California Begins Voluntary Compliance Program Rollout

Freda Pepper
March 16, 2023

The California Voluntary Compliance Program (VCP) is now available, according to an announcement from the California State Controller.

For the first time, we are hearing from the State Controller’s Office (SCO) regarding the VCP authorized by the California legislature in September 2022. The announcement on the SCO’s website provides guidance concerning the upcoming program and includes a link to a survey that must be filled out by holders interested in taking part in the program. According to the website, the survey must be completed before receiving the VCP application form “when it becomes available.” Holders filling out the survey must provide name and address information along with reporting history.

Subsequently, holders receiving the application will be required to identify those employees who will attend a mandated training program and who will be responsible for submitting reports to the state. An estimated value of liability to the state will also need to be submitted.

After reviewing applications and approving enrollment, SCO will provide due dates for required deliverables that coincide with the standard unclaimed property reporting cycle, the statement reads. To complete the program, holders will be required to complete a training program and meet reporting deadlines.

Holders are reminded that the state will not accept any applications from holders that are currently subject to an unclaimed property examination or civil or criminal investigation. Additionally, a holder cannot participate if they have an outstanding interest assessment from the last five years.

The following are tentative dates that will be assigned to those who enroll for the upcoming reporting cycle:

  • July 31, 2023 – Required training completed
  • September 30, 2023 – Due diligence completed
  • Before November 1, 2023 – Notice report submitted
  • June 1-15, 2024 – Remit report and remittance submitted

According to the SCO, this is an ongoing program. Therefore, holders that are unable to meet the 2023 due dates will still have an opportunity to submit applications. Indeed, the SCO will continue to accept applications and provide due dates to subsequent enrollees that are consistent with future report years.

As outlined in previous Sovos blogs, the VCP first required the state legislature to approve funding by way of an appropriation in the Annual Budget Act. Given the 2023 dates, it appears that the necessary funding is in the works despite the lack of acknowledgment of such in the current budget appropriations.

Furthermore, from the announcement, it appears that holders accepted into the program will not be subject to an onerous VDA process similar to those administered by other states. Instead, after ongoing training, to receive an interest waiver, holders will be required to simply report all outstanding property in the fall 2023 annual report.

It’s important to remember that conducting an annual review of potentially escheatable properties is a key step toward businesses maintaining unclaimed property compliance. Paired with strong policies and procedures, organizations are not immune from issues arising, but they will be in a much better place should anything occur. The Sovos Unclaimed Property Consulting practice is always available to assist with conducting your initial review and drafting applicable unclaimed property policies and procedures.

Take Action

What other trends and recent regulations are happening in unclaimed property? Read our annual report, The State of Unclaimed Property, to learn more.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Freda Pepper

Share this post

North America
June 6, 2024
Observations and Predictions: The Future of Tax and Compliance

When I became the CEO of Sovos one year ago, I knew that I was stepping into an innovative company in an industry primed for a seismic transformation. However, even with this knowledge in place, I must admit that the speed and scope of change over the past year has been extraordinary to witness. Here […]

EMEA IPT
July 8, 2024
Hungary Insurance Premium Tax (IPT): An Overview

Regarding calculating Insurance Premium Tax (IPT), Hungary is the only country in the EU where the regime uses the so-called sliding scale rate model.

North America ShipCompliant
July 3, 2024
The Prospects and Perils of AI in Beverage Alcohol

I recently had the privilege of speaking on a panel at the National Conference of State Liquor Administrators (NCSLA) Annual Conference, a regular meeting of regulators, attorneys and other members of the beverage alcohol industry to discuss important issues affecting our trade. Alongside Claire Mitchell, of Stoel Rives, and Erlinda Doherty, of Vinicola Consulting, and […]

North America ShipCompliant
June 27, 2024
Shifting Focus: How to Make Wine Country Interesting to Millennials

Guest blog written by Susan DeMatei, President, WineGlass Marketing WineGlass Marketing recently conducted a study to explore how Millennials and Gen X feel about wine, wine culture and wine country. The goal was to gain insight into how we can make wine, wine club and wine country appealing to these new audiences. We’ll showcase in-depth […]

North America Sales & Use Tax
June 24, 2024
Illinois to Adjust Sales Tax Nexus Rules in Light of PetMeds Threat

Illinois is poised to change their sourcing rules again, trying to find their way in a world where states apply their sales tax compliance requirements equally to both in-state and remote sellers. With this tweak, they will effectively equalize the responsibilities of remote sellers with no in-state presence, to those that have an Illinois location. […]

EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
June 21, 2024
ViDA Rejected Again – Europe Misses Another Chance to Harmonize e-Invoicing

During the latest ECOFIN meeting on 21 June, Member States met to discuss if they could come to an agreement to implement the VAT in the Digital Age (ViDA) proposals. At the ECOFIN meeting in May, Estonia objected to the platform rules being proposed, instead requesting to make the new deemed supplier rules optional (an […]