Out-of-State Retailers May Not Ship Wine to Idaho

Alex Koral
September 2, 2021

A recent review by the state of Idaho Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC) division’s legal team has conclusively determined that out-of-state retailers have no permission to ship any beverage alcohol products direct-to-consumer (DtC) in the state. This determination reverses previous interpretations of Idaho’s laws, which had been understood to permit such shipments

As the DtC wine shipping market continues to grow, interest in engaging in the market also grows. While it is well established that wine producers are now able to ship to 47 states plus the District of Columbia, there is still a lot of uncertainty about who else can engage in the DtC channel, with particular interest coming from off-premise retailers.

When researching who can ship what where, it is critical to thoroughly understand the rules of the destination state and apply the rules as determined by that state’s regulators. And it is important to understand that those determinations are subject to the reasonable interpretations of those regulators.

What happened in Idaho?

The basis for any state’s DtC laws comes from their statutes, the laws as established by their legislature. Idaho’s DtC laws are found in statute 23-1309A, which set out the licensing, tax and other compliance requirements for wineries to ship DtC into the Gem State. 

Found within that statute is section 7, which reads: 

“A licensee who holds a license for the retail sale of wine for consumption off the licensed premises may ship not more than two (2) cases of wine, containing not more than nine (9) liters per case, per shipment, for personal use and not for resale, directly to a resident of another state if the state to which the wine is sent allows residents of this state to receive wine sent from that state without payment of additional state tax, fees or charges. The sale shall be considered to have occurred in this state.” 

This provision establishes when and how an off-premise retailer can ship wine to Idaho residents.

Historically, section 7 was interpreted to establish a “reciprocal” retail DtC relationship, wherein Idaho would permit retailers to ship DtC to their residents as long as those retailers were in a state that granted Idaho retailers similarly open shipping permissions. Essentially the only restrictions were that the retailer: 

  1. had to hold some kind of retail license and
  2. could only ship two cases of wine at a time. 

Under that interpretation, it was understood then that a reciprocal relationship existed among Idaho, California and New Mexico, as those states seemed to permit retail DtC shipping of wine without additional licensing and tax obligations. (See CA BPC 23661.2 and NM Code 60-7A-3(E).)

Admittedly, Idaho’s law was never 100% clear, and the right of out-of-state retailers to ship into Idaho had to be read backwards, starting with the line about, “if the state to which the wine is sent allows residents of this state to receive wine sent from that state,” and interpreting from there. Seemingly, this statute would only work if there was an existing right for Idaho residents to receive wine shipped by retailers in other states. 

However, that is not the conclusion as determined by the Idaho ABC. After a thorough legal review made upon our request, they have ruled that statute 23-1309A only provides that Idaho residents may receive wine shipped from retailers located within Idaho, and any mention of shipments by retailers to another state are to establish Idaho as the venue where the sale occurs (even if that may contradict the laws of those other states, which generally do indicate that DtC shipments by licensed shippers are designated to occur in those states for legal and tax purposes).

There is also the broader question of whether it is constitutional for a state to permit local retailers to ship DtC while prohibiting out-of-state retailers from doing the same. However, the prevailing jurisprudence is that what may not be allowed regarding wine manufacturers may be permitted for wine retailers.

While it is unfortunate to see a state restrict the right of their residents to purchase wine from the national market of wine retailers, it is the duty of being in a highly regulated market to respect and comply with the rulings of regulatory authorities. We can hope that Idaho will amend its laws in the future to enable legal shipping of wine from out-of-state retailers. Until then, going forward the understanding is that Idaho is now closed for out-of-state retailers looking for further DtC shipping destination states.

Take Action

Find out how ShipCompliant can help retailers manage DtC shipping.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Alex Koral

Alex Koral is Senior Regulatory Counsel for Sovos ShipCompliant in the company’s Boulder, Colorado office. He actively researches beverage alcohol regulations and market developments to inform development of Sovos’ ShipCompliant product and help educate the industry on compliance issues. Alex has been in the beverage alcohol arena since 2015, after receiving his J.D. from the University of Colorado Law School.
Share This Post
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email

EMEA IPT
May 25, 2022
IPT – Goods in Transit Location of Risk

For Insurance Premium Tax, location of risk is vital in determining the correct tax. In this episode of the Sovos Expert Series, Anita Blanusic asks Russell Brown, Senior Consulting Manager to explain the location of risk for goods in transit and how it’s determined. Listen as he answers the following questions: What is goods in […]

EMEA IPT
May 25, 2022
Meet the Expert: Hooda Greig, Compliance Services Manager – IPT

Meet the Expert is our series of blogs where we share more about the team behind our innovative software and managed services. As a global organisation with indirect tax experts across all regions, our dedicated team are often the first to know about new regulatory changes and the latest developments on tax regimes across the world, […]

North America Sales & Use Tax
May 24, 2022
3 Reasons for Automated Sales Tax Compliance

At this point, knowing that increasingly complex sales tax requirements exist is not the issue. Organizations know that they’re facing more complicated rules and regulations, but it’s more a matter of taking the time to invest in the necessary tools to properly face those challenges. With an automated sales tax compliance solution, businesses can better […]

North America Tax Information Reporting
May 24, 2022
Insurance Statutory Reporting Due Dates

Insurance statutory reporting filing due dates for the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) are spread across the calendar year causing a jumble of different deadlines that apply to certain insurers. The quarterly and annual filings can be easier to remember, but the additional filings certain insurers are required to submit can be tricky to […]

EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
May 24, 2022
The Effect of Inflation on VAT Rates

It’s no surprise that inflation is on the forefront of everyone’s mind, with prices continuing to sky-rocket month by month. Data from the United Kingdom shows that the Consumer Prices Index (CPI) inflation jumped to a 40-year high of 9% in the past 12 months. Governments around the world are looking for ways to reduce […]