France is one of the most challenging countries in Europe when it comes to the premium tax treatment of motor insurance policies. This is mainly due to the variety of taxes and charges that can apply and the differing treatment of different vehicle types.
This blog provides all the information you need to know about the correct treatment in France.
As with our dedicated overviews of the taxation of motor insurance policies in Spain, Norway, Italy and Austria, this blog will focus on the specifics in France. We also have a blog covering the taxation of motor insurance policies across Europe.
First and foremost, Insurance Premium Tax (IPT) applies to motor insurance provided in France. The rate can vary (rates correct as of December 2024):
Class 3 motor cover is treated as a form of property coverage within the scope of contributions to the EUR 6.50 Common Fund for Victims of Terrorism when located in France. There is also a requirement to collect a CATNAT premium (with specific rates for motor coverage which are increasing from January 2025). IPT and contributions to the Major Risk Prevention Fund are due on this premium.
Compulsory class 10 cover triggers National Guarantee Fund contributions. This currently results in three separate rates applicable to premiums, set at 1.2%, 0.8% and 0.58%, respectively.
Finally, it is worth noting that class 3 or 10 coverage of vehicles used for agricultural operations may be excluded from the scope of contributions to the Major Risk Prevention Fund. They do, however, result in separate contributions of 11% due to the National Agricultural Risk Management Fund.
The majority of taxes and charges on motor insurance policies in France are calculated as a percentage of the taxable premium and are directly charged to the insured. There are some exceptions, though.
Where applicable, the 0.58% National Guarantee Fund contribution and contributions to the Major Risk Prevention Fund are both insurer-borne so do not result in direct additions to the premiums charged to the insured.
The EUR 6.50 contributions to the Common Fund for Victims of Terrorism are a fixed fee and apply to each insurance contract per annum – regardless of the premium value.
It should also be noted that the IPT treatment of motor insurance can be extended to include ancillary coverage, such as passenger accident cover. This is because the IPT treatment applies to risks of any nature relating to land motor vehicles. It is important to assess each risk to determine whether it is considered a risk related to land motor vehicles as this can be a contentious area in French law.
Electric vehicles are subject to an IPT exemption, albeit this was amended from January 2024 so that 75% of the premium was treated as exempt (with the remaining 25% being taxable as normal).
A 75% exemption applies to insurance incepting in 2024 for vehicles registered in 2024, but only in relation to the first insurance contract following the vehicle’s registration up to a maximum of 24 months. There is no law currently in effect extending this treatment for vehicles registered in 2025, so such vehicles will not benefit from the 75% exemption as it stands.
Coverage of any nature relating to commercial agricultural vehicles and commercial vehicles greater than 3.5 tonnes benefits from a full IPT exemption, except compulsory class 10 coverage. However, this does not provide an exemption from the applicability of the parafiscal charges mentioned above.
If you still have questions about the taxation of motor insurance policies or IPT in France, speak to our experts.
On 5 November, the long-awaited EU Commission’s VAT in the Digital Age (ViDA) proposal was approved by Member States’ Economic and Finance Ministers (ECOFIN). This webinar will examine the three pillars of the ViDA package and how you can prepare for the changes it will bring.
European tax authorities are advancing SAF-T implementation, introducing new requirements that will impact VAT compliance across the region. This webinar will offer insights into key updates, including Portugal’s SAF-T delay to 2026, Ukraine’s on-demand SAF-T for large taxpayers in 2025, Greece’s mandatory transport data fields in myDATA e-books from 1 December 2024, Romania’s SAF-T extension to non-established companies and mandatory e-reporting of B2C invoices from January 2025 and France’s reduced PPF scope and new PDP designation requirement for all companies.
In this webinar, we will revisit the foundational principles behind this mandate, covering its evolution up to the latest developments, so you have all you need to keep your business compliant.
By Christiaan Van Der Valk
The French tax administration has just announced structural changes to the 2026 French e-invoicing mandate that will discontinue the development of the free state-operated invoice exchange service. This decision will put increased pressure on taxpayers and software vendors to select a certified ‘PDP’ to fill the void created by this decision.
When France introduced mandatory business-to-business e-invoicing in its 2020 Finance Law, the tax administration conducted a broad comparative study of how other countries had implemented similar obligations. However, France adopted a unique approach, creating the complex ‘Y model,’ which combined elements from several countries’ systems. Like Italy for example, it included a central state-operated platform (the ‘PPF’) that businesses could use as a free, basic service for the exchange and reporting of e-invoices.
In parallel with the PPF’s own ability to exchange e-invoices for French taxpayer, the French tax authority solicited candidate PDPs to perform the same function for more complex business use cases.
These organizations were registered, put through vigorous testing and some were pre-approved, pending final testing with the PPF. PDPs are designed to seamlessly exchange invoices with each other and are required to report these transactions to the PPF.
And as it turned out, many companies in the French market decided to use a PDP to organize the exchange of invoice data with trading partners in a way that fits their unique business circumstances. Other French businesses counted on the availability of the free-of-charge PDP services to be provided by PPF, rather than selecting a private PDP.
The overall architecture of data flows between the public and private entities involved in the French scheme led to unprecedented complexity in the technical specifications released by the public administration. It has been clear for some time that this complexity was putting strain of budgets and timelines for the technical development of the PPF by the French public administration.
The French tax administration (DG-FIP) announced on 15 October that while the development of the PPF will continue, its focus will shift to providing directory services for routing e-invoices, without offering PDP services.
As a result, many French businesses and software vendors now face the challenge of securing the services of a private PDP. Although the e-invoicing mandate’s go-live date on September 2026, initially applies only to the largest businesses, more than four million companies will have to rely on PDP-enabled accounting software to receive those transactions regardless of their size.
Sovos was one of the first PDPs to be pre-authorized by the French tax authority and brings more than two decades of experience providing compliance technology for businesses in France. Sovos is uniquely positioned to meet the needs of companies that must now choose a reliable provider.
Learn how Sovos can help your business
From managing VAT compliance to familiarising yourself with the VAT registration timelines, Alex Smith, Senior Director of Consulting Services will detail the most critical compliance challenges for companies expanding internationally.
Join Steve Sprague, Chief Product & Strategy Officer at Sovos, for an insightful discussion on how SAP customers can navigate the shift toward SAP’s Clean Core and ensure their tax compliance processes are future-ready. As governments worldwide accelerate the move toward digital tax reporting and real-time compliance mandates, businesses face new challenges in staying compliant while managing complex ERP systems.
In Italy, the insurance premium tax (IPT) code (which is being revised as of the date of this blog’s publication) and various other laws and regulations include provisions for taxes/contributions on motor hull and motor liability insurance policies.
This article covers all you need to know about this specific indirect tax in the country.
As with our dedicated overviews of the taxation of motor insurance policies in Spain, Norway and Austria, this blog will focus on the specifics in Italy. We also have a blog covering the taxation of motor insurance policies across Europe.
In Italy, there are four types of charges payable on motor insurance policies:
Whilst motor insurance policies can include various coverages as add-ons, this blog’s main focus is on motor hull and motor liability.
Calculating taxes on land vehicles, i.e., motor hulls (Class 3), is simple. There is only IPT at 12.5% and CONSAP at 1%.
The taxable premium is the basis of these taxes. Both taxes are declared in the annual IPT return and payable monthly.
The taxation of insurance policies against civil liability arising from the circulation of motor vehicles is more complex.
The IPT rate (so called Responsabilità Civile Auto or RCA tax) is determined on a provincial level. Legislative Decree 6 May 2011, No. 68 quotes that the rate of the RCA tax is equal to 12.5%. However, this can be increased or decreased by the province or metropolitan city by a maximum of 3.5%. That is why RCA tax rates are sometimes referred to as a tax with a rate ranging from 9-16%.
In Italy, there are 20 regions, each with one or more autonomous provinces or cities. To complicate matters further, the province or city can modify the tax rates within the tax year.
CONSAP does not apply on motor liability policies, however EMER is at a rate of 10.5% with an additional 2.5% required for RAVF.
RCA and EMER are declared in the annual IPT return, and payments are due monthly.
Although RAVF is also declared annually, the declaration process differs, and there is also a prepayment obligation. The actual amount of RAVF depends on the management fee set annually by the Italian insurance supervisory body (IVASS) – the percentage of which is published during November for the next year.
As previously stated, IPT/RCA regulations are undergoing major renewal (during 2024). The legislation governing the tax provisions on private insurance and life annuities (Law 29 October 1961, No. 1216) is part of the Italian Government`s tax reform initiatives.
According to the available draft legislation, the IPT law will be divided into three parts:
The government extended the deadline for enactment of the new regulation to the end of 2025.
There are not many exemptions available for IPT/RCA tax, nor for CONSAP, EMER and RAVF. However, cars registered in Italy to NATO Allied Force benefit from an exemption from IPT/RCA.
If you still have questions about the taxation of motor insurance policies or IPT in Italy, speak to our experts.
Tax authorities across Eastern Europe continue to move ahead with SAF-T adoption, with upcoming changes impacting VAT compliance requirements for businesses operating in the region.
In this exclusive webinar, you’ll get in-depth insights on:
– Romania’s SAF-T expansion: The tax authorities will expand the scope of businesses impacted by this requirement to non-established companies from January 2025
– Bulgaria’s SAF-T Introduction (2025): Learn about Bulgaria’s planned adoption of the SAF-T framework and what it means for businesses operating in the region
– Poland’s Extended SAF-T Reporting: Discover how Poland is expanding its SAF-T filing requirements and how this may affect VAT compliance and audits
Join our expert, Clementine Mayor, VAT Consultant as she unpacks the latest developments in VAT reporting across Eastern Europe. Don’t miss this opportunity to understand how these changes will shape the future of VAT audits and prepare your business for compliance.
On 21 May 2024, the Italian tax authority published a ruling (No. 110/2024) on the IPT treatment of warranty services provided in relation to the sale of used vehicles.
The ruling dealt with a scenario in which a company (the ‘Applicant’) provided warranty services to dealers within the same company group, with the latter offering these warranties to the purchasers of the vehicles. The Applicant also separately entered into insurance contracts with an insurance company to obtain coverage for the costs it incurred in repairing the vehicles sold when required under the terms of the warranty.
The insurance contract concluded between the Applicant and the insurance company would only be subject to IPT in Italy if the policyholder’s relevant establishment was located in Italy, in line with the location of risk rules.
More significantly, however, the ruling also addressed the warranty services provided by the Applicant to the dealers. For these, the ruling assessed that guarantees such as these do not satisfy the requirements of an insurance contract with an insurance company as the contracting party. The VAT treatment of this arrangement was outside the scope of the ruling, but it was conclusive in outlining that IPT does not apply to such an arrangement.
Comparing this ruling to the position in Germany highlights the possibility of a lack of harmonisation in this area without an EU-wide position.
Read our blog on general matters of IPT in Italy for additional information.
Following the publication of various circulars by the Federal Ministry of Finance in Germany in 2021, rules on the taxation of guarantee commitments were made effective 1 January 2023. This blog explains how this affects insurers and other suppliers.
The Ministry of Finance published its initial circular in May 2021. This was in response to a Federal Fiscal Court judgment. It concerned a seller of motor vehicles providing a guarantee to buyers beyond the vehicle’s warranty.
In these circumstances, the circular confirmed that the guarantee is not an ancillary service to vehicle delivery but is deemed to be an insurance benefit. As such, it would attract IPT instead of VAT – unless the guarantee is considered a full maintenance contract.
The circular did not prompt immediate concern within the insurance sector. Markets outside the motor vehicle industry weren’t concerned either. The presumption was that it was limited to the specific context of the motor vehicle industry.
Matters changed the following month. The Ministry of Finance clarified that the tax principles it outlined in fact applied to all industries. As a result, the scope of these rules became potentially limitless in Germany. All guarantees provided as additional products to goods or services sold are now within the scope of the application of IPT.
The clarification could impact industries like those organisations selling electrical items and household appliances.
The effect on traditional insurance companies should be relatively limited as they do not usually provide guarantees as part of the sales of goods and services. There could arguably be a significant impact on other suppliers that do provide such guarantees.
First and foremost, there is a potential increase in the cost of providing the guarantees caused by the application of IPT. Unlike input VAT, a supplier cannot deduct IPT from its taxable income – it must either increase prices to compensate or accept a less favourable profit margin.
Any companies that purchase the guarantees cannot reclaim the IPT either, as they can do with VAT. The standard IPT rate of 19% in Germany is high compared to most European countries. This exacerbates these issues.
There are also practical considerations to bear in mind for suppliers obliged to settle IPT with the tax authority. They are presumably required to be registered for IPT purposes like insurers, although the Ministry of Finance has not formally confirmed this.
Perhaps more difficult is the issue of licensing. The Ministry of Finance circulars focus on taxation, leaving it unclear whether other suppliers are now required to obtain a license to write insurance under German regulatory law.
Looking for more information on general IPT matters in Germany? Our German IPT page can help.
Determining and calculating IPT liabilities in various regions can be challenging.
Sovos IPT Determination is a compliance software designed to streamline Insurance Premium Tax (IPT) calculations and ensure accurate tax reporting.
In this webinar, Ramesh Sudhan, Sovos’ Director of Product and Research & Development, will guide you step-by-step through several typical processes supported by the solution.
The Government of the Republic of Slovenia has released a draft proposal to implement mandatory e-invoicing and e-reporting for B2B and B2C transactions. This implementation would mark a significant shift in the country’s e-invoicing landscape.
Should the proposal be approved, taxpayers will be subject to a two-fold obligation: they must issue and exchange B2B invoices electronically and report B2B and B2C transactional data to the tax authority. Although clearance will not be required in the e-invoice issuance process, transactional data must be reported to the tax authority in near real-time, which shows that Slovenia is aligning with the global trend of governments implementing Continuous Transaction Controls (CTC).
Taxpayers under scope are all business entities registered in Slovenia’s Business Register (PRS), including companies, self-employed entities and associations. To register in the PRS, business entities must have a registered office or address in the territory of the Republic of Slovenia.
This new system also introduces a decentralised reporting and exchange model facilitated by registered service providers, called e-route providers. These are similar to the network exchange requirements in France and those planned for Spain.
The proposed mandatory e-invoicing and CTC e-reporting will be introduced from 1 June 2026.
The e-invoicing mandate would require taxpayers to issue, send and receive e-invoices and other e-documents for B2B domestic transactions.
Under the Slovenian proposal, e-invoices refer to an invoice or similar accounting document that records business transactions, regardless of what they are called. This includes credit notes, debit notes, advance invoices, payment requests, etc.
There are multiple supported formats for the exchange of e-invoices:
The proposal allows three methods for e-invoice issuance and exchange:
In cases where the issuer and recipient use e-invoice different standards, if using e-route providers, the recipient’s provider must convert the e-invoice to the syntax accepted by the recipient.
Regarding B2C transactions, consumers will have the option to receive either e-invoices or paper invoices. This must be agreed upon by the parties. If an e-invoice is issued, suppliers will be obliged to provide a visualised content version (e.g., PDF).
The proposal states that taxpayers must electronically report B2B and B2C transactional data, including cross-border transactions, to the Financial Administration of the Republic of Slovenia (FURS) within eight days of invoice issuance or receipt. Reporting must be done exclusively in the e-SLOG standard.
The reporting requirement extends to B2C and cross-border transactions, regardless of whether an invoice was issued electronically. This ensures that transactions such as these, for which e-invoicing is not mandatory, are reported to the FURS allowing it a comprehensive collection of taxpayers’ transactional data.
The selected method for e-invoice exchange will impact the e-reporting of transactional data. If the parties use e-route providers, both the issuer’s and recipient’s providers must send the e-invoice to FURS. For direct exchanges, both parties must separately report their transactions to FURS.
The draft establishes obligations and certain technical requirements applicable to e-route providers. According to the Slovenian government, the requirements to become an e-route provider are comparable to those in France but without the need for certification
However, the public authorities will maintain a list of registered e-route service providers who must fulfil certain requirements, some of which are already listed in the draft law. The proposal does not state explicit local registration/establishment rules for e-route providers. The government will publish further regulations detailing the application process and other applicable requirements.
The government must take certain crucial steps before enforcing the mandate. The Parliament must officially approve the draft law before the requirements are confirmed.
Moreover, publication of the technical specifications and further regulations are awaited, including details of the data reporting methods to the tax authority. Slovenia will need to apply for a derogation from the VAT Directive with the EU Commission to enforce mandatory B2B e-invoicing before the adoption of ViDA (VAT in the Digital Age).
For businesses operating in Slovenia, this will mean impactful changes to their outbound and inbound processes by 1 June 2026. This includes the acquisition of software or update of their systems to issue, send and receive e-invoices, adapting to the allowed e-invoicing formats and connecting to the FURS or availing the services of e-route providers to electronically report their data.
Have questions about how these changes could affect your operations? Ask our team of experts.
Stay informed with the latest updates from the European Commission’s VAT in the Digital Age (ViDA) on the three pillars:
* The real-time digital reporting system based on e-invoicing
* New VAT rules for the platform economy
* Single VAT registration for businesses selling to consumers across the EU
The webinar will also cover essential VAT recovery claims, highlighting the differences between EU VAT Refunds and 13th Directive claims, and guide you through the VAT recovery process.