Filing Premium Taxes When Non-Authorised Insurer

Elliot Shulver
July 30, 2020

A non-authorised insurer is the term used to describe an insurance company that isn’t licensed with a particular country to provide insurance. This can also be known as non-admitted insurance. The non-authorised insurer doesn’t have to comply with local laws and regulations, however, one consequence of not being authorised means it doesn’t get the same protection as an authorised insurer.

A non-authorised status doesn’t always mean the insurer can’t provide insurance services in that territory. The insurer can still offer insurance products, although through a registered broker or intermediary in the territory, or where allowed, the insurer can insure products directly with local policyholders in so far as the policyholder makes the first approach to the insurer.

It’s important to know that some countries don’t allow non-admitted business at all. This could be to preserve the local insurance market or to protect the policyholders in their country. This can be a challenge for a foreign insurer and prove to be almost impossible for them to do business in that country without local help. In some jurisdictions though, some exceptions may be granted and specific risks such as international cargo, marine and aviation insurance can be written on a non-admitted basis.

Knowing where the obligation lies

Where insurance premium taxes (IPT) are concerned, there may be a few different methods when declaring the taxes and insurers should recognise where the obligation and responsibility sits. Some countries may require the foreign insurer to register for tax purposes in order to settle their tax liabilities. Others will require the policyholder or local broker to settle on the insurer’s behalf, removing this compliance obligation from the insurer. Knowing who the obligation lies with and recognising and applying the individual compliance needs for each country is an enormous step in being tax compliant. Once these parts are known, the action of declaring and settling the tax liability should be relatively straightforward to complete.

Some insurers that write large, complex global policies and where it may not be possible to meet the compliance needs of all territories where they have an insured risk could use a financial interest clause to cover all their risks. This financial interest clause (FInC) removes the need for tax compliance at a local level, as the global policy insures the balance sheet risk at the company’s headquarters. Should an event trigger a claim against the policy, the compensation will probably be paid out to the headquarters and not the local entity where the event occurred. This has administration benefits and compliance benefits as the policy should only trigger IPT where the headquarters is situated.

Writing insurance business on a non-authorised basis can bring its own challenges regarding tax compliance. Understanding who bears the cost of the tax and who completes the returns and payments is crucial to ensure an insurer stays fully compliant. Using a financial interest clause can ease some compliance burden and can give an insurer coverage in countries where even non-admitted insurance is not allowed.

Take Action

Keep up to date with ever changing premium tax rules by subscribing to our blogs and following us on LinkedIn and Twitter. We also host regular webinars with our in-house specialists who are on hand to help.

Sign up for Email Updates

Stay up to date with the latest tax and compliance updates that may impact your business.

Author

Elliot Shulver

Consulting Manager, IPT compliance for indirect taxes at Sovos. A chartered accountant with 6 years’ experience of indirect tax, including IPT, VAT and Gambling Duties, Elliot is responsible for our Consultancy practice, as well as providing regulatory updates for our global compliance solution suite.
Share this post

North America Tax Information Reporting
March 22, 2024
Market Conduct Annual Statement Reminders and More

On the second Wednesday of each month, Sovos experts host a 30-minute webinar, Water Cooler Wednesday, to share the latest updates on statutory filings. In March, Sarah Stubbs shared information about the many filings due after March 1, from Market Conduct Annual Statements to health supplements for P&C and life insurers writing A&H businesses and […]

North America ShipCompliant
March 21, 2024
How Producers Can Build a DtC Shipping Market

Direct-to-consumer (DtC) shipping has become one of the leading sales models for businesses of all sizes and in all markets. The idea of connecting directly with consumers is notably attractive, as it helps brands develop a personal relationship and avoid costly distribution chains. Yet, for all its popularity, DtC is often a hard concept to […]

North America ShipCompliant
March 20, 2024
Key Findings from the 2024 DtC Beer Shipping Report

This March, Sovos ShipCompliant released the fourth annual Direct-to-Consumer Beer Shipping Report in partnership with the Brewers Association. The DtC beer shipping report features exclusive insights on the regulatory state of the direct-to-consumer (DtC) channel, Brewers Association’s perspective and key data from a consumer preferences survey. Let’s take a deeper dive into some of the […]

March 20, 2024
As the World Gets Smaller, Think Bigger About Global Tax Compliance

For the past few weeks back, my colleagues and I have been talking a lot about the importance of a global strategy when it comes to addressing today’s modern tax environments. On the heels of Sovos introducing the Sovos Compliance Cloud, many in our company’s leadership team have blogged about related topics and the critical […]

North America ShipCompliant
March 12, 2024
Florida HR 583 Set to Uncork Larger Format Wine Bottles

This bill was signed into law on March 28, 2024 and takes effect July 1, 2024. Florida wine lovers could soon enjoy a bigger selection of bottles based on a recent bill passed by the state’s legislature (HR 583) that would remove the existing cap on wine bottle sizes. What is Florida’s HR 583 bill? […]