Tax Compliance for Insurers Intensifies – the Cost of Getting it Wrong

Hooda Greig
April 13, 2021

This blog was last updated on September 2, 2021

Tax authorities have increased their focus on the insurance industry to ensure Insurance Premium Tax (IPT) and parafiscal taxes are collected correctly, accurately, and on time.

Operating in multiple countries inevitably means also having to comply with many local regulations in line with IPT statutory and parafiscal filing. Compliance regimes can be simple or complex, but the difficulty is that they’re varied.

Territories change their filing regulations frequently and without a representative in the territory it can be difficult to keep abreast of these changes. Filing administration can also be a hard to navigate as many counties require filing to be in their local language and have a set filing date. Without key local knowledge and expertise, insurers can run the risk of noncompliance. The consequences can be severe so it’s important to understand each territory’s specific requirements.

What are the consequences of IPT noncompliance?

The consequences of IPT noncompliance aren’t limited to statutory or legal penalties, the indirect costs to a company are often more significant. These include the inconvenience and cost of correcting a mistake, additional associate or representative costs and noncompliance could also have an impact on the company’s reputation.

The most common consequence for late or incorrect filings are penalties and interest but if there are inaccuracies in monthly reporting this could lead to audits from the tax authorities.

Territories with particularly strict penalties for late filings and correcting include Great Britain, Germany, Spain and Italy.

Great Britain IPT penalties

  • Reference: Para 15, Sch 7, FA 1994 and para 4, Sch 24, FA 2007
  • Penalties can range between GBP 250 and 5% of the unpaid tax, with a penalty of GBP 20.00 per day after the due date
  • Inaccurate filing or payments can be charged between 0-100% depending on whether the disclosure is prompted or unprompted and whether the error was careless, deliberate or deliberate and concealed. HMRC officers can exercise discretion within the confines of the penalty regime

Germany IPT penalties

  • Late filing penalty can be up to 10% of the unpaid tax (Section 152 of the German Fiscal Code) Late payments penalty is 1% of the unpaid tax amount (Section 240 of the German Fiscal Code)
  • Late or corrected declarations usually involve further requests from the German tax authority to clarify the submission
  • Corrections of the return shouldn’t be subject to the late filing penalty, however, if the reason for the filing is not deemed ‘excusable’ it may lead to a penalty

Spain IPT penalties

  • Late filing or payment (Artículo 27.1 de la LGT) can be up to 20% of the unpaid tax
  • The penalty amount will be reduced by 25% if the payment is made within the prescribed period set by the tax authorities and in a legally established manner
  • In case of non-payment of the penalty, the penalty amount can increase by up to 20% with the tax authorities having the power to physically enforce the debt

Italy IPT late filing penalties

  • Time-based penalties and interest apply. The penalty percentage is banded depending on the number of days after the deadline the tax is settled and can be up to 5%. Additional interest is charged daily at the prevailing annual rate
  • Keeping IPT Books is a legal requirement and should be readily presented when requested. Failure to do so can lead to penalties being applied for non-compliant or missing IPT Books

Although penalties might not be imposed in most territories with an IPT regime in Europe, interest will almost certainly be applied to any late payments or non-submission declarations.

In addition to the monthly statutory filing, some territories require annual reporting for IPT and parafiscal taxes and failure to submit these reports will also attract penalties. Tax authorities can also request detailed information at the insured level, with some requiring insured policyholder details to be reported.

An increasing number of tax authorities have introduced online submissions to close the tax gap and provide greater transparency and accuracy in the collection of taxes.

Insurers need to be aware of their compliance responsibilities by keeping pace with this heightened degree of complexity, scrutiny and change. It’s becoming essential for insurers to have a dedicated team for compliance risk management.

Take Action

To learn more about upcoming changes across Europe, download our recent webinar “IPT regulation changes in Europe: Are you prepared?

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Hooda Greig

Hooda is a compliance services manager for IPT. She joined Sovos in 2017 bringing experience and a background in personal and business tax consulting and compliance. Hooda leads a team that deliver IPT compliance services across Europe. She completed her studies at The Tax Institute, North West University, South Africa.
Share this post

North America Sales & Use Tax
February 6, 2025
The Tariff and Sales Tax Mishmash – Untying the Mess

This blog was last updated on February 6, 2025 Talk of tariffs dominates the current news cycle with some commentators suggesting that tariffs will spell disaster for our economy while others say the exact opposite. We’ve seen the stock market sometimes fluctuate as tariffs are announced but later suspended, leaving us to wonder whether an […]

retailer dtc wine shipping
North America ShipCompliant
February 6, 2025
Retailer DtC Wine Shipping: The Time Has Come

This blog was last updated on February 6, 2025 By Tom Wark, Executive Director, National Association of Wine Retailers We are often reminded by the media and those in the wine industry—as well as by wine enthusiasts—that the three-tier system of alcohol distribution in most states hinders consumer access to the expansive number of wines […]

Montana 1099-DA
North America Tax Information Reporting
February 5, 2025
State Filing Alert: Montana’s New 1099-DA Requirements for Crypto Brokers

This blog was last updated on February 5, 2025 Reporting digital asset transactions on Form 1099-DA just got a little more complicated. For 2025 transactions, crypto brokers that file Form 1099-DA with the IRS will be required to file the 1099-DA with the State of Montana. This makes Montana the first state to introduce a […]

North America ShipCompliant
January 23, 2025
DtC Wine Shipping in 2024: A Year-in-Review

This blog was last updated on January 28, 2025 The direct-to-consumer (DtC) wine shipping channel faced a storm of challenges in 2024, navigating some of the toughest market conditions in over a decade. As inflation tightened wallets and consumer behaviors shifted, the industry recorded its steepest declines in shipment volume and value since the inception […]

Form 1099-DA Crypto Transactions
North America Tax Information Reporting
January 21, 2025
What is Form 1099-DA and How Does it Impact Crypto Transactions?

This blog was last updated on January 24, 2025 The IRS has released Form 1099-DA and its accompanying instructions for filing for TY 2025. Form 1099-DA is the newest IRS information return, designed for reporting digital asset proceeds from broker transactions and is required to be filed by brokers managing digital assets such as NFTs […]