Climate-related events are an issue that impacts all industries, and the insurance industry is certainly no exception.
Beyond the challenges that insurers face in assessing the likelihood of weather-related events and natural disasters, there are also difficulties affecting Insurance Premium Tax (IPT) as countries look at ways to ensure they can fund responses to the consequences of these events. Some of these are not direct IPT measures but inevitably impact IPT, whereas others are direct IPT-related measures.
Natural catastrophe coverage is often an optional add-on to property insurance. In some countries, however, that is not the case – such coverage is mandatory. France and Spain are examples of this, with regimes in place involving the Caisse Centrale de Réassurance (CCR) and Consorcio de Compensación de Seguros (CCS), respectively.
Against a background of increasing costs due to natural disasters, recent months have seen other European countries follow suit with similar laws or proposals. Italy, for example, passed a law in late 2023 which requires companies to take out insurance policies by the end of 2024 to cover natural disasters occurring in the country. The government has authorised an Italian insurer to provide reinsurance of such risks like CCR in France, up to certain limits.
Germany and Slovenia have also seen resolutions or proposals for similar laws. In Germany, the Federal Council has called on the government to introduce mandatory natural catastrophe insurance. This is in light of the insurance protection gap relating to such coverage of properties. It remains to be seen whether the government will act based on this.
The increasing costs of weather-related events have triggered Slovenia’s national programme for protecting against natural disasters in the coming years, and a discussion of mandatory state insurance was recommended.
Additional premium amounts paid for natural catastrophe insurance can be expected to attract IPT and any applicable parafiscal charges due in these countries.
Weather-related events have also been cited as a reason for various premium taxation changes. In France, the additional premium rates due on risks which trigger natural catastrophe coverage (property and fire, as well as certain motor coverage) are increasing. Most notably, for property and fire risks, the premium rate is increasing from 12% to 20%. As IPT is due on this additional premium, this will significantly increase the IPT due on these policies.
Climate-related issues have had a major impact on levies used to fund emergency services due on property insurance in some states in Australia, specifically New South Wales and Tasmania. There is increasing pressure to reform the levies (with mixed success) due to the spiraling costs of responding to natural disasters. The levies result in huge increases to premium values, so the Insurance Council of Australia, amongst others, has urged the states to find a more sustainable way to fund emergency services.
Sovos actively monitors changes that impact IPT and is best positioned to advise if you have any IPT queries. Contact our experts today for more information.
The taxation of insurance premiums in Hungary is unique, both in terms of the technique used to calculate the tax and how it is governed.
Regarding calculating Insurance Premium Tax (IPT), Hungary is the only country in the EU where the regime uses the so-called sliding scale rate model. It applies to both IPT and the extra profit tax on insurance premium amounts (EPTIPT), also known as the supplemental insurance tax.
The insurance premium tax law (Act of 102/2012) includes the rules of IPT. However, this law can be amended by a government decree. Government Decree of 197/2022 regulates the EPTIPT. The Hungarian Tax Office has issued guidance about the rules of insurance premium taxation, and both IPT and EPTIPT are declared on the same return template.
In Hungary, insurance premium tax (IPT) and extra profit tax (EPTIPT) are levied on the premium amounts collected by the insurance companies.
In Hungary, it is almost impossible to determine the rate and amount of the insurance premium tax for a single policy, because IPT and EPTIPT are levied on the aggregated amount of the collected insurance premium.
The sliding scale regime considers:
For IPT, the threshold is HUF 20 billion since April 2024. It was HUF 8 billion prior to that. EPTIPT has no such taxable premium threshold.
For IPT, the scale is:
For IPT, the only exception from the sliding scale regime is the Class 10 motor third party liability insurance (MTPL) premium. IPT on MTPL premium is calculated differently, hence MTPL premium amount is not part of the aggregated taxable premium. The tax rate for MTPL premium is 23%.
EPTIPT’s scale differs from those of the IPT. Although the EPTIPT computation for non-life and life policies differs, the same scales apply. The EPTIPT scale is:
The rates, as of 2024, are:
The taxable basis is the insurance premium. The insurance premium is defined by the IPT Law (point 1 article 7 of Act 102/2012) as:
“The gross premium accounted for by the insurer based on accounting regulations for insurance services, including values not accounted for as gross premiums but considered as the countervalue for insurance services as coverage for insurance services, excluding premium income received from reinsurance taken from another insurance company, which is accounted for as gross income.”
MTPL premium amounts should not be considered for IPT’s sliding scale. However, the premium collected for MTPL is included in the EPTIPT non-life aggregated premium amount.
Life policies are exempt from IPT, but EPTIPT is payable on premium amounts collected by insurance companies from life policies.
Sickness insurance is exempt from both IPT and EPTIPT.
Another notable exemption is the premium amount collected on certain agricultural policies.
Currently, the biggest challenge in Hungarian Premium Taxation is the legal environment. The Constitution and the law on special measurements in case of catastrophic environments allow the government to amend tax rules – including IPT – via governmental decrees, instead of actually changing the relevant tax law.
For example, in 2022, a governmental decree introduced a new tax: the extra profit tax on insurance premium amounts (known as supplemental IPT or EPTIPT). In 2024, the government published another decree to change the applicable brackets of the sliding scale for the IPT regime.
The Act on Insurance Premium Tax No 102/2023 was not changed in either of these cases.
Hungarian IPT regulation is regularly changing. To keep yourself in the know, subscribe to Sovos’ tax alerts.
Here’s a brief timeline of changes to IPT in Hungary:
February 2024: Change for filing and payment of EPTIPT
March 2024: Hungary changes IsPT rates
These resources can help you navigate the intricacies of Insurance Premium Tax:
Sovos’ IPT Determination solution enables you to confidently calculate and apply IPT rates at quotation. Real-time tax updates ensure tax rates and tax applicability are always accurate.
Want to ease the burden on your tax teams? Sovos’ IPT Managed Services provides support from our team of local language regulatory specialists who monitor and interpret IPT regulations around the world, including in Hungary, so you don’t have to.
As the global e-invoicing landscape continues to shift and develop, our quarterly VAT Snapshot webinar brings you all the details on the key regulatory changes to watch.
Join Dilara Inal and Marta Sowinska from our Regulatory Analysis and Design team for a 30-minute update on the latest developments in e-invoicing regulations across Europe and beyond.
This session will cover:
Ever-changing Insurance Premium Tax (IPT) rules and regulations can be challenging to keep up with, so staying on top of the latest developments in IPT compliance is key.
Join our insightful webinar where Sovos’ IPT experts Edit Buliczka, James Brown and Jake Thorne will deep dive into the intricacies of remaining compliant in Hungary and discussing the current and the potential future impacts of the climate change to the IPT regulations across Europe and beyond.
Remaining current with the latest regulatory revisions in VAT reporting and SAF-T requirements in Poland. This webinar will deliver a comprehensive overview of recent changes to ensure you thoroughly understand the evolving compliance landscape. Gain valuable insights into essential strategies and best practices for preparing for VAT audits, mitigating risks and avoiding penalties.
The EU Directive for VAT has laid the groundwork for a harmonised VAT system throughout the different Member States. However, the implementation of the EU VAT law within the national jurisdictions still creates a disparity between its application and conditions to be met, specifically regarding some of the intra-EU simplifications to be applicable.
Following a webinar covering regulatory updates alongside key points of the VAT recovery process, this blog aims to shed light on the crucial aspects of VAT recovery – especially fast-approaching deadlines.
Understanding the nuances of VAT recovery applications is essential for businesses seeking to optimise operational costs by recovering VAT incurred in a different country. Let’s explore the fundamental aspects of the VAT recovery process.
Businesses can reclaim VAT incurred during their operations through VAT returns if registered in the country where costs are incurred. However, for those not registered and with no obligation to do as such, alternative routes such as the EU Refund Claim or 13th Directive procedure are available – provided specific criteria are met.
Before initiating a VAT refund claim, companies must carefully evaluate their taxable activities. Failure to identify taxable activity in the relevant country may result in the rejection of the VAT recovery application. In such cases, registering for VAT becomes imperative to facilitate input VAT recovery through VAT returns, subject to each country’s rules regarding retrospective VAT registration.
The range of recoverable expenses varies across countries, encompassing equipment, tooling, event costs, professional fees, accommodation and so on. However, due to varying regulations, conducting a comprehensive recoverability assessment based on each country’s VAT legislation is crucial before applying.
Adhering to deadlines is critical for successful VAT recovery.
EU businesses seeking VAT refunds from other Member States must submit an EU Refund Directive application by 30 September of the subsequent calendar year. Non-EU businesses aiming to reclaim VAT incurred in EU Member States should file a 13th Directive application by 30 June of the following year.
While some countries share a common deadline of 30 September, missing deadlines may restrict refund requests. Notably, even though in most cases, these deadlines cannot be extended, there are countries like the Netherlands where refund requests can be submitted to tax authorities up to five years back rather than just for the previous fiscal year.
Reciprocity agreements are pivotal in VAT refund claims, with most EU Member States mandating reciprocity. Understanding these laws is essential to avoid failed attempts at reclaiming VAT in non-reciprocal jurisdictions.
Recent updates include the UK-Italy agreement under the 13th VAT Directive, streamlining VAT refund claims for UK businesses. Notably, the deadline for a 13th directive application in Italy is September 30th, 2024, for all costs incurred during 2023 (i.e., purchase invoices dated in 2023). This represents a significant advancement toward streamlined cross-border VAT recovery processes for UK businesses. Additionally, it may be advantageous for businesses to revisit already submitted 13th Directive claims in Italy that were previously on hold due to the lack of reciprocity.
In conclusion, mastering the intricacies of VAT recovery empowers businesses to enhance financial efficiency and mitigate costs effectively. By navigating the essentials outlined above, businesses can embark on a journey toward unlocking their full VAT recovery potential.
Want to learn more about the VAT recovery process? Our expert team can help.
In Austria, the insurance premium tax law regulates the indirect tax that applies to elements of coverage under a motor insurance policy. This blog details everything you need to know about this particular indirect tax in the country.
As with our dedicated overviews of the taxation of motor insurance policies in Spain and Norway, this blog will focus on the specifics in Austria. We also have a blog covering the taxation of motor insurance policies across Europe.
In Austria, Vehicle Insurance Tax (VIT), or the so-called motor-related insurance tax, is payable in relation to:
VIT is payable in addition to the 11% insurance premium tax (IPT).
The calculation of VIT is complex. The tax is determined by the type of vehicle, the engine capacity/displacement and CO2 emissions for motorbikes, the performance of the combustion engine and the emission in grams per kilometer for passenger automobiles and the power of the combustion engine for all other engine types.
The date of registration is another item to consider when calculating the amount of VIT. The computation for automobiles registered before 1 October 2020 is different, however.
The following rates are effective for passenger cars registered after 1 October 2020 are as follows:
In 2020, the first component, power, was lowered by 65 Kwatt, while the second component, emission, was reduced by 115 grams per kilometre. Since 2021, the deduction has been lowered annually. Every year, the first component is reduced by one and the second by three. As a result, in 2024, the deductions are 61 Kwatt and 103 grams per kilometre.
To complicate this further, the aforementioned calculation only applies to M1 passenger cars whose CO2 emissions were established using the WLTP (Worldwide Harmonised Light Vehicle) test method. If this process is not followed, the calculation will be different.
Special rates apply to motorhomes, motorcyclists and other multi-track motor vehicles.
The computed amount is due monthly. Prior to 2020, the regularity of the payment was another aspect to consider in the computation.
First and foremost, VIT is required on motor vehicles weighing up to 3.5 tonnes. If the vehicle’s weight exceeds this limit, another type of tax – motor vehicle tax – is due.
The exemptions in Austria follow the usual considerations mentioned in our blog on taxation of motor insurance policies across Europe. Exemptions are dependent on:
Read our IPT Guide to learn more about Insurance Premium Tax compliance.
If you still have questions about the taxation of motor insurance policies or IPT in Austria, speak to our experts.
Unlock the secrets to fruitful global trade in our latest webinar; our consulting expert Luca Clivati will provide valuable insights and guidance to help businesses maximise operational and financial efficiency when trading globally.
Keeping up with e-invoicing requirements has never been a bigger task, especially if you operate internationally. Join us as we share the latest information necessary to successfully navigate the latest updates to the global e-invoicing landscape. This webinar will cover:
• Expansion of Romania’s e-transport mandate since December 2023
• Development of Spain’s SIF/Verifactu requirement
• Postponements in Portugal
• The legislative process for B2B Public Administration mandatory e-invoicing in Germany and Belgium
• Important dates to be aware of in Poland
• Recent changes to Malaysia’s e-invoicing mandate
• Date changes and key features in Israel
Sovos, the always-on compliance company, today announced a joint business relationship with the Belgian PwC Firm PwC Business Advisory Services bv/srl (hereinafter: “PwC”), leveraging the companies’ complementary tax and advisory service expertise and solutions to address vital e-invoicing and e-reporting needs.
Through this joint business relationship, Sovos and PwC clients can access comprehensive services to adeptly tackle the ever-evolving regulatory challenges linked to e-invoicing and e-reporting, as additional countries look to join the more than 80 countries worldwide with existing e-invoice requirements.
Through implementation of the Sovos Compliance Cloud, organisations will be able to identify and document client e-invoicing regulatory requirements across various markets, evaluate existing processes and technology, and align business objectives. Introduced in February, the Sovos Compliance Cloud is the industry’s premier unified, cloud-based tax compliance and regulatory software platform that provides a holistic system of record for global compliance.
“As companies navigate an increasingly interconnected and dynamic marketplace, the need for a more integrated e-invoice process has never been more crucial,” said Ellen Cortvriend, partner, of PwC in Belgium. “The Sovos joint business relationship allows us to deliver excellence in an e-invoicing-led global tax compliance project today, with the ability to streamline the e-invoice process even more over time.”
“With many clients of PwC in Belgium facing imminent e-invoicing mandates, the Sovos Compliance Cloud platform ensures a quick and successful integration,” said Alice Katwan, president of revenue, Sovos. “Rapid and complex compliance changes create both tax and IT challenges, from needing immediate tax determination at the point the invoice is raised, to the integration of validated e-invoices with periodic and SAF-T reporting. By reducing the operational burden and providing a singular data view into their compliance posture, Sovos and PwC allow companies to unlock tremendous business value.”
For business leaders seeking to understand more about the events driving regulatory changes and strategies to stay ahead of the compliance risk curve, PwC and Sovos compliance experts will host a complementary webinar, Have We Hit a Tipping Point for Global Indirect Tax?, on 11 April 2024 at 2 p.m. GMT. Registration is now open.
About Sovos
Sovos is a global provider of tax, compliance and trust solutions and services that enable businesses to navigate an increasingly regulated world with true confidence. Purpose-built for always-on compliance capabilities, our scalable IT-driven solutions meet the demands of an evolving and complex global regulatory landscape. Sovos’ cloud-based software platform provides an unparalleled level of integration with business applications and government compliance processes.
More than 100,000 customers in 100+ countries – including half the Fortune 500 – trust Sovos for their compliance needs. Sovos annually processes more than 11 billion transactions across 19,000 global tax jurisdictions. Bolstered by a robust partner program more than 400 strong, Sovos brings to bear an unrivaled global network for companies across industries and geographies. Founded in 1979, Sovos has operations across the Americas and Europe, and is owned by Hg and TA Associates. For more information visit https://sovos.com and follow us on LinkedIn and Twitter.
About PwC
At PwC, our purpose is to build trust in society and solve important problems. We’re a network of firms in 151 countries with more than 364,000 people who are committed to delivering quality in assurance, advisory and tax services. Find out more and tell us what matters to you by visiting us at www.pwc.com.
PwC refers to the PwC network and/or one or more of its member firms, each of which is a separate legal entity. Please see www.pwc.com/structure for further details.
© 2024 PwC. All rights reserved.
Stay updated on VAT Reporting and SAF-T with Sovos’ webinar. Explore legislative changes, prepare for VAT Recovery deadlines, and gain insights into SAF-T updates for Portugal, Bulgaria and Poland. Understand recovery claims essentials, crucial with the nearing 13th Directive deadline.
Norway has an indirect tax that applies to elements of coverage under a motor insurance policy. This blog details everything you need to know about it.
As with our dedicated Spain IPT overview, this blog will focus on the specifics in Norway. We also have a blog covering the taxation of motor insurance policies across Europe.
In 2018, Norway replaced the collection of traffic insurance tax with a new fee known as the Traffic Insurance Fee (TRIF). This fee is collected by the insurance companies on behalf of the Norwegian State, together with the premium for third-party motor liability insurance coverage.
The annual insurance tax needed significant administration. As such, implementing a new tax scheme on mandatory automobile third-party liability insurance policies aimed to streamline and speed up tax and excise administration. With the new approach, insurance companies must invoice TRIF together with the premium amount sent to registered vehicle owners. The fee is clearly stated on the invoice in a distinct line aptly named “Traffic Insurance Fee”.
In Norway, the TRIF is charged for all registered cars that weigh under 7,500 kg. The Norwegian Tax Office collects the so-called weight-year tax on heavier vehicles, in which the TRIF is not due.
Norway charges the fee for insurance contracts on compulsory third-party liability insurance regarding motor vehicles registered domestically. The fee also applies to the sum received by the Norwegian Motor Insurers’ Bureau for uninsured motor vehicles or when the new owner has not taken out insurance for the motor vehicle.
There is no insurance premium tax on insurance policies covering Class 3 policies.
As stated above, insurance companies collect TRIF at the same time as the premium, so the fee is distributed in accordance with the frequency of premium payment. This can be monthly, quarterly, semi-annually or annually.
TRIF is a daily fee based on the type and usage of the vehicle. Vehicles are classified into five classes, from a) to f).
The new rates take effect on 1 March each year. This means that if the policy is issued or renewed on or after this date, the new rates will apply. The rates for 2024 range from NOK 0.37 (approx. EUR 0.032) for group e) to NOK 9.11 (approx. EUR 0.80) for group b).
Exemptions from TRIF occur based on the car’s usage or the owner. For example, motor vehicles registered at the Nordic Investment Bank that are used for official bank operations are exempt from TRIF. Vehicles registered at NATO or NATO headquarters, forces or personnel, as defined by international agreements, are also excluded. The exemption also applies to stolen cars.
The Ministry has the authority to issue regulations for implementation, delimitation and exemption criteria.
It is also worth mentioning that if liability insurance is not compulsory to take out, for example, in the case of the Norwegian state, municipalities or local institutions, the person responsible for the motor vehicle will be considered “self-insured”. In these circumstances, TRIF is not due.
Read our IPT Guide to learn more about Insurance Premium Tax compliance.
Have questions about the taxation of motor insurance policies or IPT in Norway? Speak to our experts.