The Top 5 Most Common Unclaimed Property Compliance Mistakes

Sherry Hale
November 14, 2019

Full compliance when it comes to unclaimed property requirements can be difficult to determine. For many businesses, it isn’t until they are audited and fined that they find out they made a mistake.

Below are the most common mistakes businesses make when complying with unclaimed property requirements.

1. Reporting is mandatory

Reporting unclaimed property is not a courtesy, it’s the law. All companies in the U.S., Puerto Rico, U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam, Northern Mariana Islands and some Canadian provinces must file unclaimed property according to the requirements of those jurisdictions. However, there are a couple of universal rules which apply to all jurisdictions:

  • Even if you only have one uncashed check, you must fulfill all necessary requirements and file a report
  • Do not report property as unclaimed until the dormancy period has ended and the due date has arrived

Some U.S. states even require companies to file negative reports. Negative reports tell the state that your business did not have any unclaimed property to report.

2. Policies & procedures do not equal compliance

Having policies and procedures for unclaimed property compliance is a great start, but it’s not enough. Unclaimed property laws are constantly changing, which means that you need a system in place that notifies you immediately of these changes, as well as adjusts all of your existing unclaimed property in the same manner.

3. Reciprocal filing

The act of remitting all of your unclaimed property to one state, even if the property originated from another state, is called reciprocal filing. We do not recommend reciprocal filing and it’s not a good practice for your company. If one of your prior clients knew that you did everything in your power to return their unclaimed property, they would be more likely to do business with your company again in the future. When you file reciprocally, you are relying on another state to determine which state gets what payment. It’s much cleaner and client friendly if you submit the unclaimed property to the state of the owner’s last known address. It’s the right thing to do and some states, like California, don’t allow reciprocal filing.

4. Reporting to multiple states

When reporting to multiple states, keep in mind that each state has its own:

  • formatting requirements for the reports you submit
  • and dormancy periods based on the property type, meaning one state could have a 3-year dormancy on a property type and another might have a 5-year dormancy on the same property type

Failing to understand all of the formatting requirements, property types and dormancy periods for each state drastically increases your risk of penalties.

5. Due diligence

All businesses are required to file unclaimed property reports to the state that matches the owner’s last known address. However, they are also required by law to conduct due diligence. Due diligence includes:

  • Sending letters at the appropriate time in an attempt to locate the lost owner before the property was due to be reported.
  • Tracking those due diligence letters with an audit trail that can be easily reviewed in case of an audit.

Attempting to manually manage all of the unclaimed property requirements and due dates for every state when they’re constantly changing is a massive burden and exposes your business to substantial financial risk.

Chat with a Sovos unclaimed property compliance expert to see if our automated solutions will meet your unclaimed property compliance needs.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Sherry Hale

Sherry Hale assists in managing sales and marketing initiatives. Sherry has a degree in Marketing, Business Management, and HR Management from Mount Mercy University in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. In her free time, she loves spending time with family, volunteering with animal rescue, playing with her own rescue pets, and riding her Harley.
Share This Post

LATAM VAT & Fiscal Reporting
May 20, 2020
Sovos Acquires Taxweb, Extends Tax Determination Capabilities in World’s Most Challenging Compliance Landscape

Earlier this month Sovos announced its second acquisition of 2020, completing our solution for Brazil with an unparalleled offering that solves tax compliance in the place where it is most challenging to do so.  Too many companies doing business in Brazil have been burdened by managing multiple point solutions for continuous transaction controls (CTCs), tax […]

ShipCompliant
July 13, 2020
How Importers Can Ship DtC

The beverage alcohol industry has many complicated rules and regulations that vary by state. Even though importers are similar to other members of the “supplier” tier (like wineries and breweries), they are often treated differently in federal and state regulations. This is particularly true when it comes to direct-to-consumer (DtC) wine shipping.  Currently, 46 states […]

ShipCompliant United States
July 9, 2020
3 Sessions, Many Takeaways: Wine Summit Piccolo Event Recap

Sovos ShipCompliant hosted the 15th annual Wine Summit a couple weeks ago, only this time it was a shortened “Piccolo” virtual version. This half-day event featured some of the most popular sessions and presentations originally scheduled for the cancelled live event back in May. The recorded version of the event is available to watch on-demand; […]

EMEA Tax Compliance VAT & Fiscal Reporting
July 9, 2020
Tax IDs and List Checks: The New Trend

VAT gaps can generally be found in countries that collect indirect taxes. This hiatus has led many tax administrations to implement Continuous Transaction Controls (CTCs), through which transactional and accounting data are monitored in real-time or near real-time. However, even countries with sophisticated CTCs may encounter fraud involving missing traders and non-existent supplies. This creates […]

Tax Information Reporting United States
July 8, 2020
The Industry Leader in Tax and Regulatory Reporting

Last year, Sovos promised insurers we would Solve Tax for Good®. A year later, we have helped thousands of insurers ease the burden and risk of modern tax and regulatory compliance. We have kept our promise by helping insurers stay ahead of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, SECURE Act and all other tax and […]

EMEA IPT
July 8, 2020
The Changing Landscape for European Captives and the Challenges Ahead

Over recent years, the number of insurance captives domiciled in Europe has stagnated, if not fallen.  Against this backdrop, the challenges faced by captives across the region are rising and in particular, following the COVID-19 pandemic. A specialized market in restricted jurisdictions Europe is the third largest insurance captive domicile in the world having around […]