Technology Disconnect in Insurance – Why IPT Needs Prioritising

Christophe Bourdaire
November 24, 2020

Many insurers still depend on legacy systems to file insurance premium tax (IPT). Whilst cost is sometimes the reason for this decision, some organisations simply don’t prioritise technology upgrades, instead, choosing to focus on initiatives that improve the customer experience or other business workflows.

Can this situation continue? Unlikely for much longer, as more tax authorities require insurers to submit extensive data to their electronic tax portals for IPT.

Depending on what systems are in play in an organisation, those built on Excel spreadsheets could be far more costly than investing in IPT reporting technology. Furthermore, if information is lost, inaccurate or inadequate, insurers could face fines and reputational damage – a cost that is much more difficult to recover.

Why have insurers under-prioritised IPT technology?

Put simply, there has not been the need to.

Electronic IPT submissions are a recent development, however the increase in digital transactional reporting is likely to accelerate the need for more robust systems that collect the information required by tax authorities.

Manual systems struggle to keep pace with the latest tax updates and filing requirements. This is further complicated with cross-border filing as every country’s requirements are different.

In the case of manual reporting, an EU-heavy insurer would need a system capable of writing tax in 27 different ways. Building a tailored system like this is often too complicated and expensive for internal IT teams.

With a bespoke system often out of the equation, many insurers instead try to apply their domestic tax approach abroad, but again, nearly every country does things differently. This risks missing taxes or paying double tax in error should incorrect information be applied.

There can also be a difference in how premiums are split for taxations. In some countries it’s split but with others there is one single tax rate.

One of the main differences country to country is the tax point. There is no standard definition across EU countries. In the majority of countries, the tax point is when the premium is paid but for others it’s when the invoice is issued or when payment is due to be made, which could be two different dates.

For example, if a UK company is insuring a UK group that has subsidiaries in European territories and a contract covers multiple territories, the invoice is sent to the UK holding company. It’s one invoice with one premium amount and one tax amount, but it will cover five or six jurisdictions.

The underwriting system should split tax by country but if the tax authorities were to query the invoice to confirm payment of tax, the invoice covering all territories would not be sufficient. There would need to be additional formal documentation explaining the premiums applicable for each individual country.

In the case of many insurers, this information will be in a spreadsheet or a manual underwriting system. It’s likely that in the very near future we’ll reach a point where this method is inadequate for tax queries issued by authorities.

On the VAT side there is already the clearance system – where the invoice must be validated by tax authorities first before being sent to the customer. If this system were to be implemented in insurance now, the technology required to help collate and submit this granular data is not widely used. Although IPT is a smaller tax concern to authorities than VAT and historically it hasn’t been seen as an urgent tax to digitise, this is changing with more countries likely to follow Spain’s model.

Sovos IPT solutions help insurers navigate the multiple IPT tax requirements across the EU and beyond. There is no need to build and develop IPT technology internally and our tax experts keep our solution updated with the latest changes to ensure tax is filed correctly and compliantly.

Manual systems have always been error prone but with more and more jurisdictions likely to digitise their IPT collection, now is the time to get ahead, prepare for the inevitable widespread digitsation of IPT and prioritise your reporting technology.

Take Action

Keep up to date with ever changing rules by subscribing to our blogs and following us on LinkedIn and Twitter. We also host regular webinars with our in-house specialists who are on hand to help.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.


Christophe Bourdaire

Senior Regulatory Specialist, Regulatory Analysis. Christophe joined Sovos FiscalReps in 2011 and has been managing the IPT compliance process for a portfolio of captives and French speaking clients. Based in France, he focuses on the development of the global IPT content and technology offering. Christophe completed a degree (certificate) in Journalism at Ecole Nouvelles in Nice, France. He is a native French speaker, and also speaks fluent Spanish.
Share This Post
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email

EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
April 20, 2021
Oman Introduces VAT System

The Sultanate of Oman has imposed a Value Added Tax from 16 April 2021. The VAT system is scheduled to be implemented in phases, with businesses required to register for VAT at different points over the next year based on their turnover. Turnover Mandatory Registration Deadline Effective Date of Registration Greater than 1,000,000 OMR March […]

E-Invoicing Compliance VAT & Fiscal Reporting
April 20, 2021
Audio blog: Brazil E-Invoicing: New rules on NF-e invoices

Brazil E-Invoicing: New rules on NF-e invoices  Although Brazil is known for its complex tax laws that make compliance a difficult task in the country, it is undeniable that the Continuous Transaction Control (CTC) system implemented more than a decade ago is one of the most stable in the world.   However, even a sophisticated […]

EMEA Latin America Mexico VAT & Fiscal Reporting
April 19, 2021
Understanding Mexico’s Miscellaneous Fiscal Resolution for 2021 and its Modifications (Part II)

Mexico’s Miscellaneous Fiscal Resolution (MFR) for 2021 includes a number of changes, the first of which you can read about in our previous blog on the subject. In this blog we will discuss the approved specific technical modifications related to the validations Authorised Certification Providers (PACs) should make to electronic invoices sent to them for […]

Tax Information Reporting
April 15, 2021
Managing Form 1099-NEC Reporting After Publication 1220

Form 1099-NEC changes in 2020 Since the IRS released Publication 1220, announcing that Form 1099-NEC—for nonemployee compensation—would not be included in the Combined Federal/State Filing (CF/SF) program starting tax year 2020, 37 states have implemented direct state reporting requirements for new Form 1099-NEC.  Though there are 32 states that participate in the CF/SF program, the […]

North America Unclaimed Property
April 15, 2021
Delaware Unclaimed Property VDA Notices

Delaware VDA Responses Due Monday, April 19, 2021 If you received one of the recent unclaimed property DE VDA invitations sent February 19, 2021 your response is due Monday, April 19, 2021. Holders that received an invitation and do not respond by April 19th will be referred to State Escheator for audit examination. Double check […]