The Top Five Most Common Unclaimed Property Compliance Mistakes

Sherry Hale
November 14, 2019

Full compliance when it comes to unclaimed property requirements can be difficult to determine. For many businesses, it isn’t until they are audited and fined that they find out they made a mistake.

Below are the most common mistakes businesses make when complying with unclaimed property requirements.

1. Reporting is mandatory

Reporting unclaimed property is not a courtesy, it’s the law. All companies in the U.S., Puerto Rico, U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam, Northern Mariana Islands and some Canadian provinces must file unclaimed property according to the requirements of those jurisdictions. However, there are a couple of universal rules which apply to all jurisdictions:

  • Even if you only have one uncashed check, you must fulfill all necessary requirements and file a report
  • Do not report property as unclaimed until the dormancy period has ended and the due date has arrived

Some U.S. states even require companies to file negative reports. Negative reports tell the state that your business did not have any unclaimed property to report.

2. Policies & procedures do not equal compliance

Having policies and procedures for unclaimed property compliance is a great start, but it’s not enough. Unclaimed property laws are constantly changing, which means that you need a system in place that notifies you immediately of these changes, as well as adjusts all of your existing unclaimed property in the same manner.

3. Reciprocal filing

The act of remitting all of your unclaimed property to one state, even if the property originated from another state, is called reciprocal filing. We do not recommend reciprocal filing and it’s not a good practice for your company. If one of your prior clients knew that you did everything in your power to return their unclaimed property, they would be more likely to do business with your company again in the future. When you file reciprocally, you are relying on another state to determine which state gets what payment. It’s much cleaner and client-friendly if you submit the unclaimed property to the state of the owner’s last known address. It’s the right thing to do and some states, like California, don’t allow reciprocal filing.

4. Reporting to multiple states

When reporting to multiple states, keep in mind that each state has its own:

  • formatting requirements for the reports you submit
  • and dormancy periods based on the property type, meaning one state could have a 3-year dormancy on a property type and another might have a 5-year dormancy on the same property type

Failing to understand all of the formatting requirements, property types and dormancy periods for each state drastically increases your risk of penalties.

5. Due diligence

All businesses are required to file unclaimed property reports to the state that matches the owner’s last known address. However, they are also required by law to conduct due diligence. Due diligence includes:

  • Sending letters at the appropriate time in an attempt to locate the lost owner before the property was due to be reported.
  • Tracking those due diligence letters with an audit trail that can be easily reviewed in case of an audit.

Attempting to manually manage all of the unclaimed property requirements and due dates for every state when they’re constantly changing is a massive burden and exposes your business to substantial financial risk.

Take Action

Get in touch with a Sovos unclaimed property expert to learn more about managing your unclaimed property compliance processes.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Sherry Hale

Sherry Hale assists in managing sales and marketing initiatives. Sherry has a degree in Marketing, Business Management, and HR Management from Mount Mercy University in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. In her free time, she loves spending time with family, volunteering with animal rescue, playing with her own rescue pets, and riding her Harley.
Share this post

North America
June 6, 2024
Observations and Predictions: The Future of Tax and Compliance

When I became the CEO of Sovos one year ago, I knew that I was stepping into an innovative company in an industry primed for a seismic transformation. However, even with this knowledge in place, I must admit that the speed and scope of change over the past year has been extraordinary to witness. Here […]

EMEA IPT
July 8, 2024
Hungary Insurance Premium Tax (IPT): An Overview

Regarding calculating Insurance Premium Tax (IPT), Hungary is the only country in the EU where the regime uses the so-called sliding scale rate model.

North America ShipCompliant
July 3, 2024
The Prospects and Perils of AI in Beverage Alcohol

I recently had the privilege of speaking on a panel at the National Conference of State Liquor Administrators (NCSLA) Annual Conference, a regular meeting of regulators, attorneys and other members of the beverage alcohol industry to discuss important issues affecting our trade. Alongside Claire Mitchell, of Stoel Rives, and Erlinda Doherty, of Vinicola Consulting, and […]

North America ShipCompliant
June 27, 2024
Shifting Focus: How to Make Wine Country Interesting to Millennials

Guest blog written by Susan DeMatei, President, WineGlass Marketing WineGlass Marketing recently conducted a study to explore how Millennials and Gen X feel about wine, wine culture and wine country. The goal was to gain insight into how we can make wine, wine club and wine country appealing to these new audiences. We’ll showcase in-depth […]

North America Sales & Use Tax
June 24, 2024
Illinois to Adjust Sales Tax Nexus Rules in Light of PetMeds Threat

Illinois is poised to change their sourcing rules again, trying to find their way in a world where states apply their sales tax compliance requirements equally to both in-state and remote sellers. With this tweak, they will effectively equalize the responsibilities of remote sellers with no in-state presence, to those that have an Illinois location. […]

EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
June 21, 2024
ViDA Rejected Again – Europe Misses Another Chance to Harmonize e-Invoicing

During the latest ECOFIN meeting on 21 June, Member States met to discuss if they could come to an agreement to implement the VAT in the Digital Age (ViDA) proposals. At the ECOFIN meeting in May, Estonia objected to the platform rules being proposed, instead requesting to make the new deemed supplier rules optional (an […]