Massachusetts DOR to Impose New Filing Requirements on Taxpayers

Charles Maniace
September 24, 2021

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts is squarely in the midst of modernizing its sales tax filing and remittance requirements, and in so doing, creating new, novel and likely challenging requirements for taxpayers. The most recent incarnation of this modernization was announced in its September 2021 DOR News, which hints at new requirements for restaurants and ecommerce sellers.

In April, Massachusetts began requiring large taxpayers effectuate what they refer to as an advance payment. In sum, tax revenue collected between the 1st and the 21st of the month is required to be remitted on the 25th of that same month. Shortly before the new requirement went into effect, Massachusetts granted a “safe harbor,” allowing taxpayers to avoid any penalty liability so long as tax remitted on the 25th was at least 80% of the total tax from the prior month. However, it’s worth reiterating that the official guidance published by Massachusetts specifies that this safe harbor only extends through calendar year 2021. After that, full compliance is expected.

If that weren’t disruptive enough on its own, the DOR News includes the following friendly “Heads Up:”

Sales tax filers will be asked to break down online sales versus in-store sales and meals tax filers will be asked to break down cash sales versus credit card sales. If not already keeping that information for your business, now’s a good time to start. It will be required next year.

The new requirement for meals tax filers is likely in direct response to the prevalence of sales tax suppression software, otherwise known as “zappers.” In short, a zapper is a piece of code installed on an electronic cash register or similar device for the sole purpose of deleting cash sales from their systems, meaning tax is collected at the time of sale but never reported or remitted. Zappers were first discovered in 1997 and have represented a tax compliance challenge globally since the early 2000’s. A few years back, my former colleague, Professor Richard Ainsworth, speculated that up to $20 billion in sales tax revenue may have been siphoned off by Zappers in the U.S. with more than $600 million of losses related to the restaurant industry alone.

Zapping the zappers?

Until now, most states have addressed the zapper challenge through a combination of legislation and cyber-sleuthing. Legislatively, at least 33 states have laws on the books that overtly prohibit the use of zappers. From there, states use technology experts to search for zappers where they suspect they may exist. This leaves open the question of how states begin suspecting that a seller may be using a zapper. Well, it’s difficult. If you completely delete a transaction out of existence, how do you know it ever took place?

In much of the rest of the world, the challenges imposed by tax fraud and the underground economy are addressed through electronic invoicing and real-time reporting requirements, obligating sellers to provide transaction-level information to government concurrent with the sale or soon thereafter. In countries where these systems are in place, tax fraud is much harder to perpetrate. Brazil, for example, has seen a $58 billion increase in revenue collection attributed to their robust real-time electronic invoicing requirements.

Massachusetts is likely looking to psychology as opposed to technology to move the needle. In 2020, John Lee, a fellow at the Hoops Institute of Taxation and Research Policy posited that a simple “behavioral nudge” could substantially reduce zapper-related fraud. Lee suggests that the mere act of requiring a seller to report cash transactions and credit transactions separately on a tax return will dissuade someone from intentionally under-counting their cash sales. If you are forced to clearly and unambiguously memorialize your fraud in writing (and sign your name to it) you are less likely to commit the fraud in the first place. Massachusetts appears to be banking on that indeed being the case.

Sovos will be tracking developments closely as Massachusetts provides additional guidance which we expect will, at a minimum, include significant adjustments to their existing sales and use tax returns.

It goes to show – in the world of modern tax, the savvy tax professional needs to expect the unexpected, and also be ready with a solution sooner rather than later.

Take Action

Learn more about the changing sales and use tax laws and how they potentially impact your business by checking out our second annual Sovos Sales and Use Tax report.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Charles Maniace

Charles Maniace is Vice President – Regulatory Analysis & Design at Sovos, a leading global provider of software that safeguards businesses from the burden and risk of modern tax. An attorney by trade, Chuck leads a team of attorneys and tax professionals responsible for all the tax and regulatory content that keeps Sovos customers continually compliant. Over his 15 year career in tax and regulatory automation, he has provided analysis to the Wall Street Journal, NBC and more.
Share This Post
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email

Asia Pacific EMEA Tax Compliance
October 27, 2021
Understanding E-Commerce Tax Legislation in Asia Pacific

The global e-commerce market continues to transform in today’s digital world. E-commerce transactions consist of a variety of digital services and products such as software, applications, streaming media, web hosting, online advertising, e-books, online newspapers, and various others. From an indirect tax perspective, nations across the globe apply destination-based VAT and GST legislation to these […]

North America Unclaimed Property
October 26, 2021
Texas House Bill 1514

Texas has been quite active in amending its unclaimed property statute. Not long ago, it enacted Texas House Bill 3598 (HB 3598), which amended the manner in which holders report property to the state. Additional revisions were recently made to the statute, focusing on a number of other subjects in Texas House Bill 1514. Texas […]

EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
October 26, 2021
Romania SAF-T: Updated Guidance Released

In our last look at Romania SAF-T, we detailed the technical specifications released from Romania’s tax authority. Since then, additional guidance has been released including an official name for the SAF-T submission: D406. Implementation timeline for mandatory submission of Romania SAF-T Large taxpayers (as designated by the Romanian tax authorities) – 1 January 2022 Medium […]

EMEA IPT
October 21, 2021
IPT Compliance in Finland: 2021 Tax Filing Changes and the Introduction of the Suomi System

Insurance Premium Tax (IPT) is complex. For insurers, keeping up with changing rates, rules and regulations can be challenging especially when writing across multiple territories. Sovos’ Guide on IPT Compliance, written by our experienced team of IPT and regulatory specialists, looks at the significance of digital transformation and helps paint a picture of a diverse […]

E-Invoicing Compliance Turkey
October 20, 2021
With Plans to Expand European Product Development, Sovos to Make 2nd Acquisition in Turkey

When Sovos acquired Istanbul-based Foriba two years ago, we saw it as a key piece to the global puzzle we promised to complete on behalf of our customers. Following our previous acquisitions of Paperless in Chile and Trustweaver in Sweden, the Foriba acquisition represented the bringing together of the global pioneers of e-invoicing compliance. Since […]