The Future of Insurance Premium Tax in the UK

Russell Brown
November 10, 2021

Although Rishi Sunak did not mention Insurance Premium Tax (IPT) in his budget on 27 October 2021, one of the consequences of the UK leaving the EU is that HM Treasury (HMT) are conducting a review of the Value Added Tax (VAT) treatment of financial services in the future, and this may have implications for the future of IPT in the UK. This review is very much at the planning stage and an agreement will need to be reached at a ministerial level on the objectives, scope, and any limitations to be placed on the review.

However, it already seems clear that one of the key objectives will be to look at the numerous VAT exemptions that are in place for financial services companies, including insurers, and how these can be tidied up in the legislation as it’s not always apparent how they can be applied in practice.

Could UK IPT be abolished and replaced by VAT instead?

Abolishing IPT appears to be something that has not been ruled out at this preliminary stage. It is arguable that such a move could on the face of it be attractive to the government. They could say that they’re streamlining tax regimes and making things more straightforward for taxpayers.

For VAT, there is the EU Sixth Directive from 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax that provides legislative framework and has been enshrined into UK law. However, there isn’t a similar EU taxation directive for IPT, so abolishing IPT in the UK and introducing provisions for taxing premiums into existing UK VAT legislation doesn’t appear to be so problematic.

However, there are several key considerations that need to be considered as part of this process:

  • Would the 20% standard rate of VAT be applied to most taxable, non-life insurance policies instead of the current 12% standard rate of IPT?

This is partly a political and financial decision. The increases to the UK IPT standard rate from 6% to 12% made between 2015 and 2017 did not bring in as much tax revenue as hoped. This is mainly because non-admitted, non-EEA insurers continued to not always pay the tax and the insured can only be assessed for it by HMRC under specific circumstances, which in practice rarely happens.

Replacing IPT with VAT could change this, along with maybe making policyholders liable to pay the tax if the non-compliant insurer won’t meet their obligations. On the other side, increasing the current tax rate by 8% would not be popular politically, especially if they’re trying to say that taxpayers won’t have to pay any more tax.

  • Could different tax rates be applied depending upon the type of insurance?

This could happen. The government could decide to keep a reduced rate of 12% for types of compulsory insurance that are needed by policyholders, such as motor and property insurance.

With the latter, this would take the pressure off people looking to get on the property ladder that need buildings insurance for a mortgage. It would also dispel the accusation that the government is pricing the poorer parts of society out of having property contents insurance, leaving them exposed to financial risks if something happens, particularly if they live in places at risk of flooding.

They could still charge 20% on other types of insurance that either do not have social implications or are clearly only sold to businesses such as Directors’ and Officers’ Liability.

  • How to treat supplies of insurance to customers who are not VAT registered?

The situation for customers that are VAT registered would be beneficial as they could recover input VAT on their premiums, which they can’t do with IPT as it is an irrecoverable cost for them. For non-VAT registered customers, the situation doesn’t change from before and they would likely have to pay more tax, unless insurers reduce their pre-tax premiums accordingly before they add VAT.

  • Could life and other long-term insurance products such as income protection and permanent health insurance of at least five years become taxable as they’re currently exempt from IPT?

As many of these insurance products are deemed to be lifestyle choices for the insured as opposed to compulsory, taxing them is a distinct possibility. This could perhaps be done by using a reduced 12% rate to avoid discouraging people from taking out such insurance.

  • Could insurers deal with the increased administrative burden because of any changes?

This is a difficult question to answer. Insurers have traditionally relied on brokers to ensure policies are taxed correctly, so it is likely that the burden of any administrative changes would need to gain approval from not only insurers but brokers too before they could be implemented.

It is interesting to note that in the HMRC consultation on “The operation of Insurance Premium Tax” (July 2019) and the follow-up exercise on “Insurance Premium Tax: Administration and Unfair Outcomes” (November 2020) that the IPT abolition question was not specifically addressed, but this may not mean that it is off the table.

What are the next steps?

HMT and HMRC will continue to liaise with insurers representative bodies such as the Association of British Insurers (ABI) and the International Underwriting Association (IUA) on what options they should explore further and what the potential financial implications are of any changes.

They will then move on to the next steps of having a consultation and arranging regular Industry Liaison Group meetings with interested parties including the ABI and IUA to progress matters. All of this will take time, so we are only at the beginning of this process.

Take Action

To find out more about the changing regulatory landscape download IPT Compliance Guide and follow us on LinkedIn and Twitter to keep up-to-date with regulatory news and updates.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.


Russell Brown

As senior consulting manager, Russell joined Sovos in 2021. A career spent in insurance premium taxes on global insurance programmes has given him many years of experience in handling compliance and advisory challenges from location of risk and IPT liability to co-insurance and financial interest clause cover. He has worked for financial service providers EY and TMF and more recently as head of indirect taxes at Tokio Marine HCC. He has been a member of both the ABI and IUA Indirect Tax Working Groups as well as being an active participant in regular Lloyd’s Indirect Tax Forums.
Share This Post

North America ShipCompliant
March 27, 2023
Working Toward a Larger Kentucky DtC Spirits Channel – And Beyond

Kentucky just entered its third year of DtC alcohol shipping, opening doors for wineries, breweries and distilleries to expand their product reach. The change was especially welcomed by the Kentucky Distillers’ Association (KDA), which helped craft and guide the landmark DtC bill in 2020 that established these permissions. Founded in 1880, the KDA is the […]

Latin America Tax Compliance VAT & Fiscal Reporting
March 22, 2023
Argentina: New Perception VAT Regime on Sale of Food and Products for Human Consumption

Argentina has recently expanded its perception VAT (Value Added Tax) collection regime to ensure efficient tax administration. It has included selling food and other products for human consumption, beverages, personal hygiene, and cleaning items under its scope. The Argentinian Federal Administration of Public Revenue (AFIP) established this through Resolution No. 5329/2023 in early February 2023. […]

North America Tax Information Reporting
March 22, 2023
What is the Combined Federal State Filing (CF/SF) Program?

The IRS created the Combined Federal State Filing (CF/SF) program more than 20 years ago to help alleviate the administrative burdens on small businesses reporting 1099 information to states. This program integrates federal and state filings. The IRS uses information filed in federal filings and then forwards relevant information to states on a business’ behalf. […]

Italy VAT & Fiscal Reporting
March 21, 2023
Pre-filled Italian Annual VAT return – an innovative change

On 10 February 2023, the Italian Tax Authority introduced the possibility for 2.4 million professionals and companies to view and download the pre-filled Annual VAT declaration related to transactions carried out in 2022. This return must be submitted by 2 May 2023. Who does this impact? The service is available for taxpayers defined by the […]

North America Unclaimed Property
March 16, 2023
California Begins Voluntary Compliance Program Rollout

The California Voluntary Compliance Program (VCP) is now available, according to an announcement from the California State Controller. For the first time, we are hearing from the State Controller’s Office (SCO) regarding the VCP authorized by the California legislature in September 2022. The announcement on the SCO’s website provides guidance concerning the upcoming program and […]