Marketplace Facilitator Tax Collection Responsibilities in the European Union

Denise Hatem
May 20, 2019

Marketplace Facilitators and Payment Processors Find Themselves in the Global Tax Compliance Crosshairs – Part III

The spread of the digital economy presents massive growth opportunity, but it also creates challenges for global taxation. As the VAT landscape responds to technological change, compliance becomes increasingly burdensome and costly, and the need for a complete solution for modern tax is more important than ever. 

Parts I and II of this series, “Marketplace Facilitators and Payment Processors – The New Taxpayers?,” discussed efforts in the United States and Latin America, respectively, to catch marketplace facilitators and payment processors in the tax compliance net. This post addresses new burdens for such operators in the European Union and examines recent changes to the EU VAT framework applicable to the ever-evolving digital economy.

The VAT ecommerce package in the European Union

The VAT ecommerce package, adopted by the Economic and Financial Affairs Council in December 2017, is aimed at adapting the EU VAT system to the growing digital economy and facilitating VAT collection when consumers buy goods and services online. Key provisions of the package, concerning the VAT liability of online marketplaces or platforms, begin to come into effect in January 2021.

The “deeming provisions” for online marketplaces

Council Directive 2017/2455, which is part of the VAT ecommerce package, introduces so-called “deeming provisions” into the EU VAT Directive. Under these new rules:

1.    Marketplaces that facilitate imports into the EU of goods valued at € 150 or less will be deemed to have received and supplied those goods.

2.    Marketplaces that facilitate Business-to-Consumer (B2C) intra-EU supplies of goods by non-EU businesses will be deemed to have received and supplied those goods. Specifically, the online platform will be deemed to receive the goods from the online seller in a B2B transaction and then supply the goods to the online buyer in a B2C transaction.

In short, under these new rules, the marketplaces will be liable for VAT collection and remittance. Because the provisions effectively divide a single sale into two, proper tax determination requires that marketplaces understand each leg of the transaction and the applicable tax consequences. First, under a proposed amendment to the Directive, the “sale” from the marketplace to the online buyer (deemed B2C supply) is treated as the supply with transport. The marketplace would incur VAT liability in the country where the goods were located when transport began. The second is a fictional supply made from the seller to the marketplace (deemed B2B supply), which would be treated as a supply without transport. 

New administrative burdens for marketplace facilitators

Directive 2017/2455 also introduces a new administrative burden for marketplaces that facilitate B2C supplies of goods or services within the EU. Specifically, such marketplaces must keep “sufficiently detailed” records of the supplies. These records must be made available electronically on request and must be kept for 10 years.

Clarifying the definition of marketplace facilitator

The VAT ecommerce package was initially criticized for lack of clarity. In response, implementing rules have been introduced to define what it means to be a marketplace facilitator. Under the rules, the word “facilitates” means “use of an electronic interface to allow a customer and a supplier, offering goods for sale through the interface, to enter into contact which results in a supply of goods through that electronic interface.” A business would not be considered to “facilitate” a sale when it doesn’t set the terms and conditions of the supply, is not involved in authorizing the charge to the customer, and is not involved in the ordering or delivering the goods. Businesses that only process payments or list or advertise goods would not be considered a facilitator.

Marketplace rules in EU member states

Member states must adopt and publish laws and regulations necessary to comply with these new requirements by December 31, 2020. However, some countries have already enacted marketplace rules:

  • German legislation makes electronic marketplace operators liable for merchants’ unpaid VAT and requires that they collect information on third-party sales effective January 2019.
  • Italy enacted a law that mirrors the marketplace provisions of the Directive and applies them to sales involving certain electronics, such as cell phones, laptops, and tablets.

Obligations for payment service providers

The European Commission proposed a Council Directive which would require cooperation between payment service providers (such as credit card companies) and tax authorities. Specifically, the proposal requires member states to ensure that payment service providers keep “sufficiently detailed” records of payees and payment transactions executed for each calendar quarter. This requirement applies when there is a cross-border transfer of funds by a payment service provider who executes more than 25 payment transactions to the same payee within the course of a calendar quarter.

The Commission reasons that the information, which would include the payee’s VAT and IBAN numbers, is necessary for tax authorities to detect and combat cross-border ecommerce fraud. The provisions would apply starting in January 2022.

How to comply with the demands of modern tax

In this era of digital transformation, international tax is continuously growing in complexity and nuance, pushing businesses into a race to stay ahead. Learn how Sovos can help.


Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.


Denise Hatem

Denise Hatem is a Regulatory Counsel at Sovos specializing in international taxation, with a focus on value added tax systems in the European Union. Denise received her B.A. from the University of Connecticut and her J.D. from Notre Dame Law School. She is a member of the Massachusetts Bar.
Share This Post

North America ShipCompliant
May 25, 2023
Out-of-State Breweries Gain Self Distribution, DtC Rights in Oregon

Under a settlement agreement, breweries located outside of Oregon now have more options for selling into the Beaver State, including direct-to-consumer (DtC) shipping and self-distribution to retailers. The settlement arose out of a lawsuit filed by a group of Washington breweries last year challenging Oregon laws that limited beer self-distribution to in-state breweries and DtC […]

EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
May 24, 2023
VAT and Art: What you need to know

Significant inflation increases have impacted most of the world’s economies, with the UK still above 10% in 2023. This increase means a reduction in the purchasing power of consumers. Together with increases in the cost of raw materials, this has created uncertainty regarding growth of entire industrial departments and reduced profit margins for companies. The […]

North America ShipCompliant
May 23, 2023
Top 5 Myths Surrounding Retailer Direct-to-Consumer Wine Shipping

By Tom Wark, Executive Director, National Association of Wine Retailers Politics breed myths. This has always been the case as politics is, at its most fundamental, a form of storytelling. So it should be no surprise that myths have arisen as various elements of the wine industry have fought against consumers and specialty wine retailer seeking […]

May 23, 2023
IPT: Location of Risk and Territoriality

Much of the discussion on the Location of Risk triggering a country’s entitlement to levy insurance premium tax (IPT) and parafiscal charges focuses on the rules for different types of insurance. European Union (EU) Directive 2009/138/EC (Solvency II) set out these rules. However, a related topic of growing importance in this area concerns territoriality, i.e. […]

Asia Pacific E-Invoicing Compliance
May 23, 2023
Japan: New e-Invoice Retention Requirements

Japan’s new e-invoice retention requirements are part of the country’s latest Electronic Record Retention Law (ERRL) reform. Along with measures such as the Qualified Invoice System (QIS) and the possibility to issue and send invoices electronically via PEPPOL, Japan is implementing different indirect tax control measures, seeking to reduce tax evasion and promote digital transformation. […]