Join Steve Sprague, Chief Product & Strategy Officer at Sovos, for an insightful discussion on how SAP customers can navigate the shift toward SAP’s Clean Core and ensure their tax compliance processes are future-ready. As governments worldwide accelerate the move toward digital tax reporting and real-time compliance mandates, businesses face new challenges in staying compliant while managing complex ERP systems.

In Italy, the insurance premium tax (IPT) code (which is being revised as of the date of this blog’s publication) and various other laws and regulations include provisions for taxes/contributions on motor hull and motor liability insurance policies.

This article covers all you need to know about this specific indirect tax in the country.

As with our dedicated overviews of the taxation of motor insurance policies in Spain, Norway and Austria, this blog will focus on the specifics in Italy. We also have a blog covering the taxation of motor insurance policies across Europe.

Which taxes are payable concerning motor insurance policies in Italy?

In Italy, there are four types of charges payable on motor insurance policies:

How are the taxes calculated for motor insurance policies in Italy?

Whilst motor insurance policies can include various coverages as add-ons, this blog’s main focus is on motor hull and motor liability.

  1. Motor Hull (Class 3)

Calculating taxes on land vehicles, i.e., motor hulls (Class 3), is simple. There is only IPT at 12.5% and CONSAP at 1%.

The taxable premium is the basis of these taxes. Both taxes are declared in the annual IPT return and payable monthly.

  1. Motor Liability (Class 10)

The taxation of insurance policies against civil liability arising from the circulation of motor vehicles is more complex.

The IPT rate (so called Responsabilità Civile Auto or RCA tax) is determined on a provincial level. Legislative Decree 6 May 2011, No. 68 quotes that the rate of the RCA tax is equal to 12.5%. However, this can be increased or decreased by the province or metropolitan city by a maximum of 3.5%. That is why RCA tax rates are sometimes referred to as a tax with a rate ranging from 9-16%.

In Italy, there are 20 regions, each with one or more autonomous provinces or cities. To complicate matters further, the province or city can modify the tax rates within the tax year.

CONSAP does not apply on motor liability policies, however EMER is at a rate of 10.5% with an additional 2.5% required for RAVF.

RCA and EMER are declared in the annual IPT return, and payments are due monthly.

Although RAVF is also declared annually, the declaration process differs, and there is also a prepayment obligation. The actual amount of RAVF depends on the management fee set annually by the Italian insurance supervisory body (IVASS) – the percentage of which is published during November for the next year.

As previously stated, IPT/RCA regulations are undergoing major renewal (during 2024). The legislation governing the tax provisions on private insurance and life annuities (Law 29 October 1961, No. 1216) is part of the Italian Government`s tax reform initiatives.

According to the available draft legislation, the IPT law will be divided into three parts:

The government extended the deadline for enactment of the new regulation to the end of 2025.

What vehicles are exempt from tax in Italy?

There are not many exemptions available for IPT/RCA tax, nor for CONSAP, EMER and RAVF. However, cars registered in Italy to NATO Allied Force benefit from an exemption from IPT/RCA.

If you still have questions about the taxation of motor insurance policies or IPT in Italy, speak to our experts.

Every quarter, our VAT Snapshot webinar brings you the latest global e-invoicing updates to help your business meet the ever-changing demands of new and evolving mandates. In this session we’ll share updates for Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Slovenia, Greece, Malaysia and Saudi Arabia.

In the first blog in our series, we introduced SAP Clean Core concept and how much is being made about its impact on business, specifically the ability to customize an ERP to meet operational needs.

For part two, I’d like to address how businesses can use the SAP Clean Core principles to create a system that better supports their business objectives and positively impacts their tax and compliance management.

Why Clean Core is Becoming a Business Priority

In an article in Forbes last year entitled, SAP: Why Modern Software Needs A ‘Clean Core,’ the author makes the argument, correctly so in my opinion, that the old way of adding functionality by customizing the core has often become overly complex, cumbersome and costly. He explains how a new model was developed that decouples two components: one focused on predictability and the other on exploration. This evolution model is known as ‘bimodal IT.’

Now, bimodal IT is not a new term. According to TechTarget it was coined by Gartner back in 2014 and was the subject of a Gartner report in April of 2015 entitled, “How to Achieve Enterprise Agility with a Bimodal Capability,” by analysts Simon Mingay and Mary Mesaglio.

So, why the history lesson on the subject matter? I think it’s important to establish the fact that over-customization of technology platforms is not a new concern. It has been around for a while, but what has changed is the environment surrounding it.

Today, digital economies are moving at a pace where traditional methods and countermeasures are no longer effective. Today’s environments demand more structure, standardization and flexibility so that they can react fast when called upon.

Why Agility is Essential

Over the last decade, we have seen an explosion across core areas of the technology sector that makes agility critical. Whether it is preparing for cyberattacks, or the ability to quickly analyze data to take advantage of business opportunities, agility is an essential tool in your arsenal and old methods simply aren’t cutting it.

Today’s digital economies are demanding the rapid adoption of new technologies. A crucial step in keeping up with these changes is to adopt agile business-critical connected technologies that aligns with the principles of SAP Clean Core.

Adopting a global compliance solution that aligns with Clean Core principles will become critical to ensure you can keep up with the pace of digitization as it continues to evolve.

Clean Core’s Impact on Tax and Compliance

There is perhaps no other business segment that has felt the impact of technology on a global scale more than the area of tax and compliance. Heavy investment by government tax authorities over the past decade has completely changed the process of collecting and remitting tax obligations.

In an effort to close or eliminate tax gaps, gone or soon to be gone are the days of collecting and analyzing tax data and remitting after the fact. Today, it’s all about real-time analysis across the complete spectrum of the transaction. This requires the use of automated tax platforms that can quickly adapt to changing regulatory environments, ensuring compliance across every transaction.

Through applying the principals of Clean Core businesses can now attach dedicated and highly functional compliance platforms into their technology stacks without the need to customize their core SAP environment. This eliminates the need for long testing cycles, customization and many of the manual process updates that would otherwise be required.

Coming Next

Stay tuned for the next part in this series, where we will dive deeper into how Clean Core impacts specific tax processes. Upcoming segments will cover:

Part III: Your business’ path to Clean Core

Part IV: Clean Core benefits and business performance

Part V: Eliminating Tax’ dependency on IT


erp-ebook-download

Compliance Network: E-Invoicing, E-Receipts and E-Archiving

Transact worldwide with confidence.

See Sovos in action

Global Compliance for Continuous Transaction Controls

Sovos Compliance Network is complete, continuous and connected. We process over 6 billion compliant invoices per year through our Compliance Network, more than 60 times other industry providers.

A core component of our Indirect Tax Suite, Sovos Compliance Network helps you:

  • Effortlessly map indirect tax compliance requirements with suppliers, buyers and consumers
  • Ensure your transactional documents adhere to the latest local regulations
  • Connect seamlessly with the right government agencies and certified platforms
  • Distribute invoices to trading partners where required

Build the Sovos Compliance Network into every transaction

The solution provides: 

B2B & B2G Transaction
Compliance

The world’s first complete solution for e-invoicing compliance, including clearance, CTC and global post-audit models. 

Learn More  

B2C Transaction
Compliance

A global solution for high-volume, clearance model e-invoicing mandates for businesses selling directly to consumers. 

Learn More 

E-Archiving

Prove integrity and authenticity with universal, compliant archiving, including compliance maps, preservation sets, timestamps and signing and validation services.  

Learn More

“Compliance is now inside the transaction, elevating its importance and driving businesses to look beyond just meeting a minimum threshold. Now, the goal is a global view of compliance with a single source of data that allows them to generate actionable business intelligence”

Kevin Permenter, Research Director
IDC

Sovos Compliance Network

Global Coverage

Post Audit and CTC e-invoicing in 65+ countries.

Future-Proof

Comply today and enjoy the peace of mind that scalable solutions are built-in for tomorrow.

Always-on

Ensure invoices continue to flow so your business and its supply chains run smoothly.

Automated

Save time, eliminate labor-intensive manual updates and enhance accuracy.

Sustainable

Minimize the need for ad hoc IT involvement and investment in compliance updates.

Cost Efficient

Mitigate penalties and reduce your total cost of compliance by centralizing CTC compliance in one place.

Embedded in the Business Process Platforms You Use Today

Looking for more information on Compliance Network?

40% of CFOs around the world say that they do not trust the accuracy of their financial data, with their biggest issue being able to access and analyze financial data in real time.

SAP S/4HANA migration projects create an opportunity for businesses to mitigate this risk and drive transformative results.

Join us for an insightful webinar featuring Marco van der Veer, Senior Tax Technology Manager at Sovos, as he explores the critical intersection of ERP transformation and tax compliance. This session will provide you with:

Much is being made about the introduction of SAP’s ‘Clean Core’ concept and how it will impact a business’ ability to customize its ERP to meet the unique needs of its operation. In this first blog in a series taking on the issue of Clean Core, I’d like to focus on the realities of what it is, why it’s important and the reasoning behind it.

What is SAP Clean Core?

SAP defines ‘Clean Core’ as a method of integrating and extending systems in a way that is cloud-compliant, while ensuring governance over master data and business process. In simpler terms, the move to SAP Clean Core helps protect the integrity of the SAP platform by limiting the extent of customization. And for good reason.

As a software vendor, you can’t lose control of your own code because you’re allowing so much customization and additional code to be added by your customers and or their consultants. These customizations are often intended for very specific use cases that may impact only a small number of customers. A ‘Clean Core’ architecture protects the SAP platform and its customers by limiting these excessive customizations.

The Problem with Over-Customization

When a platform becomes overly customized, SAP, the platform owner, must deploy a tremendous amount of development and support resources to ensure that they are accounting for all the changes and capturing feedback from the field.

This generally requires the platform owner to be in a perpetual state of developing hot fix code patches to repair ‘breaks’ in the system brought on by over customization. While customers would only be required to implement the code patches there were relevant to them, SAP was still on the hook for developing thousands of these patches. The cost and resources of doing so were growing exponentially, and needed to be reined in.

Benefits of Clean Core for SAP Customers

As anyone who has worked in or with IT for any period of time can attest to, the most complicated environments are ones where there is a great deal of customization. Early on in Information Technology, it was the Wild West, where based on the knowledge and experience of your architect, is how your businesses network would be constructed.

Then, thankfully, platforms and standards entered the discussion and businesses were able to construct environments that enabled them to operationalize new capabilities quickly, while simultaneously lowering costs and driving down dependencies within IT departments. The position SAP is taking here, and one that I agree with, is that clean core will be the next stage in making your environment more productive and efficient.

Implications of SAP Clean Core on Taxes

One of the most significant implications of Clean Core is in tax compliance. Clean Core opens up new possibilities for businesses to employ personalized tax technology outside of their traditional SAP environments. Rather than trying to build complex coding to tackle increasingly complex tax rules within their ERPs, they can integrate dedicated tax engines that are automated and seamlessly update to changing regulatory environments.

SAP Clean Core offers businesses the opportunity to simplify their IT environments, reduce customization, and improve system stability. The implications of Clean Core on taxes are especially promising, as businesses can now leverage specialized tax technology that integrates smoothly with their SAP systems, ensuring compliance without added complexity.

Coming Next

Stay tuned for the next part in this series, where we will dive deeper into how Clean Core impacts specific tax processes. Upcoming segments will cover: 

Part II: The Need for a Clean Core 

Part III: Your business’ path to Clean Core 

Part IV: Clean Core benefits and business performance 

Part V: Eliminating Tax’ dependency on IT

Tax authorities across Eastern Europe continue to move ahead with SAF-T adoption, with upcoming changes impacting VAT compliance requirements for businesses operating in the region.

In this exclusive webinar, you’ll get in-depth insights on:

– Romania’s SAF-T expansion: The tax authorities will expand the scope of businesses impacted by this requirement to non-established companies from January 2025
– Bulgaria’s SAF-T Introduction (2025): Learn about Bulgaria’s planned adoption of the SAF-T framework and what it means for businesses operating in the region
– Poland’s Extended SAF-T Reporting: Discover how Poland is expanding its SAF-T filing requirements and how this may affect VAT compliance and audits

Join our expert, Clementine Mayor, VAT Consultant as she unpacks the latest developments in VAT reporting across Eastern Europe. Don’t miss this opportunity to understand how these changes will shape the future of VAT audits and prepare your business for compliance.

Italy: IPT Treatment on Used Vehicle Warranty Services

On 21 May 2024, the Italian tax authority published a ruling (No. 110/2024) on the IPT treatment of warranty services provided in relation to the sale of used vehicles.

The ruling dealt with a scenario in which a company (the ‘Applicant’) provided warranty services to dealers within the same company group, with the latter offering these warranties to the purchasers of the vehicles. The Applicant also separately entered into insurance contracts with an insurance company to obtain coverage for the costs it incurred in repairing the vehicles sold when required under the terms of the warranty.

The insurance contract concluded between the Applicant and the insurance company would only be subject to IPT in Italy if the policyholder’s relevant establishment was located in Italy, in line with the location of risk rules.

More significantly, however, the ruling also addressed the warranty services provided by the Applicant to the dealers. For these, the ruling assessed that guarantees such as these do not satisfy the requirements of an insurance contract with an insurance company as the contracting party. The VAT treatment of this arrangement was outside the scope of the ruling, but it was conclusive in outlining that IPT does not apply to such an arrangement.

Comparing this ruling to the position in Germany highlights the possibility of a lack of harmonisation in this area without an EU-wide position.

Read our blog on general matters of IPT in Italy for additional information.

 

Germany: The Application of IPT rather than VAT to Guarantee Commitments

Following the publication of various circulars by the Federal Ministry of Finance in Germany in 2021, rules on the taxation of guarantee commitments were made effective 1 January 2023. This blog explains how this affects insurers and other suppliers.

Scope of the rules for guarantee commitments

The Ministry of Finance published its initial circular in May 2021. This was in response to a Federal Fiscal Court judgment. It concerned a seller of motor vehicles providing a guarantee to buyers beyond the vehicle’s warranty.

In these circumstances, the circular confirmed that the guarantee is not an ancillary service to vehicle delivery but is deemed to be an insurance benefit. As such, it would attract IPT instead of VAT – unless the guarantee is considered a full maintenance contract.

The circular did not prompt immediate concern within the insurance sector. Markets outside the motor vehicle industry weren’t concerned either. The presumption was that it was limited to the specific context of the motor vehicle industry.

Matters changed the following month. The Ministry of Finance clarified that the tax principles it outlined in fact applied to all industries. As a result, the scope of these rules became potentially limitless in Germany. All guarantees provided as additional products to goods or services sold are now within the scope of the application of IPT.

The clarification could impact industries like those organisations selling electrical items and household appliances.

Effect on insurers and other suppliers

The effect on traditional insurance companies should be relatively limited as they do not usually provide guarantees as part of the sales of goods and services. There could arguably be a significant impact on other suppliers that do provide such guarantees.

First and foremost, there is a potential increase in the cost of providing the guarantees caused by the application of IPT. Unlike input VAT, a supplier cannot deduct IPT from its taxable income – it must either increase prices to compensate or accept a less favourable profit margin.

Any companies that purchase the guarantees cannot reclaim the IPT either, as they can do with VAT. The standard IPT rate of 19% in Germany is high compared to most European countries. This exacerbates these issues.

There are also practical considerations to bear in mind for suppliers obliged to settle IPT with the tax authority. They are presumably required to be registered for IPT purposes like insurers, although the Ministry of Finance has not formally confirmed this.

Perhaps more difficult is the issue of licensing. The Ministry of Finance circulars focus on taxation, leaving it unclear whether other suppliers are now required to obtain a license to write insurance under German regulatory law.

Looking for more information on general IPT matters in Germany? Our German IPT page can help.

Determining and calculating IPT liabilities in various regions can be challenging.

Sovos IPT Determination is a compliance software designed to streamline Insurance Premium Tax (IPT) calculations and ensure accurate tax reporting.

In this webinar, Ramesh Sudhan, Sovos’ Director of Product and Research & Development, will guide you step-by-step through several typical processes supported by the solution.

Cross-border trade requires navigating complex regulations, customs requirements, and tax laws – with compliance being essential to avoid costly penalties.

Recent mandates in Romania highlight these challenges, emphasising the need for up-to-date knowledge. Businesses trading across the EU must understand country-specific mandates, like VAT obligations and e-invoicing, especially for companies which are VAT-registered in multiple countries.

The Government of the Republic of Slovenia has released a draft proposal to implement mandatory e-invoicing and e-reporting for B2B and B2C transactions. This implementation would mark a significant shift in the country’s e-invoicing landscape.

Should the proposal be approved, taxpayers will be subject to a two-fold obligation: they must issue and exchange B2B invoices electronically and report B2B and B2C transactional data to the tax authority. Although clearance will not be required in the e-invoice issuance process, transactional data must be reported to the tax authority in near real-time, which shows that Slovenia is aligning with the global trend of governments implementing Continuous Transaction Controls (CTC).

Taxpayers under scope are all business entities registered in Slovenia’s Business Register (PRS), including companies, self-employed entities and associations. To register in the PRS, business entities must have a registered office or address in the territory of the Republic of Slovenia.

This new system also introduces a decentralised reporting and exchange model facilitated by registered service providers, called e-route providers. These are similar to the network exchange requirements in France and those planned for Spain.

The proposed mandatory e-invoicing and CTC e-reporting will be introduced from 1 June 2026.

E-invoicing requirements

The e-invoicing mandate would require taxpayers to issue, send and receive e-invoices and other e-documents for B2B domestic transactions.

Under the Slovenian proposal, e-invoices refer to an invoice or similar accounting document that records business transactions, regardless of what they are called. This includes credit notes, debit notes, advance invoices, payment requests, etc.

There are multiple supported formats for the exchange of e-invoices:

  1. e-SLOG standard, developed by the Chamber of Commerce of Slovenia, which is compatible with EN16931 and already in use in the B2G sector
  2. European standard EN 16931 for e-invoices, as per Directive 2014/55/EU
  3. Other internationally recognised standards agreed mutually by the parties

The proposal allows three methods for e-invoice issuance and exchange:

  1. E-route providers, which are registered service providers facilitating the issuance and exchange of e-invoices and e-documents.
  2. Direct exchange between the issuer and recipient’s information systems (excluding e-mail transmission)
  3. The authority’s free application for taxpayers with a smaller business volume

In cases where the issuer and recipient use e-invoice different standards, if using e-route providers, the recipient’s provider must convert the e-invoice to the syntax accepted by the recipient.

Regarding B2C transactions, consumers will have the option to receive either e-invoices or paper invoices. This must be agreed upon by the parties. If an e-invoice is issued, suppliers will be obliged to provide a visualised content version (e.g., PDF).

CTC e-reporting requirements

The proposal states that taxpayers must electronically report B2B and B2C transactional data, including cross-border transactions, to the Financial Administration of the Republic of Slovenia (FURS) within eight days of invoice issuance or receipt. Reporting must be done exclusively in the e-SLOG standard.

The reporting requirement extends to B2C and cross-border transactions, regardless of whether an invoice was issued electronically. This ensures that transactions such as these, for which e-invoicing is not mandatory, are reported to the FURS allowing it a comprehensive collection of taxpayers’ transactional data.

The selected method for e-invoice exchange will impact the e-reporting of transactional data. If the parties use e-route providers, both the issuer’s and recipient’s providers must send the e-invoice to FURS. For direct exchanges, both parties must separately report their transactions to FURS.

E-route provider requirements

The draft establishes obligations and certain technical requirements applicable to e-route providers. According to the Slovenian government, the requirements to become an e-route provider are comparable to those in France but without the need for certification

However, the public authorities will maintain a list of registered e-route service providers who must fulfil certain requirements, some of which are already listed in the draft law. The proposal does not state explicit local registration/establishment rules for e-route providers. The government will publish further regulations detailing the application process and other applicable requirements.

Next steps

The government must take certain crucial steps before enforcing the mandate. The Parliament must officially approve the draft law before the requirements are confirmed.

Moreover, publication of the technical specifications and further regulations are awaited, including details of the data reporting methods to the tax authority. Slovenia will need to apply for a derogation from the VAT Directive with the EU Commission to enforce mandatory B2B e-invoicing before the adoption of ViDA (VAT in the Digital Age).

For businesses operating in Slovenia, this will mean impactful changes to their outbound and inbound processes by 1 June 2026. This includes the acquisition of software or update of their systems to issue, send and receive e-invoices, adapting to the allowed e-invoicing formats and connecting to the FURS or availing the services of e-route providers to electronically report their data.

Have questions about how these changes could affect your operations? Ask our team of experts.

Singapore E-invoicing

While electronic invoicing is not mandated yet on any level in Singapore, the country’s tax authority is working on implementing a continuous transaction control (CTC) reporting model.

Singapore’s push towards digitalization was evidenced by the launch of its e-invoicing standard framework in 2018. Singapore was the first country outside Europe to adopt PEPPOL. The PEPPOL Business Interoperability Specifications (BIS) for e-invoicing and the PEPPOL eDelivery Network have been live since 2019.

The Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (IRAS) has announced the implementation of a phased adoption of InvoiceNow, the national e-invoicing framework based on the PEPPOL network, for invoicing data transmission. It will start voluntarily for GST-registered businesses in May 2025. The mandate will only cover B2B transactions; the government is expected to make B2G mandatory in the coming years.

Bookmark this page and revisit it often to stay on top of upcoming obligations.

At a glance: Singapore e-invoicing

Singapore B2B e-invoicing

Network

InvoiceNow

Format
Currently both Singapore BIS Billing 3.0 (PEPPOL) and Singapore (SG) PEPPOL PINT are allowed; PEPPOL PINT will be used exclusively from 2025.

eSignature Requirement
Ensuring integrity and authenticity is required, an e-signature is one method of assurance.

Archiving Requirement
Five years

Singapore B2G e-invoicing

Network
InvoiceNow.

Format
Currently both Singapore BIS Billing 3.0 (PEPPOL) and Singapore (SG) PEPPOL PINT are allowed; PEPPOL PINT will be used exclusively from 2025.

eSignature Requirement
Ensuring integrity and authenticity is required, an e-signature is one method of assurance.

Archiving Requirement
Five years.

E-invoicing in Singapore: Requirements and regulations

Currently, there is no mandate for using e-invoices in Singapore. However, taxpayers can connect to the PEPPOL network to send and receive e-invoices. Singapore’s IMDA is a PEPPOL authority and, as such, those who choose to send invoices electronically through the InvoiceNow network must meet the format requirements:

Singapore BIS Billing 3.0 (PEPPOL) or Singapore (SG) PEPPOL PINT, though the latter will become the only applicable format from 2025.

E-reporting in Singapore: Requirements and regulations

Singapore is implementing a CTC reporting mandate, utilizing the nation’s InvoiceNow PEPPOL framework. The implementation of this mandate sees a move away from a PEPPOL 4 corner model, instead adopting a PEPPOL 5 corner model with taxpayers transmitting invoice data to the IRAS, the nation’s tax authority.

Invoice data from both sales and purchases needs to be reported to the tax authority. Reporting requirements for “PEPPOL e-invoices” is real-time. For invoices issued outside InvoiceNow (“solution extracted invoices”), reporting is within a specific deadline with weekly submission recommended, no later than the return due date.

Accredited Access Points (AP) are the only parties allowed to submit invoice data to IRAS using C5 API – Sovos is an accredited AP in Singapore.

The implementation of this e-reporting obligation is included in the implementation timeline below.

Singapore’s E-invoicing and E-reporting Implementation timeline

Digitalization is on a storied journey towards implementation in Singapore. Here are the important dates:

  • May 2018: Singapore’s IMDA became the first PEPPOL Authority outside of Europe
  • January 2019: The nation’s e-invoicing network, later named InvoiceNow, launched
  • March 2020: Singapore launches Registration Grant to incentivise businesses to join the network
  • 1 May 2025: B2B e-reporting is implemented for voluntary early adoption by GST-registered businesses
  • 1 November 2025: B2B e-reporting is implemented for newly incorporated companies that register for GST voluntarily

PEPPOL in Singapore

Singapore’s Infocomm Media Development Authority (IMDA) became the first PEPPOL Authority outside of Europe in May 2018. Later, it launched its e-invoicing network with an initial 11 Access Point providers.

The network is established on the PEPPOL framework, helping businesses exchange documents electronically. As a PEPPOL Authority, IMDA can:

  • Approve and certify PEPPOL Access Point providers in Singapore
  • Accredit PEPPOL-ready solution providers in Singapore
  • Govern the compliance of businesses to the PEPPOL framework
  • Specify country-specific rules and technical standards under the PEPPOL framework – namely SG PEPPOL BIS and SG PEPPOL PINT format

Find out more about PEPPOL in Sovos’ definitive              E-invoicing Guide

Complete the form below to speak with one of our e-invoicing experts

FAQ

Businesses in Singapore are encouraged to use e-invoices, but it has yet to become mandatory.

While Singapore encourages businesses to issue and receive invoices electronically through its InvoiceNow system, it has not yet mandated e-invoicing between businesses. The mandatory e-reporting using InvoiceNow will start from 1 November 2025 for newly incorporated companies that register for GST voluntarily.

InvoiceNow is a nationwide e-invoicing initiative by The Infocomm Media Development Authority (IMDA) that helps SMEs and large enterprises streamline invoicing. The aim is to provide a faster and more sustainable way to transact, nationwide and worldwide.

Invoices in Singapore require information such as:

  • Supplier’s name, address & GST registration number
  • Customer’s name and address
  • Invoice issuance date and identification number
  • Description of goods or services provided
  • Total amount payable, both including and excluding GST

PEPPOL is a standard for sending electronic invoices to public sector clients (in other words, for B2G transactions) throughout the EU – and beyond. Singapore was the first PEPPOL-approved authority outside of Europe.

Singapore’s InvoiceNow e-invoicing framework is based on the PEPPOL network.

Yes, Sovos is an IMDA-certified PEPPOL service provider in Singapore. Our regulatory experts can connect to the InvoiceNow network on your behalf.

Meet the Sovos team in Prague where Anna Norden, Sovos Principal, Regulatory Affairs will be sharing an update on the CIAT Digitalization Classification Matrix. The team will also be waiting to greet you at the Sovos stand to discuss all things e-invoicing.  

Sovos invites you to meet the team in London and hear Ryan Ostilly, our VP, Product Management share strategies for harnessing tax compliance measures as a force for growth within your organisation.  

Sovos are delighted to support this year’s event as Platinum sponsors. Meet the team and learn more about our Indirect Tax Suite and how it can benefit your business.  

The Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (IRAS) has announced the implementation of a phased adoption of InvoiceNow, the national e-invoicing framework based on the Peppol network, for GST registered businesses starting voluntarily in May 2025. The mandate will cover B2B transactions only, as the government is expected to make B2G mandatory in the coming years.

What is InvoiceNow?

InvoiceNow is a nationwide e-invoicing initiative by The Infocomm Media Development Authority (IMDA) for SMEs and large enterprises to streamline their invoicing for a faster and more sustainable way to transact, nationwide and worldwide.

What’s the timeline?

Singapore’s nationwide e-invoicing network was first announced in 2019 and has recently been referred to as InvoiceNow. The mandate will require GST registered businesses to use InvoiceNow solutions to transmit invoice data to IRAS. The transmission of invoice data to IRAS will be done through Peppol Access Point (AP) service providers, extending the traditional four corner e-delivery model to a fifth corner model.

The mandate will be implemented in phases, as follows:

Even though an implementation timeline for all businesses has not been shared yet, further updates are expected in the future.

Sovos is here to help

Saphety Level – Trusted Services, S.A is an IMDA-certified Peppol service provider in Singapore. Our regulatory experts can connect to the InvoiceNow network on your behalf.

e-invoicing in Germany

Germany, like many European countries, is on its way to implementing electronic invoicing requirements for domestic taxpayers of all shapes and sizes. However, e-invoicing is yet to be fully implemented and mandated in the country.

E-invoicing in Germany is currently divided by transaction type. There are national and federal requirements for B2G transactions, but the time hasn’t come for B2B transactions to utilise e-invoices yet. This will begin to change in 2025, and by 2028, all German businesses will be mandated to send and receive invoices electronically.

With Germany’s e-invoicing rollout fragmented and intensive to follow, use this page as your go-to overview to ensure you meet your obligations. Bookmark this page and revisit it whenever you need a reminder of the current requirements.

At a glance: Germany e-invoicing

Germany B2B e-invoicing

CTC Type

  • Post Audit

Network

  • N/A

Format

  • Compliant with EN 16931

eSignature Requirement

  • Not mandatory, qualified e-signature can be used

Archiving Requirement

  • 10 years

Germany B2G e-invoicing

CTC Type

  • Decentralised/PEPPOL

Network

  • Individual state platforms

Format

  • Xrechnung & PEPPOL BIS

eSignature Requirement

  • N/A

Archiving Requirement

  • 10 years

E-invoicing regulations in Germany

Germany B2B e-invoicing

From January 2025, taxpayers must be able to receive electronic invoices. Sending and receiving e-invoices will become mandatory in Germany from 1 January 2027, applying to companies with an annual turnover exceeding EUR 800,000. From January 2028, it will apply to all companies.

This go-live date for German B2B e-invoicing was set in March 2024 when the Bundesrat passed the law known as ‘Wachstumschancengesetz’.

Germany B2G e-invoicing

E-invoicing is mandated when trading with public administrations, though it’s divided at a federal state level. There is a national mandate, but it runs alongside its 16 federal states – each of which has legislative freedom to develop its own e-invoicing platform.

The following German federal states have implemented e-invoicing for governmental transactions:

  • Baden-Württemberg
  • Bavaria
  • Berlin
  • Bremen
  • Hamburg
  • Hessen
  • Lower Saxony
  • Mecklenburg-Vorpommern
  • North Rhine-Westphalia
  • Rhineland-Palatinate
  • Saarland
  • Saxony
  • Saxony-Anhalt
  • Schleswig-Holstein
  • Thuringia

The aforementioned European Directive (2014/55/EU) requires member-state government entities to be able to receive and handle electronic invoices according to the CEN standard, EN 16931.

Timeline: e-invoicing adoption in Germany

The implementation of e-invoicing in Germany can be hard to follow. Here are the main dates you need to know:

  • April 2017: Germany publishes its e-Bill law
  • 18 April 2020: Federal states implement mandatory e-invoicing in public procurement
  • 27 November 2020: Public authorities must receive e-invoices from state authorities
  • July 2023: Germany’s Federal Ministry of Finance presents draft legislation for mandatory e-invoicing
  • 22 March 2024: Germany’s Federal Council approves a legislative package that includes the introduction of mandatory e-invoicing
  • 1 January 2025: German taxpayers must be able to receive e-invoices from their suppliers (B2B)
  • 1 January 2027: German taxpayers with an annual turnover of at least EUR 800,000 must issue e-invoices for B2B transactions
  • 1 January 2028: Remaining German taxpayers must issue e-invoices for B2B transactions

Benefits of e-invoicing in Germany

Implementing electronic invoicing can benefit taxpayers by automating processes. Not only can this save time and headspace, it can also significantly reduce the risk of errors by removing the need for people to input and handle data manually.

Future of e-invoicing in Germany

While it’s now clear that there’s more to come on the e-invoicing front in Germany, there’s a larger initiative that could shift how the technology is implemented in the country – and across EU Member States at large.

VAT in the Digital Age is a proposal to digitize the European VAT system, implementing digital reporting and e-invoicing, among other new, innovative tax solutions.

It’s worth noting that while Germany is still working on implementing e-invoicing for all resident taxpayers, many countries are further along in their electronic invoicing journey. Global tax compliance can be tough, considering the nuances of each country’s tax digitization journey, but Sovos can help – wherever you do business.

Additional obligations for VAT compliance in Germany

While electronic invoicing is an important component of tax compliance in Germany, organisations have other obligations to stay on top of.

Staying updated with regulatory expectations becomes even more complicated when you consider the evolving nature of laws. Not only do you need to meet your current obligations, but you also need to stay on top of what’s to come – this is demanding in terms of both time and resources.

Non-compliance can be costly, but you don’t need to fall behind. Find out more about German VAT compliance with our dedicated overview.

FAQ

B2G e-invoicing is mandatory in Germany, and B2B e-invoicing is currently scheduled to come into effect from 1 January 2027 for companies with an annual turnover exceeding EUR 800,000.

For B2G and B2B e-invoicing, German legislation requires the secure archival and access of electronic invoices for 10 years.

Germany has laid out plans to make B2B e-invoicing mandatory for resident taxpayers, following this timeline:

  • 1 January 2025: Taxpayers must be able to receive e-invoices
  • 1 January 2027: Taxpayers with an annual turnover exceeding EUR 800,000 must use e-invoices
  • 1 January 2028: All taxpayers must use e-invoices.

The ZRE stands for Zentrale Rechnungseingangsplattform des Bundes, which translates as Central Invoice Submission Portal. ZRE is a web portal that allows suppliers and service providers to send electronic invoices to federal entities.

ZUGFeRD is a hybrid e-invoicing format that includes human-readable (PDF/A-3) and machine-interpretable invoice data. It’s based on XML, allowing invoices to be sent as attachments or embedded within an email.

ZUGFeRD meets the requirements of the European standard (EN 16931).

XRechnung is a standard for electronic invoicing that the German government accepted in late 2020. It was devised as a standard for converting invoice information into an XML data file, serving as an e-invoice.

XRechnung also meets the requirements of the European standard (EN 16931).

B2G e-invoicing has been mandated at a national level since mid-2019, meaning that all Member State government agencies must be able to receive and manage electronic invoices.

Elsewhere, here’s the timeline for B2B e-invoicing in the country:

  • From January 2025, all German taxpayers must be able to receive electronic invoices from their suppliers.
  • From January 2027, all German taxpayers with an annual turnover of over EUR 800,000 must issue electronic invoices.
  • From January 2028, all German taxpayers must issue and receive electronic invoices.

When transacting with federal contracting authorities, you should send an electronic invoice through the relevant state’s individual transmission platform.

Setting up e-invoicing in Germany with Sovos

B2B e-invoicing has yet to be implemented in Germany, but it provides yet another obligation for organisations to meet once it is. Then, consider the other countries where you do business and the stages they may be at in their tax digitization journeys.

One solution is to pay attention to evolving mandates and regulations everywhere you operate. The more freeing solution is to appoint a single tax compliance partner, like Sovos, to do the busy work for you.

Trusted by the world’s best companies, including half the Fortune 500, Sovos’ solutions provide global compliance through local expertise.

Get in touch with us