SAP Central Finance Migration: Tax Compliance Spells Trouble

Billy Kazantzis
April 22, 2019

SAP S/4HANA is the promised land for SAP customers: an entire suite of ERP functionality in one place with a single data store. The ability to run all ERP capabilities, both from SAP and non-SAP systems, from a single source represents delivery of a model IT professionals and SAP administrators have sought for years.

Getting there, however, will take some work, and that’s why the SAP Central Finance module exists. With Central Finance, companies can create a single point of access for financial data from disparate accounts payable (AP), accounts receivable (AR) and ERP applications and then bring that data into SAP S/4HANA at the company’s chosen pace.

SAP Central Finance, then, is the path to ERP nirvana. With it, finance teams can leverage the benefits of SAP S/4HANA Finance without disrupting the processes in source ERP systems and without needing immediately to convert each back-end system to SAP S/4HANA. SAP has managed to remove many of the barriers to single-source ERP that existed for decades, but there are still major challenges that finance and IT departments must face.

SAP Central Finance migration and compliance challenges

One barrier to success that many organizations might not have considered is tax compliance. Governments around the world are embarking on their own form of digital transformation, seeking to capture billions in lost revenue by mandating real-time tax enforcement. This “other” digital transformation is having a significant impact on even the best-run businesses’ plans for SAP Central Finance and SAP S/4HANA migration.

For SAP customers moving to SAP Central Finance, given the massive scope of the project and the sensitivity of the data involved, tax compliance will likely start out as an afterthought in migration plans. But it shouldn’t be. Global tax mandates are complex and change constantly, and they can be incredibly invasive in a company’s business processes. Failure to comply not only courts potentially significant financial penalties, but it can also seriously affect cash flow, as well as relationships with suppliers and customers.

Tax mandates also have the potential to disrupt and add significant cost and delay to SAP Central Finance and S/4HANA migration plans. Digital transformation of the financial core is paramount for businesses that need to continue selling goods and services in countries where continuous compliance and tax enforcement are becoming increasingly complex.

SAP S/4HANA migration alerts organizations to keep up with government mandates

Migration to SAP Central Finance can take years, and over the course of those years, tax mandates will develop and change country-by-country across the world. A financial system that can’t handle those changes dynamically could derail an entire digital transformation project. Beyond that, moving data into SAP Central Finance over a period of years without accommodating for changes in AP and AR processes as a result of changing mandates will create a single-source system that can’t support digital transformation because it can’t manage compliance.

SAP Central Finance can only be the road to SAP S/4HANA single ERP paradise if companies consider compliance as central to their migration efforts and not something to handle on the periphery. Smart companies realize that compliance is a major potential stumbling block on the way to using SAP Central Finance to move ultimately to SAP S/4HANA.

Take Action

Discover how to avoid compliance roadblocks and make a successful transition to SAP Central Finance and SAP S/4HANA. Download the white paper Compliance at the Core: Why the Transformation to SAP Central Finance Should Begin with the Digital Transformation of Tax

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Billy Kazantzis

Billy Kazantzis is Sovos’ Sr. Strategic Market Manager. In his role, Billy is responsible for understanding VAT and other fiscal reporting obligations in different regions around the world, as well as how Sovos clients can ensure compliance in accordance with those regulations. Billy joined Sovos with the acquisition of Invoiceware International in 2016 where he was responsible for managing implementations of Invoiceware’s products.
Share This Post

Tax Information Reporting United States
July 11, 2019
Why the IRS Needs to Release Cryptocurrency Tax Guidance

Despite IRS Commissioner Charles Rettig’s promise of “within the next 30 days” more than 30 days ago to Congress regarding the release of forthcoming cryptocurrency tax guidance, we have not seen anything materialize.  As we mentioned previously, the ongoing confusion related to tax reporting obligations continues to plague payers such as crypto or digital currency […]

EMEA Tax Compliance
July 10, 2019
New Regulation Reinforces Free Flow of Data in the EU

When thinking about the aim of GDPR, one of the first things that comes to mind is the set of rules, obligations, and restrictions on the processing of personal data. When in fact, as the full title of GDPR – General Data Protection Regulation – and its recitals explain, the subject matter and purpose of […]

E-Invoicing Compliance EMEA
July 10, 2019
Greek E-Invoicing Reform: Potential Impact of Recent National Elections

On 7 July, Greece began voting to elect a new government.  The disposed governing left party has been dealt with a hefty blow having been in power since 2015.  It was hoped they would introduce less severe politics which many claim they have not only failed to do but, in fact, they actually introduced stricter […]

Tax Information Reporting United States
July 9, 2019
The IRS Is Allowing TIN Masking on Form W-2. Here’s Why It’s a Good Idea

At last, the IRS is allowing payers to truncate, or effectively mask, tax identification numbers (TINs) on Forms W-2 sent to payees. The decision comes after years of concern from companies and taxpayers about the risk of exposing TINs, or Social Security Numbers in the case of individual payees, in W-2 distributions.  The new policy […]

EMEA IPT
July 9, 2019
Interpreting Insurance Tax Legislation

Tax legislation is sometimes structured, or worded, ambiguously.  This leaves scope for a number of different interpretations for the treatment of tax on insurance policies, some leading to a lower tax liability than others. This can often be seen when different insurance premium tax (IPT) rates apply to specific sub-classes of the same business or […]