With the VAT in the Digital Age (ViDA) officially adopted by the EU on 11 March 2025, businesses have many questions about its rollout and impact on their operations. We answer the most frequently asked questions.
ViDA is leading to changes in several areas of Value Added tax (VAT) law, starting now and going on for the coming decade.
From its entry into force on 14 April 2025, ViDA immediately removed restrictions that previously prevented EU countries from introducing mandatory domestic e-invoicing.
Therefore, Member States can now introduce both mandatory domestic e-invoicing and digital reporting requirements (DRRs), as long as they align with ViDA by 2030. By 2030 electronic invoicing and DRRs will become mandatory for so-called intra-Community transactions.
Since ViDA’s approval, we are already seeing momentum across the EU, with several countries announcing plans to introduce mandatory e-invoicing and real-time reporting within the next few years. ViDA will see the intensification of the current wave of new Continuous Transaction Control (CTC) mandates to prepare for in the short term, with many EU countries already announcing initiatives or starting rollout.
No, the ‘grace’ period for businesses was taken into account when setting the 2030 deadline for mandatory electronic invoicing and DRRs for intra-Community transactions. Member States’ domestic mandates will follow each country’s legislative process and culture but we are seeing an average period of 18-24 months for businesses to adapt, with no grace period after that.
Many businesses gravely underestimate the work required to ensure data quality, including the long adaptation cycles for their different business applications to incorporate the data and process changes required for real-time reporting and e-invoicing.
The introduction of changes of this magnitude to business and administrative processes is never without challenges on both sides of the equation. Businesses will make mistakes that may take time to fix, and this only gets harder as governments do the same thing in parallel under the pressure of political deadlines.
All invoicing and related processes will be impacted by ViDA including any accounts payable and accounts receivable process and the associated information systems that support them. All invoicing needs to be reviewed against this backdrop and readied for the digitization paradigm shift that will come off the back of ViDA.
Whilst the reporting processes required to meet specific transmission protocols, authentication, and document exchange orchestration tend to get a lot of attention, businesses should be equally wary of the impact of CTC mandates generated or modified by ViDA on their upstream processes and data.
Many businesses have multiple ERP systems, multiple billing systems, accounts payable systems etc. for different lines of business or trading partner categories. Most of these systems process invoice data on a paper or PDF invoice manually or semi-automated which cannot be easily ‘upgraded’ to handle the data completeness and quality requirements of a stringent e-invoicing and e-reporting regime.
Beyond the headlines about mandatory e-invoicing and real-time reporting, the fine print of ViDA will drive a number of challenging modifications to business processes. This includes the very definition of what constitutes an invoice which will require billions of PDF invoices in the European Union to be converted to machine-readable formats.
To comply with ViDA, businesses will need to increasingly use software and service providers that can guarantee compliance with frameworks and laws that add up to a need for a complete rethink of invoicing processes and systems throughout most businesses.
Companies that currently use EDI systems, procure-to-pay or accounts payable automation software of SaaS services, customer communications management, order-to-cash, electronic billing presentment and payment solutions etc. must ask themselves how those platforms will handle the new requirements for e-invoicing and e-reporting under ViDA and associated regulatory initiatives.
These vendors specializing in business process optimization typically have little experience with this specific area of compliance. Most of them are not set up to anticipate and address the tens or hundreds of changes that typically follow the initial rollout of a CTC regime in any jurisdiction in a timely manner.
We advise businesses to contact their enterprise software vendors and service providers now to ask these questions – are they aware of these changes as a result of ViDA, and what is their plan to keep you compliant?
Under ViDA, cross-border transactions between EU countries will be subject to a new real-time reporting regime (DRR) that replaces the current requirement for a recapitulative statement. Each transaction will be reported individually to the respective national tax authority, which will then transmit the data within one day to a centralized European Commission-managed system known as “Central VIES”. This enhanced platform, launching in July 2030, will consolidate intra-EU B2B transaction data, integrate with systems like the Customs Surveillance System and the Central Electronic System of Payments (CESOP), and provide a unified interface for VAT number validation and transaction transparency across the EU.
In addition to these digital reporting sections of ViDA, intra-EU cross-border transactions are also affected by other parts of the proposal in other ways. For example, quite far-reaching changes will take place, removing administrative burdens for businesses moving their own stock between EU countries.
Want to know more about ViDA? Get in touch with an expert here or learn more about VAT in the Digital Age with this guide.
We recently partnered with StudioID on a global survey of 150 finance leaders to reveal significant insights into how companies are navigating the increasingly complex world of indirect tax compliance. The research, which included CFOs, EVPs/SVPs/VPs of Finance, and Finance Directors from companies with revenues ranging from $500 million to over $5 billion, provides a comprehensive look at the strategies finance leaders are implementing to stay ahead of changing regulations.
The survey found that an overwhelming 95% of finance executives believe ensuring accurate real-time data reporting is important or extremely important for improving tax and compliance operations. This shift reflects a fundamental change in how tax authorities operate globally.
Previously in indirect tax, the way that the government could enforce the law was always through periodic reporting, but it was an unsophisticated instrument. Now, continuous transaction controls have become very popular since it’s about sending data in real time to the government.
This transition means businesses are no longer simply reporting their subjective view of a period’s aggregate sales and purchasing numbers —tax authorities are increasingly gathering authenticated data in real-time and informing companies of their liability instead. The stakes are higher than ever, with non-compliance potentially halting business operations entirely rather than just resulting in penalties.
The complexity of global tax compliance is staggering. Approximately 30% of both US-based and international companies surveyed sell products and services across 2,000 to 5,000 different tax jurisdictions. Each jurisdiction has its own rules, rates, and reporting requirements. Requirements are also increasingly dynamic, with laws and technical specifications evolving to reflect tax administrations’ fine-tuning operations at an ever-increasing rate.
With initiatives like VAT in the Digital Age (ViDA) and e-invoicing mandates rolling out across Europe and beyond, companies must stay ahead of regulatory changes. Encouragingly, 87% of finance executives report having systems and processes in place to anticipate these upcoming mandates.
When it comes to successfully implementing current and upcoming e-invoicing mandates, finance leaders identified two primary challenges:
Additionally, 56% of respondents mention difficulty in making business decisions due to limitations around tax and compliance data accessibility and accuracy.
Finance leaders are implementing several key strategies to improve their indirect tax and compliance operations:
These investments are paying off—76% of finance executives report seeing a positive return on investment from their tax compliance software. However, cost remains a significant concern, with 91% identifying “lowering or maintaining compliance costs” as a top priority.
The Problem of Point Solutions
One notable finding is that 73% of respondents believe their companies use too many point systems to meet tax obligations across different geographical locations. The median number of systems currently in use is 40, with most wanting to reduce this number significantly.
There seems to be a lot of confusion in the market, whereby a lot of businesses think they need to replace their business software with regulatory-driven software. This simply isn’t true as there are multiple ways that leaders can make existing business software compliant.
As tax authorities worldwide continue advancing their technology, making compliance more complex and demanding, finance leaders must balance compliance requirements with business objectives. The most successful approach integrates tax considerations into core business processes rather than treating them as separate functions.
The message is clear: while tax compliance is becoming more complex, the right strategies and technologies can transform this challenge into an opportunity for greater efficiency and intelligence about your business. Whatever you set as your business objectives, make sure that your compliance software works in such a way that the tax is never a burden.
By staying ahead of regulatory changes and investing in the right solutions, finance leaders can ensure their organizations not only remain compliant but thrive in an increasingly complex global tax landscape.
Want to learn more about how finance leaders are adapting to the changing indirect tax landscape? Download the full research report, “The Future of Indirect Tax: How Finance Leaders Are Staying Ahead of Changing Regulations” for comprehensive insights and strategic recommendations. Download Now
By Christiaan Van Der Valk
The French tax administration has just announced structural changes to the 2026 French e-invoicing mandate that will discontinue the development of the free state-operated invoice exchange service. This decision will put increased pressure on taxpayers and software vendors to select a certified ‘PDP’ to fill the void created by this decision.
When France introduced mandatory business-to-business e-invoicing in its 2020 Finance Law, the tax administration conducted a broad comparative study of how other countries had implemented similar obligations. However, France adopted a unique approach, creating the complex ‘Y model,’ which combined elements from several countries’ systems. Like Italy for example, it included a central state-operated platform (the ‘PPF’) that businesses could use as a free, basic service for the exchange and reporting of e-invoices.
In parallel with the PPF’s own ability to exchange e-invoices for French taxpayer, the French tax authority solicited candidate PDPs to perform the same function for more complex business use cases.
These organizations were registered, put through vigorous testing and some were pre-approved, pending final testing with the PPF. PDPs are designed to seamlessly exchange invoices with each other and are required to report these transactions to the PPF.
And as it turned out, many companies in the French market decided to use a PDP to organize the exchange of invoice data with trading partners in a way that fits their unique business circumstances. Other French businesses counted on the availability of the free-of-charge PDP services to be provided by PPF, rather than selecting a private PDP.
The overall architecture of data flows between the public and private entities involved in the French scheme led to unprecedented complexity in the technical specifications released by the public administration. It has been clear for some time that this complexity was putting strain of budgets and timelines for the technical development of the PPF by the French public administration.
The French tax administration (DG-FIP) announced on 15 October that while the development of the PPF will continue, its focus will shift to providing directory services for routing e-invoices, without offering PDP services.
As a result, many French businesses and software vendors now face the challenge of securing the services of a private PDP. Although the e-invoicing mandate’s go-live date on September 2026, initially applies only to the largest businesses, more than four million companies will have to rely on PDP-enabled accounting software to receive those transactions regardless of their size.
Sovos was one of the first PDPs to be pre-authorized by the French tax authority and brings more than two decades of experience providing compliance technology for businesses in France. Sovos is uniquely positioned to meet the needs of companies that must now choose a reliable provider.
Learn how Sovos can help your business
A current mega-trend in VAT is continuous transaction controls (CTCs), whereby tax administrations increasingly request business transaction data in real-time, often pre-authorising data before a business can progress to the next step in the sales or purchase workflow.
When a tax authority introduces CTCs, companies tend to view this as an additional set of requirements to be implemented inside ERP or transaction automation software by IT experts. This kneejerk reaction is understandable as implementation timelines tend to be short and potential sanctions for non-compliance significant.
But businesses would do better to approach these changes as part of an ongoing journey to avoid inefficiencies and other risks. From a tax authority perspective, CTCs are not a standalone exercise but part of a wider digital transformation strategy where all data that can be legally accessed for audit purposes is transmitted to them electronically.
In many tax authorities’ vision of digitization, each category of data is received at ‘organic’ intervals that follow the natural cadence of data processing by the businesses and data needs of governments.
Tax administrations use digitization to access data more conveniently, on a more granular level, and more frequently.
A business that doesn’t consider this continuum from the old world of reporting and audit to the new world of automated data exchange risks over-focusing on the ‘how’ – the orchestration of messages to and from a CTC platform – rather than keeping a close eye on the ‘why’ – transparency of business operations.
Data received quicker and in a structured, machine-exploitable format is infinitely more valuable for tax administrations as it gives them an opportunity to perform deeper analysis of both varying taxpayer and third-party sources of data.
If your business data is incomplete or faulty, you are likely exposing yourself to increased audits, as your bad data is under scrutiny and more transparent to the taxman.
Put differently, in a digitized world of tax, garbage-in will translate to garbage-out.
Many companies already have the magic formula to fix these data issues at their fingertips. Start by preparing for this wave of VAT digitization with a project to analyse internal data issues and work with upstream internal and external stakeholders – including suppliers – to fix them.
Tools designed to introduce automated controls for VAT filing processes can help achieve better insight into the upstream data issues that need ironing out. These same tools can also help you through the CTC journey by re-using data extraction and integration methods set up for VAT reporting for CTC transmission, thereby creating better data governance and keeping a connection between these two naturally linked processes.
A lot of bad data stems from residual paper-based processes such as paper or PDF supplier invoices or customer purchase orders. Taking measures now to switch to automated processes based on structured, fully machine-readable alternatives will make a big difference.
Improving invoice data is not the only challenge. With the inevitable broadening of document types to be submitted under CTC rules (from invoice to buy-side approval messages, to transport documents and payment status data) tax administrations will cross-check more and more of your data, as well as trading partners’ and third parties’ data — think financial institutions, customs, and other available data points.
Tax administrations are unlikely to stop their digitization efforts at indirect tax. Mandates to introduce The Standard Audit File for Tax (SAF-T ) and similar e-accounting requirements show how quickly countries are moving away from the old world of tax and onsite audits.
All this data, from multiple sources with strong authentication, will paint an increasingly detailed and undeniable picture of your business operations. It is just a matter of time before corporate income tax returns will be pre-filled by tax administrations who expect little to no legitimate changes from your side.
‘Substance over form’ is a popular aphorism in the world of tax. As more business applications and data streams become readily accessible by tax administrations, you need to start considering data quality and consistency as a first step towards thriving in the world of digitized tax enforcement.
In the end, tax administrations want to understand your business. They don’t just want data, they want meaningful information on what you do, why you do it, how you trade, with whom and when. This is also exactly what your owners and management want.
So the ultimate goals are the same between businesses and tax administrations – it’s just that businesses will often prioritise operational efficiency and financial objectives whereas tax administrations focus on getting the best, most objective information possible.
Tax administrations introducing CTCs as an objective may be a blessing in disguise, and there are benefits of introducing better analytics to your business to comply with tax administration requirements.
The real value lies in real-time insight into business operations and financial indicators such as cash management or supply chain weaknesses. This level of instant insight into your own business also enables you to always be one step ahead, leaving you in control of the picture your data is providing to governments.
CTCs are the natural next step on a journey to a brave new world of business transparency.
Download VAT Trends: Toward Continuous Transaction Controls for other perspectives on the future of tax. Follow us on LinkedIn and Twitter to keep up-to-date with regulatory news and developments.
It’s good to see light at the end of the tunnel. Nonetheless, it’s too little, too late for many smaller – but also plenty of larger – companies. Thousands couldn’t weather the storm because they were particularly dependent on human contact. Others were affected disproportionally simply because COVID-19 hit them just as they traversed a difficult period in their life cycle. As we see the first successes of anti-COVID-19 vaccines, businesses and markets are gaining confidence that by the last quarter of 2021, countries will be back at a new cruising speed. With a few notable exceptions, many of the world’s strongest economies will take years to recover from the aftermath.
As with all crises, the past year has accentuated weaknesses and accelerated failures. Whilst it must be acknowledged that the COVID-19 crisis would have been far worse without the internet and the current state of technology adoption worldwide, remaining pockets of legacy processes where companies were lagging in their digital transformation have become highlighted as employees struggled to balance health concerns with the imperative to keep things running in deserted offices and data centers.
One area where inefficiencies have been exposed is on-premises software. Many companies have started adopting cloud-based software to support different categories of workflows and connections with trading partners; however, many larger companies have been reluctant to move core enterprise systems – such as ERPs, logistics or reservation systems – to the cloud. The reason behind this reluctance is often that legacy systems have been highly customized. Whilst many enterprise software vendors offer public-cloud versions that present many benefits over on-premises deployment in theory, the practical challenges of adapting organizations and processes to ‘canned’ workflows designed around standard best practices have often outweighed them.
Another set of challenges are more intricate. Manual processes still dominate in order and invoice management across companies of all sizes globally. Where workflow software allows accounting personnel to access the system remotely, approvals and postings could be managed from home offices, but the prevalence of paper in many vendor and customer relationships still required people to manage scanning, printing, and mailing or – yes – faxing key documents from offices with limited access.
These problems will be harder to overcome, as expensive industrial-strength machines for the processing of paper documents cannot easily be put in home offices. The answer to this challenge doesn’t lie in creative ways to convert people’s kitchens into scan or print centers, but in finally taking the big leap towards end-to-end data integration.
Interestingly, if COVID-19 isn’t enough of a reason to take that automation leap, businesses can expect a helping hand from tax administrations. Many countries had already started large-scale programs to push continuous transaction controls (CTCs). Such as mandatory real-time clearance of digital invoices. The current global health crisis is pushing tax administrations to accelerate these programs. We have seen announcements of plans towards such compulsory e-invoicing or digital reporting of accounting data in countries like France, Jordan and Saudi Arabia. In addition to several countries including Poland and Slovakia who stated their intent to follow in the footsteps of countries in Latin America and also European frontrunners like Italy and Turkey. Even in Germany, which has long resisted the call of CTCs, a significant political party has proposed decisive action in this direction.
These initiatives are still often motivated by the need to close tax gaps. However the need for resilience in revenue collection is clearly another driver. Also, examples from countries like Brazil have shown that CTCs massively improve governments’ ability to track and monitor the economic effects of a crisis down to the smallest sectoral detail. This gives them granular data that can be used for surgical fiscal policy intervention to guide the most severely affected activities through a crisis.
With all circumstances conspiring to give businesses a reason to get across that last mile towards full automation – the interface between their and their trading partners’ sales and purchasing operations – you would think that companies are now putting plans in place to get ready for a fully digital, much more resilient set of processes and organizational structures.
Unfortunately, the way that CTC mandates get rolled out and the way that companies respond to them have historically rather slowed down investment in business process automation and the adoption of modern cloud-based enterprise software.
CTC mandates are unbelievably diverse, ranging from a full online second set of accounting books to be maintained through – among other things – additional classification of supplies in the government-hosted system in Greece, to a completely different setup including service providers and transaction payment reporting being designed in France. Representatives from China are talking about blockchain-based invoicing controls, whilst countries like Poland and Saudi Arabia prepare for centralized, government-run invoice exchange networks. Mandate deadlines tend to be too short, and tax administrations make countless structural adjustments – each typically also with short deadlines and only available in local language – during implementation periods and for years thereafter.
Tax administrations could however claim with some legitimacy that deadlines are always too short, almost regardless of how much transition time taxpayers are granted, because many businesses structurally prepare too late. The global trend towards CTCs, SAF-T and similar mandates has been apparent to companies for years, yet many are ill-prepared; particularly many multinational businesses continue to consider that VAT compliance is a matter to be resolved by local subsidiaries, which step by step creates a massive web of localized procedures which rather than corresponding to corporate best practices were designed by tax administration offices.
Which brings us back to why companies aren’t adopting flashy new releases of enterprise software packages in public cloud mode. Or further automating their trading partner exchanges, more quickly. All parties in this equation want the same thing. That is seamless and secure sharing of relevant data among businesses, and between businesses and tax administrations. However kneejerk reactions to regulatory mandates by businesses, and lack of tax administrations’ familiarity with modern enterprise systems, are creating the opposite effect. Companies panic-fix local mandates without a sufficient understanding of the impact of their decisions. Neither on their future ability to innovate and standardize. The enterprise resources come first to put systems in place post-haste. They then manage the problems stemming from adopting a patchwork of local tax-driven financial and physical supply chain data integration approaches. This comes from IT budgets that then don’t get spent on proper automation.
Several things can break this vicious circle. Businesses should change their way of addressing these VAT digitization changes as revolutionary rather than evolutionary. By being well informed and well prepared, it is possible to adopt a strategic approach to take advantage of CTC mandates rather than suffer from them. Tax administrations must do their part by adopting existing good practices in designing, implementing, and operating digital platforms for mandatory business data interchange purposes. The ICC CTC Principles are an excellent way to give the world economy that much-needed immunity boost, allowing businesses and governments to improve resilience while freeing up resources locked up in inefficient manual business and tax compliance processes.
To find out more about what we believe the future holds, download VAT Trends: Toward Continuous Transaction Controls and follow us on LinkedIn and Twitter to keep up-to-date with regulatory news and other updates.
Technology can help businesses and governments measure and mitigate the impact of Covid-19. With further waves and recessions biting, technology offers an unparalleled opportunity for governments and business alike to gain a clearer picture of the current panorama. Digital tax returns and real-time or near-real time reporting offer up-to-date financial insight and many tax authorities are pressing ahead with digitisation plans.
The most powerful tool to harness amid economic strife and the most difficult to wield is clarity. Technology can offer this amidst Covid-19.
Technological developments and adoption of digitised processes offer an opportunity to measure tax lost at a macro level. Those nations already implementing continuous transaction controls (CTCs) are at an advantage having insight into lost revenue in the crisis. This year’s events highlighted the benefits of having a panoramic and timely digital view of a nation’s economic health, with economic recovery contingent on access to granular data.
Within Latin America, leading the way in terms of digitising compliance, highly detailed COVID-19 impact analysis reports have been published at key points during the crisis as a result of access to in-line invoice data for all transactions in their economies. The immediacy and quality of this data, and because it covers all or a very large proportion of a country’s economy, is a real game changer.
The trend towards CTCs was set before the pandemic, but the tendency has been catalysed faster than previously thought possible. Though the advantages of CTCs were evident before, with EY predicting that a full economic recovery isn’t achievable until 2024 at the earliest, they offer an unrivalled mechanism for businesses and governments to monitor the situation.
The benefits of digitalisation are more significant since ongoing and dynamic assessments are recognised as essential tools to inform government and business decision making. Firms submitting their actual invoice data from business transactions instead of summary returns directly to government platforms (B2G) in real or near-to-real-time, rather than periodically, can instantly view their outgoings; in turn, governments can gauge the macro picture based on overall VAT loss more accurately using digital means.
The advantages of a live dashboard that reveals the evolution of supply and demand are clear. In real-time tracks stock movements, imports/exports and price fluctuations. Having insight into these and many other data points allows a level of analysis into the minutiae of deep subcategories of goods and services offered and sold in an economy and provides clearer visibility for businesses and governments. This kind of data can dispel uncertainty, allowing companies and authorities alike to cut through risks and identify opportunities linked with policy and investment decisions.
Overall, if countries could see the loss in real-time, they can also track changing behaviours and market size, rather than relying on informed guesses without robust data to back up forecasts as currently. After all, to effectively plan for later scenarios, it’s key to understand what’s going on now.
Businesses both small and large are subject to the same rules on evidencing their fiscal activity and financial footprint, and so indirect tax measurement is the crucial indicator of the true damage of these troubling times.
Sophisticated, intricate supply and value chains are all implicated in a complex web, creating intense inter-dependency at all levels. Paramount to successfully surviving in this climate is the ability to monitor developments as they happen. For tax authorities, keeping a close eye on individual digital invoices and other key commercial data allows a forensic and accurate view of how many firms are still afloat. At a wider level, which economies are in serious hot water.
Major VAT discrepancies were already a concern before the crisis and are more so now as consumption tax rate reductions and other fiscal incentives linked with economic inactivity look set to have a devastating impact on both short and medium term revenue collection. Measuring and even reducing the VAT gap will be increasingly important.
Access to data will help unravel the spider’s web of complexities. It provides a better understanding of what the steps both through and out of the recession will be. For business and governments, investing in partnerships that operate across a global landscape will bolster knowledge needed to map out the road to economic recovery. For tax authorities, a clear priority is to understand markets and the impacts on them. This data analysis that keeps pace with developments as they happen is essential.
With whole economies already facing devastating deficit and profit loss from Covid-19, technology must continue to give us the clear vision we need to recover. At a macro level the insights technology can offer are unparalleled. However even on a micro level, individuals can harness data and keep an ongoing record of activity to guide strategic decisions and future investments. With the economic road ahead of many of the world’s economies looking rocky, technology and real-time data offers the potential for a clearer future.
To keep up to date with the changing VAT compliance landscape, download VAT Trends: Toward Continuous Transaction Controls. Follow us on LinkedIn and Twitter to keep up with regulatory news and other updates.
The French Minister of Public Accounts and Action, which has authority over all tax matters, has taken advantage of the process that is required to transpose the EU E-Commerce Directive to launch a number of initiatives to curb VAT fraud, including a renewed attempt to create a system of mandatory e-invoicing.
A program for the gradual implementation of electronic invoicing for business-to-government (public procurement) transactions is currently entering its final stages whereby even small companies will soon be required to send their invoices to public entities via the so-called Chorus platform.
Current President Macron had previously, as Finance Minister under his predecessor François Hollande, already proposed to introduce a similar obligation for B2B e-invoicing, but this proposal was rejected due to inconsistencies with the VAT Directive and a perceived increase in the administrative burden on companies.
However, times have changed and France – like other EU Member States – is seeing new opportunities to go down the B2B e-invoicing mandate path since Italy led the way on 1 January 2019. The Italian government obtained an EU derogation from certain provisions in the VAT Directive which allowed the country to go live with a countrywide e-invoicing mandate that is based on prior real-time controls by the tax administration. Such ‘clearance’ e-invoicing systems, which are generally inspired by the approach taken in the past 5-10 years by Latin American countries, have proven to be very effective tools in the fight against VAT fraud.
While it’s still too early to talk about a concrete (or theoretical) French proposal for B2B e-invoicing, it is clear that the government means business. Minister Gérald Darmanin has stated that the government will begin a consultation process that involves the private sector to discuss how to best get small and medium sized companies up-and-running as smoothly as possible.
To find out more about what we believe the future holds, download Trends: e-invoicing compliance and follow us on LinkedIn and Twitter to keep up-to-date with regulatory news and other updates.