Norway and the Trend to Taxing Low Value Goods

Andrew Decker
March 26, 2020

This blog was last updated on March 26, 2020

From 1 April 2020, Norway will require non-resident suppliers of “low value” goods to Norwegian consumers to charge VAT on such supplies. Norway is the latest in a series of countries to take this step ahead of similar changes scheduled to begin in the European Union next year.

Around the world, countries impose VAT style taxes on domestic supplies and imports of goods. Many countries, however, exempt “low value goods” from import VAT. For example, the EU currently exempts small value consignments of less than EUR 10 and provides that member states may exempt consignments up to EUR 22.  With the rise of cross-border e-commerce, these exemptions have led to a distortion of competition, as online non-resident sellers can charge less then local retailers. In a move to eliminate this distortion as well as boost tax revenue, countries are increasingly removing these exemption thresholds and requiring non-resident suppliers to collect and remit VAT on certain supplies of such low value imports. This differs from the traditional method of collecting import VAT, which typically falls on the party responsible for clearing the goods through customs.

In July 2018, Australia became one of the first countries to implement such a change, requiring foreign suppliers of goods with a custom value of AUD 1,000 to Australian consumers to collect and remit output GST on such supplies. Switzerland and New Zealand soon followed suit, implementing their own version of the new rules in January and December 2019, respectively. The EU is scheduled to eliminate its low value imports exemption and implement a special scheme for imports under EUR 150 from 1 January 2021.

Norway will require that foreign suppliers with an annual Norwegian turnover of NOK 50,000 and who make supplies of goods with a value of NOK 3,000 (per item) to Norwegian consumers register, collect and remit VAT on such supplies. Suppliers can register via the special VOEC (VAT on E-Commerce) scheme. Suppliers already registered under the VOES (VAT on Electronic Services) Scheme may use their VOES number in place of registering for a VOEC number. Additionally, when a supplier makes a sale through an electronic marketplace, the marketplace and not the supplier, must collect the VAT.

As this trend continues, businesses should consider the following questions when determining if they are liable for VAT in jurisdictions which have implemented such rules:

  • In defining “low value goods” does the jurisdiction look at the value per item, per consignment/shipment, or per invoice?
  • Is there a threshold on the amount of annual sales necessary to trigger VAT liability for non-resident suppliers? If yes, is this threshold based solely on supplies of low value goods or does it include other sales sourced to the destination country (such as supplies of electronic services) or even possibly the business’s global turnover?
  • If a sale is made through an electronic marketplace – does liability for VAT fall on the supplier or the marketplace?
  • Is there a special VAT registration, payment or reporting regime related to these supplies?
  • If a company is liable for low-value imports does this effect their VAT liabilities for other imports?

As countries continue taking steps to increase tax revenues, businesses must keep up with changing regulations to remain compliant with VAT obligations around the world.

Take Action

To find out more about what we believe the future holds, download Trends: Continuous Global VAT Compliance and follow us on LinkedIn and Twitter to keep up-to-date with regulatory news and other updates.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Andrew Decker

Andrew Decker is a Regulatory General Counsel at Sovos within the Regulatory Analysis & Design Department. Andrew focuses on international VAT and GST issues and domestic sales tax issues. Andrew received a B.A. in Economics from Bates College and J.D. at Northeastern University School of Law. Andrew is a member of the Massachusetts Bar.
Share this post

dtc spirits new york
North America ShipCompliant
February 14, 2025
A New Era for DtC Spirits Shipping: How New York’s Market is Taking Shape

This blog was last updated on February 14, 2025 In the fall of 2024, New York became the latest state to open its doors to direct-to-consumer (DtC) spirits shipping, marking a significant milestone for the industry. As one of the most populous states with a thriving market for craft and high-end spirits, the shift was […]

North America Unclaimed Property
February 10, 2025
Delaware Announces 2025 VDA Invitation Dates

This blog was last updated on February 14, 2025 Mark your calendars – April 11, 2025 and August 15, 2025 are this year’s anticipated release dates for the Delaware’s Secretary of State (SOS) VDA program invitations. In the event that an organization receives an invitation to participate in the Voluntary Disclosure Agreement (VDA) program  , […]

North America Sales & Use Tax
February 6, 2025
The Tariff and Sales Tax Mishmash – Untying the Mess

This blog was last updated on February 14, 2025 Talk of tariffs dominates the current news cycle with some commentators suggesting that tariffs will spell disaster for our economy while others say the exact opposite. We’ve seen the stock market sometimes fluctuate as tariffs are announced but later suspended, leaving us to wonder whether an […]

retailer dtc wine shipping
North America ShipCompliant
February 6, 2025
Retailer DtC Wine Shipping: The Time Has Come

This blog was last updated on February 14, 2025 By Tom Wark, Executive Director, National Association of Wine Retailers We are often reminded by the media and those in the wine industry—as well as by wine enthusiasts—that the three-tier system of alcohol distribution in most states hinders consumer access to the expansive number of wines […]

Montana 1099-DA
North America Tax Information Reporting
February 5, 2025
State Filing Alert: Montana’s New 1099-DA Requirements for Crypto Brokers

This blog was last updated on February 5, 2025 Reporting digital asset transactions on Form 1099-DA just got a little more complicated. For 2025 transactions, crypto brokers that file Form 1099-DA with the IRS will be required to file the 1099-DA with the State of Montana. This makes Montana the first state to introduce a […]