How to Comply with Switzerland’s Stamp Duty Reporting Requirements

Russell Brown
March 25, 2022

This blog was last updated on March 31, 2022

As Switzerland is not part of the European Economic Area (EEA), several premium tax issues need to be considered by insurers when they are providing insurance policies in this country. These considerations are around location of risk, double taxation and compliance concerning stamp duty, which is the main tax that Switzerland levies on insurance premiums.

What are Switzerland’s location of risk rules?

Switzerland is not in the EEA, and it has not adopted any of the location of risk rules that generally apply in the rest of Europe. These rules are mainly the result of European Court of Justice cases, such as the Kvaerner plc v Staatssecretaris van Financiën case 2001 (Case C-191/99) that determined how non-life insurance should be taxed for policies covering policyholders in multiple EEA jurisdictions.

Consequently, this means that premiums are not apportioned between risks located in Switzerland and elsewhere before determining how to tax a policy. Instead, the primary driver for determining if stamp duty is due is the location of the principal policyholder named on the policy:

  • Domicile is not located in Switzerland: no stamp duty is due on the premium the insurer receives from the policyholder regarding the policy, including any premium that relates to a Swiss risk.
  • Domicile is located in Switzerland: stamp duty is due on the entire gross premium paid by the policyholder for all countries covered on the policy. This is irrespective of the location of any of the other countries, including those in the EEA, where risks are located because the normal location of risk rules in the EEA are not applicable.

Double taxation

The upshot of the principal policyholder having their domicile in Switzerland is that double taxation on insurance policies can occur, as local premium taxes could be due on the premiums in the countries outside of Switzerland in addition to the stamp duty that has to be paid there.

In the scenario where the insurer is not established in Switzerland, it is unlikely that the presence of a taxation treaty between the country where they are resident and with Switzerland will remove the possibility of double taxation in these circumstances. However, it is possible that in some cases a local policy covering Swiss risk for a Swiss domiciled policyholder and a master policy covering all other countries for a policyholder domiciled elsewhere could be arranged by the insurer to mitigate against a double taxation scenario.

Any such approach needs to be carefully considered. The Swiss Federal Tax Administration could deem such an arrangement as being artificially made to reduce the stamp duty liability, especially if they conclude the coverage on the master policy is really for a policyholder domiciled in Switzerland and should be taxed there.

Compliance with Switzerland’s stamp duty requirements

The settlement of stamp duty depends upon the location of the insurer writing the policy:

  • For Swiss insurers, including Swiss branches of non-Swiss insurers: the insurer is liable to pay the stamp duty quarterly to the Swiss Federal Tax Administration, supported by form 11 that confirms the total tax being declared for all relevant insurance policies. If the insurer does not pay the stamp duty, it cannot be settled by the policyholder or anyone else as they are not jointly and severally liable for the tax debt.
  • For non-Swiss insurers, including non-Swiss branches of a Swiss insurer: the Swiss policyholder is liable to pay the stamp duty using form 12 quarterly to the Swiss Federal Tax Administration. In these cases, details of the non-Swiss insurer, including their name, type of insurance provided and its duration must be included in the form submitted with payment.

In this latter scenario, the policyholder must submit a separate declaration for each policy, which can mean that this process is onerous. Still, Sovos can assist insurers in ensuring compliance is maintained with the Swiss Federal Tax Administration. You can find out more about IPT compliance in Switzerland in our recent webinar “IPT Compliance: Europe and Beyond”.

Take Action

To understand more about Switzerland’s stamp duty and how it impacts compliance, get in touch with our team of experts.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Russell Brown

As senior consulting manager, Russell joined Sovos in 2021. A career spent in insurance premium taxes on global insurance programmes has given him many years of experience in handling compliance and advisory challenges from location of risk and IPT liability to co-insurance and financial interest clause cover. He has worked for financial service providers EY and TMF and more recently as head of indirect taxes at Tokio Marine HCC. He has been a member of both the ABI and IUA Indirect Tax Working Groups as well as being an active participant in regular Lloyd’s Indirect Tax Forums.
Share this post

alcohol deliveries
North America ShipCompliant
December 20, 2024
What if No One is Home to Sign for an Alcohol Delivery?

This blog was last updated on December 20, 2024 When no one is home to sign for an alcohol delivery, it becomes more than just a minor hiccup for direct-to-consumer (DtC) alcohol shippers. It’s a domino effect that transforms a perfectly curated product into a customer’s disappointment before it’s ever opened. This becomes an even […]

taxation of motor insurance policies france
North America VAT & Fiscal Reporting
December 18, 2024
Taxation of Motor Insurance Policies: France

This blog was last updated on December 18, 2024 France is one of the most challenging countries in Europe when it comes to the premium tax treatment of motor insurance policies. This is mainly due to the variety of taxes and charges that can apply and the differing treatment of different vehicle types. This blog […]

california bottle bill compliance
North America ShipCompliant
December 13, 2024
California Bottle Bill: Compliance Updates for Wine and Spirits

This blog was last updated on December 16, 2024 California’s bottle bill got a major upgrade earlier this year, and it’s changed the rules for wineries, distilleries and beverage distributors in a big way. For the first time, wine and spirits manufacturers will need to register with CalRecycle, report sales and pay California Redemption Value […]

unclaimed property compliance for wineries
North America ShipCompliant
December 12, 2024
Unclaimed Property Compliance: What Wineries and Wine Clubs Need to Know

This blog was last updated on December 12, 2024 Although hard to believe, unclaimed property obligations impact ALL industries, including wineries and other wine clubs. While most companies typically only associate unclaimed property with outstanding checks, including accounts payable and payroll, there are other exposures for wineries and wine clubs to consider. Understanding these risks […]

retail delivery fees for alcohol shipping
North America ShipCompliant
December 5, 2024
Navigating Retail Delivery Fees: A Guide for DtC Alcohol Sellers

This blog was last updated on December 5, 2024 Direct-to-consumer (DtC) alcohol shippers are no strangers to navigating a complex regulatory landscape. However, recently, a new challenge has emerged—the rise of retail delivery fees. From excise taxes to shipping restrictions, the industry has long dealt with a maze of state-specific rules that require careful attention […]