Technology Disconnect in Insurance – Why IPT Needs Prioritising

Christophe Bourdaire
November 24, 2020

Many insurers still depend on legacy systems to file insurance premium tax (IPT). Whilst cost is sometimes the reason for this decision, some organisations simply don’t prioritise technology upgrades, instead, choosing to focus on initiatives that improve the customer experience or other business workflows.

Can this situation continue? Unlikely for much longer, as more tax authorities require insurers to submit extensive data to their electronic tax portals for IPT.

Depending on what systems are in play in an organisation, those built on Excel spreadsheets could be far more costly than investing in IPT reporting technology. Furthermore, if information is lost, inaccurate or inadequate, insurers could face fines and reputational damage – a cost that is much more difficult to recover.

Why have insurers under-prioritised IPT technology?

Put simply, there has not been the need to.

Electronic IPT submissions are a recent development, however the increase in digital transactional reporting is likely to accelerate the need for more robust systems that collect the information required by tax authorities.

Manual systems struggle to keep pace with the latest tax updates and filing requirements. This is further complicated with cross-border filing as every country’s requirements are different.

In the case of manual reporting, an EU-heavy insurer would need a system capable of writing tax in 27 different ways. Building a tailored system like this is often too complicated and expensive for internal IT teams.

With a bespoke system often out of the equation, many insurers instead try to apply their domestic tax approach abroad, but again, nearly every country does things differently. This risks missing taxes or paying double tax in error should incorrect information be applied.

There can also be a difference in how premiums are split for taxations. In some countries it’s split but with others there is one single tax rate.

One of the main differences country to country is the tax point. There is no standard definition across EU countries. In the majority of countries, the tax point is when the premium is paid but for others it’s when the invoice is issued or when payment is due to be made, which could be two different dates.

For example, if a UK company is insuring a UK group that has subsidiaries in European territories and a contract covers multiple territories, the invoice is sent to the UK holding company. It’s one invoice with one premium amount and one tax amount, but it will cover five or six jurisdictions.

The underwriting system should split tax by country but if the tax authorities were to query the invoice to confirm payment of tax, the invoice covering all territories would not be sufficient. There would need to be additional formal documentation explaining the premiums applicable for each individual country.

In the case of many insurers, this information will be in a spreadsheet or a manual underwriting system. It’s likely that in the very near future we’ll reach a point where this method is inadequate for tax queries issued by authorities.

On the VAT side there is already the clearance system – where the invoice must be validated by tax authorities first before being sent to the customer. If this system were to be implemented in insurance now, the technology required to help collate and submit this granular data is not widely used. Although IPT is a smaller tax concern to authorities than VAT and historically it hasn’t been seen as an urgent tax to digitise, this is changing with more countries likely to follow Spain’s model.

Sovos IPT solutions help insurers navigate the multiple IPT tax requirements across the EU and beyond. There is no need to build and develop IPT technology internally and our tax experts keep our solution updated with the latest changes to ensure tax is filed correctly and compliantly.

Manual systems have always been error prone but with more and more jurisdictions likely to digitise their IPT collection, now is the time to get ahead, prepare for the inevitable widespread digitsation of IPT and prioritise your reporting technology.

Take Action

Keep up to date with ever changing rules by subscribing to our blogs and following us on LinkedIn and Twitter. We also host regular webinars with our in-house specialists who are on hand to help.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.


Christophe Bourdaire

Senior Regulatory Specialist, Regulatory Analysis. Christophe joined Sovos FiscalReps in 2011 and has been managing the IPT compliance process for a portfolio of captives and French speaking clients. Based in France, he focuses on the development of the global IPT content and technology offering. Christophe completed a degree (certificate) in Journalism at Ecole Nouvelles in Nice, France. He is a native French speaker, and also speaks fluent Spanish.
Share This Post

Latin America VAT & Fiscal Reporting
May 20, 2020
Sovos Acquires Taxweb, Extends Tax Determination Capabilities in World’s Most Challenging Compliance Landscape

Earlier this month Sovos announced its second acquisition of 2020, completing our solution for Brazil with an unparalleled offering that solves tax compliance in the place where it is most challenging to do so.  Too many companies doing business in Brazil have been burdened by managing multiple point solutions for continuous transaction controls (CTCs), tax […]

January 25, 2021
CJEU Rules on Conditions for VAT Refund

The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has ruled that Member States must accept, as formally submitted, VAT refund requests that contain invoice identifiers other than sequential invoice numbers. In case C-346/19 (Judgment of 17 December 2020), an Austrian taxpayer’s VAT Refund application was rejected by Germany’s Federal Central Tax Office, on the […]

January 25, 2021
6 Highlights from the 2021 Direct-to-Consumer Wine Shipping Report

This January, Sovos ShipCompliant released the 2021 Direct-to-Consumer (DtC) Wine Shipping Report with our partner, Wines Vines Analytics. This report features exclusive data and insights on the state of the industry not tracked or reported on anywhere else. With wine shipments to consumers reaching a record $3.7 billion in 2020, there has never been a […]

January 22, 2021
The Data: Wine DtC Shipments and Off-Premise Retail (December 2020 Special Report)

The wine market is in greater flux than ever as producers, retailers and consumers navigate the impacts of a global pandemic. Keeping a pulse on marketplace data has never been so important given these shifting dynamics. Nielsen is collaborating with Wines Vines Analytics and Sovos ShipCompliant to provide a much more comprehensive view of the […]

January 21, 2021
HMRC’s Second IPT Consultation – Response Deadline Fast Approaching

HMRC, the UK’s tax authority, is asking for responses to its Insurance Premium Tax: Administration and Unfair Outcomes Consultation, by 5 February 2021. The first consultation and call for evidence for Insurance Premium Tax (IPT) was back in 2019 and questions focused on the modernisation of IPT and efficiency improvements for businesses and HMRC. It […]

EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
January 21, 2021
How Ireland’s VAT Regime is Changing

As a result of Brexit, COVID-19, and the Finance Act 2020, the VAT regime in Ireland has and will continue to undergo numerous changes. Highlights of these changes are outlined below. Postponed Accounting and Reporting Changes Beginning in January all taxpayers have the ability to apply postponed VAT accounting to their imports from outside the […]