly or looking at location of risk for an insurance type. This will involve analysing a sample policy from the client to confirm what the insurable risk is so that the correct rules are applied on taxing it in the relevant countries.
Sovos’ IPT customers tend to deal in non-life insurance; we’re often asked to look at property policies or liability risks. Spain, France, Portugal and Belgium are the countries we’re asked most about due to their complicated IPT and parafiscal charges regimes and different rates.
We are also asked questions about non-admitted insurance. For example, if a company is writing insurance but isn’t licensed in that country, they might have questions about how the taxes are calculated, who is liable for the taxes, who should settle taxes etc. These questions tend to be from non-EEA insurers writing policies in EEA countries.
Brokers are another type of client we deal with, or as part of discussions with insurers when there are queries around who is responsible for settling taxes on premiums. We’re able to offer advice to both the insurer and the broker in these cases.
Where do tax teams need support and how does Sovos help?
Tax teams want certainty that they’re charging the correct taxes, and that they’re compliant in settling those taxes with the relevant countries’ authorities. That’s where we come in, providing guidance as well as reporting. We’ve received feedback from clients saying the reports have been especially useful to show senior stakeholders that tax compliance is being maintained. The reports are also an important document to have on file that demonstrates that there was an issue identified and they received external advice. Having this activity on record for senior managers and both internal and external auditors is important. If a tax team is asked any questions by tax authorities, they can provide evidence.
We tend to work with tax teams in the planning stages, when an organisation wants to identify any potential tax issues ahead of time to ensure systems are updated and compliant from day one.
What are your thoughts about the IPT landscape the future of IPT?
I have a few thoughts.
The first is about Germany’s IPT laws. When the country changed its IPT law at the end of 2020, the authority extended the scope of who could potentially be taxed for German IPT. There was some thought that other countries in Europe might try to do the same, the Dutch being a good example where current legislation does potentially allow this under certain circumstances. But because the application of Germany’s law wasn’t the most successful, there’s a feeling that other countries are unlikely to follow this path for the moment.
There is also the question whether or not IPT will be abolished in the UK and replaced with VAT. The government is in the process of starting a VAT consultation on financial services, and it’s likely that this proposal will be included in the discussions between HMT, HMRC and the insurance market including both insurers and brokers. This consultation will likely run for a couple of years, so we won’t know the results for some time, and it is possible that any decisions on this point may be delayed by the timing of the next general election.
There is also always the discussion of the digitization of IPT. There hasn’t been much movement on this recently. Ireland is in the process of digitization and France was due to follow suit but has postponed until next year. We are already helping our customers to possess the ability to file IPT online when this does become a requirement.
Poland has been moving towards introducing the CTC framework and the system, the Krajowy System e-Faktur (KSeF), since early 2021. As of 1 January 2022, the platform has been available for taxpayers who opt to issue structured invoices through KSeF and to benefit from the introduced incentives.
As the taxpayers have been using KSeF for a while, let’s take a closer look at what has been happening and will happen in the future regarding Poland’s CTC reform.
Publication of regulation on the use of KSeF
Initially presented as a draft act by the Ministry of Finance in November 2021, the regulation on the use of KSEF was finally adopted and published in the Official Gazette on 30 December 2021 after several reiterations.
The regulation covers mainly the categories of authorisations, methods of authentication, and information required to access the structured invoices.
According to the regulation, taxpayers using KSEF are required to authenticate using one of the following methods: Qualified Electronic Signature, Qualified Electronic Seal, Trusted Signature, or Token.
A trusted signature confirms the identity assigned to a specific Polish Identification (PESEL) number. The token method can be used to grant authorisations in the KSeF once the taxpayer has been authenticated.
New information and documentation published by the Polish tax authority
The Polish tax authority has published new information on its website about KSeF features including FAQs and further documentation.
The FAQs include information regarding the scope and operational side of the system, whereas the sample XML files and the information brochure shed light on the logical structure of e-invoices and mapping requirements.
What will happen next?
Although the tax authority continues to make every effort to clarify the many aspects of the new CTC system in Poland, we still have a long way to go regarding the full implementation of KSeF.
For instance, during the public consultation of the draft act the Ministry of Finance stated taxpayers would be able to download structured invoices via API in XML or PDF format. As of today, there is no technical information available regarding the PDF generation within the system using the API. The tax authority has published the technical documentation related to the outbound process but there is still no documentation available on the inbound side.
More importantly, a decision authorising Poland to introduce special measures derogating from Articles of the EU VAT Directive is yet to be obtained from the EU Council for roll-out of the e-invoicing mandate for all B2B transactions. The current Polish VAT Act requires the buyer’s acceptance to receive structured invoices. As the Polish authorities aim to make the KSeF mandatory in 2023 an amendment of this provision is expected once the special measures have been authorized by the EU Council.
The move to customer facing e‑invoicing grows in China.
China’s VAT digitization journey began nearly two decades ago with the rollout of a tax regime called the Golden Tax System. This created a national taxation platform for reporting and invoicing, as well as legislation regulating the use and legal effect of e-signatures.
With the increase of mobile payment adoption, the push towards customer-facing e-invoicing grows. The Chinese government has taken initiatives to further reform reporting and invoicing with a proposed nationwide e-invoicing service platform to provide an e-invoice issuance service to all taxpayers free of charge.
Get the information you need
Reforms
E-invoicing has been gradually introduced in China, starting with the B2C segment – in some cases by mandating large amounts of taxpayers in the public service sector to issue VAT e-invoices to their customers.
Whilst e-invoicing is not yet fully permitted, the issuance of e-invoices has been widely accepted in B2C instances for several years. They are mandatory in certain core service-based industries including telecommunications and public transportation. Invoices are issued via the national system with hardware and software certified by the state authority.
A pilot program was launched in September 2020, which enables specific taxpayers operating within China to voluntarily issue VAT special e-invoices. Special invoices are used to claim input VAT and are generally used in B2B transactions.
Quick facts
E-invoices must have an electronic signature instead of the original invoice stamp.
Taxpayers can use the tax authority’s platform for VAT services to check and verify the electronic signature of e-invoices.
Accounting documents, including invoices, may be stored electronically provided that the e-archive meets integrity and authenticity criteria, and the processing system adheres to requirements on functionality and security.
Mandate rollout dates
September 2020 – China’s e-invoicing pilot program began allowing e-invoice issuance for B2B purposes. It initially only included Ningbo, Shijiazhuang and Hangzhou.
December 2020 – Pilot expanded to include Tianjin, Hebei, Shanghai, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Anhui, Guangdong, Chongqing, Sichuan and Shenzhen.
January 2021 – Pilot further expanded to include Beijing, Shanxi, Inner Mongolia, Liaoning, Jilin, Heilongjiang, Fujian, Jiangxi, Shandong, Henan, Hunan, Guangxi, Hainan Guizhou, Yunnan, Tibet, Shaanxi, Gansu, Qinghai, Ningxia, Xinjiang, Dalian, Xiamen and Qingdao.
December 2021 – A new pilot program, only for selected taxpayers, started in Shanghai, Inner Mongolia and Guangdong, introducing the so called “fully digitized e-invoice”, a new type of e-invoice that simplifies the e-invoice issuance for both B2B and B2C purposes.
How can Sovos help?
As China’s new e-invoicing program will shortly expand to include most companies, we inch ever closer to full scale e-invoicing possibilities in China.
Our experts continually monitor, interpret and codify changes into our software, reducing the compliance burden on your tax and IT teams.
Register your interest now to learn how Sovos’ solution for tackling this major VAT reform in China will help your company stay compliant.
Compliance Mandates Around the World Have Elevated the Importance of Tax
Sorting out indirect tax issues was not traditionally at the top of any IT organisation’s to-do list. Today that’s changed and new VAT compliance mandates being introduced at an increasing rate around the world have elevated its status.
It’s more important than ever that IT decision makers and in-house tax and finance professionals engage and have meaningful, strategic discussions about how – and also why – to accelerate their digital transformation. This will enable them to not only respond but also to prepare for invasive new tax mandates.
Each time a product or service is sold in a new country or under the watchful eye of evolving national tax regimes, enterprises must respond. They must ensure their VAT recognition and reporting processes are aligned to new and evolving mandates for continuous controls on e-invoicing and other critical sales and purchase processes and documents.
Get the e-book
A cascade of tax compliance mandates
Multinational companies continue to leverage new technologies to optimise borderless supply chains. The spectacular growth of e-commerce and a new generation of technologies is opening global markets for even the smallest of micro-enterprises.
Global businesses and supply chains increasingly intersect new national mandates. Many of these mandates impose sophisticated real-time controls on business transactions and make compliance more complex than it’s ever been before. And the cost of non-compliance can be high.
Non-compliance can affect an organisation in many ways – financial, operational, employee productivity, customer experience, legal, and even brand perception.
IT, tax and finance teams need to communicate and collaborate effectively to fully understand their compliance obligations in each of the markets where they operate. If they can’t companies will likely find their digital transformations inhibited by disparate local point solutions that can be so entrenched, they can become impossible to replace.
With better collaboration between functions and alignment on tax, your entire organisation can achieve real operational efficiencies.
Download our e-book and read about
The opportunities that exist when tax and IT work together
How joined up thinking can reduce risk and uncover opportunities
A shared vision and modern tax solution
How better conversations drive a better compliance process
As tax compliances becomes increasingly interconnected with core business processes, organisations must make all aspects of tax reporting central to, and integrated with, core business activities.
A modern tax compliance solution must be engineered from the ground up to handle modern regulatory mandates. This especially applies to global manufacturers and retailers that do business in numerous countries around the world and must comply with mandates established by hundreds of tax authorities.
Read more and download the e-book
In 2020, the European Commission (EC) adopted a four-year plan to develop a fairer and simpler taxation framework. The Action Plan aspires to tighten up the tax system, ensure that digital platforms are made to follow transparency rules and utilise data better, reducing tax fraud and evasion.
In 2021, the Commission implemented e-commerce changes – another step in the modernisation process. Beginning in July of 2021, the Mini One Stop Shop (MOSS) system was expanded to the One Stop Shop (OSS) and Import One Stop Shop (IOSS).
The implementation of OSS expanded the use of the union and non-union schemes. This allows European and non-European business-to-consumer sellers of digital services and goods to simplify their reporting practices. Meanwhile, IOSS allows businesses to register and import goods into the EU with a value not exceeding €150.
In 2022, there are plans to release legislation under the “VAT in the digital age” Action Plan. Much like its predecessors in 2020 and 2021, the core purpose of this plan is to tackle the issue of fraud and improve the way businesses engage with the VAT system. The Commission has announced three points it seeks to address in its legislation:
Specifically, one point of interest is the single EU VAT registration point, which aims to facilitate compliance among Member States. With this, the European Commission is requesting feedback on how businesses think the I/OSS implementation has gone and on other potential legislative options for the future, including:
Extension of OSS to:
Cover all B2C supplies of goods and services by non-established suppliers
Enable intra-Community supplies and acquisitions of goods, thereby avoiding VAT registration when transferring own goods cross-border
Include B2B supplies of goods and services while leaving in place the current VAT refund mechanism
Include B2B supplies of goods and services while also introducing a deduction mechanism for OSS
Reverse charge made available for all B2B supplies carried out by non-established suppliers
Removing the €150 threshold for IOSS so that it applies to distance sales of goods of any value
Making IOSS mandatory for:
All distance sales of imported goods
All distance sales of imported goods above an EU turnover threshold (e.g. €10,000)
Marketplaces only
The European Commission began a period of public consultation on 21 January regarding adapting VAT rules in a digital economic landscape. They are seeking feedback on how the EC should adapt VAT tax processes and how they can incorporate technology to solve principal issues in tax, such as fraud and the complexity of its systems. The Commission is accepting feedback in this public consultation period until 15 April 2022 – submissions can be made here.
Sovos will continue to monitor the development of this legislation throughout the year as more information about its structure and impact is released, as these changes are sure to be impactful upon the European VAT landscape.
Insurance is a dynamic sector in constant flux to accommodate with insured’s needs. An increase in holidays abroad following WWII saw the need for Assistance insurance for any unforeseen events that occurred away from the insured’s home country. Council Directive 84/641/EEC regulated Assistance insurance for the first time, and a new class of insurance was created. This was in addition to the 17 previously regulated classes outlined in Directive 73/239/EEC of non-life insurance and was called Assistance (Class insurance 18).
Travel insurance evolution
Initially, the insured was covered by a policy that provided aid for any event travelling abroad (loss of passport, assistance with any problem in the car etc). The insurer created a range of support with call centres, supplier networks and additional services to help solve difficulties when travelling abroad.
Subsequently, following the insured’s requirements, insurance companies and travel agents created travel insurance that includes a wide range of services. These consist of several protections within different classes of business. This is where the tax complexity of travel insurance policies begins. It’s an amalgamation of coverages, and the application of the correct fiscal treatment needs to be analysed in each territory.
Correct tax treatment in travel insurance
When weighing the correct application of tax for travel insurance, businesses must consider the following: location of risk (LoR), class of businesses and the correct tax approach.
Business travel: The LoR of the employer’s policy to cover their employees will be located where the business is located.
Individuals: The LoR will be the territory in which the policyholder is habitually resident unless the policy covers travel or holiday risks for four months or less. In this case, the LoR is the Member State where the policyholder took out the policy.
Class of business affected: As mentioned previously, one of the complexities of travel insurance is determining the classes of business affected. It’s common to see, in these policy types, multiple coverages such as medical assistance cover, loss or damage to baggage, travel delays or cancellations, loss of documents or money, personal accident, repatriation etc. Insurers must adequately identify these coverage details to ensure the compliant tax treatment is used.
Taxability: This step is crucial. The correct treatment of the policies could vary the liabilities to be paid, the different taxes and/or levies and parafiscal charges to be included in the tax calculation. This means that the tax treatment can change by country. It’s necessary to identify the tax liability or exemption based on the class of business and the geographical location.
Insurers must understand the importance of the vital details associated with travel insurance. Determining LoR, class of business affected and taxability ensures the correct amount is paid and submitted to the proper jurisdictions.
Many multinational companies find VAT compliance challenging, especially when trading cross-border.
With the increase in real-time reporting across Europe and differing VAT registration and reporting requirements, VAT compliance now requires significant resources and specialist knowledge to ensure compliance and avoid costly penalties.
As your business expands, so do your VAT obligations. This is why many organisations, turn to managed service providers to ease the burden of VAT compliance, audits and fiscal representation.
This e-book discusses the many elements of VAT compliance including:
VAT registration
Fiscal representation
How to determine VAT obligations
Filing VAT returns
Preparing for an audit
Managing VAT changes
VAT compliance advice from JD Sports’ Indirect Tax Manager
How JD Sports manage VAT compliance with Sovos’ Managed Services
John Dowd, Indirect Tax Manager at sport-fashion retailer JD Sports discusses how he managed cross-border VAT compliance with the help of Sovos’ managed services
“For us at JD Sports and me personally I’m looking for a partnership, something long term, as it takes time and costs money to change advisors. I’m looking for a long-term relationship over a number of years with a VAT service provider.
“I want my advisor to have specialist knowledge, for us that’s retail and cross-border supply chains, overseas tax authorities, and I want to see new talent joining the team. I prefer a single point of contact to make it easier to move things along and of course, competitive pricing, and Sovos ticked all of these boxes for us.”
John Dowd, Indirect Tax Manager at JD Sports
The many elements of VAT compliance
VAT compliance has many elements, beginning with an understanding of place of supply rules to determine where VAT registration is required. Fiscal representation might be required to register in EU Member States.
Once VAT registration is underway, the next step is to determine EU VAT obligations by mapping the supply chain for the country of registration. There are also additional requirements to consider including exemptions, recovering VAT, Intrastat and varying continuous transaction controls (CTCs) mandates.
Submitting VAT returns to ensure compliance is a never-ending process. Each country has its own VAT return regulations and additional declaration requirements.
The VAT compliance cycle also includes preparation for VAT audits. Tax authorities can carry out audits for a variety of reasons so it’s important businesses prepare for audits and ensure they are able to manage the process successfully.
How Sovos VAT Managed Services can help with VAT compliance
Sovos’ end-to-end, technology-enabled VAT Managed Services can ease your compliance workload and mitigate risk where-ever you operate today, while ensuring you’re ready to handle the VAT requirements in the markets you intend to dominate tomorrow.
Whilst the UK leaving the European Union (EU) on 31 December 2020 seems like a long time ago, UK businesses still have to deal with changes to the processes in place when importing goods from suppliers in the EU.
Customs Declarations
Throughout 2021, goods imported into Great Britain from the EU were subject to several easements from a customs perspective. This was to reduce the burden of completing full customs declarations and dealing with all of the consequences of importing goods that were previously not subject to import documentation and controls.
UK businesses were unprepared, partly due to impacts from the COVID-19 pandemic, so these simplifications were extended a few times during 2021. As of 1 January 2022, goods moving between the EU and Great Britain will be subject to full customs declarations and controls. Subsequently, there is no longer the ability to defer customs declarations as was previously the case.
Additionally, any customs duty due on goods will be due at the time of entry rather than when the customs declaration is submitted, as was the case in 2021. Businesses can achieve delayed payment of the customs duty by applying for a duty deferment account with HMRC. In some instances, it can be achieved without the need for a financial guarantee to be lodged, so it is worth considering.
Due to the negotiations between the UK government and the EU on the Northern Ireland Protocol, imports of non-controlled goods from Ireland and Northern Ireland will not be subject to these changes. The previous easements will still apply. This means that customs declarations can be delayed for up to 175 days. The UK government will make further announcements once the discussions on the Protocol have been completed. We will update further when that happens.
Import VAT
Regarding import VAT, Postponed Import VAT Accounting (PIVA) remains available and, whilst not compulsory, it is recommended, as it provides a valuable cashflow benefit. It applies to imports from all countries and not just the EU. Unlike in some EU countries, it is not automatically applied and has to be claimed when the import declaration is submitted. Therefore, the importer must advise whoever submits the declaration to complete it accordingly. If it is not claimed, import VAT is payable at the time of entry and will have to be recovered on the VAT return – HMRC continues to issue the C79 certificate when VAT is paid at the border, and it is required evidence to recover VAT.
Businesses will also need to remember to download the monthly PIVA statement from HMRC’s website – this is required to determine the amount of import VAT payable on the VAT return. This needs to be done within six months as it is not available after that time.
Intrastat declarations
Another change is regarding Intrastat reporting for imports into Great Britain from the EU. Arrivals declarations were required during 2021 to provide the UK government with trade statistics, given that importers could delay submitting full customs declarations. Intrastat arrivals are now only required for goods moving from the EU to Northern Ireland – this is because Northern Ireland is still considered part of the EU for goods.
The EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement provisions have to be considered when importing goods from the EU especially regarding the origin of the goods and whether the import is tariff-free. This has been in place since 1 January 2021, but there are practical changes that are considered further in our article which discusses the origin of goods and claiming relief on trade between the EU and UK. These changes mean that imports from the EU are treated in the same way as imports from any other country, except for goods from Ireland and Northern Ireland, which are still subject to special arrangements.
Take Action
Keen to know how changes between the EU and UK will impact your VAT compliance obligations? Contact us to find out more.
The EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement (TCA) provides for tariff-free trade between the United Kingdom (UK) and the European Union (EU) but does not work in the same way as when the UK was part of the EU.
Before Brexit, if the goods were in free circulation within the EU, they could be moved cross-border without incurring any additional customs duty. Therefore, the origin of the goods was not relevant for this intra-EU movement. If the goods originated from outside the EU, customs duty would have been paid as required when they first entered into free circulation but was not payable again.
This difference creates issues for UK businesses where they import finished goods into the UK first before being sold to the EU. As the goods are not being processed in the UK, they cannot be of UK origin and will be subject to double duty unless specific duty mitigations measures are taken.
The same tariff-free trade between the EU and the UK can be achieved under the TCA, but it depends on meeting the detailed rules within the agreement. The key is in the origin of the goods and whether they qualify under the terms of the TCA. This ensures that only eligible goods are tariff-free and removes the risk of goods entering from outside the Free Trade Area without paying customs duty.
The requirement for goods to be of relevant origin to benefit from zero tariffs on imports under the TCA has been in place since 1 January 2021.
Claiming and evidencing relief
If goods meet the appropriate rules of origin, preference can be claimed on the customs declaration when they are imported. Thus, the claim is made by the importer of the goods. However, it is not as simple as completing the appropriate box on the declaration; there is a requirement for the proper evidence to be held.
To claim tariff preference, the importer needs to have one of the following proofs of origin:
A statement on origin – this must be made out by the exporter to confirm the product originates in the UK or EU; or
Importer’s knowledge – this option allows the importer to claim tariff preference based on their knowledge of where the goods they’re importing originate.
If they are relying on a statement of origin, the exporter will have to prove that the goods are of appropriate origin to qualify.
End of easement
In 2021, there was a light touch approach towards holding evidence when the customs declaration was made. The TCA allowed for a declaration to be made and the evidence to be obtained later to reduce the burden on business. There is still a requirement to provide the appropriate evidence on request, so businesses must ensure that it will be available if necessary.
There may be checks that the goods are of appropriate origin to be free of duty under the TCA. With effect from 1 January 2022, there is a need to have the appropriate evidence that the goods meet the origin requirements when the declaration is lodged. Therefore, businesses will need to ensure that the appropriate documents are immediately available should they be requested.
Post import claims for relief
Businesses should note that it is not obligatory to claim preference at the time of entry of the goods as claims can be made up to three years later, as long as there is valid proof of origin. It is beneficial to claim preference at the earliest possible time to benefit cash flow and provide certainty of the cost of the goods.
Therefore, businesses will need to ensure that they determine origin of goods correctly and have the appropriate evidence to support the goods being tariff-free.
It’s important to remember that the rules for trade between Northern Ireland and the EU are different because of the Northern Ireland Protocol.
Take Action
Get in touch with Sovos to discuss your company’s obligations for cross-border trade.
Meet the Expert is our series of blogs where we share more about the team behind our innovative software and managed services.As a global organisation with indirect tax experts across all regions, our dedicated team is often the first to know about new regulatory changes and the latest developments on tax regimes worldwide to support you in your tax compliance.
We spoke to Khaled Cherif, senior client representative here at Sovos to discover more about Insurance Premium Tax (IPT) and, in particular, the complexities of France and the French overseas territories.
Can you tell me about your role and what it involves?
I joined Sovos as part of the IPT team in June 2017. My role is senior client representative and I mostly work with our French and Italian clients, which is around 54 organisations.
I am the first point of contact so my role along with the rest of the team is to provide clients with all the assistance that they require, including helping them with filing their liabilities and ensuring they are compliant with the relevant regulations.
Can you explain IPT in France and what is particularly complex about the country’s IPT regulation and requirements?
IPT in France is quite complex as there are many parafiscal charges that can apply to insurance premiums. There are also multiple IPT rates depending on the type of risk being covered. This can range from 7% IPT rate to as high as 30%. As well as the different IPT rates there are also 10 parafiscal charges that could be due on insurance premiums and again all with varying rates.
There are also French overseas territories to be considered. There are two groups of French overseas territories, the Départements and Régions d’Outre-Mer (DROMs), and Collectivités d’Outre-Mer (COMs).
What top tips do you have for insurers that have IPT obligations in France and other EU countries?
It’s important to understand the differences in IPT requirements with the French overseas territories.
DROMs (French Guyana, Guadeloupe, Martinique, Mayotte, and Reunion) are treated the same as mainland France for premium tax purposes. Premiums covering risks located in these territories should be declared in the same way, except for Guyana and Mayotte where the IPT rates applicable are reduced by half.
For COMs the local tax authority for the territory can levy taxes on insurance premiums. Most have set up their own IPT regimes, often requiring insurers to appoint a fiscal representative. In some COMs territories the tax ID issued for Mainland France can be used.
As many French and international organisations have subsidiaries in overseas French territories it’s important to understand how the different IPT rates and filings affect compliance. Not being based in the territory where IPT needs to be filed can make things complicated, so working with local partners or representatives can ease the burden.
How can Sovos help insurers?
Sovos has a team with global IPT expertise, meaning we can help organisations understand their IPT requirements wherever they operate, including in France and the French Overseas Territories.
Sovos has in-depth knowledge of local requirements, laws and regulations as well as local partners and representatives to assist with IPT requirements.
During the last decade, the Vietnamese government has been developing a feasible solution to reduce VAT fraud in the country by adopting an e-invoice requirement for companies carrying out economic activities in Vietnam. Finally, on 1 July 2022, a mandatory e-invoicing requirement is scheduled to enter into force nationwide.
2020 e-invoicing mandate postponement
Despite the postponement of the original starting date for the mandatory nationwide e-invoicing obligation, which was first intended to enter into force in July 2020, the Vietnamese government quickly established a new deadline.
Later that year, in October 2020, the new timeline was communicated through Decree 123, delaying the e-invoicing mandate until 1 July 2022. This new deadline is also in line with the implementation dates for the rules concerning the e-invoicing system envisaged in the Law on Tax Administration.
Ongoing regional readiness plan
Vietnam’s General Taxation Department (GTD) announced its plan to work first with the local tax administrations of six provinces and cities: Ho Chi Minh City Hanoi, Binh Dinh, Quang Ninh, Hai Phong and Phu Tho to start implementing technical solutions for the new e-invoice requirements and the construction of an information technology system that allows the connection, data transmission, reception, and storage of data. According to the GTD’s action plan, by March 2022, these six cities and provinces should be ready for the e-invoice system’s activation.
The GTD announced that, from April 2022, the new e-invoicing system will continue to be deployed in the remaining provinces and cities.
Finally, under this local implementation plan, by July 2022, all cities and provinces in Vietnam must deploy the e-invoicing system based on the rules established in Decree 123 and the Circular that provides guidance and clarification to certain aspects of the new e-invoicing system.
Next steps for businesses
Taxable persons operating in Vietnam will be required to issue e-invoices for their transactions from 1 July 2022 and must be ready to comply with the new legal framework. Enterprises, economic organisations, other organisations, business households and individuals must register with the local tax administration to start using e-invoices according to the rules established in the mentioned Decree 123.
Vietnam is finally moving forward to adopt mandatory e-invoicing. However, there is plenty of work related to the necessary technical documentation and local implementation of the new e-invoicing system. We will continue to monitor the latest developments to determine whether the GTD can meet all the requirements in time for the mandatory e-invoicing roll-out.
Take Action
Need help staying up to date with the latest VAT and compliance updates that may impact your business? Get in touch with our team of experts today.
We recently launched the 13th Edition of our annual Trends report, the industry’s most comprehensive study of global VAT mandates and compliance controls. Trends provides a comprehensive look at the world’s regulatory landscape highlighting how governments across the world are enacting complex new policies and controls to close tax gaps and collect the revenue owed. These policies and protocols impact all companies in the countries where they trade no matter where they are headquartered.
This year’s report looks at how large-scale investments in digitization technology in recent years have enabled tax authorities in much of the world to enforce real-time data analysis and always-on enforcement. Driven by new technology and capabilities, governments are now into every aspect of business operations and are ever-present in company data.
Businesses are increasingly having to send what amounts to all their live sales and supply chain data as well as all the content from their accounting systems to tax administrations. This access to finance ledgers creates unprecedented opportunities for tax administrations to triangulate a company’s transaction source data with their accounting treatment and the actual movement of goods and money flows.
The European VAT landscape
After years of Latin America leading with innovation in these legislative areas, Europe is starting to accelerate the digitization of tax reporting. Our Trends report highlights the key developments and regulations that will continue to make an impact in 2022, including:
VAT reporting processes become digital and more frequent – Existing VAT reporting is becoming more granular and more frequent in many EU Member States, with the majority quickly evolving towards real-time controls with or without electronic invoice mandates.
Italy has mandatory e-invoicing via a data exchange platform previously introduced for public procurement messaging.
Since 2017 in Spain, all companies must report inbound and outbound invoices within four days.
In Hungary, suppliers have had to report their sales invoices in real-time since 2018.
Public procurement standards will play a major role in the design of various continuous transaction control (CTC) models – Frameworks such as PEPPOL are increasingly adopted by public administrations as large buyers of goods and services – the standards and platforms used for these transactions will increasingly be repurposed for electronic invoicing as a key enabler of VAT digitization.
“Own the Transaction” CTC model becomes more popular – More tax administrations aim not only to receive reporting data from business transactions but use legislation to become the invoice exchange platform themselves.
This trend is gaining traction after Turkey and Italy introduced it as core concepts in their CTC legislation, while countries like France and Poland are introducing similar models.
SAF-T is here to stay – The OECD’s Standard Audit File for Tax (SAF-T) will remain an inspiration for European tax administrations not only to enforce VAT via real-time or near-real-time controls, but to obtain copies of taxpayers’ entire accounting books on their own systems for broader tax controls and audit support as well.
EU E-commerce VAT package and digital services – Changes introduced in July 2021 to the One Stop Shop (OSS) and the launch of an Import One Stop Shop (IOSS) concept have drastically changed requirements for all e-commerce vendors and marketplaces selling low-value goods or digital services to European consumers.
According to Christiaan van der Valk, lead author of Trends, governments already have all the evidence and capabilities they need to drive aggressive programs toward real-time oversight and enforcement. These programs exist in most of South and Central America and are rapidly spreading across countries in Europe such as France, Germany and Belgium as well as Asia and parts of Africa. Governments are moving quickly to enforce these standards and failure to comply can lead to business disruptions and even stoppages.
This new level of imposed transparency is forcing businesses to adapt how they track and implement e-invoicing and data mandate changes all over the world. To remain compliant, companies need a continuous and systematic approach to requirement monitoring.
Trends is the most comprehensive report of its kind. It provides an objective view of the VAT landscape with unbiased analysis from our team of tax and regulatory experts. The pace of change for tax and regulation continues to accelerate and this report will help you prepare.
Take Action
Contact us or download Trends to keep up with the changing regulatory landscape for VAT.
Identifying the Location of Risk in the case of health insurance can be a tricky subject, but it’s also crucial to get it right. A failure to do so could lead to under-declared tax liabilities in a particular territory and the potential for penalties to be applied once these deficits are identified and belatedly settled. We examine the situation from a European perspective.
Legal background
The starting point in this area is the Solvency II Directive (Directive 138/2009/EC). Notably, Article 13(13) outlines the different categories of insurance risks that are used to determine risk locations. As health insurance doesn’t fall within the specific provisions for property, vehicles and travel risks, it is dealt with by the catch-all provision in Article 13(13)(d).
This Article refers to the ‘habitual residence of the policyholder’ or, where the policyholder is a legal person, ‘that policyholder’s establishment to which the contract relates’. We will consider these scenarios separately, given the distinction between individuals and legal persons.
Where the policyholder is an individual
For natural persons, the situation is generally straightforward. Based on the above, the key factor is the habitual residence of the policyholder. The permanent home of the policyholder tends to be relatively easy to confirm.
More challenging cases can arise where someone moves from one risk location to another. For example, when an individual purchases insurance in a particular country, having lived there for a significant period before moving to another country soon afterwards, the Location of Risk will be the original country. As EU legislation does not go into detail on the point, examples of no apparent habitual residence will be dealt with on a case-by-case basis.
Where the policyholder is a legal person
In this scenario, we have to consider the ‘policyholder’s establishment to which the contract relates’ in the first instance. The establishment is treated quite broadly, as evidenced by the European Court of Justice case of Kvaerner plc v Staatssecretaris van Financiën (C-191/99), which pre-dates Solvency II.
Notwithstanding the above, the habitual residence of the insured should be used to identify the risk location even where the policyholder is a legal person in certain circumstances. This will occur when the insured is independently a party to an insurance contract, giving them a right to make a claim themselves rather than through the corporate policyholder.
This logic can also potentially be extended to dependents of the insured person added to the policy and who can also separately claim under the contract. They will also create a risk location, although this will often be in the same country as the insured person. Ultimately, the compliant approach will be dictated by the overall set-up of the policy.
If any insurers writing business in Europe have any questions on the location of risk rules, whether concerning health insurance or any other insurance, then Sovos is best placed to provide advice to ensure taxes are being correctly declared.
On 30 January 2022, the Zakat, Tax and Customs Authority (ZATCA) published an announcement on its official web page concerning penalties for violations of VAT rules, and it is currently only available in Arabic. As part of the announcement, the previous fines have been amended, ushering in a more cooperative and educational approach for penalizing taxpayers for their non-compliance with VAT rules than previously.
What’s the new approach?
If ZATCA officials detect a violation during a field visit, the taxpayer will first be given a warning about the violation without any penalty. The ZATCA aims to raise awareness instead of penalizing taxpayers for their first violation. Taxpayers will be granted three months to comply and make necessary changes in their processes.
If non-compliance continues after the first inspection, the taxpayer will be fined 1.000 Riyals, roughly 267 USD. The penalty charge will gradually increase if the taxpayer fails to comply with the rules and doesn’t make necessary changes within three months after the notice.
The fine for each additional repetition time will be as follows: 5.000 Riyals for the third time, 10.000 Riyals for the fourth time and 40.000 Riyals for the fifth time. If the same violation is repeated 12 months after its discovery, it is considered a new violation, and the process will begin with a warning without a fine.
What are the violations of e-invoicing?
According to the announcement, the violations of e-invoicing rules will be penalized per the new procedure described above. The instances that require a notice/fine are slightly different than the initial violations described previously and highlighted as follows:
Not issuing and storing invoices electronically
Not including a QR code
Non-compliance with keeping electronic invoices and electronic notes in the form stipulated
Not notifying the authority of any malfunction that hinders the issuance of electronic invoices
Deleting or modifying electronic invoices after their issuance
Including any of the prohibited functions in the e-invoicing solutions
Violation of any other provision of electronic invoicing.
What´s next?
The ZATCA states that the new approach ensures proportionality between the violation and the penalty imposed on taxpayers while giving taxpayers a chance to comply within a specific time frame. Considering that the introduction of both VAT and mandatory e-invoicing is fairly recent in the country, there are certain aspects that are unclear for taxpayers. This approach will educate businesses and is expected to be welcomed by stakeholders.
