CJEU Rules on Conditions for VAT Refund

Charles Riordan
January 25, 2021

The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has ruled that Member States must accept, as formally submitted, VAT refund requests that contain invoice identifiers other than sequential invoice numbers.

In case C-346/19 (Judgment of 17 December 2020), an Austrian taxpayer’s VAT Refund application was rejected by Germany’s Federal Central Tax Office, on the grounds that the “invoice numbers” listed on the application form were reference numbers rather than sequential invoice numbers.

The Austrian taxpayer challenged the notice, but the tax office ruled that the reference numbers didn’t comply with legal requirements and that the taxpayer had therefore failed to formally submit a valid refund request within the statutory time period allowed.

The CJEU disagreed, holding that a refund application under these circumstances must be considered validly submitted. In the court’s view, the substantive requirements of the application were satisfied, given that the reference numbers provided by the taxpayer allowed the invoices to be identified.

The court thought it particularly relevant that the Federal Central Tax Office had the ability to request further information, including copies of the original invoices, if it felt that the information provided by the taxpayer was insufficient to grant the refund. Declaring the application invalid without making a request for further information was a disproportionate penalty for the failure to comply with a purely formal requirement.

Ensuring VAT neutrality across the EU

This is not the first time that the CJEU has scrutinized the German tax authorities’ refund practices. In C371/19 (Judgment of 18 November 2020), the court held that the German authorities had violated the principle of VAT neutrality by systematically refusing to request information missing from VAT refund applications, such as copies of invoices or import documents. Instead, the authorities would immediately reject the applications, just as in C-346/19.

The court noted that the principle of VAT neutrality requires that a refund must be granted when all substantive conditions for the refund are fulfilled and that applicants must be given every opportunity to provide information needed to support a substantive claim. This ensures a taxpayer’s right to a settlement of VAT already paid is protected to the greatest extent possible.

Although the CJEU’s ruling in both cases was favorable for taxpayers, the court emphasized both times that failure to comply with a formal requirement could still prove fatal to an application if not corrected.

In C346/19, for example, the court noted that the tax office could officially request sequential invoice numbers from the taxpayer and could reject the application if those numbers weren’t provided within a month of the request.

Businesses need to understand and comply with tax authority regulations, even if a requirement is formal rather than substantive.

Take Action

To keep up to date with the changing VAT compliance landscape, download Trends: Continuous Global VAT Compliance and follow us on LinkedIn and Twitter to stay ahead of regulatory news and other updates.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Charles Riordan

Charles Riordan is a member of the Regulatory Analysis team at Sovos specializing in international taxation, with a focus on Value Added Tax systems in the European Union. Charles received his J.D. from Boston College Law School in 2013 and is an active member of the Massachusetts Bar.
Share This Post

Latin America VAT & Fiscal Reporting
May 20, 2020
Sovos Acquires Taxweb, Extends Tax Determination Capabilities in World’s Most Challenging Compliance Landscape

Earlier this month Sovos announced its second acquisition of 2020, completing our solution for Brazil with an unparalleled offering that solves tax compliance in the place where it is most challenging to do so.  Too many companies doing business in Brazil have been burdened by managing multiple point solutions for continuous transaction controls (CTCs), tax […]

North America Sales & Use Tax
February 24, 2021
Mississippi Sales Tax Nexus Changes

The Supreme Court’s 2018 ruling on South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc. had a ripple effect across the country on how out-of-state businesses must collect and remit sales tax. The Mississippi sales tax nexus is just one example of how remote sellers and marketplace facilitators need to ensure they remain compliant as regulations are updated. Below […]

ShipCompliant
February 24, 2021
Making the Most of the Annual DtC Wine Shipping Report

By Andrew Adams Andrew Adams is the editor of the Wine Analytics Report and a regular contributor to Wine Business Monthly magazine. Adams grew up in the city of Sonoma, Calif., and graduated from the University of Oregon with a degree in journalism. In addition to working at daily newspapers for more than a decade, Adams worked for […]

EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
February 23, 2021
Advantages of Working with a Global Service Provider

The rapid rise of digitisation continues to transform companies’ business processes. Companies have either begun their digital transformation as a result of compulsory mandates or are voluntarily making the change. While digitalisation provides time, cost and workforce efficiencies, it has enabled greater cross-border business. The increasing digitisation of tax has seen companies look to third-party […]

North America Sales & Use Tax
February 23, 2021
Maryland Enters the World of Digital Tax

The Maryland Legislature overrode gubernatorial vetoes on two bills that substantially change how Maryland approaches digital tax. The Legislature adopted a novel rule that seeks to tax digital advertising services. Additionally, it expanded Maryland sales tax to include digital equivalents of tangible personal property. The concept of taxing the revenue earned by companies operating in […]

Brazil Latin America VAT & Fiscal Reporting
February 23, 2021
Transforming your approach to Tax in Brazil Part I: Understanding the Dilemma

Introduction: Brazil is the world’s ninth largest economy and a country with a well-earned reputation of being perhaps the most complex tax environment on Earth. The sheer number of laws and mandates, the constant change and the risk of non-compliance resulting in significant penalties and fines is omnipresent. In this three-part blog series, we’ll look […]