The Top Three SAP Challenges Impacting Manufacturers

Sovos
July 6, 2018

The acceleration of regulatory complexity is causing unnecessary strain on IT departments within manufacturing companies, negatively impacting growth. In fact, 31% of companies report that keeping up with the volume and complexity of regulations is their number one compliance challenge, and 45% say increasing costs of compliance is their number one barrier to growth.

The changing regulations are not slowing down anytime soon. In fact, real-time business-to-government reporting has now spread to more than 60 countries, and regulations can change multiple times per year. As tax authorities adopt even more initiatives and regulations for eInvoicing, eAccounting and eLedger, these compliance challenges will only continue to grow.

As regulations continue to change, many manufacturers – especially those operating in multiple countries – are realizing SAP is not equipped to support their unique needs from country to country. Here’s why:

  1. SAP’s compliance solutions are limited in scope and country specific, requiring resource knowledge in several systems. For example, the systems and processes that may be in place in Mexico are not the same as in Brazil, requiring different implementation processes and separate trainings to use.
  2. SAP delivers solutions as “support packs” that essentially require users to constantly monitor the changing requirements and software releases to meet compliance deadlines. This leaves manufacturing companies vulnerable to eInvoicing and reporting discrepancies that can ultimately result in fines and penalties.
  3. Leveraging SAP for compliance requires significant internal management, taking valuable time away from core business initiatives, such as growth and innovation.

The inevitable move to HANA compounds these issues even more. Since this move requires major changes to ERP infrastructure, SAP users with global operations need to proactively plan for the migration – which is required by 2025. Manufacturers must create a migration strategy to ensure seamless implementation and to future-proof their solutions to keep up with constant changes in tax regulations.

Despite these SAP challenges, it’s crucial for manufacturers to identify and implement an intelligent compliance solution that works within the company’s preexisting ERP, since it serves as a central source of truth for transactions. Solutions housing data outside the ERP are more prone to errors or manipulation. An ERP-integrated compliance solution, however, will provide the flexibility needed to adapt to the frequent change of pace and ensure compliance with local government requirements.

By integrating tax compliance and reporting into a company’s SAP, IT teams will eliminate the inefficiencies and inadequacies of SAP’s built-in solutions while also managing mandated eInvoicing and real-time reporting. This means no more back and forth will be needed with additional systems, and teams can ensure fiscal reporting and legal compliance are always in sync.

Take Action

For more information about the limitations within SAP and how you can adopt an intelligent approach for global compliance, check out Sovos for SAP here.

Author
Sovos
Sovos is a global leader in tax compliance and business-to-government reporting software, safeguarding businesses from the burden and risk of compliance around the world. As governments go digital, businesses face increased risk and complexity. The Sovos Intelligent Compliance Cloud combines world-class regulatory analysis with a global cloud software platform to create an adaptable, connected and global compliance solution that keeps businesses ahead of the ever-changing regulatory environment. Sovos supports 4,500 companies, including half of the Fortune 500, and integrates with a wide variety of business applications. Based in Boston, Sovos has offices throughout North America, Latin America and Europe. For more information visit and follow us on LinkedIn and Twitter.

Relevant Posts

New York Implements Economic Nexus by Resuscitating 1980’s Law

When New York first passed its law defining what constitutes a “vendor” subject to collecting sales tax in the 1980’s, the idea of online shopping sounded like science fiction. In retrospect, NY may have effectively enacted the first “economic nexus” law when they drafted their definition of “vendor” to include a person who regularly or […]

Read More
IRS Uses Unprecedented Methods to Enforce ACA Reporting Penalties

With recent enforcement measures, the IRS has offered definitive proof that the Affordable Care Act (ACA) is still alive and that the agency plans to strictly enforce ACA reporting. Last spring, the agency issued Letter 226J to Applicable Large Employers (ALEs) that failed to cover 95 percent of employees. ALEs are companies with 50 or […]

Read More
Government Shutdown Will Not Move IRS 1099 Reporting Deadlines

UPDATE (Jan. 8): Reporting season is moving forward according to plan. The IRS has announced that it will process tax returns on schedule and without delays. While the agency will clarify its contingency plan in the coming days, organizations should proceed as planned with 1099 reporting and other seasonal filings. The IRS will recall a […]

Read More
4 Big Post-Wayfair State Sales Tax Developments to Watch 2019

The South Dakota v. Wayfair decision last June has created a lot of angst for indirect tax professionals and the businesses they work so hard to protect from the burdens of sales and use tax filing. Six months later as we begin the new year, that angst has not gotten any lighter. Any federal legislative […]

Read More
The 5 Biggest Stories in Indirect Tax Compliance 2018

2018 was a volatile year in indirect tax compliance for tax, finance and IT professionals worldwide. With an increase in globalization and tax gaps surpassing tens of billions in some countries, it’s not surprising that one of the biggest challenges governments are addressing is revenue collection. Like enterprises, governments are creating new, technology-driven processes to […]

Read More