11 Need-to-Know Stats from 2020 DtC Wine Shipping Webinar

Delaney McDonald
March 26, 2020

The annual Direct-to-Consumer Wine Shipping Report is full of data that can help you make strategic operational and marketing decisions for your business. Out of the dense 36-page report, Alex Koral, Senior Regulatory Counsel, Sovos ShipCompliant, and Andrew Adams, Editor, Wine Analytics Report, a part of Wines Vines Analytics unpack 11 key statistics and offer some expert insights into the report’s top trends in the DtC Shipping Data webinar

  • The DtC channel continued to grow. In 2019 there was a 7.4 percent increase in shipment value equaling $3.2 billion. We’ve seen higher growth in previous years, but considering no new states opened to DtC shipping it signals very strong growth.


  • Average bottle price saw the largest increase in the past eight years from $39.70 to $40.70. In comparison, the average on-premise bottle purchase is about $11.This gives insight into what consumers are looking for in DtC versus on-premise wine purchases. DtC consumers are seeking out more rare, unique and higher priced bottles. This large price increase demonstrates the premiumization trend is still strong within the DtC channel. It also signals consumer confidence in the DtC market, and their trust that DtC shippers and carriers can safely deliver products that they have spent a premium price on.


  • Napa and Sonoma continue to be the leaders for total volume and value growth by region. Sonoma has grown significantly in volume shipped but Napa retains the lead when it comes to value shipped. Among other regions, Oregon continues to have strong growth in both volume shipped and value shipped. This year we’ve separated out the California Central Coast from the Rest of California, to better signal growth from those important wine growing regions.


  • For the second year, Sonoma shipped more wine cases than Napa. This trend demonstrates the influence and success of Sonoma County. Factors contributing to this include the influence of marketing to spur tasting room sales along with saturation in the Napa market.


  • Oregon’s DtC market continues to grow. Pinot Noir is the most popular varietal in Oregon with a value of $143 million, a volume of 233 thousand cases shipped, and an average bottle price of $51. Much of Oregon’s success can be attributed to shipments made within Oregon, as that region has spurred tourism efforts to bring more locals to wineries. Oregon residents per capita receive more DtC shipments than in any other state, demonstrating how engaging your own residents and community can be extremely effective.


  • The Central Coast region produced more than 11 million cases in 2019 and the number of wineries continues to grow. This region includes the counties of Santa Cruz, Monterrey, Santa Barbara, San Benito and San Luis Obispo. DtC shipments in this region had a value of $324 million and a volume of nearly 800 thousand cases shipped.


  • Large wineries saw impressive growth in value and volume. Large wineries are still a small segment of the overall market, but saw a 28.8 percent increase in value shipped and 12.9 percent increase in volume shipped. This shows that there is increasing interest by big players to get into the DtC market. The segment “very small wineries” saw strong growth in value shipped with a 10 percent increase despite a small reduction in volume shipped, reflecting that premiumization is still a relevant trend in DtC shipping.


  • The varietals Syrah/Shiraz and Cabernet Franc saw the largest increases in value and volume shipped. These two varietals saw great growth in the DtC channel, despite still being less popular within the three-tier system. This growth could signal that consumers will increase demand for these varietals in the three-tier system in the future, and also how the DtC channel can be utilized to sell novel or unfamiliar varietals.


  • The top varietals shipped by volume continue to be Cabernet Sauvignon, Pinot Noir, Red Blend, Chardonnay and Zinfandel.


  • Top ship-to destination states remain similar to the past several years with no new states opening up to DtC shipping.


  • Older generations continue to dominate the DtC shipping channel. This graph starkly shows how Millennials and Gen-X are less active in the wine market. However, this means there are a lot of opportunities to expand with these different age segments. As younger generations gain purchasing power, it is likely they will gain interest in the wine market. However, by engaging with these younger generations today can spur earlier entry. When appealing to younger generations consider messaging, availability/ accessibility on any device, and wine type. It is cliche, but younger generations do seem to respond more to personal stories, engaging experiences, and novel products, which are all areas that DtC wine shippers can excel at.


Watch the full webinar here, and send any questions to askshipcompliant@sovos.com, where we’ll round up the questions we receive and answer them in periodic blog posts.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.


Delaney McDonald

Share This Post

LATAM VAT & Fiscal Reporting
May 20, 2020
Sovos Acquires Taxweb, Extends Tax Determination Capabilities in World’s Most Challenging Compliance Landscape

Earlier this month Sovos announced its second acquisition of 2020, completing our solution for Brazil with an unparalleled offering that solves tax compliance in the place where it is most challenging to do so.  Too many companies doing business in Brazil have been burdened by managing multiple point solutions for continuous transaction controls (CTCs), tax […]

Sales & Use Tax United States
November 24, 2020
Dissecting the Rhode Island Economic Nexus Sales Tax

Prior to the South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc. decision, Rhode Island had already enacted legislation related to economic nexus and remote sellers. Effective August 17, 2017, remote sellers needed to comply with certain registration or notice requirements depending on whether the seller qualified as a “non-collecting retailer,” a “retail sale facilitator,” or a “referrer.” Depending […]

Sales & Use Tax United States
November 23, 2020
Yes, there are Sales Taxes, and the Impact on Holiday Shopping is Real

How much can I expect to spend on holiday shopping this year? Well, that may depend on where you live and shop. You see, your location can play a huge role in dictating the final price of an item. This is due to the fluctuation in sales tax rates across the country at both the […]

Sales & Use Tax United States
November 23, 2020
Basics of the Indiana Sales Tax Nexus

The South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc. Supreme Court decision allowed states to require sellers with no physical presence to collect and remit sales tax if they have an economic nexus with the taxing state. Indiana responded by enacting an economic nexus law like the one upheld in that case. Indiana HEA 1129 was challenged by […]

Sales & Use Tax United States
November 23, 2020
Alaska Sales Tax Nexus Details

While there is no state-wide Alaska sales tax, numerous local cities and boroughs have their own sales tax ordinances. After the South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc. decision, several of these local governments established the Alaska Remote Seller Sales Tax Commission and adopted the Uniform Alaska Remote Seller Sales Tax Code to have a system to […]

Tax Compliance United States
November 20, 2020
Is it Time to Level the Tax Playing Field when it Comes to Food?

By Kelsey O’Gorman & Denise Hatem In the United States, food is the third-largest expense for lower-income households, after housing and transportation. For higher-income households, food ranks fifth, following housing, transportation, pension contributions and health care. While income disparity can skew percentages of spending on essential items such as food and housing, there are also […]