Form 1099 Reporting Corrections: Best Practices to Maintain Compliance

Gerry Nelligan
April 12, 2019

Tax Year 2018 brought important and likely unwelcome changes for organizations filing Forms 1099. At the same time the IRS eliminated the 30-day extension of time (EOT) for filing Forms W-2 and 1099-MISC reporting non-employee compensation, the agency also increased penalty amounts for late or incorrect filings. As a result, the number of incorrect or late forms filed is likely to increase for Tax Year 2018 compared to years past.

Accurate information on Forms 1099 is more critical than ever for organizations in avoiding both financial penalties and the hassle and expense of B and P notices. The best way to deal with corrections, of course, is to avoid them altogether, something organizations can accomplish through year-round, real-time matching of names and tax identification numbers (TINs).  

1099 corrections:  Here’s what payers need to know

The cost to file a correction increases as time elapses, so dealing with corrections rapidly is critical to the reporting process. IRS penalties for late or incorrect filings currently stand at:

  • Files received not more than 30 days late: $50/form, maximum $545,500
  • 31 days late-August 1: $100/form, maximum $1,637,500
  • After August 1: $270/form, maximum $3,275,500
  • Intentional disregard: $540 per return with no maximum

Complicating matters is the fact that for most companies, dealing with corrections isn’t just about tracking one form type or deadline. The corrections process becomes exponentially more complex when an organization files a variety of different forms types with varying deadlines. Currently, filing deadlines are:

  • Jan. 31: 1099-MISC box 7
  • March 31: 1099-MISC non-box 7, 1097-BTC, 1098s, other 1099s, 3921, 3922, W-2G
  • May 31: 5498, 5498-SA, 5498-ESA

The new state of 1099 corrections

The end of the EOT for forms W-2 and 1099-MISC box 7 has heaped pressure on organizations to make sure information is accurate with tighter deadlines. If past trends hold, the number of late and incorrect forms is likely to rise year-over-year. In the first year of the PATH Act, for example, late filings of W-2 forms doubled, and corrections went up by 30 percent.

A lack of predictability and know your customer (KYC) processes is the enemy for accounts payable and finance professionals, who are either always working with new contractors and vendors each year or constantly onboarding new customers. With less time to prepare forms and the stakes higher for making errors, clean data and well-defined processes are critical. Any sort of pre-emptive method for avoiding corrections becomes extremely important as well.

Generally, there are three types of corrections organizations file:

  • Name Changes (Two Return/Transaction Type)
  • TIN Changes (Two Return/Transaction Type)
  • Amount Changes (One Return/Transaction Type)

Two of those correction types are generally avoidable with TIN matching, Name and TIN changes. The IRS gives payers the ability to prevent errors upfront by performing name and TIN matches against its database. Matching names and TINs before filing tax forms enables payers to take action before a filing error occurs. There are two types of TIN matching the IRS allows:

  • Bulk TIN Matching matches many records against the IRS’s database at one time.
  • Interactive TIN Matching enables payers to quickly verify on the fly that information is correct.

Cleaning errors up helps resolve the two biggest issues that are about to further complicate 1099 corrections. By proactively reducing the number of errors in an original filing with the IRS, companies have fewer corrections to submit and fewer B and P notices to address in time. They can then reallocate resources to different projects. Of course, the other positive result of proactively avoiding errors, and therefore corrections, is staving off IRS penalties.

Best practices for filing 1099 corrections

Interactive TIN matching enables organizations to put in place a critical best practice for avoiding 1099 errors and corrections: verifying 1099 recipient information during the onboarding process rather than in bulk just before tax season. To the greatest extent possible, companies should know as soon as they engage with 1099 recipients that the information they have for those parties is accurate.

Although the IRS eliminated EOT for Forms W-2 and 1099-MISC box 7, organizations can still apply for extensions for other forms—at least for now. So, if an organization filed, for instance, a 1099-R on time on March 25 but ended up needing to make a correction to the form on April 5, the correction wouldn’t be late because of the 30-day extension.

Another best practice is to have automated, centralized reporting process. Automation, which includes features such as interactive TIN matching, enables payers to eliminate errors and develop repeatable, reliable reporting processes. Centralizing reporting in one team, using one automated system, not only guards against errors, it also saves time and money in the reporting process.

Predictability is one of the critical goals of any organizations that handles 1099 reporting. Unfortunately, the regulations surrounding 1099 corrections are unpredictable and liable to have negative and costly consequences.

Fortunately, organizations with the right tools and processes can deal with change efficiently and effectively. Having best practices in place to avoid corrections is the best way to stave off the potentially negative byproducts of the corrections process.

Take Action

Watch a replay of a Sovos webinar to learn much more about corrections for form 1099.

Learn more about how Sovos enables companies to avoid 1099 corrections and the consequences that come with them, or contact Sovos for more information.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Gerry Nelligan

Gerry Nelligan is a Regulatory Analysis Supervisor at Sovos, leading a team of counsels covering information reporting, including 10-Series IRS reporting, Affordable Care Act (ACA) reporting and Automatic Exchange of Information (AEOI). Gerry received his J.D. from Suffolk University Law School and his B.A. from Providence College. He is a licensed attorney in the state of Massachusetts.
Share This Post

Sales & Use Tax United States
December 4, 2019
Economic Nexus: Enforcement is Coming

We are now more than 16 months removed from the groundbreaking Supreme Court decision of South Dakota v. Wayfair. This decision unlocked the ability for U.S. states to impose a sales tax collection and remittance responsibility on remote sellers based solely on their economic connection to that state. Within that time, virtually every state imposing […]

EMEA Tax Compliance VAT & Fiscal Reporting
December 4, 2019
Poland’s Departure from the Traditional VAT Return

In Europe, Poland seems to be the first country to move away from the traditional VAT return replacing it with a detailed Standard Audit File for Tax (SAF-T). This is basically an expansion of the SAF-T system already used in Poland since 2016. Large enterprises must start working with the expanded SAF-T system from April […]

EMEA Tax Compliance VAT & Fiscal Reporting
November 26, 2019
Hungary Expands Scope of Real-Time Reporting

Since July 2018, taxpayers in Hungary have been obliged to disclose the data of electronic invoices issued for transactions with accounted VAT exceeding HUF 100,000 (approximately €300). This data must be transmitted to the National Tax and Customs Administration of Hungary (NAV) in a structured manner once the electronic invoice has been issued.  This fiscal obligation […]

Asia Pacific E-Invoicing Compliance EMEA Tax Compliance VAT & Fiscal Reporting
November 26, 2019
Is Your Business Ready for Turkey’s Digital Tax Transformation?

The value of data is rising The value of data is becoming more precious than oil.  Technology has transformed market dynamics across all sectors and the way businesses operate. Big data has grown in importance and data-based platforms are today’s new technology giants. On one hand; Facebook, Google and other data-based platforms are collecting data […]

EMEA Tax Compliance VAT & Fiscal Reporting
November 21, 2019
Revisiting the EU VAT “2020 Quick Fixes”

Part 4 – Call-Off Stock Arrangements This is the last in a series of four blogs providing explanatory detail to the EU’s “2020 Quick Fixes” that aim to standardise certain VAT rules throughout the EU.   Part one of this series focussed on VAT Identification of the Customer, part two provided guidance on the Exemptions of […]