Recent Indirect Tax Changes in the Crimean Peninsula

Timur Feinstein
June 13, 2014

While most of us have been watching with close interest the events that have been unfolding in the Ukraine over the past few months, Taxware has been paying particularly close attention to the potential indirect tax ramifications of the shifting political landscape. The changes for taxpayers located in the region of Crimea and in the city of Sevastopol have been quite dramatic. When the region of Crimea and city of Sevastopol were firmly part of Ukraine, the standard Ukrainian VAT rate of 20% applied there. In March of 2014, the Russian Federation formally and physically annexed the Crimean region and the city of Sevastopol. While this annexation has not been recognized by Ukraine or the international community in general, the Russian Federation has already begun to enact laws governing the application of indirect tax in these areas. According to Russian Federation Law of March 21, 2014, № 6-ФКЗ, “On Accepting the Republic of Crimea and the City of Federal Importance Sevastopol into the Russian Federation,” Article 15, the Law of the Russian Federation on Taxes and Collections will apply in Crimea and Sevastopol effective as of January 1, 2015. Until that time, the taxes are regulated by the decrees and acts of the Crimean Republic and the City Sevastopol. ukraineOn April 30, 2014, the State Council of the Crimean Republic issued Decree No. 2093-6/14. Under the Decree, for the time period subsequent to the annexation but before May 1, 2014, a standard ‘Crimean” VAT rate of 20% applied. However, effective May 1, 2014 and extending until January 1, 2015, the standard VAT rate in Crimea became 4%. A reduced rate of 2% applies for certain items including groceries, goods for children, periodicals, and medical goods. During this period, Crimean taxpayers are not entitled to credit input VAT paid on purchases and imports. This provision effectively converts the VAT in Crimea into a turnover/sales tax with a particularly low rate, but only for the transitional period. In addition, the Deputies of the State Council forgave all unpaid VAT-related liabilities and debts owed by taxpayers as of March 1, 2014, recognizing them as non-recoverable. In other words, Crimea is not recognizing any VAT liability that may have been owed but not paid to the Ukrainian government. Conversely, it appears that if Ukraine owed a taxpayer any money (e.g. input credits) not refunded as of April 1, 2014, taxpayers should not expect that money any time soon, at least not from the Crimean government. Unlike the Crimean Republic, the City Lawyerof Sevastopol has not enacted the low rates of 4% and 2%. Instead, effective May 1, 2014, a standard VAT rate of 18% applies in Sevastopol, and a reduced rate of 10% applies for certain items including groceries, goods for children, periodicals, and medical goods. Please refer to the Law of City of Sevastopol of April 18, 2014, № 2-ЗС (as amended by Law of May 29, 2014, № 13 –ЗС). One can locate the relevant documents on the website of Sevastopol City Legislative Body. In absence of additional legal or political developments, on January 1, 2015, the VAT rates in Crimea and the city of Sevastopol will harmonize with each other and with the 18% standard VAT rate and 10% reduced VAT rate that currently apply in the Russian Federation. In Ukraine, which recently elected Petro Poroshenko as its President, a planned reduction of the standard VAT rate from 20% to 17% that was to take effect on January 1, 2015 has been repealed. However, these changes will have no direct impact on Crimean and Sevastopol taxpayers, who will quite likely be paying VAT at the rate of 18% to the Russian Government.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Timur Feinstein

Timur is the Director – Regulatory Analysis & Design at Sovos. Timur uses his eleven-plus years of experience to lead a team of tax professionals focusing on VAT determination and reporting. An attorney by trade, Timur is a member of both the Massachusetts and New York Bars. He holds a B.S. in Finance from Bentley University and a J.D. from Boston University School of Law. Timur is fluent in Russian.
Share this post

North America
June 6, 2024
Observations and Predictions: The Future of Tax and Compliance

When I became the CEO of Sovos one year ago, I knew that I was stepping into an innovative company in an industry primed for a seismic transformation. However, even with this knowledge in place, I must admit that the speed and scope of change over the past year has been extraordinary to witness. Here […]

EMEA IPT
July 8, 2024
Hungary Insurance Premium Tax (IPT): An Overview

Regarding calculating Insurance Premium Tax (IPT), Hungary is the only country in the EU where the regime uses the so-called sliding scale rate model.

North America ShipCompliant
July 3, 2024
The Prospects and Perils of AI in Beverage Alcohol

I recently had the privilege of speaking on a panel at the National Conference of State Liquor Administrators (NCSLA) Annual Conference, a regular meeting of regulators, attorneys and other members of the beverage alcohol industry to discuss important issues affecting our trade. Alongside Claire Mitchell, of Stoel Rives, and Erlinda Doherty, of Vinicola Consulting, and […]

North America ShipCompliant
June 27, 2024
Shifting Focus: How to Make Wine Country Interesting to Millennials

Guest blog written by Susan DeMatei, President, WineGlass Marketing WineGlass Marketing recently conducted a study to explore how Millennials and Gen X feel about wine, wine culture and wine country. The goal was to gain insight into how we can make wine, wine club and wine country appealing to these new audiences. We’ll showcase in-depth […]

North America Sales & Use Tax
June 24, 2024
Illinois to Adjust Sales Tax Nexus Rules in Light of PetMeds Threat

Illinois is poised to change their sourcing rules again, trying to find their way in a world where states apply their sales tax compliance requirements equally to both in-state and remote sellers. With this tweak, they will effectively equalize the responsibilities of remote sellers with no in-state presence, to those that have an Illinois location. […]

EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
June 21, 2024
ViDA Rejected Again – Europe Misses Another Chance to Harmonize e-Invoicing

During the latest ECOFIN meeting on 21 June, Member States met to discuss if they could come to an agreement to implement the VAT in the Digital Age (ViDA) proposals. At the ECOFIN meeting in May, Estonia objected to the platform rules being proposed, instead requesting to make the new deemed supplier rules optional (an […]