A Prescription for Use Tax Issues in Michigan

April 25, 2014

Michigan Skyline Blog The Michigan legislature recently passed H.B. 4831. Effective March 14, 2014, the bill exempts from sales tax over-the-counter (OTC) drugs purchased pursuant to a prescription. Although true for sales tax, H.B. 4831 does not equally exempt the purchase of OTC drugs from use tax. While this might seem like an innocuous distinction, this lack of unity between an exemption for sales tax and full taxability for use tax could have serious consequences for entities doing business and serving customers in Michigan. In order to understand the issues presented,Michigan Blog Photo 2 a brief explanation of how use tax operates is required. The most common understanding of use tax is that it is simply due when sales tax has not been paid. A prime example of this would be purchasing an item in a state that does not collect sales tax (such as New Hampshire) and bringing the item into a state which does collect sales tax (such as Massachusetts). When this occurs, the purchaser must remit sales tax to Massachusetts since they will be making “use” of the item that state. Use tax becomes more complicated than this example when you look at the two separate types; consumer’s use tax and seller’s use tax. Consumer’s use tax is a tax on the purchaser and requires self-assessment and remittance by the purchaser. Tax needs to be paid on the consumption, or use of the item. Conversely, seller’s use tax applies to sales made by a vendor to a customer located outside the vendor’s state, or for sales in interstate commerce if the vendor is registered in the jurisdiction where delivery will be made. These concepts are fairly straightforward, where use tax is due by either the seller or consumer depending on the factors surrounding the transaction. Michigan Blog Photo 1Turning back to Michigan’s recent law change, only use tax is currently due on OTC drugs purchased pursuant to a prescription. This means that consumers who purchase these types of products in Michigan would theoretically only be required to remit consumer’s use tax. Consumer’s use tax presents a bit of a problem for taxing jurisdictions, as it requires self-remittance. Most consumers are not exactly knowledgeable about use taxes, which could mean they may not be apt to pay them. In theory, this means that sellers which conduct interstate commerce into Michigan would be required to remit seller’s use tax, whereas businesses located within Michigan do not. This not only seems unfair, but presents a constitutional law issue. While the Supreme Court of the United States has rarely handled sales tax cases, it did establish a long line of jurisprudence. A number of cases, beginning with National Bellas Hess v. Department of Revenue, have established a variety of important rules with regard to sales and use taxes, namely one of non-discrimination for interstate commerce. The Supreme Court has held that states cannot put into place sales and use taxes which discriminate against interstate commerce. This means, for instance, that a state cannot force out-of-state sellers to pay one type of tax, and in-state sellers a different use tax. Unfortunately, this is exactly what is set to happen in Michigan. Without an exemption for use tax, out-of-state sellers will be forced to remit seller’s use tax, whereas instate sellers can instead pass the burden of consumer’s use tax on to their customers. This is, by default, the type of discrimination on interstate commerce that the court’s decision in National Bellas Hess was trying to prevent. As a result, it appears that the implementation of H.B. 4831 is unconstitutional. This discrepancy is not simply due to Michigan suddenly wanting to brazenly ignore constitutional law over OTC drugs, but rather due to how Michigan’s tax statutes are arranged. Michigan has two separate sections of its governing statutes for its tax law; one for sales tax, and the other for use tax. Any time the Michigan legislature wishes to create an exemption for a taxable transaction, an amendment must be made to both of these code sections. With the current state of political affairs across the country, passing two pieces of legislation, let alone one, is extremely difficult. This is, of course, not the first time Michigan has run into an issue where their use tax and sales tax exemptions were out of sync. For instance, Michigan recently passed an exemption for vehicle trade-ins; however, the legislation for the sales tax exemption was passed and enacted well before the use tax component, leading to a similar scenario to the one which exists now.

In response to this issue, the Michigan Legislature has introduced HB 5342, which eliminates use tax on sales of OTC drugs pursuant to a prescription.  HB 5342 was introduced on February 19, 2014, and, as of

Michigan Blog Photo 4March 13, 2014, is currently awaiting a vote in the Michigan Senate’s Committee on Finance. HB 4831 has been on the books for over a month, and while no use tax issues have yet to be raised, the constitutional problems surrounding this law still exist. Hopefully, Michigan will be able to rectify this issue shortly, or otherwise the passage of HB 4831 is a prescription for tax trouble.  

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.



Sovos was built to solve the complexities of the digital transformation of tax, with complete, connected offerings for tax determination, continuous transaction controls, tax reporting and more. Sovos customers include half the Fortune 500, as well as businesses of every size operating in more than 70 countries. The company’s SaaS products and proprietary Sovos S1 Platform integrate with a wide variety of business applications and government compliance processes. Sovos has employees throughout the Americas and Europe, and is owned by Hg and TA Associates.
Share This Post

North America ShipCompliant
May 25, 2023
Out-of-State Breweries Gain Self Distribution, DtC Rights in Oregon

Under a settlement agreement, breweries located outside of Oregon now have more options for selling into the Beaver State, including direct-to-consumer (DtC) shipping and self-distribution to retailers. The settlement arose out of a lawsuit filed by a group of Washington breweries last year challenging Oregon laws that limited beer self-distribution to in-state breweries and DtC […]

EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
May 24, 2023
VAT and Art: What you need to know

Significant inflation increases have impacted most of the world’s economies, with the UK still above 10% in 2023. This increase means a reduction in the purchasing power of consumers. Together with increases in the cost of raw materials, this has created uncertainty regarding growth of entire industrial departments and reduced profit margins for companies. The […]

North America ShipCompliant
May 23, 2023
Top 5 Myths Surrounding Retailer Direct-to-Consumer Wine Shipping

By Tom Wark, Executive Director, National Association of Wine Retailers Politics breed myths. This has always been the case as politics is, at its most fundamental, a form of storytelling. So it should be no surprise that myths have arisen as various elements of the wine industry have fought against consumers and specialty wine retailer seeking […]

May 23, 2023
IPT: Location of Risk and Territoriality

Much of the discussion on the Location of Risk triggering a country’s entitlement to levy insurance premium tax (IPT) and parafiscal charges focuses on the rules for different types of insurance. European Union (EU) Directive 2009/138/EC (Solvency II) set out these rules. However, a related topic of growing importance in this area concerns territoriality, i.e. […]

Asia Pacific E-Invoicing Compliance
May 23, 2023
Japan: New e-Invoice Retention Requirements

Japan’s new e-invoice retention requirements are part of the country’s latest Electronic Record Retention Law (ERRL) reform. Along with measures such as the Qualified Invoice System (QIS) and the possibility to issue and send invoices electronically via PEPPOL, Japan is implementing different indirect tax control measures, seeking to reduce tax evasion and promote digital transformation. […]