How Proper W-8 Management Ensures Seamless 1042-S Reporting

Sovos
March 9, 2023

By Wendy Walker, Solution Principal, Sovos and Jessica Metts, Director of Client Services, Comply Exchange

With the 1042-S reporting deadline approaching , Comply Exchange recently partnered with Sovos to deliver a webinar breaking down the end-to-end information reporting and withholding lifecycle. A lot of withholding agents or payers do not think of the information reporting and withholding process as a lifecycle, as organizations are often decentralized, and requirements are handled by different lines of business. However, it is a lifecycle that begins with the collection, validation and ongoing management of tax documents. Let’s examine the role the W-8 series of forms plays in 1042-S reporting and why these tax forms are crucial for setting your tax team up for success.

What is the information reporting and withholding lifecycle?

The information reporting and withholding lifecycle can be broken down into six steps:

  • Collect tax documentation to document payee’s status as U.S. or foreign
  • Review documentation for accuracy and validity
  • Verify other due diligence requirements, such as validation checks (including TIN and GIIN)
  • Calculate withholding before time of payment
  • Review/validate information on file for payees
  • Conclude reporting – 1099 or 1042-S

What type of Forms W-8 are there?

Unlike the single page Form W-9, there are several types of forms that could be used by non-U.S. persons/nonresident aliens. Have a look below at the types of Forms W-8 that you may be required to collect:

  • Form W-8BEN
    • Certificate of Foreign Status of Beneficial Owner for United States Tax Withholding and Reporting (Individuals)
  • Form W-8BEN-E
    • Certificate of Foreign Status of Beneficial Owner for United States Tax Withholding and Reporting (Entities)
  • Form W-8IMY
    • Certificate of Foreign Intermediary, Foreign Flow-Through Entity, or Certain U.S. Branches for United States Tax Withholding and Reporting
  • W-8EXP
    • Certificate of Foreign Government or Other Foreign Organization for United States Tax Withholding and Reporting
  • Form W-8ECI
    • Certificate of Foreign Person’s Claim That Income Is Effectively Connected With the Conduct of a Trade or Business in the United States
  • 8233
    • Exemption From Withholding on Compensation for Independent (and Certain Dependent) Personal Services of a Nonresident Alien Individual

What validations should be completed for new and updated W-8 forms?

While collecting tax forms upfront is important, it is equally important that you validate these tax forms. This includes validating the forms for accuracy based on the latest IRS requirements, and validating the information provided on the tax form against any existing data you have on file such as through AML/KYC processes.

While the validation process is quite complex and extensive, there are some recommended key validations when receiving a new or updated Form W-8. It is important to note that the validations do vary depending on the Form W-8 being collected. General validations that should be required, at a minimum, as part of your validation process include:

  • Checking that all required lines on the form have been completed
  • Ensuring a signature and date were provided
  • No crossing out or altering of forms or certifications
  • Confirming that any treaty claim/claims for a reduced rate of withholding are accurate
  • Validating U.S. TINs (SSN, ITIN, EIN) and GIINs provided
  • Examining checked status boxes to confirm they don’t conflict with one another
  • Checking that the most recent Form W-8 revision was used

How should you manage Forms W-8 on an ongoing basis?

Unlike the W-9 form that does not expire unless there is a change in circumstance that causes any of the information on the form to be incorrect, Forms W-8 require much more ongoing management. For starters, Forms W-8 are updated by regulatory agencies far more frequently than the Form W-9, and many of the Forms W-8 have a true form expiration, expiring within a three-year period. This means that a withholding agent or payer should have either software or manual processes in place to manages the ongoing maintenance and verifications of these forms.

This causes a lot of internal struggles for companies that think of documentation as a one-time requirement. A withholding agent or payer should make sure that they have current and valid documentation on file, which again includes monitoring for things like changes in circumstance that could render a form invalid and monitoring for true form expiration. With a key focus on technology today, companies are looking towards tax technology companies to act as a document repository, securely storing, maintaining, and monitoring tax forms as this is a living, breathing, day-to-day process.

How does information from Forms W-8 flow onto Form 1042-S?

While reporting gets a lot of focus, withholding agents often forget that the information coming off your recipients’ Forms W-8 directly feeds into the information required to be reported on the Form 1042-S. This includes the basic identify information, like name, addresses and tax identification numbers, as well as the status codes that are required on the 1042-S.

Looking at the example below, you can see where the Chapter 3 and Chapter 4 status codes are directly mapped from the Form W-8BEN-E:

How does Comply Exchange assist with W-8 and 8233 form management?

Comply Exchange provides tax software to automate the collection and management of Forms W-8 and 8233, together with real-time validation and withholding rate calculations. This alleviates the burden of withholding agents having to manually collect, validate and manage these tax forms, along with minimizing the risk of noncompliance as a result of faulty processes or human error.

A key point of collecting and validating tax documentation is so that as the withholding agent or payer, you know who you are paying (U.S. or foreign) and how to withhold on that payment prior to making the payment. If you do not know who you are paying, there may be requirements to presume the person as U.S. and backup withhold at a rate of 24%. If you do receive a Form W-8 with a claim of tax treaty benefits and you do not validate that treaty claim, then you could incorrectly withhold at a lower rate instead of the required 30%.

In both cases, as the withholding, you then become liable for the failure to withhold correctly or at all and become subject to that withholding plus potential penalties and interest.

Take Action

Check out the on-demand webinar with Sovos and Comply Exchange to learn more about Form W-8 and what your requirements may include.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Sovos

Sovos is a global provider of tax, compliance and trust solutions and services that enable businesses to navigate an increasingly regulated world with true confidence. Purpose-built for always-on compliance capabilities, our scalable IT-driven solutions meet the demands of an evolving and complex global regulatory landscape. Sovos’ cloud-based software platform provides an unparalleled level of integration with business applications and government compliance processes. More than 100,000 customers in 100+ countries – including half the Fortune 500 – trust Sovos for their compliance needs. Sovos annually processes more than three billion transactions across 19,000 global tax jurisdictions. Bolstered by a robust partner program more than 400 strong, Sovos brings to bear an unrivaled global network for companies across industries and geographies. Founded in 1979, Sovos has operations across the Americas and Europe, and is owned by Hg and TA Associates.
Share this post

North America
June 6, 2024
Observations and Predictions: The Future of Tax and Compliance

When I became the CEO of Sovos one year ago, I knew that I was stepping into an innovative company in an industry primed for a seismic transformation. However, even with this knowledge in place, I must admit that the speed and scope of change over the past year has been extraordinary to witness. Here […]

EMEA IPT
July 8, 2024
Hungary Insurance Premium Tax (IPT): An Overview

Regarding calculating Insurance Premium Tax (IPT), Hungary is the only country in the EU where the regime uses the so-called sliding scale rate model.

North America ShipCompliant
July 3, 2024
The Prospects and Perils of AI in Beverage Alcohol

I recently had the privilege of speaking on a panel at the National Conference of State Liquor Administrators (NCSLA) Annual Conference, a regular meeting of regulators, attorneys and other members of the beverage alcohol industry to discuss important issues affecting our trade. Alongside Claire Mitchell, of Stoel Rives, and Erlinda Doherty, of Vinicola Consulting, and […]

North America ShipCompliant
June 27, 2024
Shifting Focus: How to Make Wine Country Interesting to Millennials

Guest blog written by Susan DeMatei, President, WineGlass Marketing WineGlass Marketing recently conducted a study to explore how Millennials and Gen X feel about wine, wine culture and wine country. The goal was to gain insight into how we can make wine, wine club and wine country appealing to these new audiences. We’ll showcase in-depth […]

North America Sales & Use Tax
June 24, 2024
Illinois to Adjust Sales Tax Nexus Rules in Light of PetMeds Threat

Illinois is poised to change their sourcing rules again, trying to find their way in a world where states apply their sales tax compliance requirements equally to both in-state and remote sellers. With this tweak, they will effectively equalize the responsibilities of remote sellers with no in-state presence, to those that have an Illinois location. […]

EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
June 21, 2024
ViDA Rejected Again – Europe Misses Another Chance to Harmonize e-Invoicing

During the latest ECOFIN meeting on 21 June, Member States met to discuss if they could come to an agreement to implement the VAT in the Digital Age (ViDA) proposals. At the ECOFIN meeting in May, Estonia objected to the platform rules being proposed, instead requesting to make the new deemed supplier rules optional (an […]