Who Bears the Cost of Insurance Taxes – the Insurer, or the Insured?

Christina Wilcox
October 13, 2020

This blog was last updated on October 13, 2020

In most cases, the primary responsibility of calculating, reporting and settling insurance premium tax (IPT) remains with the insurance company. But similar to VAT and other indirect taxes, although the insurer acts as the collector and administrator, the economic cost is ultimately borne by the policyholder as the purchaser of the insurance.

The cost can’t be passed to the policyholder in one of two ways: either directly, as an addition to the quoted premium (where the tax is then borne by insured), or indirectly, by including the tax costs into the total premium charged (often described as tax borne by the insurer).

Insured borne taxes

One characteristic of taxes borne by the insured party is that the tax must be shown on the premium invoice – or if exempt from tax due to perhaps the class of business, this should also be specifically noted. For example, in the Netherlands, IPT is due on the total amount of premium charged to the insured and it must be separately disclosed from the premium when billed to the policyholder.

In the UK, if the tax isn’t included on the invoice, the premium stated is deemed to include the relevant amount of IPT.

Insurer borne taxes

Insurer borne taxes tend to apply to a book of business or on aggregate amounts rather than on a per policy basis. For example, the Portuguese Insurance Supervisory Authority (Autoridade de Supervisão de Seguros e Fundos de Pensões) require a contribution of 0.242% of total premium income net of deductions and cancellations relating to the undertaking’s direct insurance contracts. As this relates to total premium rather than per policy at point of sale, it’s an insurer borne tax.

A good UK example is the London Fire Brigade Charge. This is calculated on the gross amounts insured by the insurer each year, at a rate of £35 per £1,000,000 sum insured. The charge is due on movable as well as fixed property, so it’s impractical to pass the charge on to all policyholders – effectively making this another example of a charge borne by the insurer.

Who pays?

In some jurisdictions, a difference between the two types is that for insured taxes, the insurer is only responsible for settling what they collected from the policyholder, whereas for insurer taxes the insurer must pay the full amount regardless of whether they collected it from the insured.

Co-insurance arrangements can further complicate matters. In most territories, each co-insurer is responsible for the declaration and payment of taxes relating to their share of the premium. However, in some cases it’s more practical for insurers to remit taxes to the lead insurer for single settlement. For example, in Cyprus stamp duty is €2 regardless of the premium value and it would be reasonable to pay this small amount to the tax authority in full.

It’s important insurers stay up to date with all relevant taxes and parafiscal charges that apply to the coverage offered. This will not only help in complying with tax authority obligations but will ensure they’re not left with an unexpected bill.

Take Action

Keep up to date with the ever tax changing landscape by subscribing to our blogs and following us on LinkedIn and Twitter. We also host regular webinars with our in-house specialists who are on hand to help.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

By checking the above box, you are consenting to Sovos’ privacy policy and electing to receive more information from us. Our goal here is not to bombard you with communications, but to provide you with specific information regarding our services that is most helpful to you. You may opt out at any time. Click here for more information.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Author

Christina Wilcox

Christina is a Manager in the Compliance Services team, responsible for delivery of indirect tax compliance services for a portfolio of global insurers. She is a part qualified chartered accountant with over seven years of experience in dealing with European insurance premium tax. Christina previously worked in software development at Ordnance Survey and pensions administration at Skandia.
Share this post

dtc shipping law updates
North America ShipCompliant
March 12, 2025
The Case for DtC Beer Shipping Reform: Key Takeaways from the 2025 Report

This blog was last updated on March 12, 2025 Craft beer drinkers want more choices. Brewers want more opportunities. And yet, legal barriers still stand in the way of direct-to-cconsumer (DtC) beer shipping. The 2025 Direct-to-Consumer Beer Shipping Report, produced by Sovos ShipCompliant in partnership with the Brewers Association, reveals how consumer demand, regulatory restrictions […]

DtC wine market
North America ShipCompliant
March 7, 2025
From Decline to Opportunity: Lessons from the 2024 DtC Market

This blog was last updated on March 7, 2025 The 2025 Direct-to-Consumer Wine Shipping Report offers more than just data—it provides valuable insights into the trends shaping the industry and the factors driving change. To delve deeper into these findings, industry experts Andrew Adams from WineBusiness Analytics and Alex Koral from Sovos ShipCompliant joined forces […]