The Impact of No Claims Bonuses on Insurance Premium Tax

Elliot Shulver
November 5, 2020

There are two types of no claims bonus. The first one is a refund of premium at the end of the policy. This happens when, for example, a discount is given if a policyholder doesn’t make a claim on that policy or makes a claim that is smaller than agreed in the policy documents. The insurer under the terms of the agreement then refunds a portion of the premium back to the policyholder.

The second type is where an agreement is made between the policyholder and the insurer to give a discount on any future premium payment, for example, in next year’s policy. This is given by reducing the amount of premium paid by the policyholder rather than a refund.

The implications for IPT across Europe

Both types of no claims bonus can cause tax issues. This especially applies where insurance premium tax (IPT) needs to be refunded where premium has been returned to the policyholder.

For example, where the premium has been refunded at the end of the policy’s term, some territories don’t allow a tax refund. This happens Italy where no refunds are given when the premium has been refunded because of a no claims bonus. There are exceptions where a refund is given but these are specific circumstances and tend to be given for administrative errors. In Germany, refunds of premium are allowed however in some circumstances where the refund doesn’t lower the risk then the refund is blocked.

In the UK, the issue that influences whether IPT can be credited is whether the payment made to the insured is actually and specifically covered within the insurance contract. If it is, then an IPT credit will be due, if not, then an IPT credit won’t be due. The UK tax authority, HMRC, would expect to see the actual provision in the insurance policy/contract and not in some other document or contract. And, if the insurer is using the special accounting scheme, HMRC would expect a credit to be shown in the company’s premium account to reflect the payment.

When the discount is given in the following years’ premium, because there is no refund of premium and therefore no refund of tax, most countries will allow this type of discount.

Some countries, for example, Malta and Ireland apply stamp duty on insurance premiums. With regard to refunds, even where the premium and risk have been reduced, if a refund of premium is given back to the policyholder it’s unlikely the tax will be able to be reclaimed. In Malta a reclaim of stamp duty is only allowed within the cooling off period. This is usually within the first 14 days of when the policy begins, and as such, the no claims bonus will not be affected by this. For Ireland, a fixed amount of stamp duty is applied per contract, rather than on the amount of premium paid, therefore, a reduction in premium won’t reduce the fixed amount of stamp duty.

It’s important to note that a refund of premium doesn’t always trigger a refund of IPT. Some tax regimes don’t allow a credit at all, and for others it will depend on the circumstances of the refund. Insurers should be aware of the different approaches that each tax authority takes regarding refunds to maximise tax efficiency and to minimise unnecessary costs.

Take Action

Find out why Sovos is the leading solution provider for insurance premium tax compliance in Europe.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Elliot Shulver

Consulting Manager, IPT compliance for indirect taxes at Sovos. A chartered accountant with 6 years’ experience of indirect tax, including IPT, VAT and Gambling Duties, Elliot is responsible for our Consultancy practice, as well as providing regulatory updates for our global compliance solution suite.
Share this post

North America
June 6, 2024
Observations and Predictions: The Future of Tax and Compliance

When I became the CEO of Sovos one year ago, I knew that I was stepping into an innovative company in an industry primed for a seismic transformation. However, even with this knowledge in place, I must admit that the speed and scope of change over the past year has been extraordinary to witness. Here […]

EMEA IPT
July 8, 2024
Hungary Insurance Premium Tax (IPT): An Overview

Regarding calculating Insurance Premium Tax (IPT), Hungary is the only country in the EU where the regime uses the so-called sliding scale rate model.

North America ShipCompliant
July 3, 2024
The Prospects and Perils of AI in Beverage Alcohol

I recently had the privilege of speaking on a panel at the National Conference of State Liquor Administrators (NCSLA) Annual Conference, a regular meeting of regulators, attorneys and other members of the beverage alcohol industry to discuss important issues affecting our trade. Alongside Claire Mitchell, of Stoel Rives, and Erlinda Doherty, of Vinicola Consulting, and […]

North America ShipCompliant
June 27, 2024
Shifting Focus: How to Make Wine Country Interesting to Millennials

Guest blog written by Susan DeMatei, President, WineGlass Marketing WineGlass Marketing recently conducted a study to explore how Millennials and Gen X feel about wine, wine culture and wine country. The goal was to gain insight into how we can make wine, wine club and wine country appealing to these new audiences. We’ll showcase in-depth […]

North America Sales & Use Tax
June 24, 2024
Illinois to Adjust Sales Tax Nexus Rules in Light of PetMeds Threat

Illinois is poised to change their sourcing rules again, trying to find their way in a world where states apply their sales tax compliance requirements equally to both in-state and remote sellers. With this tweak, they will effectively equalize the responsibilities of remote sellers with no in-state presence, to those that have an Illinois location. […]

EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
June 21, 2024
ViDA Rejected Again – Europe Misses Another Chance to Harmonize e-Invoicing

During the latest ECOFIN meeting on 21 June, Member States met to discuss if they could come to an agreement to implement the VAT in the Digital Age (ViDA) proposals. At the ECOFIN meeting in May, Estonia objected to the platform rules being proposed, instead requesting to make the new deemed supplier rules optional (an […]