Important Verifications Beyond TIN Matching for 1099 Reporting

Kelly Conner
April 11, 2023

This blog was last updated on April 11, 2023

If you have been reporting 1099s for a while, you know that Tax Identification Number (TIN) matching is essential to ensure you don’t receive notices or penalties from the IRS. TIN matching typically occurs at two points when paying a vendor or customer: when onboarding a new vendor or customer based on information collected on Form W9 and prior to reporting amounts paid on 1099s to ensure name/TIN information is still accurate. When it comes to onboarding new vendors or customers, there are two additional verifications beyond TIN matching businesses must be aware of. Understanding these verifications can help prevent your organization from working with fraudulent individuals or businesses.

Verifications against Death Master File (DMF)

TIN matching is essential when it comes to reporting accurate 1099 name/TIN information, but accuracy only goes so far. TINs assigned to individuals, like Social Security Numbers (SSN), are unique to those individuals and remain with the individual after death. This means SSNs are never reused or removed from the IRS database once an individual passes.

When companies perform TIN matching, the IRS is aware that a name/TIN match may result in a match for deceased individuals, which could be the same result your organization is receiving as well. The IRS is aware of this issue because of an outside audit conducted by the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) that reviewed the progress the IRS made in improvements to its federal tax withholding processes and procedures.

During this audit, TIGTA found 2.7 million 1099 forms where the payee being reported was deceased at least three years prior to the issuance of the 1099. The IRS views this as taxes not being collected on at least 2.7 million payments made annually, further contributing to the nation’s federal tax gap, which was last reported as $496 billion. The IRS has mentioned increased enforcement to narrow the tax gap. Knowing 2.7 million forms are still being reported with deceased individuals’ names and TINs, it’s inevitable the IRS will be cracking down to ensure accurate names/TINs are provided and that the payments were made while the individual was alive.

Organizations must verify that the name/TIN combination does not appear on the Death Master File (DMF) to prevent issuing payments to individuals doing business under a deceased person’s identify. The Social Security Administration (SSA) created the DMF, which contains over 83 million records of deaths that have been reported to the SSA.

“Sovos helps us easily identify fraudulent individuals before we even issue payments to ensure we always have accurate information and are doing business with legitimate individuals.” – Kim Iliff, Accounts Payable Manager, Tank Holding Corp

Verifications against Office of Foreign Asset Control (OFAC) lists

Organizations 22work with individuals, entities and countries that the U.S. Treasury Departments have placed restrictions on conducting business with could be at risk of fines and penalties. Every person and every business transaction should be screened against lists created by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), a division of the U.S. Department of the Treasury. OFAC publishes lists that contain “individuals and companies owned or controlled by, or acting for or on behalf of, targeted countries. It also lists individuals, groups, and entities, such as terrorists and narcotics traffickers designated under programs that are not country-specific. Collectively, such individuals and companies are called ‘Specially Designated Nationals’ or ’SDNs.’ Their assets are blocked and U.S. persons are generally prohibited from dealing with them.” These watch-lists ensure you are not conducting business with dangerous individuals or entities.

Unlike IRS penalties for name/TIN discrepancies, payers neglecting to verify against OFAC lists open themselves up to civil and criminal penalties. OFAC non-compliance carries civil penalties of up to $1 million per violation plus criminal fines of up to $10 million and imprisonment ranging from 10 to 30 years.

“I appreciate that Sovos’ Tax Identification Verifications does TIN matching and matches against DMF and OFAC lists to make sure we are doing legitimate business. Those additional verifications have saved us from working with fraudulent individuals several times.” – Kim Iliff, Accounts Payable Manager, Tank Holding Corp

In 2022 alone, OFAC levied over $42 million in penalties/settlements, but has issued far more in previous years. In 2019, OFAC levied nearly $1.3 billion in penalties/settlements with two financial institutions facing $600 million+ in penalties and many other organizations facing six and seven figure penalties. It is important for organizations to understand who they are working with prior to onboarding new vendors or customers, and especially prior to making any payments, to avoid civil and criminal penalties.

Take Action

Download our eBook to learn more about tax identity management.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Kelly Conner

Kelly Conner is the Director, Product Marketing for Tax & Regulatory Reporting at Sovos. She has been with Sovos for 8 years and is responsible for directing a team that establishes the marketing strategy and direction for Sovos’ 1099, Affordable Care Act, Unclaimed Property, and Statutory Reporting solutions based on industry and client needs. Previously at Sovos, Kelly served as a customer service representative, where she serviced Sovos’ largest customers with unique tax reporting requirements. Kelly holds degrees in Marketing and Communication Studies from the University of Wisconsin-La Crosse.
Share this post

dtc shipping law updates
North America ShipCompliant
November 13, 2024
DtC Shipping Laws: Key Updates for Alcohol Shippers

This blog was last updated on November 13, 2024 When engaging in direct-to-consumer (DtC) shipping of alcohol, compliance with different state laws is paramount and so keeping up with law changes is critical. In 2024, the rules in several states for DtC have already been adjusted or will change soon. Here is a review of […]

sales tax vs. use taxes
North America Sales & Use Tax
November 8, 2024
Sales Tax vs. Use Tax, Explained. Who Reports What, and When?

This blog was last updated on November 19, 2024 One of the core concepts in sales tax compliance is also one of the most frequently misunderstood: the differences between sales tax and use tax. These tax types may look similar on the surface, but knowing the differences is essential for staying compliant and avoiding costly […]

2025 bond project
North America Tax Information Reporting
November 4, 2024
2025 NAIC Bond Project – The Insurer’s Guide

This blog was last updated on November 14, 2024 The regulatory landscape for insurance companies is undergoing significant changes with the Principles-Based Bond Project which is set to take effect on January 1, 2025. These changes, driven by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC), will impact how insurance companies classify and value bond investments, […]

E-Invoicing Compliance EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
November 1, 2024
VAT in the Digital Age Approved in ECOFIN

This blog was last updated on November 7, 2024 The long-awaited VAT in the Digital Age (ViDA) proposal has been approved by Member States’ Economic and Finance Ministers. On 5 November 2024, during the Economic and Financial Affairs Council (ECOFIN) meeting, Member States unanimously agreed on adopting the ViDA package. This decision marks a major […]

what is peppol
E-Invoicing Compliance North America
October 29, 2024
What it is PEPPOL?

This blog was last updated on October 29, 2024 Peppol E-invoicing explained: What it is and how it works The global adoption of electronic invoicing is accelerating. Governments worldwide are pushing to adopt e-invoicing to digitally transform their national systems and, often, to close the VAT gap. While many countries have introduced their own e-invoicing […]