10 Challenges of Native SAP Tax Compliance – Part Three

Alex Forbes
November 15, 2018

In my last blog, I discussed three additional challenges of native SAP tax management for growing companies facing multifaceted indirect tax requirements and continuous compliance mandates. These ranged from sales and use tax nexus rules to VAT requirements and filings.

Additional challenges your IT, finance and tax teams face from native ERP tax management due to the requirements of modern tax compliance are discussed below.

Real-time transaction controls

The digital transformation of public administrations and law enforcement are being spearheaded by tax authorities globally. The success of Latin American countries to narrow the VAT gap by introducing real-time transaction controls and electronic audits has inspired European Union member states and countries around the globe to announce similar radical changes to their VAT, GST and other indirect tax controls. In this “clearance” model, the local tax administration places itself between a supplier and a buyer to monitor end-to-end business transactions as they happen.

Companies are already going through major changes in adopting modern information and communication technologies, making the transition toward real-time tax control regimes over the next several years even more chaotic. Those companies that can take advantage of business process automation improvements while also meeting the complex data exchange requirements of hundreds of tax mandates without incurring major business disruption and IT administration costs will be the leaders of tomorrow.

Learn how to minimize business disruption during an SAP S/4HANA upgrade project in the wake of modern tax: Read Preparing SAP S/4HANA for Continuous Tax Compliance and don’t let the requirements of modern tax derail your company.

Europe and other post-audit countries – today and tomorrow

For many countries in Europe and globally, electronic invoicing and archiving are still optional and can be adopted by businesses as long as integrity and authenticity are guaranteed for a decade or longer. These countries are also adopting new ways of submitting and increasing the velocity, granularity and frequency of periodic indirect tax reports (“returns”) that must be submitted to the tax administration.

Many countries today require reports of individual transactions based on structured data of each invoice that is sent or received, and may have to be sent automatically to the tax administration within only days, or even hours, after the transaction. During the mandatory storage period of the original e-invoice, tax administrations may audit companies to verify that each booking in their accounting system corresponds to such verifiable e-invoices and match those with electronically reported data. These post-audit regimes are slowly transforming into full-fledged clearance environments where invoices cannot be validly exchanged between trading partners until approved by the tax administration. Italy has mandated e-invoice clearance starting January 1, 2019.

How ‘clearance’ regimes are crossing the chasm

In most Latin American countries, such government-orchestrated e-invoicing processes are now mandatory for all businesses. Every participating country has different requirements for how businesses should implement these systems, often including requirements for the clearance of other commercial data, as well as the controlled printing of – for example – transport documents to allow every step in the flow of goods and money to be audited in real time. These countries have also adopted their periodic reporting requirements to include additional information such as inventory, immovable assets, HR and other data.

Cloud-native purchasing applications

Examples of cloud-native purchasing systems include Electronic Data Interchange (EDI), supply chain management, strategic sourcing, procure-to-pay, electronic AP invoicing, travel and expense management, and AP scanning and workflow solutions. Even if these different types of AP automation systems leverage similar technologies to automate supplier relationships, they cater to very different business processes that are often managed by disparate teams. The one thing they have in common, however, is that these systems all come under pressure as indirect tax law enforcement becomes more focused on real-time integration with invoicing and other business transaction flows.

Another complexity introduced by e-invoicing compliance is the need to acknowledge the reception and validity, or rejection, of vendor invoices received within a government-defined period of time. Some governments have reduced that timeframe from 30 to just eight days. ERPs, and even business processes, are not adapted for such aggressive response times. This increases the need for a tax compliance platform that is flexible enough to be able to adapt to the increasing data requirements imposed by governments.

Safeguard your SAP S/4HANA implementation

Taking a tactical and native SAP tax management approach is not the most optimal solution to maintain regulatory compliance, as it can limit the ability of organizations to scale with growth. The pressure from affiliates and local teams to adopt local vendor approaches to panic-fix short-term digital tax mandates can be significant. The fragmentation and lost opportunities that arise from the resulting patchwork of e-invoicing, reporting and B2B transaction automation systems drives significant cost and risks as they torpedo company wide attempts to standardize on strategic solutions and approved best practices.

Take Action

Learn how to minimize business disruption during an SAP S/4HANA upgrade project in the wake of modern tax: Read Preparing SAP S/4HANA for Continuous Tax Compliance and don’t let the requirements of modern tax derail your company.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Alex Forbes

Alex Forbes is Senior Manager, Content Marketing, at Sovos. When not helping readers navigate their tax-related digital business transformation journeys, he enjoys day tripping around New England with his wife.
Share This Post

LATAM VAT & Fiscal Reporting
May 20, 2020
Sovos Acquires Taxweb, Extends Tax Determination Capabilities in World’s Most Challenging Compliance Landscape

Earlier this month Sovos announced its second acquisition of 2020, completing our solution for Brazil with an unparalleled offering that solves tax compliance in the place where it is most challenging to do so.  Too many companies doing business in Brazil have been burdened by managing multiple point solutions for continuous transaction controls (CTCs), tax […]

E-Invoicing Compliance EMEA Italy VAT & Fiscal Reporting
December 2, 2020
Italian Tax Controls: Five Key Facts to Know Before the New Year

While Italy rolled out its continuous transaction controls (CTC) reform in 2019, 2020 has been a year of expansion. Italian authorities plan to leverage all potential benefits of the successful implementation of the country’s central e-invoicing platform. Many of the updates will either be launched or enforced in the upcoming year, or later in 2022. […]

Tax Compliance Tax Information Reporting United States
December 1, 2020
Unclaimed Property Dormancy Periods by State: What You Need to Know

Understanding unclaimed property dormancy periods by state and executing the appropriate decisions can make or break your company’s unclaimed property program. This is due primarily to the fact that each state has varying dormancy periods. To complicate matters even further, each state has specific dormancy periods for each corresponding property type. As a result, determining […]

Sales & Use Tax United States
December 1, 2020
How Was the Nevada Economic Nexus Law Modified?

When the Supreme Court ruled on South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc., remote sellers and marketplace facilitators across the country had to make changes in how they collected and remitted sales tax. The Nevada economic nexus law is one example of a state modifying its requirements for both remote sellers and marketplace facilitators in relation to […]

Sales & Use Tax United States
December 1, 2020
Does Oregon Have Economic Nexus Rules?

Following the South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc. decision, the majority of states enacted legislation on how remote sellers and marketplace facilitators must collect and remit sales tax. However, Oregon has no economic nexus because it does not have a sales tax. Enforcement date: N/A Sales/transactions threshold: N/A Measurement period: N/A Included transactions/sales: N/A When You […]

Sales & Use Tax United States
December 1, 2020
Is There a Missouri Economic Nexus Sales Tax?

After the South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc. decision, almost every state incorporated changes to how remote sellers must collect and remit sales tax. However, Missouri has not yet finalized legislation relating to an economic nexus sales tax. While Missouri has introduced several bills aimed at enacting economic nexus rules, none have become law. But this […]