SAF-T – What’s Next?

Kelsey O'Gorman
November 20, 2020

We last reviewed the SAF-T global situation over a year ago, and in that time there have been many changes and proposals especially across the EU. Let’s look at what’s changed since then, as well as what to expect over the next year or two.

A refresher

What is SAF-T?

The Standard Audit File for Tax (SAF-T) concept was introduced back in 2005 by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) with the goal of providing auditors access to reliable accounting data in an easily readable format. This goal is achieved, in part, by allowing companies to export information from their accounting systems (invoices, payments, general ledger journals and master files). In turn, audits should be more efficient and effective based on the standarised format set by the OECD. Though minor, a wrinkle exists in the fact that countries may require a different format in which the data is to be captured, which therefore may mean that no two country implementations of SAF-T are exactly the same.

What’s new in 2020?


The biggest player in the field of SAF-T is now Poland. First introduced in 2016 for large taxpayers, SAF-T has certainly evolved over the years. Starting 1 October 2020, all taxpayers must submit JPK_V7M/K which replaces the previously filed JPK_VAT and periodic VAT returns. This new requirement includes a declaration portion, which corresponds to the no longer submitted VAT return and a records portion, which represents the no longer submitted JPK_VAT portion.

The largest change to taxpayers who had previously submitted JPK_VAT is the introduction of commodity group codes (also known as GTUs). Taxpayers must now designate specific fraud vulnerable transactions with relevant GTU codes on invoices. Additionally, Poland requires certain other transactions to be flagged with invoice markers including transactions between related parties and split payment transactions.

Poland is the first country to entirely replace the VAT return with a SAF-T file requirement. Other countries will certainly take note of whether this requirement curbs VAT fraud and reduces the VAT gap.


After announcing intentions to implement SAF-T, there has yet to be any official guidance released from Romania as to how or when this will take effect. Recent reports indicate that the Romanian National Agency for Fiscal Administration (ANAF) has plans to begin the pilot phase of SAF-T filing sometime in 2021, though the ANAF has not confirmed any new timelines. Taxpayers should certainly monitor for additional information on implementation in Romania.


Hungary is another country which targeted 2021 as a SAF-T requirement effective date. Announced late last year, the National Tax and Customs Authority (NAV) launched a pilot project to introduce SAF-T in addition to Hungary’s current real-time reporting requirement. This was originally slated with a 1 January 2021 effective date, though the public consultation document on the NAV website still allows for comments until 1 January. Though no official announcement from NAV yet, it’s expected that this date will be pushed out further into late 2021 or early 2022.

As governments globally continue to introduce measures to increase tax efficiency and reduce VAT gaps, businesses need to ensure that their processes and systems can comply. As can be seen from the measures above, SAF-T provides tax authorities with access to reliable accounting data in an easily readable format and SAF-T and remains effective and popular in the fight against VAT fraud and evasion.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.


Kelsey O'Gorman

Kelsey O’Gorman is a Regulatory Counsel at Sovos. Within Sovos’ Regulatory Analysis function, Kelsey focuses on global sales tax and VAT issues, supporting both the tax determination and reporting engines. Kelsey received her B.A. in Psychology from University at Buffalo and her J.D. from Roger Williams University School of Law. She is a member of the Massachusetts Bar.
Share This Post

North America ShipCompliant
May 25, 2023
Out-of-State Breweries Gain Self Distribution, DtC Rights in Oregon

Under a settlement agreement, breweries located outside of Oregon now have more options for selling into the Beaver State, including direct-to-consumer (DtC) shipping and self-distribution to retailers. The settlement arose out of a lawsuit filed by a group of Washington breweries last year challenging Oregon laws that limited beer self-distribution to in-state breweries and DtC […]

EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
May 24, 2023
VAT and Art: What you need to know

Significant inflation increases have impacted most of the world’s economies, with the UK still above 10% in 2023. This increase means a reduction in the purchasing power of consumers. Together with increases in the cost of raw materials, this has created uncertainty regarding growth of entire industrial departments and reduced profit margins for companies. The […]

North America ShipCompliant
May 23, 2023
Top 5 Myths Surrounding Retailer Direct-to-Consumer Wine Shipping

By Tom Wark, Executive Director, National Association of Wine Retailers Politics breed myths. This has always been the case as politics is, at its most fundamental, a form of storytelling. So it should be no surprise that myths have arisen as various elements of the wine industry have fought against consumers and specialty wine retailer seeking […]

May 23, 2023
IPT: Location of Risk and Territoriality

Much of the discussion on the Location of Risk triggering a country’s entitlement to levy insurance premium tax (IPT) and parafiscal charges focuses on the rules for different types of insurance. European Union (EU) Directive 2009/138/EC (Solvency II) set out these rules. However, a related topic of growing importance in this area concerns territoriality, i.e. […]

Asia Pacific E-Invoicing Compliance
May 23, 2023
Japan: New e-Invoice Retention Requirements

Japan’s new e-invoice retention requirements are part of the country’s latest Electronic Record Retention Law (ERRL) reform. Along with measures such as the Qualified Invoice System (QIS) and the possibility to issue and send invoices electronically via PEPPOL, Japan is implementing different indirect tax control measures, seeking to reduce tax evasion and promote digital transformation. […]