The Impact of No Claims Bonuses on Insurance Premium Tax

Elliot Shulver
November 5, 2020

There are two types of no claims bonus. The first one is a refund of premium at the end of the policy. This happens when, for example, a discount is given if a policyholder doesn’t make a claim on that policy or makes a claim that is smaller than agreed in the policy documents. The insurer under the terms of the agreement then refunds a portion of the premium back to the policyholder.

The second type is where an agreement is made between the policyholder and the insurer to give a discount on any future premium payment, for example, in next year’s policy. This is given by reducing the amount of premium paid by the policyholder rather than a refund.

The implications for IPT across Europe

Both types of no claims bonus can cause tax issues. This especially applies where insurance premium tax (IPT) needs to be refunded where premium has been returned to the policyholder.

For example, where the premium has been refunded at the end of the policy’s term, some territories don’t allow a tax refund. This happens Italy where no refunds are given when the premium has been refunded because of a no claims bonus. There are exceptions where a refund is given but these are specific circumstances and tend to be given for administrative errors. In Germany, refunds of premium are allowed however in some circumstances where the refund doesn’t lower the risk then the refund is blocked.

In the UK, the issue that influences whether IPT can be credited is whether the payment made to the insured is actually and specifically covered within the insurance contract. If it is, then an IPT credit will be due, if not, then an IPT credit won’t be due. The UK tax authority, HMRC, would expect to see the actual provision in the insurance policy/contract and not in some other document or contract. And, if the insurer is using the special accounting scheme, HMRC would expect a credit to be shown in the company’s premium account to reflect the payment.

When the discount is given in the following years’ premium, because there is no refund of premium and therefore no refund of tax, most countries will allow this type of discount.

Some countries, for example, Malta and Ireland apply stamp duty on insurance premiums. With regard to refunds, even where the premium and risk have been reduced, if a refund of premium is given back to the policyholder it’s unlikely the tax will be able to be reclaimed. In Malta a reclaim of stamp duty is only allowed within the cooling off period. This is usually within the first 14 days of when the policy begins, and as such, the no claims bonus will not be affected by this. For Ireland, a fixed amount of stamp duty is applied per contract, rather than on the amount of premium paid, therefore, a reduction in premium won’t reduce the fixed amount of stamp duty.

It’s important to note that a refund of premium doesn’t always trigger a refund of IPT. Some tax regimes don’t allow a credit at all, and for others it will depend on the circumstances of the refund. Insurers should be aware of the different approaches that each tax authority takes regarding refunds to maximise tax efficiency and to minimise unnecessary costs.

Take Action

Find out why Sovos is the leading solution provider for insurance premium tax compliance in Europe.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Elliot Shulver

Consulting Manager, IPT compliance for indirect taxes at Sovos. A chartered accountant with 6 years’ experience of indirect tax, including IPT, VAT and Gambling Duties, Elliot is responsible for our Consultancy practice, as well as providing regulatory updates for our global compliance solution suite.
Share this post

North America Tax Information Reporting
March 22, 2024
Market Conduct Annual Statement Reminders and More

On the second Wednesday of each month, Sovos experts host a 30-minute webinar, Water Cooler Wednesday, to share the latest updates on statutory filings. In March, Sarah Stubbs shared information about the many filings due after March 1, from Market Conduct Annual Statements to health supplements for P&C and life insurers writing A&H businesses and […]

North America ShipCompliant
March 21, 2024
How Producers Can Build a DtC Shipping Market

Direct-to-consumer (DtC) shipping has become one of the leading sales models for businesses of all sizes and in all markets. The idea of connecting directly with consumers is notably attractive, as it helps brands develop a personal relationship and avoid costly distribution chains. Yet, for all its popularity, DtC is often a hard concept to […]

North America ShipCompliant
March 20, 2024
Key Findings from the 2024 DtC Beer Shipping Report

This March, Sovos ShipCompliant released the fourth annual Direct-to-Consumer Beer Shipping Report in partnership with the Brewers Association. The DtC beer shipping report features exclusive insights on the regulatory state of the direct-to-consumer (DtC) channel, Brewers Association’s perspective and key data from a consumer preferences survey. Let’s take a deeper dive into some of the […]

March 20, 2024
As the World Gets Smaller, Think Bigger About Global Tax Compliance

For the past few weeks back, my colleagues and I have been talking a lot about the importance of a global strategy when it comes to addressing today’s modern tax environments. On the heels of Sovos introducing the Sovos Compliance Cloud, many in our company’s leadership team have blogged about related topics and the critical […]

North America ShipCompliant
March 12, 2024
Florida HR 583 Set to Uncork Larger Format Wine Bottles

Florida wine lovers could soon enjoy a bigger selection of bottles based on a recent bill passed by the state’s legislature (HR 583) that would remove the existing cap on wine bottle sizes. What is Florida’s HR 583 bill? Currently, Florida law prohibits the sale of wine in bottles larger than one gallon (a little […]