Developments in India’s GST Reporting

Andrew Decker
October 8, 2020

This blog was last updated on October 8, 2020

It’s now over two years since goods and services tax (GST) was implemented in India. And yet GST reporting continues to present challenges for businesses. With the unveiling by the GST Network of new filing enhancements and considering the increased focus on GST compliance with the advent of e-invoicing, a review of periodic GST filing is welcome.

The history of periodic GST filing

GST taxpayers must file electronic returns through a portal provided by the GST Network. GST rules originally required normal taxpayers to file three returns every month; the GSTR-1, containing details on outward supplies by the filer, the GSTR-2, containing details on inward supplies by the filer, and summary return GSTR-3 partially auto-populated by the first two returns. The filing of the GSTR-2 was quickly suspended, resulting in the suspension of the GSTR-3, and its replacement with the “simpler” GSTR-3B, which taxpayers had to complete manually.

A new GST return system, which would have replaced the current monthly filings with new form GST RET-1 and its annexes on inward and outward supplies, was planned for October 2020. Key aspects of this new system would have been the validation of supplier’s outward supplies by the recipient, and the auto-population of the RET-1 based on the annexes on inward and outward supplies. This summer, however, the new system was put on indefinite hold, with the government and the GST Network announcing they would instead be enhancing the current return system. 

Recent GST filing enhancements

Since August, the GST Network has unveiled three major GST Filing enhancements:

1.The creation of the GSTR-2B:

The GST Network now generates the GSTR-2B, a statement on Input Tax Credit for all recipients. The statement provides recipients with information on available and unavailable input tax credits as of the 12th of every month. The statement draws information from a recipient’s suppliers’ GSTR-1s, and other forms such as the GSTR-5 and 6 when appropriate. Beginning in September, details on imports from Special Economic Zones Units/Developers will also be included in the statement. The generation of the GSTR-2B should help taxpayers when completing the GSTR-3B and in managing their input credits. Additionally, the GST Network has also provided taxpayers with a reconciliation tool to reconcile the GSTR-2B with their own purchase ledgers.

2. GSTR-3B:

Taxpayers can now generate a PDF containing values found in table 3 (excluding 3.1d) of form GSTR-3B based on data found in their filed GSTR-1. The impacted sections of the report are not auto-populated. Taxpayers must still verify the values contained in the PDF and transfer them onto the actual GSTR-3B which they file.

3. Nil Returns:

Taxpayers can now file Nil GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B returns via SMS (text message).

All these changes are steps towards increasing the automation of return filing to ease the burden of GST compliance on taxpayers. Given the advent of e-invoicing in India last week and the ongoing challenges presented by the Coronavirus crisis, taxpayers will appreciate these enhancements and being able to avoid learning a new return system. These changes still don’t achieve the level of automation envisioned under the now aborted new filing system, or achieve true automation of GST filing. Going forward it’s important taxpayers continue monitoring the government’s steps to automate India’s GST reporting regime, especially once the e-invoicing reform has been fully launched.

Take Action

Sovos has more than a decade of experience keeping clients up to date with e-invoicing mandates all over the world.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Andrew Decker

Andrew Decker is a Regulatory General Counsel at Sovos within the Regulatory Analysis & Design Department. Andrew focuses on international VAT and GST issues and domestic sales tax issues. Andrew received a B.A. in Economics from Bates College and J.D. at Northeastern University School of Law. Andrew is a member of the Massachusetts Bar.
Share this post

dtc shipping law updates
North America ShipCompliant
March 12, 2025
The Case for DtC Beer Shipping Reform: Key Takeaways from the 2025 Report

This blog was last updated on March 12, 2025 Craft beer drinkers want more choices. Brewers want more opportunities. And yet, legal barriers still stand in the way of direct-to-cconsumer (DtC) beer shipping. The 2025 Direct-to-Consumer Beer Shipping Report, produced by Sovos ShipCompliant in partnership with the Brewers Association, reveals how consumer demand, regulatory restrictions […]

DtC wine market
North America ShipCompliant
March 7, 2025
From Decline to Opportunity: Lessons from the 2024 DtC Market

This blog was last updated on March 7, 2025 The 2025 Direct-to-Consumer Wine Shipping Report offers more than just data—it provides valuable insights into the trends shaping the industry and the factors driving change. To delve deeper into these findings, industry experts Andrew Adams from WineBusiness Analytics and Alex Koral from Sovos ShipCompliant joined forces […]