Blockchain: Advice for Regulators to Tackle the Digital Asset Dilemma

Charles Maniace
June 14, 2022

With a few jurisdictions already on the record, including Belgium, Spain and Switzerland, and with Puerto Rico and Washington poised to issue official guidance, it seems extraordinarily likely that within a few months a substantial number of states will have issued opinions on the application of sales tax on digital assets transferred on blockchain. With this new technology, states have a unique opportunity to issue thoughtful and comprehensive tax rules that can apply (almost) from its inception. In this blog, we offer some helpful advice to legislators and regulators as they look to create effective tax policies.

Blockchain and sales tax

In the absence of official guidance, the possibility of abuse unquestionably exists. The flexibility offered by blockchain and smart contracts could be used by tax-savvy bad actors to circumvent traditional sales tax requirements as they clearly exist and apply today. For example, the transfer of a token representing the right to obtain a kitchen appliance, should (ultimately) be taxed identically to the sale a kitchen appliance. Given the possibility of abuse, when combined with the notoriety generated by the sale of high-priced assets, legislation and regulation in the digital space is inevitable.

However, before states start writing statutes and rules into this new blank slate, we offer the following words of wisdom.

  1. Know what you are regulating. If the topics of blockchain, smart contracts and NFTs feel daunting, consult with the experts. Understand the technology before you start articulating new rules. Tax rules always work best when they reflect business reality as opposed to a regulator’s conception about how businesses operate.
  2. Apply all new rules and requirements prospectively. Remember, in the seminal Wayfair decision, states were given the authority to depart from standard physical presence nexus restrictions and apply their sales tax requirements on remote sellers, but only if their tax compliance obligations do not represent an undue burden on interstate commerce. In fact, in the Wayfair decision, the Supreme Court specifically noted that South Dakota was not seeking to apply its economic nexus standard retrospectively. Any state opting to retroactively apply the tax to this new industry is arguably creating an unfair and undue burden on the taxpaying public. Asking a seller or a marketplace to have known they are responsible for sales tax compliance seems facially unjust.
  3. Don’t try to shoehorn. Some states have laws on the books as it relates to digital products. Many of the 24 member states of the Streamlined Sales Tax Agreement have definitions for specific digital products and other products transferred electronically, including digital audio works, digital audio-visual works, digital books and digital codes. As explained above, digital assets transferred on the blockchain are not necessarily analogous to “traditional” digital products as we know them today and they are worthy of their own clear rules and requirements.
  4. This is likely not a passing fad. It’s possible, if not tempting, to dismiss digital assets as the latest trend. Thinking they are destined to go the way of the Beanie Baby or to analogize the current market for certain digital art as the newest incarnation of the Dutch “Tulip Mania” of the 17th century. However, the flexibility of blockchain and the certainty of smart contracts means that we are likely at the beginning of a new sales channel that doesn’t necessarily replace, but stands alongside traditional brick and mortar and ecommerce channels.

For the most part, sellers and marketplaces stand ready to comply with reasonable and well-articulated sales tax compliance requirements. The key to writing such requirements is rooted in a thoughtful and comprehensive understanding of the industry. Here’s hoping states take a moment and adopt this best practice, before diving headfirst into blockchain, sales tax and digital assets.

Take Action

Want to see how sales tax has changed over the past year? Check out our annual Sales and Use Tax Report.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.


Charles Maniace

Charles Maniace is Vice President – Regulatory Analysis & Design at Sovos, a leading global provider of software that safeguards businesses from the burden and risk of modern tax. An attorney by trade, Chuck leads a team of attorneys and tax professionals responsible for all the tax and regulatory content that keeps Sovos customers continually compliant. Over his 15 year career in tax and regulatory automation, he has provided analysis to the Wall Street Journal, NBC and more.
Share This Post

North America ShipCompliant
September 29, 2022
5 Essential Questions to Ask When Searching for a Compliance Partner

Managing beverage alcohol compliance and tax in a rapidly evolving regulatory environment takes expertise and a relentless attention to detail. Odds are, you didn’t get into the industry to spend countless hours each week pouring over mandate changes, tax laws and regulatory updates. Partnering with a compliance software company is an easy way to mitigate […]

E-Invoicing Compliance EMEA
September 27, 2022
Billing SAF-T in Portugal: A New Obligation for Non-Residents

Portugal’s state budget entered into force on 27 June 2022 after protracted negotiations. The budget contained an interesting provision: the obligation to present invoice details to the tax authorities was extended to all VAT-registered taxpayers including non-resident taxpayers, who had long been exempt from this obligation. VAT-registered non-residents now have three options for communicating invoice […]

September 27, 2022
Understanding Insurance Premium Tax Prepayments in Italy

Continuing our IPT prepayment series, we take a look at Italy’s requirements. In previous articles we have looked at Belgium, Austria, and Hungary. All insurers authorised to write business under the Italian regime have a legal obligation to make an advance annual payment for the following year. What is the prepayment rate in Italy? The […]

EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
September 23, 2022
Virtual Events and the Risk of Double Taxation

When organising a virtual event, it’s important to determine how this supply will be treated for VAT purposes. We have previously discussed VAT rules and place of supply for virtual events, this blog will discuss the potential future changes to the VAT position for EU Member States. Current VAT position for virtual events in Europe […]

Brazil E-Invoicing Compliance EMEA
September 22, 2022
Brazil Introduces National Standard for the Service e-Invoice

Brazil is known for its highly complex continuous transaction controls (CTC) e-invoicing system. As well as keeping up with daily legislative changes in its 26 states and the Federal District, the country has over 5,000 municipalities with different standards for e-invoicing. The tax levied on consumption of services (ISSQN – Imposto Sobre Serviços de Qualquer […]