,

List of States with Economic Nexus Sales Tax Requirements

Charles Maniace
October 17, 2018

What are the state sales tax economic nexus requirements?

Since the Supreme Court decision in South Dakota v. Wayfair on June 21, states have moved with incredible speed to enact economic nexus requirements. To keep our customers and the taxpaying public informed, Sovos has put together a South Dakota v. Wayfair economic nexus state requirements table that details pending and effective remote sales tax collection rules across the country. As tracking economic nexus rules is a continually moving target, you may want to visit this table often as Sovos is committed to keeping the table as up to date as possible. 

Sales tax nexus is created when your business has a sufficient connection to a state, allowing the state to impose a tax collection and remittance responsibility on you as long as it does not represent an undue burden. With the Supreme Court’s decision in South Dakota v. Wayfair, states are no longer limited by the “physical presence” standard, established in Quill Corp. v. North Dakota in 1992. This means states are no longer restricted to enact nexus rules that require a form of physical contact. 

What is economic nexus?

The concept of economic nexus refers to nexus standards that look to criteria other than physical presence in evaluating a sellers connection to that state. For example, South Dakota’s standard looked to revenue earned by sales to in-state customers ($100,000) or the total number of in-state transactions (200).

Understanding which states have enacted (or are about to enact) economic nexus standards, and how those standards are articulated in each state, is the key to maintaining compliance in this turbulent time.

What states have enacted economic nexus requirements?

To date, over 30 states have enacted economic nexus state sales and use tax requirements. These include, Alabama, Colorado, Connecticut, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, Vermont, Washington, and Wyoming.

What states are already collecting tax on remote commerce?

The following states have already begun collecting sales tax on remote commerce:

  • Alabama, effective October 1, 2018
  • Hawaii, effective July 1, 2018
  • Illinois, effective October 1, 2018
  • Indiana, effective October 1, 2018
  • Kentucky, effective October 1, 2018
  • Maine, effective July 1, 2017
  • Maryland, effective October 1, 2017
  • Massachusetts, effective October 1, 2017 (cookie nexus)
  • Michigan, effective October 1, 2018
  • Minnesota, effective October 1, 2018
  • Mississippi, effective September 1, 2018
  • New Jersey, effective October 1, 2018
  • Nevada, effective October 1, 2018
  • North Dakota, effective October 1, 2018
  • Ohio, effective January 1, 2018
  • Oklahoma, effective April 10, 2018
  • Pennsylvania, effective April 1, 2018
  • Rhode Island, effective August 1, 2017
  • Vermont, effective July 1, 2018
  • Washington, effective October 1, 2018
  • Wisconsin, effective October 1, 2018

While a number of states have economic nexus laws already on the books and ready to take effect once Wayfair was decided, October 1, 2018 was nonetheless a pretty big day, with 11 states beginning enforcement of new nexus standards. 

Refer to the Sovos Economic Nexus State Thresholds Rules Table for up to date details.

Which states recently enacted economic nexus rules requiring remote sellers to collect sales tax?

  • Alabama, effective October 1, 2018
  • Illinois, effective October 1, 2018
  • Indiana, effective October 1, 2018
  • Kentucky, effective October 1, 2018
  • Michigan, effective October 1, 2018
  • Minnesota, effective October 1, 2018
  • Nevada, effective October 1, 2018
  • New Jersey, effective October 1, 2018
  • North Dakota, effective October 1, 2018
  • Washington, effective October 1, 2018

However, a few more big days are taking shape, with any number of states planning on having new rules take effect on November 1st and December 1, 2018, with others beginning January 1, 2019.

Which states are about to start requiring remote sellers to collect sales tax?

  • Colorado, effective December 1, 2018
  • Connecticut, effective December 1, 2018
  • Georgia, effective January 1, 2019
  • Iowa, effective, January 1, 2019
  • Louisiana, effective January 1, 2019
  • Nebraska, effective January 1, 2019
  • North Carolina, effective November 1, 2018
  • South Carolina, effective November 1, 2018
  • South Dakota, effective November 1, 2018
  • Utah, effective January 1, 2019
  • West Virginia, effective January 1, 2019

How will sales tax nexus affect my business?

For many sellers, it’s likely already had a substantial effect. If you haven’t already, organizations need to start planning and preparing for their expanded sales tax determination, collection and reporting responsibilities. Sovos has some suggestions on how you might start to think about maintaining your compliance in this new world: 

  1. Many states have already articulated transactional thresholds that they deem to create “substantial nexus” with their state. While most have copied the South Dakota standard of $100,000 in sales and 200 transactions, it’s not universal. Sovos has compiled the known threshold information for each state across the country. This information can be used to forecast your expanded nexus footprint over the next few months. However, there is one proviso – most states have not been particularly clear on how total sales and total transactions should be calculated. Over the next few months, we fully expect states to publish more and more guidance on this topic. 
  2. Evaluate your current sales tax determination and filing approach in terms of cost-effectiveness and performance. Does your solution offer accurate rates in all the jurisdictions in which you may now be on the hook for filing? And does it have the scalability to keep up with any new obligations you may have?
  3. Get in contact with some third-party software providers and ask how their solutions can track to your specifications. Tax automation software solutions vary in functionality, capability, and, of course, in price. You will identify the right one for your business based on how large your company is, how quickly you are growing, your existing financial applications, ERP, shopping cart vendor, and the products you sell. If planned and executed well, implementing a tax automation solution can yield a number of benefits for your organization in both the short and long term.

By overturning Quill, the Supreme Court has unleashed a flurry of state activity that is unlike to abate any time soon. By creating a new standard that is far more “facts and circumstances” oriented, state litigation over the propriety of a particular standard in light of the general complexity of compliance is certainly possible. Congressional action at the federal level is also an outside possibility. Either way, we are clearly not done! 

How to Protect Your Business From Economic Nexus State Requirements

Refer to our Economic Nexus State Requirements table to determine where your next filing obligation may require significant effort from your team.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Charles Maniace

Chuck is Vice President –Regulatory Analysis & Design at Sovos, a global provider of software that safeguards businesses from the burden and risk of modern tax. An attorney by trade, he leads a team of attorneys and tax professionals that provide the tax and regulatory content that keeps Sovos customers continually compliant. Over his 20-year career in tax and regulatory automation, he has provided analysis to the Wall Street Journal, NBC, Bloomberg and more. Chuck has also been named to the Accounting Today list of Top 100 Most Influential People four times.
Share This Post

North America ShipCompliant
May 25, 2023
Out-of-State Breweries Gain Self Distribution, DtC Rights in Oregon

Under a settlement agreement, breweries located outside of Oregon now have more options for selling into the Beaver State, including direct-to-consumer (DtC) shipping and self-distribution to retailers. The settlement arose out of a lawsuit filed by a group of Washington breweries last year challenging Oregon laws that limited beer self-distribution to in-state breweries and DtC […]

EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
May 24, 2023
VAT and Art: What you need to know

Significant inflation increases have impacted most of the world’s economies, with the UK still above 10% in 2023. This increase means a reduction in the purchasing power of consumers. Together with increases in the cost of raw materials, this has created uncertainty regarding growth of entire industrial departments and reduced profit margins for companies. The […]

North America ShipCompliant
May 23, 2023
Top 5 Myths Surrounding Retailer Direct-to-Consumer Wine Shipping

By Tom Wark, Executive Director, National Association of Wine Retailers Politics breed myths. This has always been the case as politics is, at its most fundamental, a form of storytelling. So it should be no surprise that myths have arisen as various elements of the wine industry have fought against consumers and specialty wine retailer seeking […]

EMEA IPT
May 23, 2023
IPT: Location of Risk and Territoriality

Much of the discussion on the Location of Risk triggering a country’s entitlement to levy insurance premium tax (IPT) and parafiscal charges focuses on the rules for different types of insurance. European Union (EU) Directive 2009/138/EC (Solvency II) set out these rules. However, a related topic of growing importance in this area concerns territoriality, i.e. […]

Asia Pacific E-Invoicing Compliance
May 23, 2023
Japan: New e-Invoice Retention Requirements

Japan’s new e-invoice retention requirements are part of the country’s latest Electronic Record Retention Law (ERRL) reform. Along with measures such as the Qualified Invoice System (QIS) and the possibility to issue and send invoices electronically via PEPPOL, Japan is implementing different indirect tax control measures, seeking to reduce tax evasion and promote digital transformation. […]