The Challenges of Simplification – Transaction Privilege Tax Reporting in Arizona

Antonio Di Benedetto
June 20, 2016

This blog was last updated on June 27, 2021

The Arizona Department of Revenue (DOR) has been working toward the objective of simplifying the way that taxpayers report the Arizona Transaction Privilege Tax (TPT) for all localities (program and non-program) within the state. Arizona intended for the state DOR to become the single point of licensing, filing and payment for all localities on January 1, 2016; however, a decision was made to delay this implementation until (at least) next year.

Changes to Arizona’s TPT Tax Returns

A change, however, is effective for June 2016 filings due in July. Arizona will no longer accept filings on the existing Arizona TPT-1 tax return and will require taxpayers to either file the TPT-2 or the TPT-EZ. The TPT-2 should be utilized by those taxpayers who have two or more locations within the state, while the TPT-EZ is intended for taxpayers who only have a single Arizona location.  Arizona is requiring taxpayers to report program city level tax by location code or location number on these two forms. This filing methodology is a form of outlet reporting similar to what is currently required in Missouri, Florida and Texas. Location codes are not required for state/county reporting. If a taxpayer is filing by for two or more locations or several business names, then they must file their return electronically. Organizations can find their location code or number (which can be used interchangeably) on their transaction privilege tax license, as assigned by the DOR. Taxpayers may have one license number, with multiple locations associated to that number. Conversely, they may have individual licenses for each separate location, with each license having its own location number. Our understanding here at Sovos is that taxpayers are required to report tax on a separate TPT form for each license number. In contrast, a taxpayer with a single license number can report multiple locations on one form (TPT-2).

What About Reporting E-Commerce, Digital Products and Digital Services?

The shift to an outlet or location based reporting system poses interesting compliance questions. For example, how should entities report transaction privilege tax for both their in-store and internet sales utilizing this new system? As Arizona employs origin based sourcing (i.e., location of the retailer) for intra-state sales of goods, in-store sales or transactions that originate from one of the taxpayers physical locations should be sourced to that physical location. The reporting of local tax by outlet becomes unclear when contending with digital products, digital services or interstate sale of goods because origin based sourcing may not be applicable. The state has not provided clear guidance on any of these points. Nexus issues will also cause reporting challenges. In Arizona, city-level nexus is determined on a locality-by-locality basis. If the taxpayer does not have nexus in the given location where a sale is sourced, they are not required to collect the program city transaction privilege tax. This stands in contrast to county level tax, which always has to be collected by Arizona taxpayers. We suspect if a taxpayer has nexus, but does not have a location code for the city at issue, that the state will require that the sale should be reported to one of existing the taxpayer’s location. As long as taxpayers are taking a consistent approach in reporting tax on such transactions, the state should not have issue with the reporting in this manner. Arizona did confirm that a taxpayer would require a new location when they move a physical location or establish a new physical location. This tells us that the state appears to be taking the position that outlets are established only via physical location, and the mere act of selling into a location would not necessitate the creation of an outlet. For example, Arizona specifies that internet sales into a city where no outlet exists should be reported to an outlet in a different city, but in the same county.

Origin-Based, Outlet Reporting May Be the Future for Arizona

In summation, Arizona appears to be following the lead of other origin-based states in now requiring outlet reporting. This shift also evidences a movement to bring all Arizona cities into alignment for reporting, whereby the appropriate tax is always associated with the taxpayer’s physical locations. This change may also set the stage for eventual state-level administration of all local taxes. Some questions remain unanswered as they relate to the reporting of inter-state sales, sales of digital products as well as the proper sourcing of services. Sovos is closely monitoring the situation and will continue to ensure that our clients remain compliant with whatever changes Arizona may have in store.  

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Antonio Di Benedetto

Share this post

Hungary Supplemental Insurance Premium Tax
EMEA IPT
July 11, 2022
Extra Profit Tax: An Introduction to Supplemental IPT in Hungary

This blog was last updated on October 28, 2024 Update 7 October 2024 by Edit Buliczka Hungarian Tax Office Updates IPT Declaration Form for 2023 The procedure necessary to correct an underdeclared premium figure in Hungary can be complicated. The complexity of a correction for return form 2320 has become even more challenging. Following a […]

2025 bond project
North America Tax Information Reporting
November 4, 2024
The Insurer’s Guide to the 2025 Bond Project

This blog was last updated on November 4, 2024 The regulatory landscape for insurance companies is undergoing significant changes with the Principles-Based Bond Project which is set to take effect on January 1, 2025. These changes, driven by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC), will impact how insurance companies classify and value bond investments, […]

E-Invoicing Compliance EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
November 1, 2024
New ViDA Proposal Set for ECOFIN Approval

This blog was last updated on November 1, 2024 The Council of the European Union has released a new proposal regarding the VAT in the Digital Age (ViDA) reform. The proposal aims to modernise and streamline VAT systems across the EU, notably e-invoicing and Continuous Transaction Controls (CTC). Members States will review it on 5 […]

what is peppol
E-Invoicing Compliance North America
October 29, 2024
What it is PEPPOL?

This blog was last updated on October 29, 2024 Peppol E-invoicing explained: What it is and how it works The global adoption of electronic invoicing is accelerating. Governments worldwide are pushing to adopt e-invoicing to digitally transform their national systems and, often, to close the VAT gap. While many countries have introduced their own e-invoicing […]

remote sellers sales tax
North America Sales & Use Tax
October 28, 2024
Will Congress Act to Simplify Remote Seller Sales Tax Collection

This blog was last updated on October 29, 2024 When the United States Supreme Court ruled in 2018, that South Dakota’s law imposing sales tax collection requirements on sellers without in-state physical presence was constitutional, it did not grant states free reign. States are still responsible for ensuring that their sales tax requirements are manageable, […]

dtc shipping laws for craft spirits
North America ShipCompliant
October 23, 2024
Why It’s Time to Reform DtC Shipping Laws for Craft Spirits

This blog was last updated on October 23, 2024 While wine lovers have enjoyed the convenience of direct-to-consumer (DtC) shipping for nearly two decades, the craft spirits market is still not afforded the same access. Outdated and restrictive spirits shipping laws have kept the spirits industry from fully leveraging the benefits of DtC shipping, leaving […]