CPA trade groups pen letter to Congress about net investment income tax

Sovos
August 15, 2014

Under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), the net investment income tax (NIIT) was enacted under section 1411 of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC). The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), Virgin Islands Society of Certified Public Accountants (VISCPA) and the Guam Society of Certified Public Accountants (GSCPA) wrote to Congress to inquire whether the NIIT applied to bona fide residents of the Virgin Islands, Guam and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands.

The letter was sent Aug. 7. It notes that there is some confusion between what the NIIT regulations appear to state and what local tax authorities in Guam and the Virgin Islands have said on the matter.

“The wording of proposed and final [IRS] regulations regarding NIIT appears to exempt from the NIIT bona fide residents of the U.S. Territories; however, the VIBIR [Virgin Islands Bureau of Internal Revenue] has issued a statement and the GDRT [Guam Department of Revenue and Taxation] Deputy Tax Commissioner has stated that the NIIT applies to bona fide residents of the U.S. Territories, causing much confusion among taxpayers and practitioners,” the letter read. “Clarity on the applicability of the NIIT to bona fide residents of the U.S. Territories is needed.”

The mirror code and NIIT regulations
Under what is known as the mirror code, all tax information reporting responsibilities outlined in the IRC apply to certain U.S. territories, including the three in question. However, territories following the mirror code have no income tax obligation to the IRS because they report tax information to their tax authorities. As such, it would appear that the NIIT regulations, which impose a 3.8 percent excise tax for net investment income of certain trusts, estates and individuals, would not be applicable for the three territories, according to the letter.

Furthermore, the letter asserted that certain provisions of the ACA, which fund sections of the health care law, were not to apply to bona fide residents of the territories because they cannot realize the benefits of the ACA. Based on the confusion, the three CPA groups had the following recommendation for providing more clarity for tax compliance professionals and taxpayers:

“Treasury should provide clarity to bona fide residents of mirror code U.S. Territories as to when and how the NIIT applies,” the letter said. “If bona fide residents of mirror code U.S. Territories are exempt from the NIIT, we additionally request clarification as to whether or not U.S. Territory estates and trusts are exempt from the NIIT as well.” 

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Sovos

Sovos is a global provider of tax, compliance and trust solutions and services that enable businesses to navigate an increasingly regulated world with true confidence. Purpose-built for always-on compliance capabilities, our scalable IT-driven solutions meet the demands of an evolving and complex global regulatory landscape. Sovos’ cloud-based software platform provides an unparalleled level of integration with business applications and government compliance processes. More than 100,000 customers in 100+ countries – including half the Fortune 500 – trust Sovos for their compliance needs. Sovos annually processes more than three billion transactions across 19,000 global tax jurisdictions. Bolstered by a robust partner program more than 400 strong, Sovos brings to bear an unrivaled global network for companies across industries and geographies. Founded in 1979, Sovos has operations across the Americas and Europe, and is owned by Hg and TA Associates.
Share this post

North America VAT & Fiscal Reporting
May 1, 2024
Taxation of Motor Insurance Policies: Austria

In Austria, the insurance premium tax law regulates the indirect tax that applies to elements of coverage under a motor insurance policy. This blog details everything you need to know about this particular indirect tax in the country. As with our dedicated overviews of the taxation of motor insurance policies in Spain and Norway, this […]

North America ShipCompliant
April 17, 2024
3 Reasons Craft Beer Drinkers Want DtC Shipping

While only 11 states and D.C. allow direct-to-consumer (DtC) beer shipping, more than half of Americans ages 21+ (51%) would purchase more craft beer if they were able to have it shipped directly to their home. In this blog, we discuss the top three reasons why craft beer drinkers want beer sent directly to them […]

North America ShipCompliant
April 17, 2024
States Are Looking to Expand DtC Spirits & Beer Availability

2024 is shaping up to be a banner year for legislative efforts related to the direct-to-consumer (DtC) shipping of beverage alcohol. While these proposed laws span a range of legal issues, the primary driver of the bills is expanding access to the DtC market for beer and spirits producers. Currently, 47 states and D.C. permit […]

North America Tax Information Reporting
March 22, 2024
Market Conduct Annual Statement Reminders and More

On the second Wednesday of each month, Sovos experts host a 30-minute webinar, Water Cooler Wednesday, to share the latest updates on statutory filings. In March, Sarah Stubbs shared information about the many filings due after March 1, from Market Conduct Annual Statements to health supplements for P&C and life insurers writing A&H businesses and […]

North America ShipCompliant
March 21, 2024
How Producers Can Build a DtC Shipping Market

Direct-to-consumer (DtC) shipping has become one of the leading sales models for businesses of all sizes and in all markets. The idea of connecting directly with consumers is notably attractive, as it helps brands develop a personal relationship and avoid costly distribution chains. Yet, for all its popularity, DtC is often a hard concept to […]