The On-Premise Challenge Part II: The Cost of Supporting Your Tax Engine with Dated Technology

Tim Roden
November 4, 2020

Should we move our tax engine to the cloud or keep it on-premise? This conversation is taking place in many organizations as they assess their approach to sales tax management. In this three-part series, we’ll explore some of the problems IT is working through to maintain on-premise solutions that may not always be visible to leadership, but that are creating issues of efficiency, scale and effectiveness.

In our first blog post in this series, we examined the cost and commitment from IT required to keep on-premise technology up to date and manage the number of content updates a modern tax environment demands. In our second installment, we are going to examine another challenge of managing your tax engine on-premise: the cost of maintaining older technology and the impact it can have on your IT organization.

While maybe not as obvious as content updates that come at you fast and furious, legacy technology can have an equally adverse impact on your IT departments ability to prioritize more strategic business initiatives.

Technology that is a generation or more behind often requires a higher level of dedicated maintenance than the newer platforms on the market. This can be in the form of software updates, security patching, dedicated servers and individual IT expertise that may not be prevalent on the team.

Let’s see if this scenario sounds familiar: You are running your tax engine on a technology  platform that has been phased out for most or all other applications. It currently exists solely to support your sales tax operation. Since tax is a business-critical task, you need to dedicate time and resources to ensuring that it always remains active and operational and that updates are made regularly. However, this technology is unfamiliar to some members of the IT team due to its age; requiring a more experienced and expensive team member to own this assignment thus taking time away from more strategic and timely projects.

If this sounds like you, you are not alone. I have conversations every week with IT leaders who outline situations just like this. While most recognize that it’s a problem and needs to be addressed, they are still hesitant to overall the operation and these issues continue to linger. 

Most common reasons companies are reluctant to change and adapt new technology:

  1. Because the current setup is working, people are afraid to make a major change that could disrupt a critical business application like tax.
  2. IT is often hesitant to embrace the unknown. Sure, our current system may be inefficient, but we know how to manage it. 
  3. How would implementing a new platform integrate with our existing systems? We don’t want to create an even bigger problem in the process of trying to solve tax.

Luckily, a move to the cloud is a solution that addresses all your problems and concerns in one fell swoop. By moving your tax operations to the cloud, you can eliminate the need for separate technology, maintenance and oversight of a unique system, while secure in the knowledge that updates are made timely, all the while being protected by the strictest of security standards and protocols.

You can’t solve the challenges of an on-premise tax engine by migrating to a different premise-based solution. Cloud is the proven alternative, one in which you are likely running many of your core systems already. Like those platforms, the cloud is the present and the future of tax. 

 Be sure to read our final installment in this series, Part III the business case for change.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Tim Roden

Tim Roden is Sales Engineer, SME (Subject Matter Expert) for Indirect Tax. He and his group specialize in solving complex business and systems challenges around Indirect Tax for Global and Enterprise businesses. Tim has been providing expertise in these areas for Sovos since 2014. Prior to his time at Sovos, Tim worked as a Senior Solutions Engineer for ACI Worldwide, supporting SaaS-based electronic payment solutions for Global and Regional Financial Institutions. Tim has a B.A. in History from Wake Forest University.
Share this post

North America
June 6, 2024
Observations and Predictions: The Future of Tax and Compliance

When I became the CEO of Sovos one year ago, I knew that I was stepping into an innovative company in an industry primed for a seismic transformation. However, even with this knowledge in place, I must admit that the speed and scope of change over the past year has been extraordinary to witness. Here […]

EMEA IPT
July 8, 2024
Hungary Insurance Premium Tax (IPT): An Overview

Regarding calculating Insurance Premium Tax (IPT), Hungary is the only country in the EU where the regime uses the so-called sliding scale rate model.

North America ShipCompliant
July 3, 2024
The Prospects and Perils of AI in Beverage Alcohol

I recently had the privilege of speaking on a panel at the National Conference of State Liquor Administrators (NCSLA) Annual Conference, a regular meeting of regulators, attorneys and other members of the beverage alcohol industry to discuss important issues affecting our trade. Alongside Claire Mitchell, of Stoel Rives, and Erlinda Doherty, of Vinicola Consulting, and […]

North America ShipCompliant
June 27, 2024
Shifting Focus: How to Make Wine Country Interesting to Millennials

Guest blog written by Susan DeMatei, President, WineGlass Marketing WineGlass Marketing recently conducted a study to explore how Millennials and Gen X feel about wine, wine culture and wine country. The goal was to gain insight into how we can make wine, wine club and wine country appealing to these new audiences. We’ll showcase in-depth […]

North America Sales & Use Tax
June 24, 2024
Illinois to Adjust Sales Tax Nexus Rules in Light of PetMeds Threat

Illinois is poised to change their sourcing rules again, trying to find their way in a world where states apply their sales tax compliance requirements equally to both in-state and remote sellers. With this tweak, they will effectively equalize the responsibilities of remote sellers with no in-state presence, to those that have an Illinois location. […]

EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
June 21, 2024
ViDA Rejected Again – Europe Misses Another Chance to Harmonize e-Invoicing

During the latest ECOFIN meeting on 21 June, Member States met to discuss if they could come to an agreement to implement the VAT in the Digital Age (ViDA) proposals. At the ECOFIN meeting in May, Estonia objected to the platform rules being proposed, instead requesting to make the new deemed supplier rules optional (an […]