Easing the Stress of IPT Filings

December 21, 2021

Insurance premium tax (IPT) deadlines – whether it’s month end, quarterly filing or end of year, can be stressful for insurance tax teams. Juggling regular workloads alongside the added pressure of ensuring filings are completed accurately and on time are often challenging.

This blog provides some helpful guidance on how to navigate deadline season successfully.

Understand tax and reporting requirements in each territory

There’s very little consistency country to country when it comes to IPT reporting.

Differences include:

  • Tax point – it can be when premium is received, on the date of invoice or the maturity date for when tax liabilities become due
  • Filing and settlement frequency – differ between monthly, quarterly, bi-annually and annually
  • Tax rates and their application – up-to-date tax rates are required for compliant filing
  • Language – tax returns need submitting in the country’s native language

Specialist expertise is often necessary to ease this burden as ensuring taxes are filed and settled correctly, compliantly, and all while adhering to the latest rules and regulations for each country can be challenging.

The treatment of negative premiums also varies country by country. The nature of negative premiums (cancellations, mid-term adjustment or correction of errors) defines whether negative premiums can be included in the current submission or if a formal reclaim needs filing.

Be aware of submission deadlines

When filing in multiple territories, understanding when taxes are due and the relevant submission deadlines is vital. It’s important to be aware of country specific bank holidays and any rules for deadlines that fall on weekends. This will help set internal submission deadlines for the settlement of taxes.

Ireland, the UK and the Netherlands all require filing and settlement on a quarterly basis, so adding these submissions to existing monthly deadlines increases workloads as it involves reviewing the last three months of data.

There is additional stress when quarter end coincides with bi-annual and annual reporting, such as the bi-annual reporting of ASF in Portugal and annual reporting in Spain.

There are even territories, such as Portugal, where some taxes and parafiscal charges are declared on a quarterly, bi-annually and annual basis.

Missing submission deadlines can result in penalties and interest imposed by the tax authority, as well as reputational damage with both the tax authority and the market.

In Germany, late submission of the tax declaration can result in penalties of up to ten percent of the liabilities due and the tax office may impose penalties of one percent for late settlement. There are also penalties in the UK for late submission of tax returns and some tax authorities (Ireland and Italy) impose interest calculated on a daily basis.

Beware of nil submission filing

In Germany, the UK, Denmark, Finland and Austria, nil returns must be submitted regardless of whether business is currently being written or not. The tax authorities require nil return submissions as formal proof that the company has no liabilities to declare, and failure to submit can incur penalties.

Accurate data and planning ahead

Smooth filing starts with underwriting. Collecting all the required details for submission at this stage ensures seamless submissions and avoids having to contact policyholders for missing information or queries about inaccuracies.

Early preparation of data can mitigate potential issues. Providing data monthly allows time to review well in advance of deadlines and lets you clarify and rectify any missing information proactively.

This means that once the quarter submission is due, only the data for the last month of the quarter will need to be reviewed and final quarter declaration approved, rather than data for the entire quarter (or year).

Be aware of latest changes

Whilst it’s always important to stay ahead of upcoming changes, this year has proved once again to be one where keeping update is vital to ensure compliance as due to COVID-19 some tax authorities have issued deferrals or have changed filing requirements.

Depending on country rules, the pandemic has also meant that some workforces are continuing to work from home which can make data collection for filing a more complicated process and cause delays. As always, looking ahead and planning in advance can avoid these pitfalls and ensure a smooth submission.

Outsource to alleviate stress

Organisation and mobilisation of resources will help make quarter end and annual submissions easier. Unfortunately, the normal workload doesn’t stop and filing still needs to take place, so it can be helpful to outsource this task to ensure it’s completed accurately and on time.

Take Action

Get in touch about the benefits a managed service provider can offer to ease your IPT compliance burden.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.



Sovos was built to solve the complexities of the digital transformation of tax, with complete, connected offerings for tax determination, continuous transaction controls, tax reporting and more. Sovos customers include half the Fortune 500, as well as businesses of every size operating in more than 70 countries. The company’s SaaS products and proprietary Sovos S1 Platform integrate with a wide variety of business applications and government compliance processes. Sovos has employees throughout the Americas and Europe, and is owned by Hg and TA Associates.
Share This Post

North America ShipCompliant
May 25, 2023
Out-of-State Breweries Gain Self Distribution, DtC Rights in Oregon

Under a settlement agreement, breweries located outside of Oregon now have more options for selling into the Beaver State, including direct-to-consumer (DtC) shipping and self-distribution to retailers. The settlement arose out of a lawsuit filed by a group of Washington breweries last year challenging Oregon laws that limited beer self-distribution to in-state breweries and DtC […]

EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
May 24, 2023
VAT and Art: What you need to know

Significant inflation increases have impacted most of the world’s economies, with the UK still above 10% in 2023. This increase means a reduction in the purchasing power of consumers. Together with increases in the cost of raw materials, this has created uncertainty regarding growth of entire industrial departments and reduced profit margins for companies. The […]

North America ShipCompliant
May 23, 2023
Top 5 Myths Surrounding Retailer Direct-to-Consumer Wine Shipping

By Tom Wark, Executive Director, National Association of Wine Retailers Politics breed myths. This has always been the case as politics is, at its most fundamental, a form of storytelling. So it should be no surprise that myths have arisen as various elements of the wine industry have fought against consumers and specialty wine retailer seeking […]

May 23, 2023
IPT: Location of Risk and Territoriality

Much of the discussion on the Location of Risk triggering a country’s entitlement to levy insurance premium tax (IPT) and parafiscal charges focuses on the rules for different types of insurance. European Union (EU) Directive 2009/138/EC (Solvency II) set out these rules. However, a related topic of growing importance in this area concerns territoriality, i.e. […]

Asia Pacific E-Invoicing Compliance
May 23, 2023
Japan: New e-Invoice Retention Requirements

Japan’s new e-invoice retention requirements are part of the country’s latest Electronic Record Retention Law (ERRL) reform. Along with measures such as the Qualified Invoice System (QIS) and the possibility to issue and send invoices electronically via PEPPOL, Japan is implementing different indirect tax control measures, seeking to reduce tax evasion and promote digital transformation. […]