California Amends Tax Rules for Delivered Sales Affecting Instate Wineries

Alex Koral
May 8, 2019

On April 25, 2019, the Governor of California approved Assembly Bill No. 147, amending the state’s rules on when and where businesses shipping through the state have a sales tax obligation, which will likely have major implications for wineries selling direct-to-consumer (DtC).

Over the last year, we at ShipCompliant by Sovos have been monitoring as states have adopted economic nexus rules following the Supreme Court’s ruling in South Dakota v. Wayfair last June, and how they impact the DtC wine shipping market. For the most part, these changes to nexus rules have been focused on increasing tax collection from out-of-state retailers.

California’s recent change, however, establishes a requirement on in-state businesses to collect more local district taxes, which will affect almost every winery shipping wine in the state.

Local district taxes are voter-approved taxes imposed by cities, counties and other local jurisdiction that are added to the California base sales and use tax rate.

What Does Assembly Bill No. 147 Require?

The main provisions of the bill require remote sellers to collect and remit California sales and use tax if the seller had over $500,000 in sales of tangible personal property for delivery into California in the preceding or current calendar year. A similar requirement had previously been set out by the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration (CDTFA) in December 2018, where the economic thresholds for remote sellers was set at 200 or more separate transactions or retail sales in excess of $100,000. The new bill raises the revenue threshold to $500,000 and removes the per-transaction threshold.

However — and this is where we see the biggest potential impact on California wineries, the bill also amends the rules regarding when an in-state and out-of-state business must collect local district taxes.

California law prior to Wayfair only required a business to collect a local district tax if the business was “doing business” in that district. Last December, the CDTFA set out a new rule, in light of Wayfair, stating that if a California business met the $100,000 in sales or 200 separate transaction threshold in a district then the business would be required to collect that district’s local taxes. This new rule went into effect on April 1, 2019.

This new bill changes that rule. Retroactively applying to April 1, 2019, and going forward, if a business makes over $500,000 in annual revenue in California, it is required to collect and remit all district taxes, regardless of how much revenue it receives from any single district. This means that all California wineries with an annual revenue of $500,000 or more will have to collect district tax on all shipments they make within the state, even for districts where they make a single shipment.

Non-California wineries have long been required to collect sales tax on shipments to the state, as a condition of getting a DtC license there. However, this requirement only extended to the state rate of 7.5% (6% plus the 1.5% state-wide local rate), but not to the district taxes. For those wineries, a district tax only applied if they were “doing business” in that district, which implied specific physical presence there. Going forward, non-California wineries will have to collect and remit the same district taxes for all locations in the state if they meet the $500,000 of California revenue threshold as an in-state winery.

What Can I Do to Prepare?

Wineries shipping DtC in California must now be ready to calculate local district taxes across the state, and cannot rely on only collecting tax based on their premises rate. This will require a concerted effort to look up rates across the state at the time of purchase, to avoid the potential pitfalls of under- or over-calculating tax collected from customers.

ShipCompliant by Sovos users currently can receive California district tax rates across the state. This can be very easily done by switching one’s California Tax Preferences to “Local Taxes.” Thereafter, any tax lookup for a California location, whether done in an account or through our integration with sales systems, will include the proper local district rate.

____________________________________________________________________

We have seen a tremendous amount of change regarding tax policy over the last year as states move to expand tax obligations on out-of-state businesses. For the most part, DtC shipping wineries have not been greatly affected as most states have for years required them to accept a tax obligation in order to ship wine (except for a few states, like Colorado, Minnesota, and Iowa).

This change by California, however, will have a major impact on DtC shipping wineries, as California is both by leaps and bounds the largest source and destination for DtC shipped wine. Starting April 1, 2019, and going forward, the glut of these shipments will now need to have local taxes assessed and paid to the state.

View Assembly Bill No. 147 in its entirety.

Request a demo of ShipCompliant

 

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Alex Koral

Alex Koral is Senior Regulatory Counsel for Sovos ShipCompliant in the company’s Boulder, Colorado office. He actively researches beverage alcohol regulations and market developments to inform development of Sovos’ ShipCompliant product and help educate the industry on compliance issues. Alex has been in the beverage alcohol arena since 2015, after receiving his J.D. from the University of Colorado Law School.
Share This Post

Latin America VAT & Fiscal Reporting
May 20, 2020
Sovos Acquires Taxweb, Extends Tax Determination Capabilities in World’s Most Challenging Compliance Landscape

Earlier this month Sovos announced its second acquisition of 2020, completing our solution for Brazil with an unparalleled offering that solves tax compliance in the place where it is most challenging to do so.  Too many companies doing business in Brazil have been burdened by managing multiple point solutions for continuous transaction controls (CTCs), tax […]

Tax Information Reporting
January 19, 2021
IRS and States Continue To Focus on Gaps in Nonemployee Compensation Income Reporting

Nonemployee compensation is the income paid by companies that classify an individual as a nonemployee. Nonemployee compensation can represent a variety of business payments including fees, commissions, prizes or rewards. The IRS and states use a variety of information returns to verify the accuracy of income claimed by individuals and business taxpayers including Form 1099-MISC […]

EMEA Tax Compliance Turkey VAT & Fiscal Reporting
January 18, 2021
What to Consider When Changing E-Transformation Service Provider in Turkey

In today’s business world, it’s common for companies to use third party providers. This includes for activities such as regulatory integrations, with organizations using third parties to assist with the processing and submitting of electronic records in Turkey including e-invoice, e-ledger, e-arşiv invoice and e-delivery note on behalf of the taxpayer in compliance with the […]

E-Invoicing Compliance EMEA
January 17, 2021
The South Korean E-invoicing System in a Nutshell

Collection of real-time fiscal data is becoming one of the core public finance decision making tools. Transactional data provides a timely and reliable overview of the business sector, enabling governments to rely on analytical data in the decision-making process. This is what has led many governments to adopt Continuous Transaction Controls (CTC) regimes that require […]

EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
January 14, 2021
How the EU-UK Trade and Co-operation Agreement Affects Business

The EU-UK Trade and Co-operation Agreement (TCA) was finally agreed on 24 December 2020, a week before the end of the transition period. The TCA has been fully implemented into UK law but remains provisional as it needs to be ratified in the European Parliament. It is therefore being applied on a provisional basis until […]

E-Invoicing Compliance EMEA
January 13, 2021
Greece’s myDATA scheme postponed to April 2021

On 31 December 2020, in a last-minute change, the Greek government once again postponed the go-live date of myDATA to April 2021. This announcement had been anticipated and came as a great relief to Greek taxpayers who were concerned about being ready for the previous go-live date of January 2021. The first quarter of 2021 […]