10 Challenges of Native SAP Tax Compliance – Part One

Alex Forbes
November 1, 2018

As tax, finance and IT teams plan to support the future growth of their businesses, many are realizing the challenges of managing customized ERP-centric tax compliance. A recent HCL-sponsored global study of large enterprises (over $1 billion in annual revenue) found that on average respondents had five separate instances of SAP operating across their businesses. Thirty-nine percent stated they were running more than six instances. Given increased M&A activity and the complexities involved in globalization and compliance, that number is likely to rise, and consolidation projects are already underway in best-run businesses.

The centralization of business processes, including continuous transaction-level tax compliance, is now a must for continued growth, visibility into operations, reporting and archiving. ERPs are proving limited in their ability to scale with growing companies facing multifaceted indirect tax requirements including value-added tax (VAT), sales and use tax, and e-invoicing. From the United States, with its 10,000+ tax jurisdictions, to Latin America and Europe, where governments have legislated B2B transaction-level reporting, SAP S/4HANA or Central Finance alone may not be able to address all of the challenges of a dynamic global regulatory environment.

Tax compliance is now an important consideration of an SAP S/4HANA implementation, a move to Central Finance or cloud upgrade strategy. A single integrated solution supports indirect tax determination, e-invoicing compliance and VAT reporting for current tax compliance obligations, and evolves as businesses grow and requirements change to address regulations five, even 10 years down the road.

Country-by-country tools and custom workflows

As global businesses move toward Intelligent ERPs, like SAP S/4HANA, and cloud-based applications, local governments worldwide are introducing legislation requiring businesses to comply with detailed processes for invoicing, accounting and tax reporting. This is forcing businesses to accelerate digital transformation in every financial process from purchasing to general ledger. SAP S/4HANA and ECC both address compliance requirements by providing country-by-country tools to build custom workflows, adding cost and complexity to SAP centers of excellence (COEs). Additionally, compliance updates are handled through complex standardized code releases, forcing companies to adapt the code to their customized systems.

SAP tax compliance gaps

Constantly changing requirements have come to be expected in the corporate regulatory environment. Global strategies set to roll out SAP updates on a set schedule are causing companies hyper-focused on this calendar to fall behind in compliance. The major updates and testing required by e-invoicing compliance and all forms of continuous tax compliance interrupt the COEs calendar and can affect entire global operations. Companies that run an N-1 upgrade strategy are especially at risk, as their compliance measures won’t be up-to-date with new requirements. SAP also doesn’t account for local-level details – like certain fields, naming architectures, codes and character limits. All of this equates to implementation nightmares and gaps in compliance measures.

ERP-centric tax compliance administration

To address these issues, tax compliance must be proactively managed within SAP S/4HANA to not only avoid the risks, fines and penalties that occur from data discrepancies and errors but project delays and wasted IT spend. Internal management of this process is no small feat, however, it requires major changes to the way global COE and shared service teams operate. At the same time, the IT team is involved in these time-intensive IT projects and frequent updates for not only the ERP and billing system but other customer transaction and purchasing systems the business requires, and acquires, with growth.

An ERP-centric approach to tax compliance administration can lead to multiple different ways of calculating tax across the business, leading to errors and increased difficulty as companies try to evolve for new opportunities or expand into new geographies. This quickly erodes IT’s time for other projects, causing missed opportunities to drive more effective compliance and innovation.

These challenges are most prevalent for companies operating multinationally. In Latin America, for example, 10 countries currently mandate e-invoicing compliance and/or tax reporting. In this region, global ERP upgrade strategies simply do not work. Companies doing business in Latin America need to understand the limitation of ERP systems and look for solutions that provide local expertise, support and flexibility.

In Part 2, I’ll address local and global tax challenges of native SAP tax compliance.

 

Take Action

Learn how to minimize business disruption during an SAP S/4HANA upgrade project in the wake of modern tax: Read Preparing SAP S/4HANA for Continuous Tax Compliance and don’t let the requirements of modern tax derail your company.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Alex Forbes

Alex Forbes is Senior Manager, Content Marketing, at Sovos. When not helping readers navigate their tax-related digital business transformation journeys, he enjoys day tripping around New England with his wife.
Share This Post

Colombia E-Invoicing Compliance LATAM
May 24, 2019
Colombia DIAN UBL 2.1 E-invoicing Mandate Reminds SAP Shops Why Compliance Matters

Colombia’s new electronic invoicing mandate serves as another reminder to SAP that compliance has to be at the heart of digital transformation efforts and migrations to SAP S/4HANA. The South American country, following the lead of Latin American neighbors Brazil and Mexico, is moving from a reporting e-invoicing model to a clearance model. Effectively, that means […]

Tax Information Reporting United States
May 24, 2019
TIGTA Audit Highlights Gaps in IRS Withholding Controls

The Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) reported results of a recent audit of the IRS internal controls in place to ensure that the withholding reported on information returns (i.e., Forms 1099) is accurately reflected on Form 945, Annual Return of Withheld Federal Income Tax, and that those amounts were paid to the IRS. […]

EMEA IPT
May 23, 2019
Key Reporting Considerations for Insurers Writing Insurance Across the EU

Freedom of services insurers are faced with a number of different obligations when entering new territories and writing insurance business within the European Union.  One that may initially be overlooked relates to which policy details are required to be recorded and then reported to the tax authorities.   It is essential that all insurance premium […]

E-Invoicing Compliance EMEA
May 23, 2019
Europe Embraces Digitized Invoices but Country Specific Requirements are Diverse

Based on the Billentis report of 2019 (The E-invoicing Journey 2019-2025), automated e-invoicing will generally result in cost savings of 60-80% compared to conventional paper format invoices. In this age of digital transformation, optimizing invoice flows is top of corporate agendas for most companies to improve efficiencies and reduce operating costs. And many companies want […]

Colombia E-Invoicing Compliance
May 22, 2019
Colombia anuncia el nuevo modelo de validación previa y el protocolo UBL 2.1 para su mandato de facturación electrónica

La autoridad fiscal de Colombia, DIAN (Dirección de Impuestos y Aduanas Nacionales), ha anunciado nuevos cambios a su mandato de facturación electrónica que serán implementados según la Resolución 020, orientada a las empresas que aún no han adoptado este modelo de facturación. Quienes ya son facturadores electrónicos deberán implementar el nuevo modelo antes del 2 […]