Revisiting the EU VAT “2020 Quick Fixes”

Jeff Gambold
November 13, 2019

Part 3:  Chain Transactions

This is the third in a series of four blogs providing explanatory detail to the EU’s “2020 Quick Fixes” that aim to standardise certain VAT rules throughout the EU. Part one of this series focussed on VAT Identification of the Customer, whilst part two provided guidance on the Exemptions of Intra-Community Supplies of Goods.   Here, we will discuss the updated guidance around the handling of Chain Transactions which take effect from 1 January 2020.   

What are chain transactions?

Chain transactions occur where there are several successive deliveries of goods between businesses but only one Intra-Community shipment.  Only one of the transactions in the chain can be treated as a VAT-free Intra-Community delivery; the others will be treated as domestic transactions in either the Member State of dispatch or destination, with the relevant local rate of VAT charged. Since local rules in each Member State can vary, this has often resulted in inquiries and disputes with and between tax authorities in both Member States as to whether the VAT treatment at each step was correctly applied. This in turn leads to commercial uncertainty for businesses and can result in financial penalties for incorrectly applying VAT (as well as potentially the loss of input VAT incurred, especially during a dispute and additional evidential paperwork.

Quick Fix

Going forward, the new rule defines the link in the chain that is the VAT-free Intra-Community transaction.  The following conditions must be met for the new rules to apply:

  • The goods must be supplied successively (the EU defines this to be at least three parties in the chain)
  • The goods must be dispatched from one Member State to another (i.e. the transaction doesn’t involve an in-country movement, or imports or exports between an EU Member State and a non-EU country)
  • The goods must be dispatched directly from the first supplier to the last customer in the chain
  • Delivery by a supplier to an intermediary undertaking the cross-border shipment may be zero-rated if that intermediary either organises the shipment or is recognised as legally responsible for it. However, if an intermediary arranging the transport has given the supplier their VAT registration number, the intermediary is regarded as carrying out the Intra-Community movement.  The first delivery is instead then treated as a domestic movement subject to VAT at the rate of the dispatch country. In circumstances where they are seeking to be the party zero-rating their transaction, the intermediary must keep documentary evidence to prove they (or a third party acting on their behalf) have dispatched the goods.  In effect, two separate proofs are necessary – evidence of the arrangement of the dispatch, and of the dispatch itself taking place.

For clarity, the Chain Transactions “Quick Fix” does not impact or interact with the “Triangulation” simplification.

Some EU countries have already unilaterally introduced some or all the “2020 Quick Fixes” in their local VAT legislations. However, the EU formalises these measures across the board from 1 January 2020. Businesses are encouraged to analyse the new framework to see how they can in turn make improvements and efficiencies in their Intra-Community goods movement processes. 

Take Action

To find out more about what we believe the future holds, download Trends: e-invoicing compliance and follow us on LinkedIn and Twitter to keep up-to-date with regulatory news and other updates.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.


Jeff Gambold

Jeff Gambold is a Senior Regulatory Specialist at Sovos, with responsibility for ensuring that the SVR product is kept updated and compliant with the latest VAT legislative changes. Prior to joining Sovos, Jeff worked in various VAT advisory and management roles within HMRC, UK Top 15 accounting practices and commercial business.
Share This Post

North America ShipCompliant
May 25, 2023
Out-of-State Breweries Gain Self Distribution, DtC Rights in Oregon

Under a settlement agreement, breweries located outside of Oregon now have more options for selling into the Beaver State, including direct-to-consumer (DtC) shipping and self-distribution to retailers. The settlement arose out of a lawsuit filed by a group of Washington breweries last year challenging Oregon laws that limited beer self-distribution to in-state breweries and DtC […]

EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
May 24, 2023
VAT and Art: What you need to know

Significant inflation increases have impacted most of the world’s economies, with the UK still above 10% in 2023. This increase means a reduction in the purchasing power of consumers. Together with increases in the cost of raw materials, this has created uncertainty regarding growth of entire industrial departments and reduced profit margins for companies. The […]

North America ShipCompliant
May 23, 2023
Top 5 Myths Surrounding Retailer Direct-to-Consumer Wine Shipping

By Tom Wark, Executive Director, National Association of Wine Retailers Politics breed myths. This has always been the case as politics is, at its most fundamental, a form of storytelling. So it should be no surprise that myths have arisen as various elements of the wine industry have fought against consumers and specialty wine retailer seeking […]

May 23, 2023
IPT: Location of Risk and Territoriality

Much of the discussion on the Location of Risk triggering a country’s entitlement to levy insurance premium tax (IPT) and parafiscal charges focuses on the rules for different types of insurance. European Union (EU) Directive 2009/138/EC (Solvency II) set out these rules. However, a related topic of growing importance in this area concerns territoriality, i.e. […]

Asia Pacific E-Invoicing Compliance
May 23, 2023
Japan: New e-Invoice Retention Requirements

Japan’s new e-invoice retention requirements are part of the country’s latest Electronic Record Retention Law (ERRL) reform. Along with measures such as the Qualified Invoice System (QIS) and the possibility to issue and send invoices electronically via PEPPOL, Japan is implementing different indirect tax control measures, seeking to reduce tax evasion and promote digital transformation. […]