IRS Cryptocurrency Tax Guidance Fails to Address 1099 Reporting

Wendy Walker
October 10, 2019

The IRS released long-awaited guidance on cryptocurrency tax regulations this week, but the agency did little to clarify tax reporting policy.

The guidance, the first update to IRS cryptocurrency policy in five years, is aimed at individual taxpayers and tax practitioners who prepare returns for taxpayers. The new information addresses information IRS Commissioner Charles Rettig promised the agency would provide after receiving several letters from members of Congress demanding a response and includes clarification on taxation of specified forked assets, air drops, and fair market value issues.

What it does not do, however, is specify which forms crypto trading exchanges should use to report tax information to the IRS and customers. Confusion remains over whether Form 1099-K, 1099-B or some other document is appropriate for reporting, as well as how to report the details on whichever form is determined to be appropriate.

IRS aims cryptocurrency tax guidance at individual taxpayers 

With its guidance, the IRS is likely trying to inform taxpayers who are:  

  1. Crypto asset owners who filed extensions to the standard April 15 filing deadline to push filing until Oct. 15 in anticipation of IRS policy clarification, and 
  2. Crypto asset owners who will be obligated to file returns for the 2019 season.

The guidance is specific to the type of questions those taxpayers and their practitioners have asked in an effort to properly calculate gains and losses or value assets. 

With the IRS sending enforcement letters to individual taxpayers recently, the agency definitely  has taxpayers’ attention, and now is the time to educate taxpayers that they need to include crypto income not only in returns they file on October 15th but also for the coming 2019 season.

Crypto clarification arrives on forked asset transactions and airdrop 

Specifically, the guidance primarily provides information about forked transactions and airdrops. Forked transactions occur when one type of cryptocurrency splits into two types of cryptocurrency. The clarification offered two specific scenarios in terms of when taxpayers realize income associated with a forked transaction:

The first is a forked transaction in which the value of the new digital asset is not deposited into a wallet for the holder to access, and the second occurs when the value of the new digital asset is deposited into a wallet for the holder to access. In the second, the IRS clarifies that the “gift” of the new value of the currency is treated as ordinary income to the taxpayer in that calendar year.

The guidance provides plenty of citations to existing tax law in terms of why the income is considered taxable and at what points the IRS has determined the income to be taxable. For instance, the IRS focuses recognition of income to the taxpayer around the point when the taxpayer was able to access the value of the cryptocurrency, or “exercise dominion or control” over it. 

That is not a new concept. When a taxpayer receives income deposited into a bank checking account, the taxpayer is taxed when the money is deposited and not when the taxpayer actually withdraws it from the account. That is because the taxpayer had the ability to “exercise dominion or control” over the income as soon as the bank deposited the money into the account. But in the crypto world, the “control” issue is a hotly debated topic, something the IRS deftly avoided in this round of guidance.

IRS FAQs expand on previously answered questions 

There are also new FAQs, essentially an updated version to the Notice 2014-21 FAQs that have existed since the IRS first provided cryptocurrency guidelines. Again, the FAQs are primarily relevant for individual taxpayers and address specific income tax calculation questions related to airdrops, forks and how to value assets. 

Fair market value has been a problem for crypto holders because an asset’s value is different depending on which exchange platform the holder checks at any given date. Taxpayers wanted some clarity from the IRS on this point, and there are a few questions and answers aimed at how to value assets in certain scenarios. In addition to complex forked and airdrop scenarios, the FAQs also address basic trading transactions that occur with digital assets, including trading crypto for fiat currency and trading one crypto asset for another. 

Form 1099 filers will have to continue to wait for IRS cryptocurrency tax guidance 

However, the glaring omission is the same level of guidance for filers of Forms 1099. Filers can certainly glean some ideas from the guidance to individual taxpayers, but they need the IRS to provide the community with more specifics: Which form should a filer use to report forked asset transactions with airdrops on so that the taxpayer can calculate income appropriately? Which form should a filer use when a taxpayer trades crypto for fiat? Which details are required to be included on that form so that the taxpayer can calculate cost-basis? As 2019 filing season rapidly approaches, filers need this, and other clarifications, so that they could work to update transaction systems and produce accurate tax information in time for January deadlines. 

There are two types of taxpayers impacted by the IRS’s ongoing lack of guidance in this area: the taxpayer and the payer of the income, or the filer. Filers provide the IRS, through W-2 and 1099 reporting, with the level of tax compliance that is necessary to enforce tax law. The fact that the government does not put the same level of effort into proactively managing this problem through the tried and true 1099 reporting process remains baffling. Instead, it continues to use its resources on enforcement for direct taxpayers, who often weren’t given the tax information they needed to comply in the first place.

Perhaps the next round of IRS guidance for filers is on the heels of this round for taxpayers. In the meantime, all filers can do is wait. 

Take Action

Find out how Sovos helps cryptocurrency exchanges mitigate risk of IRS penalties and stay prepared for changes in tax regulations. 

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Wendy Walker

Wendy Walker is the principal of Tax Information Reporting solutions at Sovos. She has more than 15 years of tax operations management and tax compliance experience with emphasis in large financial institutions, having held positions with CTI Technologies (a division of IHS Markit), Zions Bancorporation and JP Morgan Chase. Wendy has served as a member of several prominent industry advisory boards. She graduated with a BS in Process Engineering from Franklin University and earned her MBA from Ohio Dominican University, in Columbus, Ohio.
Share This Post

EMEA Italy Tax Compliance VAT & Fiscal Reporting
November 19, 2019
Italy to Introduce Pre-Completed VAT Returns by July 2020

The Italian government has introduced an ambitious new program for collecting VAT, under which the tax authorities will pre-populate VAT returns on behalf of taxpayers. This program is aimed at reducing the VAT gap in Italy, which reached 33.5 billion Euros in 2017 – in absolute terms, the largest loss of revenue in the European […]

Tax Compliance United States
November 14, 2019
The Top 5 Most Common Unclaimed Property Compliance Mistakes

Full compliance when it comes to unclaimed property requirements can be difficult to determine. For many businesses, it isn’t until they are audited and fined that they find out they made a mistake. Below are the most common mistakes businesses make when complying with unclaimed property requirements. 1. Reporting is mandatory Reporting unclaimed property is […]

EMEA Tax Compliance VAT & Fiscal Reporting
November 13, 2019
Revisiting the EU VAT “2020 Quick Fixes”

Part 3:  Chain Transactions This is the third in a series of four blogs providing explanatory detail to the EU’s “2020 Quick Fixes” that aim to standardise certain VAT rules throughout the EU. Part one of this series focussed on VAT Identification of the Customer, whilst part two provided guidance on the Exemptions of Intra-Community […]

E-Invoicing Compliance EMEA
November 12, 2019
Will the myDATA Project be Delayed in Greece and Mandatory E-Invoicing be Introduced?

Two months after closing the public consultation on the myDATA scheme, the Greek tax authority, IAPR, has yet to share the feedback received from the industry on the proposed scheme or make any official announcement in this regard. However, local discussions indicate that, the IAPR may reintroduce its initial agenda proposed back in August 2018, […]

Tax Information Reporting United States
November 7, 2019
IRS Tax Gap Data Previews the Future of 10-series Reporting Requirements

A recent fact sheet released by the IRS shows the latest tax gap estimates and overall taxpayer compliance and demonstrates why the IRS is likely to strengthen its tax reporting enforcement policies. The findings are based on data from tax years 2011, 2012 and 2013. The purpose of this document is to let the public […]