Continuous Transaction Controls (CTC): The Future of Compliance

Sovos
September 20, 2024

This blog was last updated on September 20, 2024

One key development shaping the future of tax compliance is the rise of Continuous Transaction Controls (CTCs). CTCs represent a shift in how governments monitor and enforce tax compliance, requiring businesses to submit transaction data to tax authority systems on an ongoing basis.  The models differ drastically from traditional, post-transaction tax reporting systems, where businesses would submit their invoices or tax filings periodically (e.g., monthly or quarterly).

What are Continuous Transaction Controls (CTCs)?

Continuous Transaction Controls (CTCs) are a framework in which transaction data must be submitted to government authorities for validation either in real-time or before they are issued to customers. This process involves transmitting business activity data directly from the taxpayer’s systems to a government-designated platform, ensuring tax compliance either before, during, or immediately after the business transactions take place between the parties. 

Why are Tax Administrations Enforcing CTCs?

Globally, governments are increasingly enforcing CTCs to increase transparency and eliminate tax evasion. By requiring real or near-real-time transmission of transaction data directly to tax administrations through electronic invoicing (e-invoicing), CTC systems provide significant advantages for local tax administrations and the overall global economy, including:

  • Increased tax revenue: CTCs ensure that the correct taxes are paid on every transaction, leading to more efficient tax collection and increased revenue for governments. This is especially important for countries facing significant tax gaps or high levels of tax evasion.
  • Reduced tax fraud: By requiring real-time invoice reporting, CTCs improve the accuracy of tax data collected. This reduces the risk of errors that can occur when businesses report transactions months after they occur.
  • Informed economic policy: E-invoicing data allows governments to make more informed decisions regarding economic policy and revenue planning. For instance, if data reveals that certain industries are experiencing slower growth or higher costs, governments can introduce targeted tax relief measures or incentives to support these industries.

How Do CTCs Work?

Compliance with e-invoicing regulations varies by country. Although there are different CTC models, the core process typically consists of the same five steps: e-invoice generation, submission, validation, decision, and issuance.

  1. Invoice Generation: A business generates an electronic invoice (e-invoice) as part of its normal business operations.
  2. Real-Time Transaction Submission: When a business generates an invoice, it is immediately sent to the tax administration’s platform before being issued to the buyer.
  3. Validation by the Tax Authority: The tax authority checks the invoice for compliance with local tax laws. This could include verifying the accuracy of tax calculations, confirming that the correct VAT rate is applied, and ensuring the invoice contains all required fields.
  4. Approval or Rejection: If the invoice is compliant, the tax authority approves it, allowing the business to send it to the customer. If the invoice is incorrect, it will be rejected, and the business must make the necessary corrections before resubmitting.
  5. Issuance: Once the invoice is approved, the business can send it to the buyer with the necessary validation stamp or code. This ensures that the buyer receives an invoice that has already been approved for tax compliance.

Types of E-Invoicing CTC Models

Different countries employ varying models for e-invoicing and CTCs, each with its unique approach to validation and data submission.

Clearance: Under the clearance model, all transactional data must be approved by the tax authority before being exchanged between businesses through electronic invoices. Examples of e-invoicing clearance models include the Sistema di Interscambio (SdI) platform in Italy and the GIB system in Turkey.

Centralized Exchange: Countries that use a centralized exchange system for e-invoicing typically require all invoices to pass through a single government-controlled platform for validation before they are sent to trading partners. Examples of centralized exchange for e-invoicing include the AFIP platform in Argentina and FACe for B2G transactions in Spain.

PEPPOL CTC: The PEPPOL CTC model integrates real-time reporting to tax authorities with the existing PEPPOL framework, allowing businesses to automate invoicing while complying with government regulations. By using PEPPOL Access Points, businesses can exchange invoices and simultaneously report transactions, offering both convenience and regulatory compliance.

Belgium and Greece are a few examples of those leveraging the PEPPOL network, though these implementations may not always include direct tax authority controls like traditional CTC systems. Singapore has also implemented PEPPOL for e-invoicing, aligning with a decentralized framework that allows businesses to streamline processes while complying with government regulations.

DCTCE (Decentralized CTC and Exchange): The DCTCE model expands on PEPPOL CTC by allowing the use of various technical standards beyond PEPPOL specifications. The decentralized model still enables real-time reporting to tax authorities but offers greater flexibility in terms of the technological infrastructure used for invoice exchange.

Hybrid Models: France, for example, uses a hybrid model that combines both centralized exchange and decentralized systems like DCTCE. This approach allows flexibility while maintaining rigorous tax controls, as it adapts to different business needs and governmental oversight methods.

Pros vs. Cons of E-Invoicing and CTC Adoption

This next-generation taxation requirement offers businesses a more structured and reliable framework for managing tax compliance. Mandatory e-invoicing helps businesses by:

  • Reducing the risk of penalties: With real-time validation of invoices, businesses ensure transactions are compliant with local tax laws before they are finalized, thereby reducing the risk of costly penalties and audits.
  • Eliminating discrepancies: Real-time validation also ensures that any mistakes are caught and corrected before the invoice is sent to the customer.
  • Expediting payment processing: With CTCs in place, businesses can expedite the invoicing process, leading to faster payment cycles and improved cash flow.

However, adapting to CTCs isn’t without its challenges. Without a single regulatory management system or tax authority platform, businesses face the challenge of integrating their systems with various platforms and CTC formats used across different countries. For businesses operating across multiple jurisdictions, the complexity of different CTC models, regulations, and technology requirements can be overwhelming. Each country has unique rules, ranging from clearance models that require pre-approval from tax authorities to decentralized systems that offer more flexibility.

The Future of Global Tax Compliance

Continuous transaction monitoring through real-time reporting is the future of tax compliance. As governments worldwide continue to recognize the value of accurate, timely data to combat tax fraud and increase revenue collection, CTCs will continue to become a core component of tax enforcement.

Companies that embrace this change will not only mitigate the risk of penalties but also streamline their operations, leading to more efficient tax management and improved cash flow. However, this evolution requires more than just regulatory compliance—it demands a transformation in how they manage invoicing, data management, and reporting.

To navigate the intricacies of CTC implementation, organizations need the right tools and expertise. Sovos software offers a powerful, automated solution specifically designed to manage the complexities of global tax compliance. With the Sovos Continuous Transaction Controls Software, teams can automate the submission and validation of electronic invoices, keeping teams up to date with the latest regulatory changes, regardless of where they operate.

Learn more about how Sovos is helping businesses stay compliant with CTC obligations around the world: Sovos for CTC Compliance.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Sovos

Sovos is a global provider of tax, compliance and trust solutions and services that enable businesses to navigate an increasingly regulated world with true confidence. Purpose-built for always-on compliance capabilities, our scalable IT-driven solutions meet the demands of an evolving and complex global regulatory landscape. Sovos’ cloud-based software platform provides an unparalleled level of integration with business applications and government compliance processes. More than 100,000 customers in 100+ countries – including half the Fortune 500 – trust Sovos for their compliance needs. Sovos annually processes more than three billion transactions across 19,000 global tax jurisdictions. Bolstered by a robust partner program more than 400 strong, Sovos brings to bear an unrivaled global network for companies across industries and geographies. Founded in 1979, Sovos has operations across the Americas and Europe, and is owned by Hg and TA Associates.
Share this post

Hungary Supplemental Insurance Premium Tax
EMEA IPT
July 11, 2022
Extra Profit Tax: An Introduction to Supplemental IPT in Hungary

This blog was last updated on October 28, 2024 Update 7 October 2024 by Edit Buliczka Hungarian Tax Office Updates IPT Declaration Form for 2023 The procedure necessary to correct an underdeclared premium figure in Hungary can be complicated. The complexity of a correction for return form 2320 has become even more challenging. Following a […]

sales tax vs. use taxes
North America Sales & Use Tax
November 8, 2024
Demystifying Tax Types: Sales Tax vs. Seller’s Use Tax vs. Consumer’s Use Tax

This blog was last updated on November 8, 2024 One of the core concepts in sales tax compliance is also one of the most frequently misunderstood: the differences between sales tax and use tax. These tax types may look similar on the surface, but knowing the differences is essential for staying compliant and avoiding costly […]

2025 bond project
North America Tax Information Reporting
November 4, 2024
The Insurer’s Guide to the 2025 Bond Project

This blog was last updated on November 4, 2024 The regulatory landscape for insurance companies is undergoing significant changes with the Principles-Based Bond Project which is set to take effect on January 1, 2025. These changes, driven by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC), will impact how insurance companies classify and value bond investments, […]

E-Invoicing Compliance EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
November 1, 2024
VAT in the Digital Age Approved in ECOFIN

This blog was last updated on November 7, 2024 The long-awaited VAT in the Digital Age (ViDA) proposal has been approved by Member States’ Economic and Finance Ministers. On 5 November 2024, during the Economic and Financial Affairs Council (ECOFIN) meeting, Member States unanimously agreed on adopting the ViDA package. This decision marks a major […]

what is peppol
E-Invoicing Compliance North America
October 29, 2024
What it is PEPPOL?

This blog was last updated on October 29, 2024 Peppol E-invoicing explained: What it is and how it works The global adoption of electronic invoicing is accelerating. Governments worldwide are pushing to adopt e-invoicing to digitally transform their national systems and, often, to close the VAT gap. While many countries have introduced their own e-invoicing […]

remote sellers sales tax
North America Sales & Use Tax
October 28, 2024
Will Congress Act to Simplify Remote Seller Sales Tax Collection

This blog was last updated on November 5, 2024 When the United States Supreme Court ruled in 2018, that South Dakota’s law imposing sales tax collection requirements on sellers without in-state physical presence was constitutional, it did not grant states free reign. States are still responsible for ensuring that their sales tax requirements are manageable, […]