SAP Central Finance Migration: Tax Compliance Spells Trouble

Billy Kazantzis
April 22, 2019

SAP S/4HANA is the promised land for SAP customers: an entire suite of ERP functionality in one place with a single data store. The ability to run all ERP capabilities, both from SAP and non-SAP systems, from a single source represents delivery of a model IT professionals and SAP administrators have sought for years.

Getting there, however, will take some work, and that’s why the SAP Central Finance module exists. With Central Finance, companies can create a single point of access for financial data from disparate accounts payable (AP), accounts receivable (AR) and ERP applications and then bring that data into SAP S/4HANA at the company’s chosen pace.

SAP Central Finance, then, is the path to ERP nirvana. With it, finance teams can leverage the benefits of SAP S/4HANA Finance without disrupting the processes in source ERP systems and without needing immediately to convert each back-end system to SAP S/4HANA. SAP has managed to remove many of the barriers to single-source ERP that existed for decades, but there are still major challenges that finance and IT departments must face.

SAP Central Finance migration and compliance challenges

One barrier to success that many organizations might not have considered is tax compliance. Governments around the world are embarking on their own form of digital transformation, seeking to capture billions in lost revenue by mandating real-time tax enforcement. This “other” digital transformation is having a significant impact on even the best-run businesses’ plans for SAP Central Finance and SAP S/4HANA migration.

For SAP customers moving to SAP Central Finance, given the massive scope of the project and the sensitivity of the data involved, tax compliance will likely start out as an afterthought in migration plans. But it shouldn’t be. Global tax mandates are complex and change constantly, and they can be incredibly invasive in a company’s business processes. Failure to comply not only courts potentially significant financial penalties, but it can also seriously affect cash flow, as well as relationships with suppliers and customers.

Tax mandates also have the potential to disrupt and add significant cost and delay to SAP Central Finance and S/4HANA migration plans. Digital transformation of the financial core is paramount for businesses that need to continue selling goods and services in countries where continuous compliance and tax enforcement are becoming increasingly complex.

SAP S/4HANA migration alerts organizations to keep up with government mandates

Migration to SAP Central Finance can take years, and over the course of those years, tax mandates will develop and change country-by-country across the world. A financial system that can’t handle those changes dynamically could derail an entire digital transformation project. Beyond that, moving data into SAP Central Finance over a period of years without accommodating for changes in AP and AR processes as a result of changing mandates will create a single-source system that can’t support digital transformation because it can’t manage compliance.

SAP Central Finance can only be the road to SAP S/4HANA single ERP paradise if companies consider compliance as central to their migration efforts and not something to handle on the periphery. Smart companies realize that compliance is a major potential stumbling block on the way to using SAP Central Finance to move ultimately to SAP S/4HANA.

Take Action

Discover how to avoid compliance roadblocks and make a successful transition to SAP Central Finance and SAP S/4HANA. Download the white paper Compliance at the Core: Why the Transformation to SAP Central Finance Should Begin with the Digital Transformation of Tax

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Billy Kazantzis

Billy Kazantzis is Sovos’ Sr. Strategic Market Manager. In his role, Billy is responsible for understanding VAT and other fiscal reporting obligations in different regions around the world, as well as how Sovos clients can ensure compliance in accordance with those regulations. Billy joined Sovos with the acquisition of Invoiceware International in 2016 where he was responsible for managing implementations of Invoiceware’s products.
Share This Post

LATAM VAT & Fiscal Reporting
May 20, 2020
Sovos Acquires Taxweb, Extends Tax Determination Capabilities in World’s Most Challenging Compliance Landscape

Earlier this month Sovos announced its second acquisition of 2020, completing our solution for Brazil with an unparalleled offering that solves tax compliance in the place where it is most challenging to do so.  Too many companies doing business in Brazil have been burdened by managing multiple point solutions for continuous transaction controls (CTCs), tax […]

E-Invoicing Compliance EMEA Italy VAT & Fiscal Reporting
December 2, 2020
Italian Tax Controls: Five Key Facts to Know Before the New Year

While Italy rolled out its continuous transaction controls (CTC) reform in 2019, 2020 has been a year of expansion. Italian authorities plan to leverage all potential benefits of the successful implementation of the country’s central e-invoicing platform. Many of the updates will either be launched or enforced in the upcoming year, or later in 2022. […]

Tax Compliance Tax Information Reporting United States
December 1, 2020
Unclaimed Property Dormancy Periods by State: What You Need to Know

Understanding unclaimed property dormancy periods by state and executing the appropriate decisions can make or break your company’s unclaimed property program. This is due primarily to the fact that each state has varying dormancy periods. To complicate matters even further, each state has specific dormancy periods for each corresponding property type. As a result, determining […]

Sales & Use Tax United States
December 1, 2020
How Was the Nevada Economic Nexus Law Modified?

When the Supreme Court ruled on South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc., remote sellers and marketplace facilitators across the country had to make changes in how they collected and remitted sales tax. The Nevada economic nexus law is one example of a state modifying its requirements for both remote sellers and marketplace facilitators in relation to […]

Sales & Use Tax United States
December 1, 2020
Does Oregon Have Economic Nexus Rules?

Following the South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc. decision, the majority of states enacted legislation on how remote sellers and marketplace facilitators must collect and remit sales tax. However, Oregon has no economic nexus because it does not have a sales tax. Enforcement date: N/A Sales/transactions threshold: N/A Measurement period: N/A Included transactions/sales: N/A When You […]

Sales & Use Tax United States
December 1, 2020
Is There a Missouri Economic Nexus Sales Tax?

After the South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc. decision, almost every state incorporated changes to how remote sellers must collect and remit sales tax. However, Missouri has not yet finalized legislation relating to an economic nexus sales tax. While Missouri has introduced several bills aimed at enacting economic nexus rules, none have become law. But this […]