10 Challenges of Native SAP Tax Compliance – Part Three

Alex Forbes
November 15, 2018

In my last blog, I discussed three additional challenges of native SAP tax management for growing companies facing multifaceted indirect tax requirements and continuous compliance mandates. These ranged from sales and use tax nexus rules to VAT requirements and filings.

Additional challenges your IT, finance and tax teams face from native ERP tax management due to the requirements of modern tax compliance are discussed below.

Real-time transaction controls

The digital transformation of public administrations and law enforcement are being spearheaded by tax authorities globally. The success of Latin American countries to narrow the VAT gap by introducing real-time transaction controls and electronic audits has inspired European Union member states and countries around the globe to announce similar radical changes to their VAT, GST and other indirect tax controls. In this “clearance” model, the local tax administration places itself between a supplier and a buyer to monitor end-to-end business transactions as they happen.

Companies are already going through major changes in adopting modern information and communication technologies, making the transition toward real-time tax control regimes over the next several years even more chaotic. Those companies that can take advantage of business process automation improvements while also meeting the complex data exchange requirements of hundreds of tax mandates without incurring major business disruption and IT administration costs will be the leaders of tomorrow.

Learn how to minimize business disruption during an SAP S/4HANA upgrade project in the wake of modern tax: Read Preparing SAP S/4HANA for Continuous Tax Compliance and don’t let the requirements of modern tax derail your company.

Europe and other post-audit countries – today and tomorrow

For many countries in Europe and globally, electronic invoicing and archiving are still optional and can be adopted by businesses as long as integrity and authenticity are guaranteed for a decade or longer. These countries are also adopting new ways of submitting and increasing the velocity, granularity and frequency of periodic indirect tax reports (“returns”) that must be submitted to the tax administration.

Many countries today require reports of individual transactions based on structured data of each invoice that is sent or received, and may have to be sent automatically to the tax administration within only days, or even hours, after the transaction. During the mandatory storage period of the original e-invoice, tax administrations may audit companies to verify that each booking in their accounting system corresponds to such verifiable e-invoices and match those with electronically reported data. These post-audit regimes are slowly transforming into full-fledged clearance environments where invoices cannot be validly exchanged between trading partners until approved by the tax administration. Italy has mandated e-invoice clearance starting January 1, 2019.

How ‘clearance’ regimes are crossing the chasm

In most Latin American countries, such government-orchestrated e-invoicing processes are now mandatory for all businesses. Every participating country has different requirements for how businesses should implement these systems, often including requirements for the clearance of other commercial data, as well as the controlled printing of – for example – transport documents to allow every step in the flow of goods and money to be audited in real time. These countries have also adopted their periodic reporting requirements to include additional information such as inventory, immovable assets, HR and other data.

Cloud-native purchasing applications

Examples of cloud-native purchasing systems include Electronic Data Interchange (EDI), supply chain management, strategic sourcing, procure-to-pay, electronic AP invoicing, travel and expense management, and AP scanning and workflow solutions. Even if these different types of AP automation systems leverage similar technologies to automate supplier relationships, they cater to very different business processes that are often managed by disparate teams. The one thing they have in common, however, is that these systems all come under pressure as indirect tax law enforcement becomes more focused on real-time integration with invoicing and other business transaction flows.

Another complexity introduced by e-invoicing compliance is the need to acknowledge the reception and validity, or rejection, of vendor invoices received within a government-defined period of time. Some governments have reduced that timeframe from 30 to just eight days. ERPs, and even business processes, are not adapted for such aggressive response times. This increases the need for a tax compliance platform that is flexible enough to be able to adapt to the increasing data requirements imposed by governments.

Safeguard your SAP S/4HANA implementation

Taking a tactical and native SAP tax management approach is not the most optimal solution to maintain regulatory compliance, as it can limit the ability of organizations to scale with growth. The pressure from affiliates and local teams to adopt local vendor approaches to panic-fix short-term digital tax mandates can be significant. The fragmentation and lost opportunities that arise from the resulting patchwork of e-invoicing, reporting and B2B transaction automation systems drives significant cost and risks as they torpedo company wide attempts to standardize on strategic solutions and approved best practices.

Take Action

Learn how to minimize business disruption during an SAP S/4HANA upgrade project in the wake of modern tax: Read Preparing SAP S/4HANA for Continuous Tax Compliance and don’t let the requirements of modern tax derail your company.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Alex Forbes

Alex Forbes is Senior Manager, Content Marketing, at Sovos. When not helping readers navigate their tax-related digital business transformation journeys, he enjoys day tripping around New England with his wife.
Share This Post

Tax Information Reporting United States
July 11, 2019
Why the IRS Needs to Release Cryptocurrency Tax Guidance

Despite IRS Commissioner Charles Rettig’s promise of “within the next 30 days” more than 30 days ago to Congress regarding the release of forthcoming cryptocurrency tax guidance, we have not seen anything materialize.  As we mentioned previously, the ongoing confusion related to tax reporting obligations continues to plague payers such as crypto or digital currency […]

EMEA Tax Compliance
July 10, 2019
New Regulation Reinforces Free Flow of Data in the EU

When thinking about the aim of GDPR, one of the first things that comes to mind is the set of rules, obligations, and restrictions on the processing of personal data. When in fact, as the full title of GDPR – General Data Protection Regulation – and its recitals explain, the subject matter and purpose of […]

E-Invoicing Compliance EMEA
July 10, 2019
Greek E-Invoicing Reform: Potential Impact of Recent National Elections

On 7 July, Greece began voting to elect a new government.  The disposed governing left party has been dealt with a hefty blow having been in power since 2015.  It was hoped they would introduce less severe politics which many claim they have not only failed to do but, in fact, they actually introduced stricter […]

Tax Information Reporting United States
July 9, 2019
The IRS Is Allowing TIN Masking on Form W-2. Here’s Why It’s a Good Idea

At last, the IRS is allowing payers to truncate, or effectively mask, tax identification numbers (TINs) on Forms W-2 sent to payees. The decision comes after years of concern from companies and taxpayers about the risk of exposing TINs, or Social Security Numbers in the case of individual payees, in W-2 distributions.  The new policy […]

EMEA IPT
July 9, 2019
Interpreting Insurance Tax Legislation

Tax legislation is sometimes structured, or worded, ambiguously.  This leaves scope for a number of different interpretations for the treatment of tax on insurance policies, some leading to a lower tax liability than others. This can often be seen when different insurance premium tax (IPT) rates apply to specific sub-classes of the same business or […]