E-Delivery Note Usage Scenarios

Tamer Taşdelen
June 25, 2020

The General Communiqué no. 509 (communiqué) established the date of transition to the e-delivery note application and the full scope of the mandate. Whilst the communiqué addressed the general use of the application and the basic practices, it didn’t contain all the information businesses require and although the FAQ and information from the Turkish Revenue Administration (TRA) were useful, a guide was necessary.

In February 2020, the TRA released the e-Delivery Application Guideline (guideline) detailing the basic principles. It also answered the questions that companies and integrators had been asking.

Whilst the guideline provided much needed clarity, there are still some confusing scenarios as the deadline of July 2020 approaches.

Among these scenarios is the structure of delivery notes for goods that are not subject to sale and the chain delivery issue.

E-delivery notes issued for goods not subject to sale

One critical concern is that the TRA has included the scenario of delivery notes issued for goods not subject to sale and stated that e-delivery notes must also be issued for these transactions. However, these delivery notes should include additional details in the note section.

To illustrate, let’s say there are goods, equipment, to be shipped for repair/maintenance purposes. An e-delivery note must be issued for these goods with an explanation stated on the document, such as “to be repaired”, “to be painted”, “to change parts” etc.

Similarly, in outsourcing, a sample and consignment processes e-delivery note must be issued.

The chain delivery scenario

Another scenario in the guideline is chain delivery which was illustrated as follows.

Wholesaler “Y” who receives goods from manufacturer “X” may sell the goods directly to the dealer “Z” without actually receiving them. And dealer “Z” may sell the goods that are not yet delivered directly to customer “T”. In this scenario, the goods that are still in the warehouse of manufacturer “X” may be shipped directly to customer “T” by manufacturer “X”.

The schematron file answers the question, “To whom will the e-delivery note be issued in this scenario?” E-delivery notes should be sent directly to the recipient of the goods. So based on our example, the e-delivery note must include the information of customer “T”.

There are control options regarding this issue in the schematron. So, to understand whether the e-delivery note will be sent to a virtual or actual taxpayer, the tax ID/ID number of customer “T” should be checked.

Take Action

Sovos has more than a decade of experience keeping clients up to date with e-invoicing mandates all over the world.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Tamer Taşdelen

Tamer, 6 years of expertise in SAP, total 8 years of experience in software, has received a Bachelor’s Degree in Instructional Technologies and holds a MIS Master’s degree. Tamer has gained expertise in application development, project management, integration and system architecture. He uses his expertise in Sovos to guide its business partners and customers in technical and legal terms, to optimize business processes, to support Urge – marketing and customer compliance. Tamer also supports e-transformation in every platform as a speaker in Webinars and events.
Share This Post
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email

North America Sales & Use Tax
April 22, 2021
Why You Need Scalable Sales Tax Technology

Sales tax is a necessary evil for all businesses but you don’t want to spend more time thinking about it than you have to. Implementing the right sales tax solution can help your business continue to grow while ensuring you meet all sales tax obligations. Choosing an efficient, reliable, always-up-to-date solution will help you keep […]

North America ShipCompliant
April 22, 2021
New Florida Economic Nexus Law to Impact DtC Wine Shippers

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis signed SB 50 into law on April 19, which makes Florida the latest state to adopt economic nexus rules to impose a sales tax liability on remote sellers, including direct-to-consumer (DtC) shippers of wine.  Unlike most other states, Florida does not currently require DtC wine shippers to assume a sales tax […]

April 21, 2021
The Rise of Continuous Transaction Controls in Eastern Europe

We’ve recently seen several Eastern European countries begin their journey of implementing continuous transaction controls (CTC) as an efficient tool for combating tax fraud and reducing the VAT gap. The CTC frameworks may vary in nature, scope and implementation, but they all have one thing in common: an ambition to achieve operational efficiency for businesses […]

North America Unclaimed Property
April 21, 2021
Healthcare Industry Insights into Unclaimed Property

Historically, the healthcare industry has experienced challenges in identifying and reporting unclaimed property. This is due to several reasons including a lack of clear statutory guidance, limited understanding of the potential unclaimed property liabilities which they are truly subject, and conflicting laws (i.e., refund recoupment, prompt payment, HIPAA, etc.).  The fundamental understanding that healthcare entities […]

ShipCompliant
April 21, 2021
The Data: Wine DtC Shipments and Off-Premise Retail (March 2021 Special Report)

Fluctuation in the wine market is not showing any signs of easing as producers, retailers and consumers continue to navigate the impacts of a global pandemic. It has never been so critical to keep a pulse on marketplace data given these shifting dynamics. Nielsen is collaborating with Wines Vines Analytics and Sovos ShipCompliant to provide […]