The Top Three SAP Challenges Impacting Manufacturers

Sovos
July 6, 2018

The acceleration of regulatory complexity is causing unnecessary strain on IT departments within manufacturing companies, negatively impacting growth. In fact, 31% of companies report that keeping up with the volume and complexity of regulations is their number one compliance challenge, and 45% say increasing costs of compliance is their number one barrier to growth.

The changing regulations are not slowing down anytime soon. In fact, real-time business-to-government reporting has now spread to more than 60 countries, and regulations can change multiple times per year. As tax authorities adopt even more initiatives and regulations for eInvoicing, eAccounting and eLedger, these compliance challenges will only continue to grow.

As regulations continue to change, many manufacturers – especially those operating in multiple countries – are realizing SAP is not equipped to support their unique needs from country to country. Here’s why:

  1. SAP’s compliance solutions are limited in scope and country specific, requiring resource knowledge in several systems. For example, the systems and processes that may be in place in Mexico are not the same as in Brazil, requiring different implementation processes and separate trainings to use.
  2. SAP delivers solutions as “support packs” that essentially require users to constantly monitor the changing requirements and software releases to meet compliance deadlines. This leaves manufacturing companies vulnerable to eInvoicing and reporting discrepancies that can ultimately result in fines and penalties.
  3. Leveraging SAP for compliance requires significant internal management, taking valuable time away from core business initiatives, such as growth and innovation.

The inevitable move to HANA compounds these issues even more. Since this move requires major changes to ERP infrastructure, SAP users with global operations need to proactively plan for the migration – which is required by 2025. Manufacturers must create a migration strategy to ensure seamless implementation and to future-proof their solutions to keep up with constant changes in tax regulations.

Despite these SAP challenges, it’s crucial for manufacturers to identify and implement an intelligent compliance solution that works within the company’s preexisting ERP, since it serves as a central source of truth for transactions. Solutions housing data outside the ERP are more prone to errors or manipulation. An ERP-integrated compliance solution, however, will provide the flexibility needed to adapt to the frequent change of pace and ensure compliance with local government requirements.

By integrating tax compliance and reporting into a company’s SAP, IT teams will eliminate the inefficiencies and inadequacies of SAP’s built-in solutions while also managing mandated eInvoicing and real-time reporting. This means no more back and forth will be needed with additional systems, and teams can ensure fiscal reporting and legal compliance are always in sync.

Take Action

For more information about the limitations within SAP and how you can adopt an intelligent approach for global compliance, check out Sovos for SAP here.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Sovos

Sovos is a leading global provider of software that safeguards businesses from the burden and risk of modern tax. As governments and businesses go digital, businesses face increased risks, costs and complexity. The Sovos Intelligent Compliance Cloud is the first complete solution for modern tax, giving businesses a global solution for tax determination, e-invoicing compliance and tax reporting. Sovos supports 5,000 customers, including half of the Fortune 500, and integrates with a wide variety of business applications. The company has offices throughout North America, Latin America and Europe. Sovos is owned by London-based Hg. For more information visit http://www.sovos.com and follow us on LinkedIn and Twitter.
Share This Post

Tax Information Reporting United States
December 12, 2019
The Affordable Care Act is Alive and Kicking

Despite what you may have heard, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) tax reporting requirements are not dead. In fact, enforcement of the Employer Shared Responsibility Provisions (ESRPs) under IRC 4980H is very much alive at the federal level. And states are enforcing the individual mandate. Federal Enforcement of ESRPs Many employers and other filers of […]

ShipCompliant United States
December 12, 2019
2019 ShipCompliant End-Of-Year Webinar

In our end-of-year webinar we covered the news and changes that encompassed the beverage alcohol industry in 2019. We discussed industry growth, the latest trends like hard seltzer and canned wine, and recent regulatory updates like the Tennessee Wine & Spirits v. Thomas decision.  Industry growth through ShipCompliant data 2019 was a busy year for […]

EMEA Tax Compliance VAT & Fiscal Reporting
December 12, 2019
Norway to Mandate SAF-T Reporting from 2020

Mandatory SAF-T (Standard Audit File-Tax) reporting will be introduced in Norway from 1 January 2020. Use of SAF-T, a standardized XML format containing exported accounting information, remains voluntary until that date. SAF-T is designed to reduce compliance and administrative costs for businesses and revenue bodies and enhance audit outcomes.  Its standardized, easily readable layout and […]

Tax Information Reporting United States
December 10, 2019
Illinois Enacts Form 1099-K Reporting Requirements

For the first time in state history, the Illinois state legislature has enacted form 1099-K reporting requirements as part of the FY20 Budget Implementation Act.   This change is a new direct state reporting requirement for payers of income made to Illinois residents. For 2019 reporting, Illinois requires form 1099-K reporting to be submitted to them […]

Sales & Use Tax United States
December 10, 2019
5 Predictions for Sales Tax in 2020

As we sit on the cusp of 2020, we find ourselves living in a world where almost every state imposes tax collection and remittance obligations on remote sellers (an increase of 50 percent from last year) and where a majority of states have enacted rules that impose new tax collection and remittance responsibilities on third […]