Managing Indirect Tax Compliance in Accounts Payable

Delaney McDonald
December 26, 2019

Tax compliance is not just an issue that accounts receivable (AR) handles. With regulatory changes becoming more and more complex, the responsibility also lies with accounts payable (AP) to minimize a company’s risk.

AP plays an important role in indirect tax compliance. States and the IRS continue to digitize efforts with tax collection and enforcement, and sales and use tax is often low-hanging fruit for auditors. With more room for potential errors, regulators will be looking increasingly at how much companies pay in sales tax.

The ruling in the Supreme Court case South Dakota v. Wayfair changed the standards for determining economic nexus. The question of physical presence has been replaced with the standard that states can collect sales tax from remote sellers with “substantial nexus” as long as it doesn’t create an “undue burden” to that remote seller. This makes it increasingly complicated for suppliers working with remote sellers to determine the correct taxation on purchased items. With new economic nexus standards, sellers need to determine whether they are complying with new mandates, while purchasers need to make sure sellers are determining correctly. 

Catching indirect tax discrepancies in the AP department

Trading partners must determine the right taxing jurisdictions and apply the right tax rate for every item in the supply chain. If a formal invoice has issues in the supplier’s systems, the best the buyer can do is catch the supplier’s determination errors in the AP approval process as early as possible.

If an error is found, the invoice with the incorrect rate and the associated data must then be returned. It should be returned with the suggested changes immediately upon receipt of that invoice into the AP approval workflow, rather than later when all business-related approvals have already happened—saving time and avoiding unnecessary business operations.

Having a solution in place that quickly catches and corrects any errors early in the workflow can save significant time, money and resources within the supply chain.

Automate indirect tax determination to mitigate AP risk 

With the continuing digitization of corporate procurement processes, an automated solution can catch errors that would otherwise be left uncorrected. With organizations often adapting new AP systems as needed, this multiplicity can also make the task of finding and fixing supplier errors exponentially more difficult. Unlike a centralized solution, multiple systems don’t always communicate with one another, creating an opportunity for mistakes. 

Buyers do not always trust their suppliers to know how to create invoices that are fully compliant in form and content. Indirect tax automation can reduce error rates that are associated with manual controls and keep up with the acceleration of business processes in AP automation. An automated solution mitigates issues by integrating legacy systems— a complex yet essential part of maintaining tax compliance and reducing risk.

Download the e-book, “Accounts Payable Tax Compliance: 5 Challenges SAP Shops Must Overcome,” and successfully manage supplier errors and AP system diversification.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Delaney McDonald

Share This Post
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email

North America ShipCompliant
September 22, 2021
Wine Retailer Interstate Shipping and the Courts: An Update

By Tom Wark, Executive Director, National Association of Wine Retailers The effort to open more states for interstate wine retailer-to-consumer shipments is multi-pronged. One prong—perhaps the most important—is the effort to overturn discriminatory state laws by using the federal courts to challenge state laws that violate the U.S. Constitution’s dormant commerce clause as well as the […]

EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
September 22, 2021
EU E-Commerce VAT Package FAQs: Understanding OSS

The EU E-Commerce VAT Package is here. The new schemes, One Stop Shop (OSS) and Import One Stop Shop (IOSS), bring significant changes to VAT treatment and reporting mechanisms for sales to private individuals in the EU. Our recent webinar, Back to Basics: The EU E-Commerce VAT Package, discussed the basic principles of the three […]

EMEA IPT
September 22, 2021
Insurance Premium Tax Returns: Italian IPT Books

The proper supporting documentation of a tax return has always been required by the local tax offices. In this blog we will focus on the supporting documentation of Insurance Premium Tax (IPT) returns, especially the Italian requirements. Although the requirements for the preparation of IPT supporting documentation differs from country to country, the details of […]

North America VAT & Fiscal Reporting
September 21, 2021
Looking to Cut Tax Compliance Costs? Consider Tax Solutions Before Migrating to SAP S/4HANA

As the digitization of tax continues, many organizations are looking to reduce the complexity and cost of tax compliance. In our latest spotlight report, created in partnership with Americas’  SAP Users’ Group (ASUG), “Boost Tax Compliance Capabilities and Visibility with SAP S/4HANA”, we discuss the most optimal time in the SAP S/4HANA migration process to […]

EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
September 21, 2021
Fiscal Representation Post-Brexit – Requirements for UK Companies Trading in the EU

Non-EU companies are required to appoint a Fiscal Representative in order to be registered for VAT in many Member States. Following the end of the Brexit transition agreement on 31 December 2021, this was a consideration for UK companies who wanted to remain registered or had to register as a result of changes to supply […]