North America

Location of Risk: The Rules and Exceptions to Look Out For

Rahul Lawlor
January 7, 2021

This blog was last updated on December 2, 2022

Location of Risk is the foundation of any discussion concerning Insurance Premium Tax (IPT). Once you have correctly established the Location of Risk on a policy, you are on the cusp of determining what indirect taxes are due. This blog provides you with an overview on Location of Risk. For a deep dive read our guide for Location of Risk.

The rules can be complex and differ from country to country, so a robust apportionment and calculation procedure is paramount to ensure compliance. Otherwise, the insurer runs the risk of late filings, penalties, double taxation, and critically, reputational damage.

The landmark 2001 Kvaerner case paved the way for the current treatment of IPT in Europe. Kvaerner, a UK resident company established in the UK, took out a liability insurance policy to cover its global operations. Subsidiaries around the world which also wanted to be covered by the global policy were included, one of which was a Dutch subsidiary of an entity owned by Kvaerner.

The relevant IPT amounts were paid solely to HMRC. The Dutch authorities challenged the policy and the case eventually made its way to the European Court of Justice. The court ruled that IPT was due on the Location of Risk, thus Dutch IPT was due.

Solvency II

The EU Solvency II directive from 2009 further focused IPT compliance. Article 13 Section 13 clearly defines the rules for non-life insurance and member states have implemented this into their own legislation. Loosely speaking, the rules have been implemented according to the following four pillars:

  • Location of property
  • Registration of vehicles
  • Country of residence in which you took out the travel policy
  • Anything else that does not fall into the above categories

Article 157 from the same directive is easy to interpret but is perhaps the most important piece of the jigsaw as it means the member state can tax the premium.

Divergences from Solvency II

As we see with IPT and tax points from country to country, treatment and application is not harmonised. Whilst the Location of Risk rules do not differ to the same extent, insurers need to be aware of the different interpretations of the wording from Solvency II.

Registration of vehicles is one such example. Section 13b of Article 13 from Solvency II states ‘the Member State of registration, where the insurance relates to vehicles of any type’.

The Maltese only consider land motor vehicles under this definition, so ships and aircraft are not included. Interestingly, the European Commission take the same view, however this has never been challenged in court. If it were, it could lead to significant changes in the vehicle insurance market.

Another deviation from the norm is the German definition and treatment for the registration of vehicles, particularly commercial sea vessels. Prior to 2017, in the case where a ship was flagged in the UK but operated from Felixstowe to Hamburg for six months of the year, the German authorities took the stance that the risk should be subject to German IPT, since the vessel would be registered in the Hamburg shipping register.

This is an example of double taxation and there have been several cases of this kind in the German courts.

This has posed a particular problem for P&I clubs and marine insurers. In 2017, despite pushback from the market, the German authorities went one step further. Whilst they removed the stance of IPT being triggered based on the shipping register, they replaced this with the ability to tax any vessel that has a connection with Germany. It could be argued that this contradicts EU directives.

In more recent times, the German authorities have updated their Location of Risk rules to include the possibility of taxing premiums relating to non-EU territories in the case where the policyholder is domiciled in Germany.

Ramifications and the future

The cases mentioned are not exhaustive but give an idea of the differences of treatment that can occur. Standing still is simply not an option as we can see authorities are willing to challenge and chase tax gaps to increase revenue.

With the full digitalisation of IPT on the horizon, leading to transactional details becoming increasingly visible, now more than ever it is vital to ensure you are getting it right.

Knowing which rules apply from country to country can be burdensome and the potential consequences of getting it wrong is severe. Our team of experts can guide you through the details and ensure you are on the right compliance path.

Take Action

To understand more about Location of Risk rules download our e-book

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Rahul Lawlor

Rahul is a compliance services manager, responsible for overseeing the delivery of indirect tax compliance services for a portfolio of global insurers. He joined Sovos in 2016 after completing a Financial Maths degree from the University of Surrey.
Share this post

North America Tax Information Reporting
June 11, 2025
IRS FIRE System Sunset: What the IRIS Transition Means for Filers

This blog was last updated on June 11, 2025 The IRS has officially confirmed a plan to sunset the FIRE system, marking one of the most significant transformations in information return filing in decades. After serving as the backbone of electronic tax reporting since the 1980s, the Filing Information Returns Electronically (FIRE) system will be […]

Maine state flag over vineyard
ShipCompliant
June 11, 2025
Maine Bottle Bill to Extend to DtC Wine Shipments in July

This blog was last updated on June 11, 2025 Effective July 1, 2025, all direct-to-consumer (DtC) shipments of wine into Maine must comply with the state’s beverage container redemption program, better known as a “bottle bill.”   While wine bottles sold in Maine retail stores have long been subject to these provisions, the state is […]

E-Invoicing Compliance North America
May 29, 2025
Global E-archiving Compliance: The Essentials of E-invoice Storage

This blog was last updated on May 29, 2025 The digital business landscape is forever changing, yet one thing is certain: electronic archiving is more than a convenience – it’s a matter of compliance. As governments worldwide invest in digital tax transformation initiatives like e-invoicing and e-reporting, a complex web of e-archiving requirements that vary […]

states with no sales tax
North America Sales & Use Tax
May 27, 2025
The 5 U.S. States with No Sales Tax

This blog was last updated on May 27, 2025 In a country where sales tax is the norm, a handful of states stand out for going against the grain—they don’t impose any statewide sales tax at all. That’s right—no last-minute filings, no scrambling to collect and remit every month. At least, not for sales tax. […]

what is sales tax
North America Sales & Use Tax
May 16, 2025
What is Sales Tax? How it Works & Why It Matters

Uncover what sales tax is, how it works! This guide provides everything from rates and exemptions, to how it varies by location and product type.

See for yourself how the Sovos Compliance Cloud can meet your business' unique tax compliance challenges.
Book a Demo
© 2025 Sovos Compliance, LLC. All rights reserved.
Why Sovos?
Resources
About
Products
Indirect Tax Suite
Information Reporting and Withholding Suite
Specialty Products
Solutions
By Tax or Document Type
By Industry
By Team or Initiative
By Region