IRS Continues to Look for Crypto Investors the Hard Way

Wendy Walker
August 26, 2020

Last week, the IRS released an updated draft of the Form 1040 to be used by individual taxpayers when reporting income taxes for the 2020 calendar year. The new version contains the question about whether a taxpayer held an interest in virtual currency assets on the front page of the form.

Crypto investors and the IRS

The IRS has been trying to track down crypto investors who are not claiming income related to their trading activities for some time.The IRS reported only receivIng about 800 to 900 income tax returns claiming crypto gains from 2013 to 2015. In 2017, they issued a summons to Coinbase demanding taxpayer information for all of their clients, which resulted in the exchange turning over information for about 13,000 taxpayers. By the spring of 2018, U.S. headlines screamed of overnight millionaires as Bitcoin soared over 1,000% in value. Last summer, the IRS issued audit notices to over 10,000 crypto taxpayers that they believed were underreporting or misreporting income associated with virtual currency transactions. 

And last fall, the IRS added a question about virtual currency assets to the 2019 version of Schedule 1 – Additional Income and Adjustments to Income.

So why the change to the 1040 this year?

Previously, the question “did you receive, sell, send, exchange, or otherwise acquire any financial interest in any virtual currency?” was located on Schedule 1 – Additional Income and Adjustments to Income. This Schedule is used by taxpayers to report 1099 income outside of bank interest and dividends as well as to adjust income for certain eligible deductions (separate from itemized deductions or the standard deduction).

For 2019, a crypto investor would have needed to receive a Form 1099 from the exchange related to their crypto transactions and then would complete the Schedule 1 accordingly. However, since most exchanges do not report Form 1099 or they report the Form 1099-K which follows an extremely high federal reporting threshold, many crypto investors do not have a form that would require them to complete Schedule 1. 

As a result, many crypto investors are not required to complete Schedule 1 and therefore, the IRS is not receiving the information it intended.

By placing the question on the front page of Form 1040 however, the IRS can get information from a larger group of taxpayers about their virtual currency activity.

Why not just require 1099 reporting?

For over 30 years, the IRS has used Forms 1099, W-2, 1098 and other information returns to substantiate income and deductions made by businesses and individual taxpayers alike. Given this well-established practice of enforcing tax compliance, tax professionals (and crypto investors) continue to be baffled by the lack of clear guidance from the IRS on withholding and 1099 reporting requirements related to crypto transactions.

If businesses were required to issue Form 1099 for crypto transactions like all other U.S. businesses do for taxable transactions they make, the IRS would not need to spend resources on issuing legal summons to exchanges, auditing pockets of taxpayers one-by-one to find evaders and asking broad questions that will likely not reveal meaningful or enforceable tax information.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Wendy Walker

Wendy Walker is the principal of Tax Information Reporting solutions at Sovos. She has more than 15 years of tax operations management and tax compliance experience with emphasis in large financial institutions, having held positions with CTI Technologies (a division of IHS Markit), Zions Bancorporation and JP Morgan Chase. Wendy has served as a member of several prominent industry advisory boards. She graduated with a BS in Process Engineering from Franklin University and earned her MBA from Ohio Dominican University, in Columbus, Ohio.
Share This Post

LATAM VAT & Fiscal Reporting
May 20, 2020
Sovos Acquires Taxweb, Extends Tax Determination Capabilities in World’s Most Challenging Compliance Landscape

Earlier this month Sovos announced its second acquisition of 2020, completing our solution for Brazil with an unparalleled offering that solves tax compliance in the place where it is most challenging to do so.  Too many companies doing business in Brazil have been burdened by managing multiple point solutions for continuous transaction controls (CTCs), tax […]

Tax Information Reporting United States
October 27, 2020
Sovos Regulatory Course Spotlight and Meet Our Educators

Course Offering Spotlight In this week’s course offering spotlight, we are highlighting another one of Sovos’ regularly offered courses, Schedule P Preparation. This course teaches you how to complete schedule P of the annual statement and understand its analytic value. In our upcoming Sovos Insurance Regulatory Summit 2020, we will be offering a session on […]

Sales & Use Tax United States
October 27, 2020
What Are the Illinois Sales Tax Nexus Rules?

This year has brought change to the Illinois sales tax nexus rules. In addition to the South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc. decision, collection obligations changed for marketplace and remote sellers on January 1, 2020. Two new laws expanded nexus in Illinois to include marketplace facilitators, which “are required to register to collect and remit Illinois Use […]

Tax Information Reporting
October 27, 2020
Latest Updates: State Direct Reporting Requirements for Form 1099-NEC

With the latest IRS announcement in Publication 1220 stating that information reporting data for the new Form 1099-NEC  will not be included in the Combined Federal/State Filing (CF/SF) program,  numerous states are beginning to publish direct reporting requirements. The Sovos regulatory analysis team will continuously update this page with the latest state requirements for Form […]

Sales & Use Tax United States
October 27, 2020
How Has the New York Economic Nexus Changed?

Many states have started making changes to how they collect and remit state and local sales tax following the South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc. decision. However, the New York economic nexus changed more quickly than others. New York made its enforcement date June 21, 2018 – the same day as the Wayfair ruling. The state […]

E-Invoicing Compliance EMEA VAT & Fiscal Reporting
October 27, 2020
Portugal: New Unique ID Number (ATCUD) Delayed Until 2022

Portuguese authorities recently published the long awaited regulation on unique ID number (ATCUD), in preparation for the entry into force of this requirement on 1 January 2021. Even though this effectively meant that a significant piece in the puzzle had now become available to the public, the Portuguese tax authority has postponed the requirement until […]