HMRC’s Second IPT Consultation – Response Deadline Fast Approaching

Elliot Shulver
January 21, 2021

HMRC, the UK’s tax authority, is asking for responses to its Insurance Premium Tax: Administration and Unfair Outcomes Consultation, by 5 February 2021.

The first consultation and call for evidence for Insurance Premium Tax (IPT) was back in 2019 and questions focused on the modernisation of IPT and efficiency improvements for businesses and HMRC. It also considered unfair practices and tax outcomes and how to address them.

The consultation outcomes were published in July 2020 but there were only 27 responses received from the insurance industry. This meant that there was no clear evidence that specific changes to IPT needed to be made and therefore a further consultation was issued to collect more specific responses. The hope is that the second consultation will receive a higher number of responses and provide a more extensive view of the industry’s opinion on proposed approaches.

The aim of the consultation

The second consultation was issued in November 2020 and responses are due by 5 February 2021. As with the first consultation, the aim is to find measures that make the IPT administration process more efficient for both the insurance industry and HMRC and to tackle IPT avoidance and evasion.

This second consultation focuses more on administration and unfair outcomes with three key chapters: unregistered insurers, avoidance structures and administration of IPT. The consultation document puts forth a number of potential approaches for each topic, with specific questions for each option for the industry to provide their feedback and insights.

Some specific IPT challenges up for discussion include tax avoidance through ‘value shifting’, which is when a broker charges a fee to the insured via a separate contract and in turn the insurer will lower the premium. This results in lower IPT being paid.

Frequency of IPT declarations

There is also discussion around changing the frequency of the IPT return declaration from quarterly to annually, with larger taxpayers paying quarterly amounts on account. Germany already has a similar scheme where smaller taxpayers can file returns at a lower frequency (i.e. annually instead of monthly) if they are below a certain tax threshold. This provides the benefit of reduced admin for both the taxpayer and tax authority.

HMRC hopes this second consultation will reveal insight into how the industry would like to tackle some of these issues and help shape the framework of future legislation. We will provide an update once results are published later this year.

Take Action

Get in touch about the benefits a managed service provider can offer to ease your IPT compliance burden.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Elliot Shulver

Consulting Manager, IPT compliance for indirect taxes at Sovos. A chartered accountant with 6 years’ experience of indirect tax, including IPT, VAT and Gambling Duties, Elliot is responsible for our Consultancy practice, as well as providing regulatory updates for our global compliance solution suite.
Share This Post

Latin America VAT & Fiscal Reporting
May 20, 2020
Sovos Acquires Taxweb, Extends Tax Determination Capabilities in World’s Most Challenging Compliance Landscape

Earlier this month Sovos announced its second acquisition of 2020, completing our solution for Brazil with an unparalleled offering that solves tax compliance in the place where it is most challenging to do so.  Too many companies doing business in Brazil have been burdened by managing multiple point solutions for continuous transaction controls (CTCs), tax […]

North America Sales & Use Tax
February 24, 2021
Mississippi Sales Tax Nexus Changes

The Supreme Court’s 2018 ruling on South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc. had a ripple effect across the country on how out-of-state businesses must collect and remit sales tax. The Mississippi sales tax nexus is just one example of how remote sellers and marketplace facilitators need to ensure they remain compliant as regulations are updated. Below […]

ShipCompliant
February 24, 2021
Making the Most of the Annual DtC Wine Shipping Report

By Andrew Adams Andrew Adams is the editor of the Wine Analytics Report and a regular contributor to Wine Business Monthly magazine. Adams grew up in the city of Sonoma, Calif., and graduated from the University of Oregon with a degree in journalism. In addition to working at daily newspapers for more than a decade, Adams worked for […]

EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
February 23, 2021
Advantages of Working with a Global Service Provider

The rapid rise of digitisation continues to transform companies’ business processes. Companies have either begun their digital transformation as a result of compulsory mandates or are voluntarily making the change. While digitalisation provides time, cost and workforce efficiencies, it has enabled greater cross-border business. The increasing digitisation of tax has seen companies look to third-party […]

North America Sales & Use Tax
February 23, 2021
Maryland Enters the World of Digital Tax

The Maryland Legislature overrode gubernatorial vetoes on two bills that substantially change how Maryland approaches digital tax. The Legislature adopted a novel rule that seeks to tax digital advertising services. Additionally, it expanded Maryland sales tax to include digital equivalents of tangible personal property. The concept of taxing the revenue earned by companies operating in […]

Brazil Latin America VAT & Fiscal Reporting
February 23, 2021
Transforming your approach to Tax in Brazil Part I: Understanding the Dilemma

Introduction: Brazil is the world’s ninth largest economy and a country with a well-earned reputation of being perhaps the most complex tax environment on Earth. The sheer number of laws and mandates, the constant change and the risk of non-compliance resulting in significant penalties and fines is omnipresent. In this three-part blog series, we’ll look […]